SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Corporate Crime Excised from the American Mainstream
Jul 06, 2007
On February 27, 2007, the Wall Street Journal ran a story under the following headline:"Korean Court Aids Push to Curb Corporate Crime."
What is so unusual about this headline?
What is so unusual is that the term "corporate crime" is rarely used by mainstream American newspapers in headlines.
It is rarely used in headlines.
It is rarely used in text.
It is rarely used.
Period.
If the story is about corporate crime in the United States, "corporate crime" is replaced by the more benign "white collar crime."
But mostly, if the mainstream American press uses the term "corporate crime," it is used to refer to corporate crime committed by foreign companies.
Otherwise, the term is rarely used in this country.
A database survey of major American news outlets found that in the first six months of 2007, the term "corporate crime" was used in news reports around the world 861 times.
Of the 861 references, only 57 (6 percent) were carried in stories published by U.S. news outlets.
And of those 57, fourteen were references to Corporate Crime Reporter.
The remaining 800 or so stories were published by foreign news outlets, primarily in Australia, East Asia, and Europe. (The survey did not count U.S. blog references.)
"We don't want to admit that the corporations that bring us the luxuries we love also commit heinous criminal acts," said Russell Mokhiber, editor of Corporate Crime Reporter. "So, we excise it from our consciousness. Don't look behind the curtain. That big giant American corporation isn't committing a crime. Only South Koreans do it."
Mokhiber said that there is little evidence to support the belief that the corporate crime wave of the past couple of years has abated.
"Most corporate crime defense attorneys will readily admit that in today's environment, we can have as much corporate crime as we can prosecute," Mokhiber said. "When there is a will, there is a way - to corporate conviction."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Russell Mokhiber
Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime Reporter. He is also founder of singlepayeraction.org, and editor of the website Morgan County USA.
On February 27, 2007, the Wall Street Journal ran a story under the following headline:"Korean Court Aids Push to Curb Corporate Crime."
What is so unusual about this headline?
What is so unusual is that the term "corporate crime" is rarely used by mainstream American newspapers in headlines.
It is rarely used in headlines.
It is rarely used in text.
It is rarely used.
Period.
If the story is about corporate crime in the United States, "corporate crime" is replaced by the more benign "white collar crime."
But mostly, if the mainstream American press uses the term "corporate crime," it is used to refer to corporate crime committed by foreign companies.
Otherwise, the term is rarely used in this country.
A database survey of major American news outlets found that in the first six months of 2007, the term "corporate crime" was used in news reports around the world 861 times.
Of the 861 references, only 57 (6 percent) were carried in stories published by U.S. news outlets.
And of those 57, fourteen were references to Corporate Crime Reporter.
The remaining 800 or so stories were published by foreign news outlets, primarily in Australia, East Asia, and Europe. (The survey did not count U.S. blog references.)
"We don't want to admit that the corporations that bring us the luxuries we love also commit heinous criminal acts," said Russell Mokhiber, editor of Corporate Crime Reporter. "So, we excise it from our consciousness. Don't look behind the curtain. That big giant American corporation isn't committing a crime. Only South Koreans do it."
Mokhiber said that there is little evidence to support the belief that the corporate crime wave of the past couple of years has abated.
"Most corporate crime defense attorneys will readily admit that in today's environment, we can have as much corporate crime as we can prosecute," Mokhiber said. "When there is a will, there is a way - to corporate conviction."
Russell Mokhiber
Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime Reporter. He is also founder of singlepayeraction.org, and editor of the website Morgan County USA.
On February 27, 2007, the Wall Street Journal ran a story under the following headline:"Korean Court Aids Push to Curb Corporate Crime."
What is so unusual about this headline?
What is so unusual is that the term "corporate crime" is rarely used by mainstream American newspapers in headlines.
It is rarely used in headlines.
It is rarely used in text.
It is rarely used.
Period.
If the story is about corporate crime in the United States, "corporate crime" is replaced by the more benign "white collar crime."
But mostly, if the mainstream American press uses the term "corporate crime," it is used to refer to corporate crime committed by foreign companies.
Otherwise, the term is rarely used in this country.
A database survey of major American news outlets found that in the first six months of 2007, the term "corporate crime" was used in news reports around the world 861 times.
Of the 861 references, only 57 (6 percent) were carried in stories published by U.S. news outlets.
And of those 57, fourteen were references to Corporate Crime Reporter.
The remaining 800 or so stories were published by foreign news outlets, primarily in Australia, East Asia, and Europe. (The survey did not count U.S. blog references.)
"We don't want to admit that the corporations that bring us the luxuries we love also commit heinous criminal acts," said Russell Mokhiber, editor of Corporate Crime Reporter. "So, we excise it from our consciousness. Don't look behind the curtain. That big giant American corporation isn't committing a crime. Only South Koreans do it."
Mokhiber said that there is little evidence to support the belief that the corporate crime wave of the past couple of years has abated.
"Most corporate crime defense attorneys will readily admit that in today's environment, we can have as much corporate crime as we can prosecute," Mokhiber said. "When there is a will, there is a way - to corporate conviction."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.