Corporate Crime Excised from the American Mainstream
On February 27, 2007, the Wall Street Journal ran a story under the following headline:"Korean Court Aids Push to Curb Corporate Crime."
What is so unusual about this headline?
What is so unusual is that the term "corporate crime" is rarely used by mainstream American newspapers in headlines.
It is rarely used in headlines.
It is rarely used in text.
It is rarely used.
Period.
If the story is about corporate crime in the United States, "corporate crime" is replaced by the more benign "white collar crime."
But mostly, if the mainstream American press uses the term "corporate crime," it is used to refer to corporate crime committed by foreign companies.
Otherwise, the term is rarely used in this country.
A database survey of major American news outlets found that in the first six months of 2007, the term "corporate crime" was used in news reports around the world 861 times.
Of the 861 references, only 57 (6 percent) were carried in stories published by U.S. news outlets.
And of those 57, fourteen were references to Corporate Crime Reporter.
The remaining 800 or so stories were published by foreign news outlets, primarily in Australia, East Asia, and Europe. (The survey did not count U.S. blog references.)
"We don't want to admit that the corporations that bring us the luxuries we love also commit heinous criminal acts," said Russell Mokhiber, editor of Corporate Crime Reporter. "So, we excise it from our consciousness. Don't look behind the curtain. That big giant American corporation isn't committing a crime. Only South Koreans do it."
Mokhiber said that there is little evidence to support the belief that the corporate crime wave of the past couple of years has abated.
"Most corporate crime defense attorneys will readily admit that in today's environment, we can have as much corporate crime as we can prosecute," Mokhiber said. "When there is a will, there is a way - to corporate conviction."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
On February 27, 2007, the Wall Street Journal ran a story under the following headline:"Korean Court Aids Push to Curb Corporate Crime."
What is so unusual about this headline?
What is so unusual is that the term "corporate crime" is rarely used by mainstream American newspapers in headlines.
It is rarely used in headlines.
It is rarely used in text.
It is rarely used.
Period.
If the story is about corporate crime in the United States, "corporate crime" is replaced by the more benign "white collar crime."
But mostly, if the mainstream American press uses the term "corporate crime," it is used to refer to corporate crime committed by foreign companies.
Otherwise, the term is rarely used in this country.
A database survey of major American news outlets found that in the first six months of 2007, the term "corporate crime" was used in news reports around the world 861 times.
Of the 861 references, only 57 (6 percent) were carried in stories published by U.S. news outlets.
And of those 57, fourteen were references to Corporate Crime Reporter.
The remaining 800 or so stories were published by foreign news outlets, primarily in Australia, East Asia, and Europe. (The survey did not count U.S. blog references.)
"We don't want to admit that the corporations that bring us the luxuries we love also commit heinous criminal acts," said Russell Mokhiber, editor of Corporate Crime Reporter. "So, we excise it from our consciousness. Don't look behind the curtain. That big giant American corporation isn't committing a crime. Only South Koreans do it."
Mokhiber said that there is little evidence to support the belief that the corporate crime wave of the past couple of years has abated.
"Most corporate crime defense attorneys will readily admit that in today's environment, we can have as much corporate crime as we can prosecute," Mokhiber said. "When there is a will, there is a way - to corporate conviction."
On February 27, 2007, the Wall Street Journal ran a story under the following headline:"Korean Court Aids Push to Curb Corporate Crime."
What is so unusual about this headline?
What is so unusual is that the term "corporate crime" is rarely used by mainstream American newspapers in headlines.
It is rarely used in headlines.
It is rarely used in text.
It is rarely used.
Period.
If the story is about corporate crime in the United States, "corporate crime" is replaced by the more benign "white collar crime."
But mostly, if the mainstream American press uses the term "corporate crime," it is used to refer to corporate crime committed by foreign companies.
Otherwise, the term is rarely used in this country.
A database survey of major American news outlets found that in the first six months of 2007, the term "corporate crime" was used in news reports around the world 861 times.
Of the 861 references, only 57 (6 percent) were carried in stories published by U.S. news outlets.
And of those 57, fourteen were references to Corporate Crime Reporter.
The remaining 800 or so stories were published by foreign news outlets, primarily in Australia, East Asia, and Europe. (The survey did not count U.S. blog references.)
"We don't want to admit that the corporations that bring us the luxuries we love also commit heinous criminal acts," said Russell Mokhiber, editor of Corporate Crime Reporter. "So, we excise it from our consciousness. Don't look behind the curtain. That big giant American corporation isn't committing a crime. Only South Koreans do it."
Mokhiber said that there is little evidence to support the belief that the corporate crime wave of the past couple of years has abated.
"Most corporate crime defense attorneys will readily admit that in today's environment, we can have as much corporate crime as we can prosecute," Mokhiber said. "When there is a will, there is a way - to corporate conviction."