SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
What Biden Means
I was on Fox News this morning about what the Biden VP nomination means. You can watch it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2U62uk5cZs
If you don't want to watch the clip, let me summarize my thoughts
with a quick rundown of the good, bad and ugly of Biden's nomination.
Aug 23, 2008
I was on Fox News this morning about what the Biden VP nomination means. You can watch it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2U62uk5cZs
If you don't want to watch the clip, let me summarize my thoughts
with a quick rundown of the good, bad and ugly of Biden's nomination.
The Good: As the Drum Major Institute shows, Biden has a fairly
progressive record on basic economic issues, and has gotten more
progressive on specific issues like trade. He's also been a strong
voice opposing unilateral war against Iran. And rhetorically, he seems
comfortable painting a stark contrast between Democrats and Republicans
on issues.
The Bad: He is one of the most arrogant and conceited people in
Washington - one of the jokes in D.C. when I was there is that Biden
uses the term "I" more than anyone else. Because of this
self-importance, he consequently shoots his mouth off in ways that can
undermine progressives. For example, he has made insulting racial
comments about African Americans and Indians. This might not only be
dredged up by Republicans, but Biden may commit additional errors in
his new platform as VP nominee. Additionally, Biden is an insider's
insider, having spent most of his life in Washington, D.C. That doesn't
exactly underscore Obama's message of change.
The Ugly: He was one of the most ardent supporters of the credit
card-industry written Bankrupty Bill of 2005, which was one of the most
regressive pieces of economic legislation in the last generation. And
though he cites his foreign policy experience as an asset, he used his
position as one of Democrats' top foreign policy voices to support the
Iraq War.
So, all in all, the Biden choice is a shade on the good side of
mediocre, though Obama's willingness to anoint a senator who voted for
two landmark travesties - the Bankruptcy Bill and Iraq War - gives us
some disturbing clues about the Illinois senator's attitude toward the
economic progressive movement and the antiwar movement. It also shows
how much work those movements have in front of them - and how, in
particular, the antiwar movement's strategy of focusing all attention
on Republicans has actually helped create the situation whereby the
Democratic Party feels perfectly comfortable rewarding supposed Serious
Foreign Policy Voics like Biden even after they voted for the war.
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
David Sirota
David Sirota is an award-winning journalist and bestselling author living in Denver, Colorado. He was nominated for an Academy Award for his work helping create the story for the film DON'T LOOK UP, which became one of the most widely viewed movies in Netflix's history. He is the founder and editor of The Daily Poster, an editor at large at Jacobin Magazine and a columnist at The Guardian. He served as Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign speechwriter in 2020. Sirota is the author of "Back to Our Future" and "Hostile Takeover: How Big Money & Corruption Conquered Our Government--And How We Take It Back". His website: www.davidsirota.com.
I was on Fox News this morning about what the Biden VP nomination means. You can watch it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2U62uk5cZs
If you don't want to watch the clip, let me summarize my thoughts
with a quick rundown of the good, bad and ugly of Biden's nomination.
The Good: As the Drum Major Institute shows, Biden has a fairly
progressive record on basic economic issues, and has gotten more
progressive on specific issues like trade. He's also been a strong
voice opposing unilateral war against Iran. And rhetorically, he seems
comfortable painting a stark contrast between Democrats and Republicans
on issues.
The Bad: He is one of the most arrogant and conceited people in
Washington - one of the jokes in D.C. when I was there is that Biden
uses the term "I" more than anyone else. Because of this
self-importance, he consequently shoots his mouth off in ways that can
undermine progressives. For example, he has made insulting racial
comments about African Americans and Indians. This might not only be
dredged up by Republicans, but Biden may commit additional errors in
his new platform as VP nominee. Additionally, Biden is an insider's
insider, having spent most of his life in Washington, D.C. That doesn't
exactly underscore Obama's message of change.
The Ugly: He was one of the most ardent supporters of the credit
card-industry written Bankrupty Bill of 2005, which was one of the most
regressive pieces of economic legislation in the last generation. And
though he cites his foreign policy experience as an asset, he used his
position as one of Democrats' top foreign policy voices to support the
Iraq War.
So, all in all, the Biden choice is a shade on the good side of
mediocre, though Obama's willingness to anoint a senator who voted for
two landmark travesties - the Bankruptcy Bill and Iraq War - gives us
some disturbing clues about the Illinois senator's attitude toward the
economic progressive movement and the antiwar movement. It also shows
how much work those movements have in front of them - and how, in
particular, the antiwar movement's strategy of focusing all attention
on Republicans has actually helped create the situation whereby the
Democratic Party feels perfectly comfortable rewarding supposed Serious
Foreign Policy Voics like Biden even after they voted for the war.
David Sirota
David Sirota is an award-winning journalist and bestselling author living in Denver, Colorado. He was nominated for an Academy Award for his work helping create the story for the film DON'T LOOK UP, which became one of the most widely viewed movies in Netflix's history. He is the founder and editor of The Daily Poster, an editor at large at Jacobin Magazine and a columnist at The Guardian. He served as Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign speechwriter in 2020. Sirota is the author of "Back to Our Future" and "Hostile Takeover: How Big Money & Corruption Conquered Our Government--And How We Take It Back". His website: www.davidsirota.com.
I was on Fox News this morning about what the Biden VP nomination means. You can watch it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2U62uk5cZs
If you don't want to watch the clip, let me summarize my thoughts
with a quick rundown of the good, bad and ugly of Biden's nomination.
The Good: As the Drum Major Institute shows, Biden has a fairly
progressive record on basic economic issues, and has gotten more
progressive on specific issues like trade. He's also been a strong
voice opposing unilateral war against Iran. And rhetorically, he seems
comfortable painting a stark contrast between Democrats and Republicans
on issues.
The Bad: He is one of the most arrogant and conceited people in
Washington - one of the jokes in D.C. when I was there is that Biden
uses the term "I" more than anyone else. Because of this
self-importance, he consequently shoots his mouth off in ways that can
undermine progressives. For example, he has made insulting racial
comments about African Americans and Indians. This might not only be
dredged up by Republicans, but Biden may commit additional errors in
his new platform as VP nominee. Additionally, Biden is an insider's
insider, having spent most of his life in Washington, D.C. That doesn't
exactly underscore Obama's message of change.
The Ugly: He was one of the most ardent supporters of the credit
card-industry written Bankrupty Bill of 2005, which was one of the most
regressive pieces of economic legislation in the last generation. And
though he cites his foreign policy experience as an asset, he used his
position as one of Democrats' top foreign policy voices to support the
Iraq War.
So, all in all, the Biden choice is a shade on the good side of
mediocre, though Obama's willingness to anoint a senator who voted for
two landmark travesties - the Bankruptcy Bill and Iraq War - gives us
some disturbing clues about the Illinois senator's attitude toward the
economic progressive movement and the antiwar movement. It also shows
how much work those movements have in front of them - and how, in
particular, the antiwar movement's strategy of focusing all attention
on Republicans has actually helped create the situation whereby the
Democratic Party feels perfectly comfortable rewarding supposed Serious
Foreign Policy Voics like Biden even after they voted for the war.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.