A Cameo by the Old John Conyers
I'd been waiting for the old John Conyers to reappear.
Conyers rightfully brags about being a leader in the movement to impeach Richard Nixon back in the day.
And in the last Congressional term, before the Democrats took over, Conyers introduced a bill to explore grounds for impeaching Bush. He explained to Lewis Lapham of Harper's in early 2006 why he was doing so:
" 'To take away the excuse,' he said, 'that we didn't know.' So that two or four or ten years from now, if somebody should ask, 'Where were you, Conyers, and where was the United States Congress?' when the Bush Administration declared the Constitution inoperative and revoked the license of parliamentary government, none of the company now present can plead ignorance or temporary insanity, can say that 'somehow it escaped our notice' that the President was setting himself up as a supreme leader exempt from the rule of law."
Well, this old John Conyers made a cameo on Tuesday at a town hall meeting in Detroit.
Now the head of the House Judiciary Committee, he finally declared his independence from Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the urgent question of impeachment.
According to rawstory.com, Conyers said: "Nancy Pelosi has impeachment 'off the table,' but that's off her table. It is not off John Conyers's table."
That's a relief, since I thought Pelosi had permanently gagged Conyers on the subject.
Not anymore.
Nancy Pelosi, he said, "cannot prevent me from introducing an impeachment resolution."
He added: "I want you to know that I have no reticence, no reluctance, no hesitation to use the tool of impeachment . . . whenever I feel that it is appropriate."
So what's his hesitation now?
And when is a more appropriate time than now, after all the crimes Bush and Cheney have already committed?
When is a more appropriate time than now, just as they are about to commit another heinous one, by illegally attacking Iran?
Under pressure from Cindy Sheehan and other impeachment activists, the old John Conyers this week put his toes back in the impeachment pool.
It's time now for him to dive right in.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
I'd been waiting for the old John Conyers to reappear.
Conyers rightfully brags about being a leader in the movement to impeach Richard Nixon back in the day.
And in the last Congressional term, before the Democrats took over, Conyers introduced a bill to explore grounds for impeaching Bush. He explained to Lewis Lapham of Harper's in early 2006 why he was doing so:
" 'To take away the excuse,' he said, 'that we didn't know.' So that two or four or ten years from now, if somebody should ask, 'Where were you, Conyers, and where was the United States Congress?' when the Bush Administration declared the Constitution inoperative and revoked the license of parliamentary government, none of the company now present can plead ignorance or temporary insanity, can say that 'somehow it escaped our notice' that the President was setting himself up as a supreme leader exempt from the rule of law."
Well, this old John Conyers made a cameo on Tuesday at a town hall meeting in Detroit.
Now the head of the House Judiciary Committee, he finally declared his independence from Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the urgent question of impeachment.
According to rawstory.com, Conyers said: "Nancy Pelosi has impeachment 'off the table,' but that's off her table. It is not off John Conyers's table."
That's a relief, since I thought Pelosi had permanently gagged Conyers on the subject.
Not anymore.
Nancy Pelosi, he said, "cannot prevent me from introducing an impeachment resolution."
He added: "I want you to know that I have no reticence, no reluctance, no hesitation to use the tool of impeachment . . . whenever I feel that it is appropriate."
So what's his hesitation now?
And when is a more appropriate time than now, after all the crimes Bush and Cheney have already committed?
When is a more appropriate time than now, just as they are about to commit another heinous one, by illegally attacking Iran?
Under pressure from Cindy Sheehan and other impeachment activists, the old John Conyers this week put his toes back in the impeachment pool.
It's time now for him to dive right in.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
I'd been waiting for the old John Conyers to reappear.
Conyers rightfully brags about being a leader in the movement to impeach Richard Nixon back in the day.
And in the last Congressional term, before the Democrats took over, Conyers introduced a bill to explore grounds for impeaching Bush. He explained to Lewis Lapham of Harper's in early 2006 why he was doing so:
" 'To take away the excuse,' he said, 'that we didn't know.' So that two or four or ten years from now, if somebody should ask, 'Where were you, Conyers, and where was the United States Congress?' when the Bush Administration declared the Constitution inoperative and revoked the license of parliamentary government, none of the company now present can plead ignorance or temporary insanity, can say that 'somehow it escaped our notice' that the President was setting himself up as a supreme leader exempt from the rule of law."
Well, this old John Conyers made a cameo on Tuesday at a town hall meeting in Detroit.
Now the head of the House Judiciary Committee, he finally declared his independence from Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the urgent question of impeachment.
According to rawstory.com, Conyers said: "Nancy Pelosi has impeachment 'off the table,' but that's off her table. It is not off John Conyers's table."
That's a relief, since I thought Pelosi had permanently gagged Conyers on the subject.
Not anymore.
Nancy Pelosi, he said, "cannot prevent me from introducing an impeachment resolution."
He added: "I want you to know that I have no reticence, no reluctance, no hesitation to use the tool of impeachment . . . whenever I feel that it is appropriate."
So what's his hesitation now?
And when is a more appropriate time than now, after all the crimes Bush and Cheney have already committed?
When is a more appropriate time than now, just as they are about to commit another heinous one, by illegally attacking Iran?
Under pressure from Cindy Sheehan and other impeachment activists, the old John Conyers this week put his toes back in the impeachment pool.
It's time now for him to dive right in.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive