

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sometimes I wonder whether this country not only has lost its moral
compass, but does what it can to forbid its recovery. Then I remember:
of course it has. Iraq. Afghanistan. Black sites. Torture. Guantanamo.
AIG. Bear Stearns. George Bush. The gathering depression. Tim Geithner
turning courtesan for his old Wall Street pals. It's all of a piece.
There's no pretense of propriety or civility, let alone of anything
resembling moral behavior. There's greed. There's thievery. There's
more greed. Then there are apologies for the thieves and the greedy,
half of that compliments of the government we thought we'd elected to
clean house.
What brings it all in perspective is the scandal over the AIG bonuses,
and the lies surrounding the supposed contractual necessity of paying
them, or President Obama's revoltingly timid order to Geithner, of all
flaccid vertebrates, to do what he can to stop AIG from the paying the
bonuses. Don't taxpayers own this company? At last check, yes: 80
percent is U.S. government property, meaning you and me (and the
Chinese, given their stash of Treasurys) own it. But first, a little
clarity on the numbers, which even our dearly beloved Obama is getting
wrong. No, it's not $165 million in bonuses. It's $1.2 billion.
Here's how the Wall Street Journal broke it down today:
On Sunday, new criticism emerged about $450 million in bonuses paid to
employees of AIG 's Financial Products unit, which made a series of
bets on credit default swap contracts that drove $40.5 billion in
losses last year. [...] In his letter to Mr. Geithner,
dated Saturday, AIG 's Mr. Liddy said the firm's "hands are tied" on
making $165 million of the payments that were due Sunday.The payments at AIG 's financial-products unit are in addition to
$121.5 million in incentive bonuses for 2008 that AIG will start making
this month to about 6,400 of its roughly 116,000 employees. Separately,
AIG is also making $619 million in retention payments to 4,200
employees.Together, the three
programs could result in roughly $1.2 billion in retention and bonus
payments to AIG employees. At least some individual employees are
receiving millions of dollars -- at the financial-products unit, for
instance, seven employees will get more than $3 million for 2008,
according to an AIG document.
Retention
payments? To the employees who created the very mess they're being paid
to clean up? From a company owned by taxpayers? This is the company
Obama is putting silk gloves on before slapping around. The financial
crisis has exploded in his face. He couldn't do anything about that.
The political crisis now exploding about him is his own making, if he
doesn't demolish corporate moralists' claim that AIG is under
contractual obligation to pay these bonuses.
Companies
left and right facing tighter profit margins (not even bankruptcy) are
renegotiating contracts, firing people outright, imposing new wage
scales or, in some cases, shutting their doors. AIG is
bankrupt, and would have been so three times over had it not been for
three successive cash infusions from you and me. It has no contractual
obligations because it's no longer a company. It's in receivership. It
doesn't get to say what should be done anymore. It gets told what gets
done. Here's what.
Speaking
of contractual obligation: it'd have been nice if our employers had
stuck to theirs while we did our part. But as always, it's never more
than a one-way street.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Sometimes I wonder whether this country not only has lost its moral
compass, but does what it can to forbid its recovery. Then I remember:
of course it has. Iraq. Afghanistan. Black sites. Torture. Guantanamo.
AIG. Bear Stearns. George Bush. The gathering depression. Tim Geithner
turning courtesan for his old Wall Street pals. It's all of a piece.
There's no pretense of propriety or civility, let alone of anything
resembling moral behavior. There's greed. There's thievery. There's
more greed. Then there are apologies for the thieves and the greedy,
half of that compliments of the government we thought we'd elected to
clean house.
What brings it all in perspective is the scandal over the AIG bonuses,
and the lies surrounding the supposed contractual necessity of paying
them, or President Obama's revoltingly timid order to Geithner, of all
flaccid vertebrates, to do what he can to stop AIG from the paying the
bonuses. Don't taxpayers own this company? At last check, yes: 80
percent is U.S. government property, meaning you and me (and the
Chinese, given their stash of Treasurys) own it. But first, a little
clarity on the numbers, which even our dearly beloved Obama is getting
wrong. No, it's not $165 million in bonuses. It's $1.2 billion.
Here's how the Wall Street Journal broke it down today:
On Sunday, new criticism emerged about $450 million in bonuses paid to
employees of AIG 's Financial Products unit, which made a series of
bets on credit default swap contracts that drove $40.5 billion in
losses last year. [...] In his letter to Mr. Geithner,
dated Saturday, AIG 's Mr. Liddy said the firm's "hands are tied" on
making $165 million of the payments that were due Sunday.The payments at AIG 's financial-products unit are in addition to
$121.5 million in incentive bonuses for 2008 that AIG will start making
this month to about 6,400 of its roughly 116,000 employees. Separately,
AIG is also making $619 million in retention payments to 4,200
employees.Together, the three
programs could result in roughly $1.2 billion in retention and bonus
payments to AIG employees. At least some individual employees are
receiving millions of dollars -- at the financial-products unit, for
instance, seven employees will get more than $3 million for 2008,
according to an AIG document.
Retention
payments? To the employees who created the very mess they're being paid
to clean up? From a company owned by taxpayers? This is the company
Obama is putting silk gloves on before slapping around. The financial
crisis has exploded in his face. He couldn't do anything about that.
The political crisis now exploding about him is his own making, if he
doesn't demolish corporate moralists' claim that AIG is under
contractual obligation to pay these bonuses.
Companies
left and right facing tighter profit margins (not even bankruptcy) are
renegotiating contracts, firing people outright, imposing new wage
scales or, in some cases, shutting their doors. AIG is
bankrupt, and would have been so three times over had it not been for
three successive cash infusions from you and me. It has no contractual
obligations because it's no longer a company. It's in receivership. It
doesn't get to say what should be done anymore. It gets told what gets
done. Here's what.
Speaking
of contractual obligation: it'd have been nice if our employers had
stuck to theirs while we did our part. But as always, it's never more
than a one-way street.
Sometimes I wonder whether this country not only has lost its moral
compass, but does what it can to forbid its recovery. Then I remember:
of course it has. Iraq. Afghanistan. Black sites. Torture. Guantanamo.
AIG. Bear Stearns. George Bush. The gathering depression. Tim Geithner
turning courtesan for his old Wall Street pals. It's all of a piece.
There's no pretense of propriety or civility, let alone of anything
resembling moral behavior. There's greed. There's thievery. There's
more greed. Then there are apologies for the thieves and the greedy,
half of that compliments of the government we thought we'd elected to
clean house.
What brings it all in perspective is the scandal over the AIG bonuses,
and the lies surrounding the supposed contractual necessity of paying
them, or President Obama's revoltingly timid order to Geithner, of all
flaccid vertebrates, to do what he can to stop AIG from the paying the
bonuses. Don't taxpayers own this company? At last check, yes: 80
percent is U.S. government property, meaning you and me (and the
Chinese, given their stash of Treasurys) own it. But first, a little
clarity on the numbers, which even our dearly beloved Obama is getting
wrong. No, it's not $165 million in bonuses. It's $1.2 billion.
Here's how the Wall Street Journal broke it down today:
On Sunday, new criticism emerged about $450 million in bonuses paid to
employees of AIG 's Financial Products unit, which made a series of
bets on credit default swap contracts that drove $40.5 billion in
losses last year. [...] In his letter to Mr. Geithner,
dated Saturday, AIG 's Mr. Liddy said the firm's "hands are tied" on
making $165 million of the payments that were due Sunday.The payments at AIG 's financial-products unit are in addition to
$121.5 million in incentive bonuses for 2008 that AIG will start making
this month to about 6,400 of its roughly 116,000 employees. Separately,
AIG is also making $619 million in retention payments to 4,200
employees.Together, the three
programs could result in roughly $1.2 billion in retention and bonus
payments to AIG employees. At least some individual employees are
receiving millions of dollars -- at the financial-products unit, for
instance, seven employees will get more than $3 million for 2008,
according to an AIG document.
Retention
payments? To the employees who created the very mess they're being paid
to clean up? From a company owned by taxpayers? This is the company
Obama is putting silk gloves on before slapping around. The financial
crisis has exploded in his face. He couldn't do anything about that.
The political crisis now exploding about him is his own making, if he
doesn't demolish corporate moralists' claim that AIG is under
contractual obligation to pay these bonuses.
Companies
left and right facing tighter profit margins (not even bankruptcy) are
renegotiating contracts, firing people outright, imposing new wage
scales or, in some cases, shutting their doors. AIG is
bankrupt, and would have been so three times over had it not been for
three successive cash infusions from you and me. It has no contractual
obligations because it's no longer a company. It's in receivership. It
doesn't get to say what should be done anymore. It gets told what gets
done. Here's what.
Speaking
of contractual obligation: it'd have been nice if our employers had
stuck to theirs while we did our part. But as always, it's never more
than a one-way street.