SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Torture memo author Jay Bybee, who outlined procedures for inflicting
cruel and unusual punishments on prisoners in U.S. custody, should of
course be impeached and removed from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals bench.
But how did Bybee, who was either inept or corrupt, win Senate approval to serve as a federal judge?
As it happens, it was not easy.
Former President Bush appointed Bybee, an aggressively ideological
assistant attorney general to a position on the nation's largest
appellate court on May 22, 2002.
Because Bybee was already a highly controversial figure, a narrowly
Democratic Senate refused to act on the nomination that year.
Bybee's nomination died when it was "returned without action" in December, 2002.
Control of the Senate shifted from the Democrats to Bush's
Republicans in January, 2003, and Bush immediately resubmitted the
nomination.
A month later, the Senate Judiciary Committee split on the
nomination, with 10 Republicans and 2 Democrats backing it while 6
Democrats were opposed. So, with a 12-6 endorsement, Bybee's nomination
went to the full Senate.
The full Senate vote came on March 13, 2003, when Bybee was confirmed by a vote of 74-19.
Who cast the "no" votes?
Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
Robert Byrd (D-WV)
Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
Jon Corzine (D-NJ)
Mark Dayton (D-MN)
Dick Durbin (D-IL)
Russ Feingold (D-WI)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Tom Harkin (D-IA)
Daniel Inouye (D-HI)
Ted Kennedy (D-MA)
Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Carl Levin (D-MI)
Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
Patty Murray (D-WA)
Jack Reed (D-RI)
Paul Sarbanes (D-MD)
Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
Ron Wyden (D-OR)
Feingold battled hardest, focusing during the confirmation process
on gaining Senate access to the memos written by Bybee while serving
with the Office of Legal Counsel. During the March 13th, 2003, debate,
Feingold told the Senate:
"The administration should be able to agree to an
acceptable procedure to allow the Judiciary Committee to review Mr.
Bybee's OLC opinions. Given the recent history of many OLC opinions
being made public, it is hard to believe that there are no opinions
authored by Mr. Bybee that could be disclosed without damaging the
deliberative process. Indeed, it is very hard to give credence to the
idea that OLC's independence would be compromised by the release of
some selection of the opinions of interest to members of the Judiciary
Committee or the Senate."
The essential OLC opinions never were released -- until now.
And they confirm that Feingold had reason to be concerned.
What's the senator saying now?
"The idea that one of the architects of this perversion of the law is
now sitting on the federal bench is very troubling," Feingold argues.
"The memos offer some of the most explicit evidence yet that Mr. Bybee
and others authorized torture and they suggest that grounds for
impeachment can be made," says the senator.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Torture memo author Jay Bybee, who outlined procedures for inflicting
cruel and unusual punishments on prisoners in U.S. custody, should of
course be impeached and removed from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals bench.
But how did Bybee, who was either inept or corrupt, win Senate approval to serve as a federal judge?
As it happens, it was not easy.
Former President Bush appointed Bybee, an aggressively ideological
assistant attorney general to a position on the nation's largest
appellate court on May 22, 2002.
Because Bybee was already a highly controversial figure, a narrowly
Democratic Senate refused to act on the nomination that year.
Bybee's nomination died when it was "returned without action" in December, 2002.
Control of the Senate shifted from the Democrats to Bush's
Republicans in January, 2003, and Bush immediately resubmitted the
nomination.
A month later, the Senate Judiciary Committee split on the
nomination, with 10 Republicans and 2 Democrats backing it while 6
Democrats were opposed. So, with a 12-6 endorsement, Bybee's nomination
went to the full Senate.
The full Senate vote came on March 13, 2003, when Bybee was confirmed by a vote of 74-19.
Who cast the "no" votes?
Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
Robert Byrd (D-WV)
Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
Jon Corzine (D-NJ)
Mark Dayton (D-MN)
Dick Durbin (D-IL)
Russ Feingold (D-WI)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Tom Harkin (D-IA)
Daniel Inouye (D-HI)
Ted Kennedy (D-MA)
Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Carl Levin (D-MI)
Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
Patty Murray (D-WA)
Jack Reed (D-RI)
Paul Sarbanes (D-MD)
Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
Ron Wyden (D-OR)
Feingold battled hardest, focusing during the confirmation process
on gaining Senate access to the memos written by Bybee while serving
with the Office of Legal Counsel. During the March 13th, 2003, debate,
Feingold told the Senate:
"The administration should be able to agree to an
acceptable procedure to allow the Judiciary Committee to review Mr.
Bybee's OLC opinions. Given the recent history of many OLC opinions
being made public, it is hard to believe that there are no opinions
authored by Mr. Bybee that could be disclosed without damaging the
deliberative process. Indeed, it is very hard to give credence to the
idea that OLC's independence would be compromised by the release of
some selection of the opinions of interest to members of the Judiciary
Committee or the Senate."
The essential OLC opinions never were released -- until now.
And they confirm that Feingold had reason to be concerned.
What's the senator saying now?
"The idea that one of the architects of this perversion of the law is
now sitting on the federal bench is very troubling," Feingold argues.
"The memos offer some of the most explicit evidence yet that Mr. Bybee
and others authorized torture and they suggest that grounds for
impeachment can be made," says the senator.
Torture memo author Jay Bybee, who outlined procedures for inflicting
cruel and unusual punishments on prisoners in U.S. custody, should of
course be impeached and removed from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals bench.
But how did Bybee, who was either inept or corrupt, win Senate approval to serve as a federal judge?
As it happens, it was not easy.
Former President Bush appointed Bybee, an aggressively ideological
assistant attorney general to a position on the nation's largest
appellate court on May 22, 2002.
Because Bybee was already a highly controversial figure, a narrowly
Democratic Senate refused to act on the nomination that year.
Bybee's nomination died when it was "returned without action" in December, 2002.
Control of the Senate shifted from the Democrats to Bush's
Republicans in January, 2003, and Bush immediately resubmitted the
nomination.
A month later, the Senate Judiciary Committee split on the
nomination, with 10 Republicans and 2 Democrats backing it while 6
Democrats were opposed. So, with a 12-6 endorsement, Bybee's nomination
went to the full Senate.
The full Senate vote came on March 13, 2003, when Bybee was confirmed by a vote of 74-19.
Who cast the "no" votes?
Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
Robert Byrd (D-WV)
Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
Jon Corzine (D-NJ)
Mark Dayton (D-MN)
Dick Durbin (D-IL)
Russ Feingold (D-WI)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Tom Harkin (D-IA)
Daniel Inouye (D-HI)
Ted Kennedy (D-MA)
Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Carl Levin (D-MI)
Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
Patty Murray (D-WA)
Jack Reed (D-RI)
Paul Sarbanes (D-MD)
Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
Ron Wyden (D-OR)
Feingold battled hardest, focusing during the confirmation process
on gaining Senate access to the memos written by Bybee while serving
with the Office of Legal Counsel. During the March 13th, 2003, debate,
Feingold told the Senate:
"The administration should be able to agree to an
acceptable procedure to allow the Judiciary Committee to review Mr.
Bybee's OLC opinions. Given the recent history of many OLC opinions
being made public, it is hard to believe that there are no opinions
authored by Mr. Bybee that could be disclosed without damaging the
deliberative process. Indeed, it is very hard to give credence to the
idea that OLC's independence would be compromised by the release of
some selection of the opinions of interest to members of the Judiciary
Committee or the Senate."
The essential OLC opinions never were released -- until now.
And they confirm that Feingold had reason to be concerned.
What's the senator saying now?
"The idea that one of the architects of this perversion of the law is
now sitting on the federal bench is very troubling," Feingold argues.
"The memos offer some of the most explicit evidence yet that Mr. Bybee
and others authorized torture and they suggest that grounds for
impeachment can be made," says the senator.