SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
THE NEW YORK TIMES, America's most prestigious newspaper, has recently rolled over into a deep ditch of debt. Its chances of getting out were estimated to be slim and none. So the paper's corporate executives chose Slim.
That would be Carlos Slim, the Mexican business mogul who used his political connections, monopoly power and low-paid workforce to amass a $60 billion personal fortune, said to make him the second-richest man in the world. In 1990, Mexico's corrupt national government went on a privatization frenzy, selling public assets to a select few political cronies. Slim grabbed Telmex, the telephone monopoly that today controls 90 percent of the country's market. Using this as his core building block, he now owns banks, an airline, railroads, restaurants, and, well, his reach is so pervasive that analysts say you can't spend a day in Mexico City without paying at least one peso to him.
Last year, his reach crossed the U.S. border, buying multimillion-dollar stakes in Saks Fifth Avenue, Citigroup and The Times. This January, Slim dramatically upped his ownership of The Times, to about 17 percent, making a $250 million loan to help executives there cope with the company's billion-dollar debt.
What a deal! At least for Slim. In return for the cash, he got more shares, making him the second-largest owner of the paper. Better yet, he's getting 14-percent interest on the loan, which means that The Times will pay him about $35 million a year to borrow his money.
But The Times is paying an even-greater price in its journalistic credibility. By aligning its reputation with a monopolist baron of Mexico's crony capitalism, the company is now saddled with the kind of apparent conflict of interest that it routinely (and rightly) deplores in others.
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
THE NEW YORK TIMES, America's most prestigious newspaper, has recently rolled over into a deep ditch of debt. Its chances of getting out were estimated to be slim and none. So the paper's corporate executives chose Slim.
That would be Carlos Slim, the Mexican business mogul who used his political connections, monopoly power and low-paid workforce to amass a $60 billion personal fortune, said to make him the second-richest man in the world. In 1990, Mexico's corrupt national government went on a privatization frenzy, selling public assets to a select few political cronies. Slim grabbed Telmex, the telephone monopoly that today controls 90 percent of the country's market. Using this as his core building block, he now owns banks, an airline, railroads, restaurants, and, well, his reach is so pervasive that analysts say you can't spend a day in Mexico City without paying at least one peso to him.
Last year, his reach crossed the U.S. border, buying multimillion-dollar stakes in Saks Fifth Avenue, Citigroup and The Times. This January, Slim dramatically upped his ownership of The Times, to about 17 percent, making a $250 million loan to help executives there cope with the company's billion-dollar debt.
What a deal! At least for Slim. In return for the cash, he got more shares, making him the second-largest owner of the paper. Better yet, he's getting 14-percent interest on the loan, which means that The Times will pay him about $35 million a year to borrow his money.
But The Times is paying an even-greater price in its journalistic credibility. By aligning its reputation with a monopolist baron of Mexico's crony capitalism, the company is now saddled with the kind of apparent conflict of interest that it routinely (and rightly) deplores in others.
THE NEW YORK TIMES, America's most prestigious newspaper, has recently rolled over into a deep ditch of debt. Its chances of getting out were estimated to be slim and none. So the paper's corporate executives chose Slim.
That would be Carlos Slim, the Mexican business mogul who used his political connections, monopoly power and low-paid workforce to amass a $60 billion personal fortune, said to make him the second-richest man in the world. In 1990, Mexico's corrupt national government went on a privatization frenzy, selling public assets to a select few political cronies. Slim grabbed Telmex, the telephone monopoly that today controls 90 percent of the country's market. Using this as his core building block, he now owns banks, an airline, railroads, restaurants, and, well, his reach is so pervasive that analysts say you can't spend a day in Mexico City without paying at least one peso to him.
Last year, his reach crossed the U.S. border, buying multimillion-dollar stakes in Saks Fifth Avenue, Citigroup and The Times. This January, Slim dramatically upped his ownership of The Times, to about 17 percent, making a $250 million loan to help executives there cope with the company's billion-dollar debt.
What a deal! At least for Slim. In return for the cash, he got more shares, making him the second-largest owner of the paper. Better yet, he's getting 14-percent interest on the loan, which means that The Times will pay him about $35 million a year to borrow his money.
But The Times is paying an even-greater price in its journalistic credibility. By aligning its reputation with a monopolist baron of Mexico's crony capitalism, the company is now saddled with the kind of apparent conflict of interest that it routinely (and rightly) deplores in others.