The $700 Billion Wall Street Bailout: One More Weapon of Mass Deception
Not since the Bush Administration's lies about Iraq's "weapons of mass destruction" have the American people been so despicably misled.
The Bush Administration's proposal to buy, with taxpayers' money, $700 billion of toxic liabilities from the corporate financial titans of Wall Street is a fraud. It is by no means necessary, as Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson claims in the agency's Fact Sheet, "...to promote market stability, and help protect American families and the U.S. economy."
Not since the Bush Administration's lies about Iraq's "weapons of mass destruction" have the American people been so despicably misled.
The Bush Administration's proposal to buy, with taxpayers' money, $700 billion of toxic liabilities from the corporate financial titans of Wall Street is a fraud. It is by no means necessary, as Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson claims in the agency's Fact Sheet, "...to promote market stability, and help protect American families and the U.S. economy."
It is necessary only to assure the financial survival of Wall Street banks and brokerages, the Administration's most loyal supporters and its greatest political contributors-and in large measure the cause of the financial meltdown the country is facing.
These financial corporations lobbied ferociously to be free of government regulation. Had they not succeeded, they could not have done what they did next. They created and leveraged trillions of dollars of complex "derivatives"-mortgage-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations, and credit default swaps-all riding on an unprecedented real estate bubble stimulated by their frenzy of creative finance. When the bubble burst, as bubbles do, many of these financial titans faced bankruptcy, their obligations far exceeding their assets.
The $700 billion of taxpayers' money, in the plan suggested by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, will buy enough of the toxic obligations to allow the companies to avoid bankruptcy. Not coincidentally a major beneficiary of the scheme will be the investment bank Goldman, Sachs. Mr. Paulson resigned as CEO of Goldman, Sachs to become Treasury Secretary in 2006, having amassed a personal net worth of $700 million during his 32-year tenure at the bank. (On average, $21.9 million per year.)
We need to "remove the distressed assets from the financial system," Mr. Paulson suggests. Relieved of the burden, the great Wall Street banks can then regain, presumably, their folksy function: assuring that "...money and capital flow to and from households and businesses to pay for home loans, school loans, and investments that create jobs."
For the good of the American economy, Mr. Paulson is correct that credit needs to flow and the distressed assets need to be removed. He is not correct that credit needs to flow from Goldman, Sachs and other Wall Street financial houses. And the distressed assets do not have to be assumed by the taxpayers.
There are other, far more equitable and justified ways to accomplish both.
The distressed assets-that is the losses-can and should be absorbed by the executives, directors, and stockholders of the corporate banks and other institutions that propagated the financial firestorm. They can and should, as the dictates of the free market insist, stand accountable for their actions and accept bankruptcy. It is not the responsibility of the American taxpayers to shield them.
Mr. Paulson wants to rescue Wall Street so Wall Street, he assures us, can get back to lending. That is certain to save Mr. Paulson's former firm and the others, but it is by no means certain credit will then flow to "...home loans, school loans, and investments that create jobs." The Wall Street firms are far more likely to revive their lucrative trade in complex and esoteric financial "products."
$700 billion is a lot of money. It is more than we've spent so far on the Administration's fraudulent "war on terror." (See https://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/63632/ ) Is it not better public policy to channel the money to "households and businesses" in some other, more direct, more effective, and far more reliable way?
There are hundreds if not thousands of Main Street banks and thrift institutions which played no part in the real estate securitization/derivatives game. Certainly the $700 billion could be made available to them instead, at low but positive interest. Or special publicly-held banks could be set up in statute and capitalized with the $700 billion.
The crisis is real, but there are ways to serve the nation's interests at large, and even to earn a modest return on its assets. We do not need to subsidize the failure of Wall Street and hope thereafter for better days.
The welfare of the Wall Street financiers should not be the focus of public policy, and this clever attempt by the Bush Administration is a perversion of decent governance. We should not be stampeded into the greatest corporate theft of public assets, arguably, in the nation's history. Instead, to paraphrase one of our presidential campaigns, we need to put our country first and stop Mr. Paulson dead in his tracks.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Richard Behan lives and writes in Corvallis, Oregon. For two decades he has been writing about democracy’s decline, corporate dominion, and the fraudulent “war on terrorism.” He is completing a book, Defeated Democracy and Criminal War: the Backstories of America’s Interlocked Tragedies. Behan welcomes comments and he can be reached at richard.behan@icloud.com.
Not since the Bush Administration's lies about Iraq's "weapons of mass destruction" have the American people been so despicably misled.
The Bush Administration's proposal to buy, with taxpayers' money, $700 billion of toxic liabilities from the corporate financial titans of Wall Street is a fraud. It is by no means necessary, as Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson claims in the agency's Fact Sheet, "...to promote market stability, and help protect American families and the U.S. economy."
It is necessary only to assure the financial survival of Wall Street banks and brokerages, the Administration's most loyal supporters and its greatest political contributors-and in large measure the cause of the financial meltdown the country is facing.
These financial corporations lobbied ferociously to be free of government regulation. Had they not succeeded, they could not have done what they did next. They created and leveraged trillions of dollars of complex "derivatives"-mortgage-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations, and credit default swaps-all riding on an unprecedented real estate bubble stimulated by their frenzy of creative finance. When the bubble burst, as bubbles do, many of these financial titans faced bankruptcy, their obligations far exceeding their assets.
The $700 billion of taxpayers' money, in the plan suggested by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, will buy enough of the toxic obligations to allow the companies to avoid bankruptcy. Not coincidentally a major beneficiary of the scheme will be the investment bank Goldman, Sachs. Mr. Paulson resigned as CEO of Goldman, Sachs to become Treasury Secretary in 2006, having amassed a personal net worth of $700 million during his 32-year tenure at the bank. (On average, $21.9 million per year.)
We need to "remove the distressed assets from the financial system," Mr. Paulson suggests. Relieved of the burden, the great Wall Street banks can then regain, presumably, their folksy function: assuring that "...money and capital flow to and from households and businesses to pay for home loans, school loans, and investments that create jobs."
For the good of the American economy, Mr. Paulson is correct that credit needs to flow and the distressed assets need to be removed. He is not correct that credit needs to flow from Goldman, Sachs and other Wall Street financial houses. And the distressed assets do not have to be assumed by the taxpayers.
There are other, far more equitable and justified ways to accomplish both.
The distressed assets-that is the losses-can and should be absorbed by the executives, directors, and stockholders of the corporate banks and other institutions that propagated the financial firestorm. They can and should, as the dictates of the free market insist, stand accountable for their actions and accept bankruptcy. It is not the responsibility of the American taxpayers to shield them.
Mr. Paulson wants to rescue Wall Street so Wall Street, he assures us, can get back to lending. That is certain to save Mr. Paulson's former firm and the others, but it is by no means certain credit will then flow to "...home loans, school loans, and investments that create jobs." The Wall Street firms are far more likely to revive their lucrative trade in complex and esoteric financial "products."
$700 billion is a lot of money. It is more than we've spent so far on the Administration's fraudulent "war on terror." (See https://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/63632/ ) Is it not better public policy to channel the money to "households and businesses" in some other, more direct, more effective, and far more reliable way?
There are hundreds if not thousands of Main Street banks and thrift institutions which played no part in the real estate securitization/derivatives game. Certainly the $700 billion could be made available to them instead, at low but positive interest. Or special publicly-held banks could be set up in statute and capitalized with the $700 billion.
The crisis is real, but there are ways to serve the nation's interests at large, and even to earn a modest return on its assets. We do not need to subsidize the failure of Wall Street and hope thereafter for better days.
The welfare of the Wall Street financiers should not be the focus of public policy, and this clever attempt by the Bush Administration is a perversion of decent governance. We should not be stampeded into the greatest corporate theft of public assets, arguably, in the nation's history. Instead, to paraphrase one of our presidential campaigns, we need to put our country first and stop Mr. Paulson dead in his tracks.
Richard Behan lives and writes in Corvallis, Oregon. For two decades he has been writing about democracy’s decline, corporate dominion, and the fraudulent “war on terrorism.” He is completing a book, Defeated Democracy and Criminal War: the Backstories of America’s Interlocked Tragedies. Behan welcomes comments and he can be reached at richard.behan@icloud.com.
Not since the Bush Administration's lies about Iraq's "weapons of mass destruction" have the American people been so despicably misled.
The Bush Administration's proposal to buy, with taxpayers' money, $700 billion of toxic liabilities from the corporate financial titans of Wall Street is a fraud. It is by no means necessary, as Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson claims in the agency's Fact Sheet, "...to promote market stability, and help protect American families and the U.S. economy."
It is necessary only to assure the financial survival of Wall Street banks and brokerages, the Administration's most loyal supporters and its greatest political contributors-and in large measure the cause of the financial meltdown the country is facing.
These financial corporations lobbied ferociously to be free of government regulation. Had they not succeeded, they could not have done what they did next. They created and leveraged trillions of dollars of complex "derivatives"-mortgage-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations, and credit default swaps-all riding on an unprecedented real estate bubble stimulated by their frenzy of creative finance. When the bubble burst, as bubbles do, many of these financial titans faced bankruptcy, their obligations far exceeding their assets.
The $700 billion of taxpayers' money, in the plan suggested by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, will buy enough of the toxic obligations to allow the companies to avoid bankruptcy. Not coincidentally a major beneficiary of the scheme will be the investment bank Goldman, Sachs. Mr. Paulson resigned as CEO of Goldman, Sachs to become Treasury Secretary in 2006, having amassed a personal net worth of $700 million during his 32-year tenure at the bank. (On average, $21.9 million per year.)
We need to "remove the distressed assets from the financial system," Mr. Paulson suggests. Relieved of the burden, the great Wall Street banks can then regain, presumably, their folksy function: assuring that "...money and capital flow to and from households and businesses to pay for home loans, school loans, and investments that create jobs."
For the good of the American economy, Mr. Paulson is correct that credit needs to flow and the distressed assets need to be removed. He is not correct that credit needs to flow from Goldman, Sachs and other Wall Street financial houses. And the distressed assets do not have to be assumed by the taxpayers.
There are other, far more equitable and justified ways to accomplish both.
The distressed assets-that is the losses-can and should be absorbed by the executives, directors, and stockholders of the corporate banks and other institutions that propagated the financial firestorm. They can and should, as the dictates of the free market insist, stand accountable for their actions and accept bankruptcy. It is not the responsibility of the American taxpayers to shield them.
Mr. Paulson wants to rescue Wall Street so Wall Street, he assures us, can get back to lending. That is certain to save Mr. Paulson's former firm and the others, but it is by no means certain credit will then flow to "...home loans, school loans, and investments that create jobs." The Wall Street firms are far more likely to revive their lucrative trade in complex and esoteric financial "products."
$700 billion is a lot of money. It is more than we've spent so far on the Administration's fraudulent "war on terror." (See https://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/63632/ ) Is it not better public policy to channel the money to "households and businesses" in some other, more direct, more effective, and far more reliable way?
There are hundreds if not thousands of Main Street banks and thrift institutions which played no part in the real estate securitization/derivatives game. Certainly the $700 billion could be made available to them instead, at low but positive interest. Or special publicly-held banks could be set up in statute and capitalized with the $700 billion.
The crisis is real, but there are ways to serve the nation's interests at large, and even to earn a modest return on its assets. We do not need to subsidize the failure of Wall Street and hope thereafter for better days.
The welfare of the Wall Street financiers should not be the focus of public policy, and this clever attempt by the Bush Administration is a perversion of decent governance. We should not be stampeded into the greatest corporate theft of public assets, arguably, in the nation's history. Instead, to paraphrase one of our presidential campaigns, we need to put our country first and stop Mr. Paulson dead in his tracks.