SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Impeach Jay Bybee
Feingold on Torture Judge: "Grounds for Impeachment"
Apr 22, 2009
Torture memo author Jay Bybee, who outlined procedures for inflicting
cruel and unusual punishments on prisoners in U.S. custody, should of
course be impeached and removed from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals bench.
But how did Bybee, who was either inept or corrupt, win Senate approval to serve as a federal judge?
As it happens, it was not easy.
Former President Bush appointed Bybee, an aggressively ideological
assistant attorney general to a position on the nation's largest
appellate court on May 22, 2002.
Because Bybee was already a highly controversial figure, a narrowly
Democratic Senate refused to act on the nomination that year.
Bybee's nomination died when it was "returned without action" in December, 2002.
Control of the Senate shifted from the Democrats to Bush's
Republicans in January, 2003, and Bush immediately resubmitted the
nomination.
A month later, the Senate Judiciary Committee split on the
nomination, with 10 Republicans and 2 Democrats backing it while 6
Democrats were opposed. So, with a 12-6 endorsement, Bybee's nomination
went to the full Senate.
The full Senate vote came on March 13, 2003, when Bybee was confirmed by a vote of 74-19.
Who cast the "no" votes?
Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
Robert Byrd (D-WV)
Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
Jon Corzine (D-NJ)
Mark Dayton (D-MN)
Dick Durbin (D-IL)
Russ Feingold (D-WI)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Tom Harkin (D-IA)
Daniel Inouye (D-HI)
Ted Kennedy (D-MA)
Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Carl Levin (D-MI)
Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
Patty Murray (D-WA)
Jack Reed (D-RI)
Paul Sarbanes (D-MD)
Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
Ron Wyden (D-OR)
Feingold battled hardest, focusing during the confirmation process
on gaining Senate access to the memos written by Bybee while serving
with the Office of Legal Counsel. During the March 13th, 2003, debate,
Feingold told the Senate:
"The administration should be able to agree to an
acceptable procedure to allow the Judiciary Committee to review Mr.
Bybee's OLC opinions. Given the recent history of many OLC opinions
being made public, it is hard to believe that there are no opinions
authored by Mr. Bybee that could be disclosed without damaging the
deliberative process. Indeed, it is very hard to give credence to the
idea that OLC's independence would be compromised by the release of
some selection of the opinions of interest to members of the Judiciary
Committee or the Senate."
The essential OLC opinions never were released -- until now.
And they confirm that Feingold had reason to be concerned.
What's the senator saying now?
"The idea that one of the architects of this perversion of the law is
now sitting on the federal bench is very troubling," Feingold argues.
"The memos offer some of the most explicit evidence yet that Mr. Bybee
and others authorized torture and they suggest that grounds for
impeachment can be made," says the senator.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Nation
John Nichols
John Nichols is Washington correspondent for The Nation and associate editor of The Capital Times in Madison, Wisconsin. His books co-authored with Robert W. McChesney are: "Dollarocracy: How the Money and Media Election Complex is Destroying America" (2014), "The Death and Life of American Journalism: The Media Revolution that Will Begin the World Again" (2011), and "Tragedy & Farce: How the American Media Sell Wars, Spin Elections, and Destroy Democracy" (2006). Nichols' other books include: "The "S" Word: A Short History of an American Tradition...Socialism" (2015), "Dick: The Man Who is President (2004) and "The Genius of Impeachment: The Founders' Cure for Royalism" (2006).
Torture memo author Jay Bybee, who outlined procedures for inflicting
cruel and unusual punishments on prisoners in U.S. custody, should of
course be impeached and removed from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals bench.
But how did Bybee, who was either inept or corrupt, win Senate approval to serve as a federal judge?
As it happens, it was not easy.
Former President Bush appointed Bybee, an aggressively ideological
assistant attorney general to a position on the nation's largest
appellate court on May 22, 2002.
Because Bybee was already a highly controversial figure, a narrowly
Democratic Senate refused to act on the nomination that year.
Bybee's nomination died when it was "returned without action" in December, 2002.
Control of the Senate shifted from the Democrats to Bush's
Republicans in January, 2003, and Bush immediately resubmitted the
nomination.
A month later, the Senate Judiciary Committee split on the
nomination, with 10 Republicans and 2 Democrats backing it while 6
Democrats were opposed. So, with a 12-6 endorsement, Bybee's nomination
went to the full Senate.
The full Senate vote came on March 13, 2003, when Bybee was confirmed by a vote of 74-19.
Who cast the "no" votes?
Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
Robert Byrd (D-WV)
Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
Jon Corzine (D-NJ)
Mark Dayton (D-MN)
Dick Durbin (D-IL)
Russ Feingold (D-WI)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Tom Harkin (D-IA)
Daniel Inouye (D-HI)
Ted Kennedy (D-MA)
Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Carl Levin (D-MI)
Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
Patty Murray (D-WA)
Jack Reed (D-RI)
Paul Sarbanes (D-MD)
Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
Ron Wyden (D-OR)
Feingold battled hardest, focusing during the confirmation process
on gaining Senate access to the memos written by Bybee while serving
with the Office of Legal Counsel. During the March 13th, 2003, debate,
Feingold told the Senate:
"The administration should be able to agree to an
acceptable procedure to allow the Judiciary Committee to review Mr.
Bybee's OLC opinions. Given the recent history of many OLC opinions
being made public, it is hard to believe that there are no opinions
authored by Mr. Bybee that could be disclosed without damaging the
deliberative process. Indeed, it is very hard to give credence to the
idea that OLC's independence would be compromised by the release of
some selection of the opinions of interest to members of the Judiciary
Committee or the Senate."
The essential OLC opinions never were released -- until now.
And they confirm that Feingold had reason to be concerned.
What's the senator saying now?
"The idea that one of the architects of this perversion of the law is
now sitting on the federal bench is very troubling," Feingold argues.
"The memos offer some of the most explicit evidence yet that Mr. Bybee
and others authorized torture and they suggest that grounds for
impeachment can be made," says the senator.
John Nichols
John Nichols is Washington correspondent for The Nation and associate editor of The Capital Times in Madison, Wisconsin. His books co-authored with Robert W. McChesney are: "Dollarocracy: How the Money and Media Election Complex is Destroying America" (2014), "The Death and Life of American Journalism: The Media Revolution that Will Begin the World Again" (2011), and "Tragedy & Farce: How the American Media Sell Wars, Spin Elections, and Destroy Democracy" (2006). Nichols' other books include: "The "S" Word: A Short History of an American Tradition...Socialism" (2015), "Dick: The Man Who is President (2004) and "The Genius of Impeachment: The Founders' Cure for Royalism" (2006).
Torture memo author Jay Bybee, who outlined procedures for inflicting
cruel and unusual punishments on prisoners in U.S. custody, should of
course be impeached and removed from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals bench.
But how did Bybee, who was either inept or corrupt, win Senate approval to serve as a federal judge?
As it happens, it was not easy.
Former President Bush appointed Bybee, an aggressively ideological
assistant attorney general to a position on the nation's largest
appellate court on May 22, 2002.
Because Bybee was already a highly controversial figure, a narrowly
Democratic Senate refused to act on the nomination that year.
Bybee's nomination died when it was "returned without action" in December, 2002.
Control of the Senate shifted from the Democrats to Bush's
Republicans in January, 2003, and Bush immediately resubmitted the
nomination.
A month later, the Senate Judiciary Committee split on the
nomination, with 10 Republicans and 2 Democrats backing it while 6
Democrats were opposed. So, with a 12-6 endorsement, Bybee's nomination
went to the full Senate.
The full Senate vote came on March 13, 2003, when Bybee was confirmed by a vote of 74-19.
Who cast the "no" votes?
Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
Robert Byrd (D-WV)
Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
Jon Corzine (D-NJ)
Mark Dayton (D-MN)
Dick Durbin (D-IL)
Russ Feingold (D-WI)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Tom Harkin (D-IA)
Daniel Inouye (D-HI)
Ted Kennedy (D-MA)
Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Carl Levin (D-MI)
Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
Patty Murray (D-WA)
Jack Reed (D-RI)
Paul Sarbanes (D-MD)
Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
Ron Wyden (D-OR)
Feingold battled hardest, focusing during the confirmation process
on gaining Senate access to the memos written by Bybee while serving
with the Office of Legal Counsel. During the March 13th, 2003, debate,
Feingold told the Senate:
"The administration should be able to agree to an
acceptable procedure to allow the Judiciary Committee to review Mr.
Bybee's OLC opinions. Given the recent history of many OLC opinions
being made public, it is hard to believe that there are no opinions
authored by Mr. Bybee that could be disclosed without damaging the
deliberative process. Indeed, it is very hard to give credence to the
idea that OLC's independence would be compromised by the release of
some selection of the opinions of interest to members of the Judiciary
Committee or the Senate."
The essential OLC opinions never were released -- until now.
And they confirm that Feingold had reason to be concerned.
What's the senator saying now?
"The idea that one of the architects of this perversion of the law is
now sitting on the federal bench is very troubling," Feingold argues.
"The memos offer some of the most explicit evidence yet that Mr. Bybee
and others authorized torture and they suggest that grounds for
impeachment can be made," says the senator.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.