Jul 01, 2009
It's encouraging that General Jim Jones, the national security adviser,
seems to have laid down the law to US generals in Afghanistan: no more
troops.
That's not the same as less troops, but it's a start.
In a lengthy Washington Post report, Jones is quoted
extensively telling the generals that economic development in
Afghanistan will win the fight with the Taliban, not more soldiers.
And he used rather colorful language to make his point. During the
meeting with Jones, General Nicholson, the US commander, dropped hints
that he'd like more forces. Here's the Post account:
Jones recalled how Obama had initially decided to
deploy additional forces this year. "At a table much like this," Jones
said, referring to the polished wood table in the White House Situation
Room, "the president's principals met and agreed to recommend 17,000
more troops for Afghanistan." The principals -- Secretary of State
Hillary Rodham Clinton; Gates; Mullen; and the director of national
intelligence, Dennis C. Blair -- made this recommendation in February
during the first full month of the Obama administration. The president
approved the deployments, which included Nicholson's Marines.Soon after that, Jones said, the principals told the president, "oops,"
we need an additional 4,000 to help train the Afghan army."They then said, 'If you do all that, we think we can turn this
around,' " Jones said, reminding the Marines here that the president
had quickly approved and publicly announced the additional 4,000.Now suppose you're the president, Jones told them, and the requests
come into the White House for yet more forces. How do you think Obama
might look at this? Jones asked, casting his eyes around the colonels.
How do you think he might feel?Jones let the question hang in the air-conditioned, fluorescent-lighted room. Nicholson and the colonels said nothing.
Well, Jones went on, after all those additional troops, 17,000 plus
4,000 more, if there were new requests for force now, the president
would quite likely have "a Whiskey Tango Foxtrot moment." Everyone in
the room caught the phonetic reference to WTF -- which in the military
and elsewhere means "What the [expletive]?"
The Post added that the generals seemed "to blanch at the unambiguous message that this might be all the troops they were going to get."
It seems significant to me that Jones did this in public, with a
reporter in the room, rather than privately, since it does commit the
administration to an end to the escalation in Afghanistan. (Or else we
can all say: WTF?)
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
© 2023 The Nation
Bob Dreyfuss
Bob Dreyfuss is an independent journalist based in New York City and Cape May, New Jersey. For the past twenty-five years, he's written extensively on politics and national security for a wide range of publications. His work has appeared in Common Dreams, Rolling Stone, The Nation, The American Prospect, Mother Jones, The New Republic, The Huffington Post, Slate, Salon, and many other magazines and websites.
It's encouraging that General Jim Jones, the national security adviser,
seems to have laid down the law to US generals in Afghanistan: no more
troops.
That's not the same as less troops, but it's a start.
In a lengthy Washington Post report, Jones is quoted
extensively telling the generals that economic development in
Afghanistan will win the fight with the Taliban, not more soldiers.
And he used rather colorful language to make his point. During the
meeting with Jones, General Nicholson, the US commander, dropped hints
that he'd like more forces. Here's the Post account:
Jones recalled how Obama had initially decided to
deploy additional forces this year. "At a table much like this," Jones
said, referring to the polished wood table in the White House Situation
Room, "the president's principals met and agreed to recommend 17,000
more troops for Afghanistan." The principals -- Secretary of State
Hillary Rodham Clinton; Gates; Mullen; and the director of national
intelligence, Dennis C. Blair -- made this recommendation in February
during the first full month of the Obama administration. The president
approved the deployments, which included Nicholson's Marines.Soon after that, Jones said, the principals told the president, "oops,"
we need an additional 4,000 to help train the Afghan army."They then said, 'If you do all that, we think we can turn this
around,' " Jones said, reminding the Marines here that the president
had quickly approved and publicly announced the additional 4,000.Now suppose you're the president, Jones told them, and the requests
come into the White House for yet more forces. How do you think Obama
might look at this? Jones asked, casting his eyes around the colonels.
How do you think he might feel?Jones let the question hang in the air-conditioned, fluorescent-lighted room. Nicholson and the colonels said nothing.
Well, Jones went on, after all those additional troops, 17,000 plus
4,000 more, if there were new requests for force now, the president
would quite likely have "a Whiskey Tango Foxtrot moment." Everyone in
the room caught the phonetic reference to WTF -- which in the military
and elsewhere means "What the [expletive]?"
The Post added that the generals seemed "to blanch at the unambiguous message that this might be all the troops they were going to get."
It seems significant to me that Jones did this in public, with a
reporter in the room, rather than privately, since it does commit the
administration to an end to the escalation in Afghanistan. (Or else we
can all say: WTF?)
Bob Dreyfuss
Bob Dreyfuss is an independent journalist based in New York City and Cape May, New Jersey. For the past twenty-five years, he's written extensively on politics and national security for a wide range of publications. His work has appeared in Common Dreams, Rolling Stone, The Nation, The American Prospect, Mother Jones, The New Republic, The Huffington Post, Slate, Salon, and many other magazines and websites.
It's encouraging that General Jim Jones, the national security adviser,
seems to have laid down the law to US generals in Afghanistan: no more
troops.
That's not the same as less troops, but it's a start.
In a lengthy Washington Post report, Jones is quoted
extensively telling the generals that economic development in
Afghanistan will win the fight with the Taliban, not more soldiers.
And he used rather colorful language to make his point. During the
meeting with Jones, General Nicholson, the US commander, dropped hints
that he'd like more forces. Here's the Post account:
Jones recalled how Obama had initially decided to
deploy additional forces this year. "At a table much like this," Jones
said, referring to the polished wood table in the White House Situation
Room, "the president's principals met and agreed to recommend 17,000
more troops for Afghanistan." The principals -- Secretary of State
Hillary Rodham Clinton; Gates; Mullen; and the director of national
intelligence, Dennis C. Blair -- made this recommendation in February
during the first full month of the Obama administration. The president
approved the deployments, which included Nicholson's Marines.Soon after that, Jones said, the principals told the president, "oops,"
we need an additional 4,000 to help train the Afghan army."They then said, 'If you do all that, we think we can turn this
around,' " Jones said, reminding the Marines here that the president
had quickly approved and publicly announced the additional 4,000.Now suppose you're the president, Jones told them, and the requests
come into the White House for yet more forces. How do you think Obama
might look at this? Jones asked, casting his eyes around the colonels.
How do you think he might feel?Jones let the question hang in the air-conditioned, fluorescent-lighted room. Nicholson and the colonels said nothing.
Well, Jones went on, after all those additional troops, 17,000 plus
4,000 more, if there were new requests for force now, the president
would quite likely have "a Whiskey Tango Foxtrot moment." Everyone in
the room caught the phonetic reference to WTF -- which in the military
and elsewhere means "What the [expletive]?"
The Post added that the generals seemed "to blanch at the unambiguous message that this might be all the troops they were going to get."
It seems significant to me that Jones did this in public, with a
reporter in the room, rather than privately, since it does commit the
administration to an end to the escalation in Afghanistan. (Or else we
can all say: WTF?)
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.