Sayonara, Sarah

And so we bid farewell to Sarah Palin. How I'll miss her daily presence
in my life! The mooseburgers, the wolf hunts, the kids named after bays
and sports and trees and airplanes and who did not seem to go to school
at all, the winks and blinks, the cute Alaska accent, the witch-hunting
pastor and those great little flared jackets, especially the gray
stripey one. People say she was a dingbat, but that is just sexist: the
woman read everything, she said so herself; her knowledge of geography
was unreal--she knew just where to find the pro-America part of the
country; and don't forget her keen interest in ancient history! Thanks
largely to her, Bill Ayers is now the most famous sixtysomething
professor in the country--eat your heart out, Ward Churchill! You can
snipe all you want, but she was truly God's gift: to Barack Obama, Katie
Couric--notice no one's making fun of America's sweetheart now--Tina Fey
and columnists all over America.

She was also a gift to feminism. Seriously. I don't mean she was a
feminist--she told Couric she considered herself one, but in a later
interview, perhaps after looking up the meaning of the word, coyly
wondered why she needed to "label" herself. And I don't mean she had a
claim on the votes of feminists or women--why should women who care
about equality vote for a woman who wants to take their rights away?
Elaine Lafferty, a former editor of Ms., made a splash by
revealing in The Daily Beast (Tina Brown's new website, for those
of you still following the news on paper) that she has been working as a
consultant to Palin. In a short but painful piece of public relations
called "Sarah Palin's a Brainiac," Lafferty claimed to find in Palin "a
mind that is thoughtful, curious, with a discernible pattern of
associative thinking and insight," with a "photographic memory," as
smart as legendary Senator Sam Ervin, "a woman who knows exactly
who she is." According to Lafferty, all that stuff about library
censorship and rape kits was just "nonsense"--and feminists who held
Palin's wish to criminalize abortion against her were Beltway
feminist-establishment elitists who shop at Whole Foods when they should
be voting against Barack Obama to make the Dems stop taking women for
granted.

So the first way Palin was good for feminism is that she helped us
clarify what it isn't: feminism doesn't mean voting for "the woman" just
because she's female, and it doesn't mean confusing self-injury with
empowerment, like the Ellen Jamesians in The World According to
Garp (I'll vote for the forced-childbirth candidate, that'll
show Howard Dean!). It isn't just feel-good "you go, girl" appreciation
of female moxie, which I cheerfully acknowledge Palin has by the gallon.
As I wrote when she was selected, if she were my neighbor I would
probably like her--at least until she organized with her fellow
Christians to ban abortion at the local hospital, as Palin did in the
1990s. Yes, feminism is about women getting their fair share of power,
and that includes the top jobs--but that can't take a back seat to
policies that benefit all women: equality on the job and the legal
framework that undergirds it, antiviolence, reproductive
self-determination, healthcare, education, childcare and so on.
Fortunately, women who care about equality get this--dead-enders like
the comically clueless Lynn Forester de Rothschild got lots of press,
but in the end Obama won the support of the vast majority of women who
had supported Hillary Clinton.

Second, Palin's presence on the Republican ticket forced family-values
conservatives to give public support to working mothers, equal
marriages, pregnant teens and their much-maligned parents. Talk-show
frothers, Christian zealots and professional antifeminists--Rush
Limbaugh and Phyllis Schlafly--insisted that a mother of five, including
a "special-needs" newborn, could perfectly well manage governing a state
(a really big state, as we were frequently reminded), while
simultaneously running for veep and, who knows, field-dressing a moose.
No one said she belonged at home. No one said she was neglecting her
husband or failing to be appropriately submissive to him. No one blamed
her for 17-year-old Bristol's out-of-wedlock pregnancy or hard-partying
high-school-dropout boyfriend. No one even wondered out loud why Bristol
wasn't getting married before the baby arrived. All these things have
officially morphed from sins to "challenges," just part of normal family
life. No matter how strategic this newfound broadmindedness is, it will
not be easy to row away from it. Thanks to Sarah, ladies, we can do just
about anything we want as long as we don't have an abortion.

Third, while Palin did not win the Hillary vote, the love she got from
Republican women, including very conservative, traditional women, shows
that what I like to call the feminism of everyday life is taking hold
across the spectrum. That old frilly-doormat model of femininity is
gone: even women who stay home and attend churches that bar women from
the clergy thrill to the idea of women being all that they can be and
taking their rightful place in the public realm. Like everyone else,
they want respect and power, and now, finally, thanks to the women's
movement they despise, they may actually get some.

Finally, Palin completed the task Hillary Clinton began: running in
different parties across a single political season, they have normalized
the idea of a woman in the White House. It is hard even to remember now
how iconoclastic Hillary was--how hard it was for her to negotiate
femininity and ambition, to be warm but not weak, smart but not cold,
attractive but not sexy, dynamic but not threatening. Only a year ago,
it was a real question whether men would vote for a woman or, for that
matter, whether women would. Palin may have been unfit for high office,
but just by running she showed there was more than one mode for a female
politician. After almost two years of the whole country watching two
very different women in the White House race, it finally seems normal.

So thanks, Sarah. And now, please--back to your iceberg.