SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Does William Kristol really need another platform?
He's the co-founder and editor of the Weekly Standard, which Rupert Murdoch owns.
For years, he's been all over the airwaves, first on ABC's Sunday morning talk show and then on Fox.
And he's been, until recently, a columnist for Time magazine.
So why does the Times want him?
In its December 30 announcement, the Times noted that in the mid-1990s, "Kristol led the Project for the Republican Future." But the Times failed to note another, much more important project that he led: The Project for a New American Century, which did so much to pave the way for Bush's Iraq War.
At the Weekly Standard and through the Project for a New American Century, Kristol kept promoting specious claims about the threat from Iraq. And still today he wants war with Iran.
His role in domestic politics is no better. He was instrumental in torpedoing the Clinton health care plan. In December 1993, he circulated a strategy document among Republicans to kill the Clinton plan because it would strengthen the Democrats' base of support among the middle class. The next month, he urged Republicans to take the stance that "there is no health care crisis."
So why the Times feels any obligation to give someone so disreputable a perch on its paper is beyond me.
And it shows a certain lack of institutional self-respect, as well. "Mr. Kristol, 55, has been a fierce critic of the Times," the paper noted in its announcement. "In 2006, he said that the government should consider prosecuting the Times for disclosing a secret government program to track international banking transactions." He also, the announcement added, said the Times was "irredeemable."
So why has the Times coronated this unscrupulous neocon and enemy of the paper?
It's a bad omen for 2008.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Does William Kristol really need another platform?
He's the co-founder and editor of the Weekly Standard, which Rupert Murdoch owns.
For years, he's been all over the airwaves, first on ABC's Sunday morning talk show and then on Fox.
And he's been, until recently, a columnist for Time magazine.
So why does the Times want him?
In its December 30 announcement, the Times noted that in the mid-1990s, "Kristol led the Project for the Republican Future." But the Times failed to note another, much more important project that he led: The Project for a New American Century, which did so much to pave the way for Bush's Iraq War.
At the Weekly Standard and through the Project for a New American Century, Kristol kept promoting specious claims about the threat from Iraq. And still today he wants war with Iran.
His role in domestic politics is no better. He was instrumental in torpedoing the Clinton health care plan. In December 1993, he circulated a strategy document among Republicans to kill the Clinton plan because it would strengthen the Democrats' base of support among the middle class. The next month, he urged Republicans to take the stance that "there is no health care crisis."
So why the Times feels any obligation to give someone so disreputable a perch on its paper is beyond me.
And it shows a certain lack of institutional self-respect, as well. "Mr. Kristol, 55, has been a fierce critic of the Times," the paper noted in its announcement. "In 2006, he said that the government should consider prosecuting the Times for disclosing a secret government program to track international banking transactions." He also, the announcement added, said the Times was "irredeemable."
So why has the Times coronated this unscrupulous neocon and enemy of the paper?
It's a bad omen for 2008.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
Does William Kristol really need another platform?
He's the co-founder and editor of the Weekly Standard, which Rupert Murdoch owns.
For years, he's been all over the airwaves, first on ABC's Sunday morning talk show and then on Fox.
And he's been, until recently, a columnist for Time magazine.
So why does the Times want him?
In its December 30 announcement, the Times noted that in the mid-1990s, "Kristol led the Project for the Republican Future." But the Times failed to note another, much more important project that he led: The Project for a New American Century, which did so much to pave the way for Bush's Iraq War.
At the Weekly Standard and through the Project for a New American Century, Kristol kept promoting specious claims about the threat from Iraq. And still today he wants war with Iran.
His role in domestic politics is no better. He was instrumental in torpedoing the Clinton health care plan. In December 1993, he circulated a strategy document among Republicans to kill the Clinton plan because it would strengthen the Democrats' base of support among the middle class. The next month, he urged Republicans to take the stance that "there is no health care crisis."
So why the Times feels any obligation to give someone so disreputable a perch on its paper is beyond me.
And it shows a certain lack of institutional self-respect, as well. "Mr. Kristol, 55, has been a fierce critic of the Times," the paper noted in its announcement. "In 2006, he said that the government should consider prosecuting the Times for disclosing a secret government program to track international banking transactions." He also, the announcement added, said the Times was "irredeemable."
So why has the Times coronated this unscrupulous neocon and enemy of the paper?
It's a bad omen for 2008.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive