SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Health Insurance Industry Doesn't Deserve Our Trust
Jun 19, 2009
Farmers often depend on off farm jobs to provide health insurance, if
that wasn't an option they could generally afford an individual plan.
Farming is one of the most dangerous occupations in America, heavy
machinery, large animals, long hours in the sun, chemicals and that
always present independent streak that keeps us from seeing the doctor
when we should. Still, we need insurance.
Most jobs are cutting insurance benefits, if the jobs are still there.
Individual plans for farmers are expensive with high deductibles since
our work is dangerous, we probably have pre-existing conditions and we
are nearing an average age of 58 years.
The Center for Rural Affairs in Nebraska notes that rural residents are
twice as likely to be uninsured as urban Americans while farmers and
ranchers are four times as likely to be "underinsured", covered by
insurance with reduced benefits and a high deductibles.
Montana Senator Max Baucus says single payer health care " is off the
table". Who made him king? What are we, chopped liver, doesn't our
opinion count? A January CBS/New York Times poll showed 59% of
respondents favored a national health care plan. A February CNN poll
showed 72% favored a government controlled plan. Any issue with that
much across the board support should be "on the table".
It seems especially surprising that Baucus, from Montana, a rural
state, one that would benefit most from a single payer plan, is opposed
to any discussion. However if one looks at campaign contributions from the health insurance industry to Baucus, we see why he supports the status quo.
The insurance companies, in hopes of killing single payer, say they are
willing to cover those with "pre-existing conditions" provided "everyone" buys their health insurance. The the insurance companies
dream, every American with an insurance policy and private insurers
collecting premiums on another 49 million people. Of course they can
still deny payment of claims, they're good at that.
But they say trust us, we will cut costs, as long as everyone buys a
policy from us; but, there will be no competition from a public option.
No competition? Workers and farmers are expected to compete in the
world market but insurance companies are afraid to compete against a
public option?
Trust us? Trust insurance companies to care about our health over their profits?
According to the New England Journal of Medicine,
insurance companies own billions of dollars of tobacco industry stock.
Clearly, their motive is profit, not the best interest of the American
public.
While health insurance companies downplay their tobacco investments as
being only a small percentage of their total investment portfolio, with
billions invested in tobacco, one wonders how much money do these guys
have, where did they get it and why won't they pay it to their policy
holders when they deserve it?
While New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo investigates
industry wide rate manipulation in the health insurance industry, they
say trust us. Trust an industry that employs an "army of claim deniers"
and administrative personnel whose numbers have grown 25 times faster
than the number of physicians in the US over the past 30 years?
They expect us to believe they care about the health of the 49 million
uninsured Americans or the 53,000 that die yearly due to denied claims?
A "public option" should be an option, just as public education,
transportation, and legal protection are available, but not required.
Some of my neighbors, like many Americans, lack confidence in the
governments ability to administer a public health insurance plan. But
they are beginning to trust private insurance companies even less. So
to legislators who say the public option is off the table, think again,
there are 49 million uninsured and 25 million underinsured in America, we may lack health insurance but we can still vote.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jim Goodman
Jim Goodman is a retired third-generation dairy farmer from Wonewoc, Wisconsin and a member of Family Farm Defenders.
Farmers often depend on off farm jobs to provide health insurance, if
that wasn't an option they could generally afford an individual plan.
Farming is one of the most dangerous occupations in America, heavy
machinery, large animals, long hours in the sun, chemicals and that
always present independent streak that keeps us from seeing the doctor
when we should. Still, we need insurance.
Most jobs are cutting insurance benefits, if the jobs are still there.
Individual plans for farmers are expensive with high deductibles since
our work is dangerous, we probably have pre-existing conditions and we
are nearing an average age of 58 years.
The Center for Rural Affairs in Nebraska notes that rural residents are
twice as likely to be uninsured as urban Americans while farmers and
ranchers are four times as likely to be "underinsured", covered by
insurance with reduced benefits and a high deductibles.
Montana Senator Max Baucus says single payer health care " is off the
table". Who made him king? What are we, chopped liver, doesn't our
opinion count? A January CBS/New York Times poll showed 59% of
respondents favored a national health care plan. A February CNN poll
showed 72% favored a government controlled plan. Any issue with that
much across the board support should be "on the table".
It seems especially surprising that Baucus, from Montana, a rural
state, one that would benefit most from a single payer plan, is opposed
to any discussion. However if one looks at campaign contributions from the health insurance industry to Baucus, we see why he supports the status quo.
The insurance companies, in hopes of killing single payer, say they are
willing to cover those with "pre-existing conditions" provided "everyone" buys their health insurance. The the insurance companies
dream, every American with an insurance policy and private insurers
collecting premiums on another 49 million people. Of course they can
still deny payment of claims, they're good at that.
But they say trust us, we will cut costs, as long as everyone buys a
policy from us; but, there will be no competition from a public option.
No competition? Workers and farmers are expected to compete in the
world market but insurance companies are afraid to compete against a
public option?
Trust us? Trust insurance companies to care about our health over their profits?
According to the New England Journal of Medicine,
insurance companies own billions of dollars of tobacco industry stock.
Clearly, their motive is profit, not the best interest of the American
public.
While health insurance companies downplay their tobacco investments as
being only a small percentage of their total investment portfolio, with
billions invested in tobacco, one wonders how much money do these guys
have, where did they get it and why won't they pay it to their policy
holders when they deserve it?
While New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo investigates
industry wide rate manipulation in the health insurance industry, they
say trust us. Trust an industry that employs an "army of claim deniers"
and administrative personnel whose numbers have grown 25 times faster
than the number of physicians in the US over the past 30 years?
They expect us to believe they care about the health of the 49 million
uninsured Americans or the 53,000 that die yearly due to denied claims?
A "public option" should be an option, just as public education,
transportation, and legal protection are available, but not required.
Some of my neighbors, like many Americans, lack confidence in the
governments ability to administer a public health insurance plan. But
they are beginning to trust private insurance companies even less. So
to legislators who say the public option is off the table, think again,
there are 49 million uninsured and 25 million underinsured in America, we may lack health insurance but we can still vote.
Jim Goodman
Jim Goodman is a retired third-generation dairy farmer from Wonewoc, Wisconsin and a member of Family Farm Defenders.
Farmers often depend on off farm jobs to provide health insurance, if
that wasn't an option they could generally afford an individual plan.
Farming is one of the most dangerous occupations in America, heavy
machinery, large animals, long hours in the sun, chemicals and that
always present independent streak that keeps us from seeing the doctor
when we should. Still, we need insurance.
Most jobs are cutting insurance benefits, if the jobs are still there.
Individual plans for farmers are expensive with high deductibles since
our work is dangerous, we probably have pre-existing conditions and we
are nearing an average age of 58 years.
The Center for Rural Affairs in Nebraska notes that rural residents are
twice as likely to be uninsured as urban Americans while farmers and
ranchers are four times as likely to be "underinsured", covered by
insurance with reduced benefits and a high deductibles.
Montana Senator Max Baucus says single payer health care " is off the
table". Who made him king? What are we, chopped liver, doesn't our
opinion count? A January CBS/New York Times poll showed 59% of
respondents favored a national health care plan. A February CNN poll
showed 72% favored a government controlled plan. Any issue with that
much across the board support should be "on the table".
It seems especially surprising that Baucus, from Montana, a rural
state, one that would benefit most from a single payer plan, is opposed
to any discussion. However if one looks at campaign contributions from the health insurance industry to Baucus, we see why he supports the status quo.
The insurance companies, in hopes of killing single payer, say they are
willing to cover those with "pre-existing conditions" provided "everyone" buys their health insurance. The the insurance companies
dream, every American with an insurance policy and private insurers
collecting premiums on another 49 million people. Of course they can
still deny payment of claims, they're good at that.
But they say trust us, we will cut costs, as long as everyone buys a
policy from us; but, there will be no competition from a public option.
No competition? Workers and farmers are expected to compete in the
world market but insurance companies are afraid to compete against a
public option?
Trust us? Trust insurance companies to care about our health over their profits?
According to the New England Journal of Medicine,
insurance companies own billions of dollars of tobacco industry stock.
Clearly, their motive is profit, not the best interest of the American
public.
While health insurance companies downplay their tobacco investments as
being only a small percentage of their total investment portfolio, with
billions invested in tobacco, one wonders how much money do these guys
have, where did they get it and why won't they pay it to their policy
holders when they deserve it?
While New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo investigates
industry wide rate manipulation in the health insurance industry, they
say trust us. Trust an industry that employs an "army of claim deniers"
and administrative personnel whose numbers have grown 25 times faster
than the number of physicians in the US over the past 30 years?
They expect us to believe they care about the health of the 49 million
uninsured Americans or the 53,000 that die yearly due to denied claims?
A "public option" should be an option, just as public education,
transportation, and legal protection are available, but not required.
Some of my neighbors, like many Americans, lack confidence in the
governments ability to administer a public health insurance plan. But
they are beginning to trust private insurance companies even less. So
to legislators who say the public option is off the table, think again,
there are 49 million uninsured and 25 million underinsured in America, we may lack health insurance but we can still vote.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.