SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
I'd been waiting for the old John Conyers to reappear.
Conyers rightfully brags about being a leader in the movement to impeach Richard Nixon back in the day.
And in the last Congressional term, before the Democrats took over, Conyers introduced a bill to explore grounds for impeaching Bush. He explained to Lewis Lapham of Harper's in early 2006 why he was doing so:
" 'To take away the excuse,' he said, 'that we didn't know.' So that two or four or ten years from now, if somebody should ask, 'Where were you, Conyers, and where was the United States Congress?' when the Bush Administration declared the Constitution inoperative and revoked the license of parliamentary government, none of the company now present can plead ignorance or temporary insanity, can say that 'somehow it escaped our notice' that the President was setting himself up as a supreme leader exempt from the rule of law."
Well, this old John Conyers made a cameo on Tuesday at a town hall meeting in Detroit.
Now the head of the House Judiciary Committee, he finally declared his independence from Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the urgent question of impeachment.
According to rawstory.com, Conyers said: "Nancy Pelosi has impeachment 'off the table,' but that's off her table. It is not off John Conyers's table."
That's a relief, since I thought Pelosi had permanently gagged Conyers on the subject.
Not anymore.
Nancy Pelosi, he said, "cannot prevent me from introducing an impeachment resolution."
He added: "I want you to know that I have no reticence, no reluctance, no hesitation to use the tool of impeachment . . . whenever I feel that it is appropriate."
So what's his hesitation now?
And when is a more appropriate time than now, after all the crimes Bush and Cheney have already committed?
When is a more appropriate time than now, just as they are about to commit another heinous one, by illegally attacking Iran?
Under pressure from Cindy Sheehan and other impeachment activists, the old John Conyers this week put his toes back in the impeachment pool.
It's time now for him to dive right in.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
I'd been waiting for the old John Conyers to reappear.
Conyers rightfully brags about being a leader in the movement to impeach Richard Nixon back in the day.
And in the last Congressional term, before the Democrats took over, Conyers introduced a bill to explore grounds for impeaching Bush. He explained to Lewis Lapham of Harper's in early 2006 why he was doing so:
" 'To take away the excuse,' he said, 'that we didn't know.' So that two or four or ten years from now, if somebody should ask, 'Where were you, Conyers, and where was the United States Congress?' when the Bush Administration declared the Constitution inoperative and revoked the license of parliamentary government, none of the company now present can plead ignorance or temporary insanity, can say that 'somehow it escaped our notice' that the President was setting himself up as a supreme leader exempt from the rule of law."
Well, this old John Conyers made a cameo on Tuesday at a town hall meeting in Detroit.
Now the head of the House Judiciary Committee, he finally declared his independence from Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the urgent question of impeachment.
According to rawstory.com, Conyers said: "Nancy Pelosi has impeachment 'off the table,' but that's off her table. It is not off John Conyers's table."
That's a relief, since I thought Pelosi had permanently gagged Conyers on the subject.
Not anymore.
Nancy Pelosi, he said, "cannot prevent me from introducing an impeachment resolution."
He added: "I want you to know that I have no reticence, no reluctance, no hesitation to use the tool of impeachment . . . whenever I feel that it is appropriate."
So what's his hesitation now?
And when is a more appropriate time than now, after all the crimes Bush and Cheney have already committed?
When is a more appropriate time than now, just as they are about to commit another heinous one, by illegally attacking Iran?
Under pressure from Cindy Sheehan and other impeachment activists, the old John Conyers this week put his toes back in the impeachment pool.
It's time now for him to dive right in.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
I'd been waiting for the old John Conyers to reappear.
Conyers rightfully brags about being a leader in the movement to impeach Richard Nixon back in the day.
And in the last Congressional term, before the Democrats took over, Conyers introduced a bill to explore grounds for impeaching Bush. He explained to Lewis Lapham of Harper's in early 2006 why he was doing so:
" 'To take away the excuse,' he said, 'that we didn't know.' So that two or four or ten years from now, if somebody should ask, 'Where were you, Conyers, and where was the United States Congress?' when the Bush Administration declared the Constitution inoperative and revoked the license of parliamentary government, none of the company now present can plead ignorance or temporary insanity, can say that 'somehow it escaped our notice' that the President was setting himself up as a supreme leader exempt from the rule of law."
Well, this old John Conyers made a cameo on Tuesday at a town hall meeting in Detroit.
Now the head of the House Judiciary Committee, he finally declared his independence from Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the urgent question of impeachment.
According to rawstory.com, Conyers said: "Nancy Pelosi has impeachment 'off the table,' but that's off her table. It is not off John Conyers's table."
That's a relief, since I thought Pelosi had permanently gagged Conyers on the subject.
Not anymore.
Nancy Pelosi, he said, "cannot prevent me from introducing an impeachment resolution."
He added: "I want you to know that I have no reticence, no reluctance, no hesitation to use the tool of impeachment . . . whenever I feel that it is appropriate."
So what's his hesitation now?
And when is a more appropriate time than now, after all the crimes Bush and Cheney have already committed?
When is a more appropriate time than now, just as they are about to commit another heinous one, by illegally attacking Iran?
Under pressure from Cindy Sheehan and other impeachment activists, the old John Conyers this week put his toes back in the impeachment pool.
It's time now for him to dive right in.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive