

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
THE NEW YORK TIMES, America's most prestigious newspaper, has recently rolled over into a deep ditch of debt. Its chances of getting out were estimated to be slim and none. So the paper's corporate executives chose Slim.
That would be Carlos Slim, the Mexican business mogul who used his political connections, monopoly power and low-paid workforce to amass a $60 billion personal fortune, said to make him the second-richest man in the world. In 1990, Mexico's corrupt national government went on a privatization frenzy, selling public assets to a select few political cronies. Slim grabbed Telmex, the telephone monopoly that today controls 90 percent of the country's market. Using this as his core building block, he now owns banks, an airline, railroads, restaurants, and, well, his reach is so pervasive that analysts say you can't spend a day in Mexico City without paying at least one peso to him.
Last year, his reach crossed the U.S. border, buying multimillion-dollar stakes in Saks Fifth Avenue, Citigroup and The Times. This January, Slim dramatically upped his ownership of The Times, to about 17 percent, making a $250 million loan to help executives there cope with the company's billion-dollar debt.
What a deal! At least for Slim. In return for the cash, he got more shares, making him the second-largest owner of the paper. Better yet, he's getting 14-percent interest on the loan, which means that The Times will pay him about $35 million a year to borrow his money.
But The Times is paying an even-greater price in its journalistic credibility. By aligning its reputation with a monopolist baron of Mexico's crony capitalism, the company is now saddled with the kind of apparent conflict of interest that it routinely (and rightly) deplores in others.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
THE NEW YORK TIMES, America's most prestigious newspaper, has recently rolled over into a deep ditch of debt. Its chances of getting out were estimated to be slim and none. So the paper's corporate executives chose Slim.
That would be Carlos Slim, the Mexican business mogul who used his political connections, monopoly power and low-paid workforce to amass a $60 billion personal fortune, said to make him the second-richest man in the world. In 1990, Mexico's corrupt national government went on a privatization frenzy, selling public assets to a select few political cronies. Slim grabbed Telmex, the telephone monopoly that today controls 90 percent of the country's market. Using this as his core building block, he now owns banks, an airline, railroads, restaurants, and, well, his reach is so pervasive that analysts say you can't spend a day in Mexico City without paying at least one peso to him.
Last year, his reach crossed the U.S. border, buying multimillion-dollar stakes in Saks Fifth Avenue, Citigroup and The Times. This January, Slim dramatically upped his ownership of The Times, to about 17 percent, making a $250 million loan to help executives there cope with the company's billion-dollar debt.
What a deal! At least for Slim. In return for the cash, he got more shares, making him the second-largest owner of the paper. Better yet, he's getting 14-percent interest on the loan, which means that The Times will pay him about $35 million a year to borrow his money.
But The Times is paying an even-greater price in its journalistic credibility. By aligning its reputation with a monopolist baron of Mexico's crony capitalism, the company is now saddled with the kind of apparent conflict of interest that it routinely (and rightly) deplores in others.
THE NEW YORK TIMES, America's most prestigious newspaper, has recently rolled over into a deep ditch of debt. Its chances of getting out were estimated to be slim and none. So the paper's corporate executives chose Slim.
That would be Carlos Slim, the Mexican business mogul who used his political connections, monopoly power and low-paid workforce to amass a $60 billion personal fortune, said to make him the second-richest man in the world. In 1990, Mexico's corrupt national government went on a privatization frenzy, selling public assets to a select few political cronies. Slim grabbed Telmex, the telephone monopoly that today controls 90 percent of the country's market. Using this as his core building block, he now owns banks, an airline, railroads, restaurants, and, well, his reach is so pervasive that analysts say you can't spend a day in Mexico City without paying at least one peso to him.
Last year, his reach crossed the U.S. border, buying multimillion-dollar stakes in Saks Fifth Avenue, Citigroup and The Times. This January, Slim dramatically upped his ownership of The Times, to about 17 percent, making a $250 million loan to help executives there cope with the company's billion-dollar debt.
What a deal! At least for Slim. In return for the cash, he got more shares, making him the second-largest owner of the paper. Better yet, he's getting 14-percent interest on the loan, which means that The Times will pay him about $35 million a year to borrow his money.
But The Times is paying an even-greater price in its journalistic credibility. By aligning its reputation with a monopolist baron of Mexico's crony capitalism, the company is now saddled with the kind of apparent conflict of interest that it routinely (and rightly) deplores in others.