To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
In this world, where everything and everyone is for sale, we must sustain independent media we can trust. If you believe independent journalism is critical to protecting democracy and the common good, please support Common Dreams this Giving Tuesday! We wouldn't exist without you.
Barack Obama's presidency will be recorded in the history books as having begun on January 20, 2009, in Washington, D.C.
In fact, it began on another, colder January night in Dubuque, Iowa. Obama was not in Dubuque that night.
But Brianna Cleland, a 22-year-old teacher, was.
"I really want to make something happen in America," she told me that
night. "And the way to do that is with someone new, with someone
different, and that's Barack Obama."
Cleland had never caucused before.
Neither had most of the Iowans who joined her at Dubuque County
Precinct 19's Democratic presidential caucus in the Mississippi
Riverfront city's Carnegie-Stout Library.
For them, and for thousands like them, Obama represented the promise of fundamental, transformational change.
It was not just a matter of breaking with George Bush.
It was a matter of breaking with Bill Clinton, and with the definition
of the Democratic party as a managerial institution that was poised to
run things for awhile after a more dynamic but less able Republican
party had messed up sufficiently to make dull centrism seem appealing.
As Obama takes office, far from Iowa, and far from the political
dynamic that was in play last January, he would do well to remember
that it was this sense that he would be different that made people like
Brianna Cleland brave the cold, and people like 25-year-old Liz Wagner,
a high school social studies teacher who caucuses wearing an orange "I
Caucus for Darfur" t-shirt that night.
Wagner's shirt may have referenced a neglected region of Africa, but
she was really motivated by a deep, genuinely pained frustration with a
foreign-policy consensus that saw Democrats joining Republicans in
making excuses for humanitarian, diplomatic and strategic failures that
culminated with a unwise and unnecessary war in Iraq.
"I'm glad that he was opposed to the Iraq War before it started,"
Wagner said of Obama. "It shows he has some judgment. That's more that
you can say about most of the other candidates or most of the Democrats
in Congress."
Wagner was right. Obama might not have run as an anti-war candidate,
but he was understood as such. The Iowans who caucused for the young
senator from Illinois, giving him the victory that would propel him
into serious competition for the presidency, did so because they saw
him as the most political viable foe of the Bush doctrine and the
disasters it has caused.
It ought never be forgotten that Barack Obama became the Democratic
nominee because of his opposition to George Bush's wrongheaded approach
to the world.
As a candidate, Obama promised change.
Today, as he assumes the presidency, Obama will continue to promise change.
Pundits in Washington may debate what that change entails.
But the people who made Barack Obama our president understand - and so should the man who is now our president.
The first and most fundamental change must come in how this nation relates to the rest of the world.
And the place to begin is with Iraq.
This new president, our new president, should end George Bush's war.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Barack Obama's presidency will be recorded in the history books as having begun on January 20, 2009, in Washington, D.C.
In fact, it began on another, colder January night in Dubuque, Iowa. Obama was not in Dubuque that night.
But Brianna Cleland, a 22-year-old teacher, was.
"I really want to make something happen in America," she told me that
night. "And the way to do that is with someone new, with someone
different, and that's Barack Obama."
Cleland had never caucused before.
Neither had most of the Iowans who joined her at Dubuque County
Precinct 19's Democratic presidential caucus in the Mississippi
Riverfront city's Carnegie-Stout Library.
For them, and for thousands like them, Obama represented the promise of fundamental, transformational change.
It was not just a matter of breaking with George Bush.
It was a matter of breaking with Bill Clinton, and with the definition
of the Democratic party as a managerial institution that was poised to
run things for awhile after a more dynamic but less able Republican
party had messed up sufficiently to make dull centrism seem appealing.
As Obama takes office, far from Iowa, and far from the political
dynamic that was in play last January, he would do well to remember
that it was this sense that he would be different that made people like
Brianna Cleland brave the cold, and people like 25-year-old Liz Wagner,
a high school social studies teacher who caucuses wearing an orange "I
Caucus for Darfur" t-shirt that night.
Wagner's shirt may have referenced a neglected region of Africa, but
she was really motivated by a deep, genuinely pained frustration with a
foreign-policy consensus that saw Democrats joining Republicans in
making excuses for humanitarian, diplomatic and strategic failures that
culminated with a unwise and unnecessary war in Iraq.
"I'm glad that he was opposed to the Iraq War before it started,"
Wagner said of Obama. "It shows he has some judgment. That's more that
you can say about most of the other candidates or most of the Democrats
in Congress."
Wagner was right. Obama might not have run as an anti-war candidate,
but he was understood as such. The Iowans who caucused for the young
senator from Illinois, giving him the victory that would propel him
into serious competition for the presidency, did so because they saw
him as the most political viable foe of the Bush doctrine and the
disasters it has caused.
It ought never be forgotten that Barack Obama became the Democratic
nominee because of his opposition to George Bush's wrongheaded approach
to the world.
As a candidate, Obama promised change.
Today, as he assumes the presidency, Obama will continue to promise change.
Pundits in Washington may debate what that change entails.
But the people who made Barack Obama our president understand - and so should the man who is now our president.
The first and most fundamental change must come in how this nation relates to the rest of the world.
And the place to begin is with Iraq.
This new president, our new president, should end George Bush's war.
Barack Obama's presidency will be recorded in the history books as having begun on January 20, 2009, in Washington, D.C.
In fact, it began on another, colder January night in Dubuque, Iowa. Obama was not in Dubuque that night.
But Brianna Cleland, a 22-year-old teacher, was.
"I really want to make something happen in America," she told me that
night. "And the way to do that is with someone new, with someone
different, and that's Barack Obama."
Cleland had never caucused before.
Neither had most of the Iowans who joined her at Dubuque County
Precinct 19's Democratic presidential caucus in the Mississippi
Riverfront city's Carnegie-Stout Library.
For them, and for thousands like them, Obama represented the promise of fundamental, transformational change.
It was not just a matter of breaking with George Bush.
It was a matter of breaking with Bill Clinton, and with the definition
of the Democratic party as a managerial institution that was poised to
run things for awhile after a more dynamic but less able Republican
party had messed up sufficiently to make dull centrism seem appealing.
As Obama takes office, far from Iowa, and far from the political
dynamic that was in play last January, he would do well to remember
that it was this sense that he would be different that made people like
Brianna Cleland brave the cold, and people like 25-year-old Liz Wagner,
a high school social studies teacher who caucuses wearing an orange "I
Caucus for Darfur" t-shirt that night.
Wagner's shirt may have referenced a neglected region of Africa, but
she was really motivated by a deep, genuinely pained frustration with a
foreign-policy consensus that saw Democrats joining Republicans in
making excuses for humanitarian, diplomatic and strategic failures that
culminated with a unwise and unnecessary war in Iraq.
"I'm glad that he was opposed to the Iraq War before it started,"
Wagner said of Obama. "It shows he has some judgment. That's more that
you can say about most of the other candidates or most of the Democrats
in Congress."
Wagner was right. Obama might not have run as an anti-war candidate,
but he was understood as such. The Iowans who caucused for the young
senator from Illinois, giving him the victory that would propel him
into serious competition for the presidency, did so because they saw
him as the most political viable foe of the Bush doctrine and the
disasters it has caused.
It ought never be forgotten that Barack Obama became the Democratic
nominee because of his opposition to George Bush's wrongheaded approach
to the world.
As a candidate, Obama promised change.
Today, as he assumes the presidency, Obama will continue to promise change.
Pundits in Washington may debate what that change entails.
But the people who made Barack Obama our president understand - and so should the man who is now our president.
The first and most fundamental change must come in how this nation relates to the rest of the world.
And the place to begin is with Iraq.
This new president, our new president, should end George Bush's war.