Far-Right Obama Critics Get a Reply
''I hope he fails.'' -- Limbaugh
It is, of course, a calculated outrage.
Meaning,
it was spewed by a clown in the media circus to kick a familiar
sequence into motion: angry denunciation by bloggers, pundits and
supporters of President Barack Obama (the ''he'' whose failure is
hoped), followed by Rush Limbaugh refusing to retract a word, a
courageous truth teller who will not be moved. And, trailing behind,
like the folks with brooms trail the elephants in the circus parade,
Limbaugh's devotees, complaining that their hero has been misquoted,
misunderstood or otherwise mistreated. ``What Rush meant was . . .
yadda yadda yadda.''
A calculated outrage.
And
knowing this, knowing how frequently and adroitly media are manipulated
by self-promoting media clowns who defame conservatism by calling
themselves conservative, one is tempted to let the statement pass, to
make its way unimpeded to the dustbin like so many other manufactured
controversies. But occasionally, it's necessary to intercept one of
them and hold it up to the light.
This is one of those times. Not
because what Limbaugh said on his radio program a few days before the
inauguration was an outrage -- outrage is the point, remember? -- but
rather, because of what the thing he said says about him and his fellow
clowns.
``I hope he fails.''
Do you ever say that about
your president if you are an American who loves your country? Would you
say it about George W. Bush, who was disastrous; about Bill Clinton,
who was slimy; about Jimmy Carter, who was inept; about Richard Nixon,
who was crooked? You may think he's going to fail, yes. You may warn
he's going to fail, yes.
But do you ever hope he fails? Knowing his failure is the country's failure? Isn't that, well . . . disloyal?
The
irony is that Limbaugh and the other clowns would have you believe they
are bedrock defenders of this country, that they love it more than the
rest of us, more than anything.
That's a lie. Limbaugh just told us so, emphatically.
It's
not the country they love. It's the attention. The ideology, their
perversion of conservatism, is but a means toward that end.
Yes,
an observer might point out that it's counterproductive to give them
attention while decrying their love of attention. But, as already
noted, occasionally the clowns spew something that cannot, and ought
not, be ignored.
Ideological division is nothing new to politics.
But has ideology ever taken quite the seat of prominence it now enjoys?
Have people ever been quite so prone to regard their ideological
identity as more important than their national identity? The last 30
years are rare in that regard, if not unique.
``I hope he fails?!''
So
that, what? The defamation of conservatism Limbaugh represents will
stand vindicated? The Republicans will pick up a few seats in the
midterm election? Limbaugh's ''side'' -- his word -- will score points?
A sense of mission
Is this only a game, then? No lives at stake, no future on the line, no planet in the balance? Just a game?
I hope he bricks this free throw.
I hope he fumbles that pass.
I hope he fails.
And to hell with the country.
The
country doesn't matter. The ''side'' does. And Limbaugh's side seems
angry in power and angry out. It's as if anger is all they really have.
Barack
Obama was elected in large part on a promise to carry the nation past
anger, past the notion that either party has a monopoly on wisdom, past
the belief that ideology is identity. He was elected because people
want a sense of mission that makes them feel like Americans again.
If
he is successful, Limbaugh and the other clowns will face tough
sledding in a radically different world. Small wonder he is so eager to
strangle this presidency in its infancy. And need it even be said?
I hope he fails.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
''I hope he fails.'' -- Limbaugh
It is, of course, a calculated outrage.
Meaning,
it was spewed by a clown in the media circus to kick a familiar
sequence into motion: angry denunciation by bloggers, pundits and
supporters of President Barack Obama (the ''he'' whose failure is
hoped), followed by Rush Limbaugh refusing to retract a word, a
courageous truth teller who will not be moved. And, trailing behind,
like the folks with brooms trail the elephants in the circus parade,
Limbaugh's devotees, complaining that their hero has been misquoted,
misunderstood or otherwise mistreated. ``What Rush meant was . . .
yadda yadda yadda.''
A calculated outrage.
And
knowing this, knowing how frequently and adroitly media are manipulated
by self-promoting media clowns who defame conservatism by calling
themselves conservative, one is tempted to let the statement pass, to
make its way unimpeded to the dustbin like so many other manufactured
controversies. But occasionally, it's necessary to intercept one of
them and hold it up to the light.
This is one of those times. Not
because what Limbaugh said on his radio program a few days before the
inauguration was an outrage -- outrage is the point, remember? -- but
rather, because of what the thing he said says about him and his fellow
clowns.
``I hope he fails.''
Do you ever say that about
your president if you are an American who loves your country? Would you
say it about George W. Bush, who was disastrous; about Bill Clinton,
who was slimy; about Jimmy Carter, who was inept; about Richard Nixon,
who was crooked? You may think he's going to fail, yes. You may warn
he's going to fail, yes.
But do you ever hope he fails? Knowing his failure is the country's failure? Isn't that, well . . . disloyal?
The
irony is that Limbaugh and the other clowns would have you believe they
are bedrock defenders of this country, that they love it more than the
rest of us, more than anything.
That's a lie. Limbaugh just told us so, emphatically.
It's
not the country they love. It's the attention. The ideology, their
perversion of conservatism, is but a means toward that end.
Yes,
an observer might point out that it's counterproductive to give them
attention while decrying their love of attention. But, as already
noted, occasionally the clowns spew something that cannot, and ought
not, be ignored.
Ideological division is nothing new to politics.
But has ideology ever taken quite the seat of prominence it now enjoys?
Have people ever been quite so prone to regard their ideological
identity as more important than their national identity? The last 30
years are rare in that regard, if not unique.
``I hope he fails?!''
So
that, what? The defamation of conservatism Limbaugh represents will
stand vindicated? The Republicans will pick up a few seats in the
midterm election? Limbaugh's ''side'' -- his word -- will score points?
A sense of mission
Is this only a game, then? No lives at stake, no future on the line, no planet in the balance? Just a game?
I hope he bricks this free throw.
I hope he fumbles that pass.
I hope he fails.
And to hell with the country.
The
country doesn't matter. The ''side'' does. And Limbaugh's side seems
angry in power and angry out. It's as if anger is all they really have.
Barack
Obama was elected in large part on a promise to carry the nation past
anger, past the notion that either party has a monopoly on wisdom, past
the belief that ideology is identity. He was elected because people
want a sense of mission that makes them feel like Americans again.
If
he is successful, Limbaugh and the other clowns will face tough
sledding in a radically different world. Small wonder he is so eager to
strangle this presidency in its infancy. And need it even be said?
I hope he fails.
''I hope he fails.'' -- Limbaugh
It is, of course, a calculated outrage.
Meaning,
it was spewed by a clown in the media circus to kick a familiar
sequence into motion: angry denunciation by bloggers, pundits and
supporters of President Barack Obama (the ''he'' whose failure is
hoped), followed by Rush Limbaugh refusing to retract a word, a
courageous truth teller who will not be moved. And, trailing behind,
like the folks with brooms trail the elephants in the circus parade,
Limbaugh's devotees, complaining that their hero has been misquoted,
misunderstood or otherwise mistreated. ``What Rush meant was . . .
yadda yadda yadda.''
A calculated outrage.
And
knowing this, knowing how frequently and adroitly media are manipulated
by self-promoting media clowns who defame conservatism by calling
themselves conservative, one is tempted to let the statement pass, to
make its way unimpeded to the dustbin like so many other manufactured
controversies. But occasionally, it's necessary to intercept one of
them and hold it up to the light.
This is one of those times. Not
because what Limbaugh said on his radio program a few days before the
inauguration was an outrage -- outrage is the point, remember? -- but
rather, because of what the thing he said says about him and his fellow
clowns.
``I hope he fails.''
Do you ever say that about
your president if you are an American who loves your country? Would you
say it about George W. Bush, who was disastrous; about Bill Clinton,
who was slimy; about Jimmy Carter, who was inept; about Richard Nixon,
who was crooked? You may think he's going to fail, yes. You may warn
he's going to fail, yes.
But do you ever hope he fails? Knowing his failure is the country's failure? Isn't that, well . . . disloyal?
The
irony is that Limbaugh and the other clowns would have you believe they
are bedrock defenders of this country, that they love it more than the
rest of us, more than anything.
That's a lie. Limbaugh just told us so, emphatically.
It's
not the country they love. It's the attention. The ideology, their
perversion of conservatism, is but a means toward that end.
Yes,
an observer might point out that it's counterproductive to give them
attention while decrying their love of attention. But, as already
noted, occasionally the clowns spew something that cannot, and ought
not, be ignored.
Ideological division is nothing new to politics.
But has ideology ever taken quite the seat of prominence it now enjoys?
Have people ever been quite so prone to regard their ideological
identity as more important than their national identity? The last 30
years are rare in that regard, if not unique.
``I hope he fails?!''
So
that, what? The defamation of conservatism Limbaugh represents will
stand vindicated? The Republicans will pick up a few seats in the
midterm election? Limbaugh's ''side'' -- his word -- will score points?
A sense of mission
Is this only a game, then? No lives at stake, no future on the line, no planet in the balance? Just a game?
I hope he bricks this free throw.
I hope he fumbles that pass.
I hope he fails.
And to hell with the country.
The
country doesn't matter. The ''side'' does. And Limbaugh's side seems
angry in power and angry out. It's as if anger is all they really have.
Barack
Obama was elected in large part on a promise to carry the nation past
anger, past the notion that either party has a monopoly on wisdom, past
the belief that ideology is identity. He was elected because people
want a sense of mission that makes them feel like Americans again.
If
he is successful, Limbaugh and the other clowns will face tough
sledding in a radically different world. Small wonder he is so eager to
strangle this presidency in its infancy. And need it even be said?
I hope he fails.