

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"In the dark times that we are living in now," said the preeminent scientist, "if people don't have hope, we're doomed."
In her final months, renowned conservationist and scientist Jane Goodall secretly sat down for an interview with producers of a newly greenlit show for Netflix—with an agreement in place that the content of the discussion wouldn't be shared publicly until after her death.
The interview turned out to be the first episode of "Famous Last Words," which was released last Friday—two days after Goodall's death at the age of 91.
Goodall used the interview as an opportunity to reflect on her life and work as a groundbreaking primatologist, to send a message of hope to those left on "this beautiful planet Earth," and to unload her deep dissatisfaction with some of the world's most powerful people.
When asked by producer Brad Falchuk whether there was anyone she did not like, Goodall at first did not name names, but said there were "absolutely" people whom she would like to put on one of SpaceX CEO Elon Musk's spaceships, "and send them all off to the planet he's sure he's going to discover."
"Would he be one of them?" Falchuk pressed.
Goodall replied that Musk, the world's richest person and a megadonor to US President Donald Trump, would "host" the expedition, with Trump among the passengers.
Earlier this year, Dr. Jane Goodall sat down for an interview for Brad Falchuk’s new Netflix series, Famous Last Words.
The premise of the series is to interview people on the condition that the interview not air until the subject has passed away. pic.twitter.com/jzhLqRtpQP
— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) October 5, 2025
"And then I would put [Russian President Vladimir Putin] in there and I would put President Xi [Jinping of China]," said Goodall. "I'd certainly put [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu in there and his far-right government. Put them all on that spaceship and send them off."
The interview was filmed amid compounding global crises that are still ongoing—the climate emergency; Western governments' allegiance to and capture by corporations and the ultrarich, including fossil fuel giants that continue to threaten Earth with planet-heating emissions; worsening global inequality; and violent conflicts like Israel's bombardment and starvation of Palestinians in Gaza.
But Goodall urged viewers to resist giving in to a feeling of hopelessness, which would cause them to "become apathetic and do nothing."
Describing herself as "somebody sent to this world to try to give people hope in dark times," Goodall warned:
In the dark times that we are living in now, if people don't have hope, we're doomed, and how can we bring little children into this dark world we've created and let them be surrounded by people who have given up? So even if this is the end of humanity as we know it, let's fight to the very end. Let's let the children know that there is hope if they get together.
"Even if it becomes impossible," she said, "for anybody, it's better to go on fighting to the end than to just give up and say, 'Okay.'"
She added that everyone on Earth "has a role to play."
"Your life matters and you are here for a reason," said Goodall. "Every single day you live, you make a difference in the world and you get to choose the difference that you make."
But the message Goodall wished to send to the world "above all," she said, was that "when we're on planet Earth, we are part of Mother Nature."
"We depend on Mother Nature for clean air, for water, for food, for clothing, for everything," she said. "And as we destroy one ecosystem after another, as we create worse climate change, worse loss of diversity, we have to do everything in our power to make the world a better place for the children alive today and for those that will follow."
"Don't give up. There is a future for you," she said. "Do your best while you're still on this beautiful planet Earth that I look down upon from where I am now."
Scientists, climate advocates, and political leaders were among those who shared an outpouring of gratitude and mourning last week when Goodall's death from natural causes was announced.
Goodall's pioneering work with chimpanzees led to greater understanding of the primates, other species, biodiversity, and the need to protect the natural world.
“Jane Goodall was fearless in all things," Falchuk told Variety as the episode was released. "She deeply loved humanity and the natural world. It was clear to me in our conversation that she was approaching her final adventure with the same fearlessness, hope, humor, and joy that she approached everything else in life. She was one of the world’s greatest and most beloved champions of good."
The world has lost one of the best of us. The animals have lost one of their greatest allies to have ever lived. We in the humane education movement have lost a groundbreaking advocate, and, for so many of us, a role model.
When I was a child growing up in the 60s and 70s, watching National Geographic specials on TV, I wanted to be Jane Goodall. Not like her. Her. I could imagine no better life than observing and learning about chimpanzees.
But only Jane Goodall could be Jane Goodall, and I eventually fell into a more traditional path, even going to law school. That didn’t last long. I dropped out by Thanksgiving; read a book by a scientist who taught a chimp named Sarah to communicate through symbolic language; and, with Jane Goodall in mind, went to volunteer in his lab.
When I got there, I was introduced to Sarah. She was isolated in an enclosure, no longer willing to participate in language studies, and prone to temper tantrums. I was advised to keep my distance. The next day, I visited her by myself and felt moved to twirl my finger in the air and say: “Turn around, and I’ll scratch your back.” Sure enough, Sarah turned around, sank down to the floor, and pressed her back against the bars of the cage so I could do so.
“What would Jane think?” I asked myself. I imagined that she would be both angry and heartbroken if she could witness Sarah’s diminished and miserable life. I left that lab a few weeks later. Shortly after that, I discovered my life’s work: humane education.
Most of all, she left us hope, something she talked about frequently, reminding us that hope is generated by our individual and collective acts of positive change.
Little did I know that Jane was about to leave her scientific career behind to be a humane educator herself, realizing with such profound resolve that she needed to try to protect chimps and other animals, vulnerable human communities, and the ecosystems that sustain us all, and the best way to do this was through education. She created Roots and Shoots, a humane education program that has impacted millions of children across the globe. Then she went on to become the most famous, respected, and influential humane educator in the world. Most people probably wouldn’t know to use the term humane educator in association with her. The New York Times’ remembrances of her in the past twenty-four hours didn’t use it, but humane education is exactly what she spent the last half-century of her life doing.
Jane Goodall traveled approximately 300 days out of the year, tirelessly teaching about how we can build a humane, regenerative, peaceable world for animals, people, and the environment. She was on a speaking tour when she died on Oct. 1, 2025, at the age of 91. She was brilliant, kind, funny, and dedicated beyond measure to the work of teaching and spreading a message of compassion in action.
I got to meet Jane a couple of times and speak alongside her, including on the same keynote stage at a humane education conference that the Institute for Humane Education co-led with Roots and Shoots and HEART. Jane’s blurb of my book The World Becomes What We Teach: Educating a Generation of Solutionaries is the primary reason the book became a #1 best seller on Amazon in the philosophy and social aspects of education, and it was among the greatest honors of my life that she wrote the foreword to my recent book, The Solutionary Way. She shared an essay I wrote on her social media, garnering tens of thousands of views. For all I know, you may be reading this because Jane propelled our humane education work forward.
It was a dream come true that I got to publicly share with Jane and the world just how much she meant to me. Apple TV+ launched its programming with the “Dear…” series, highlighting global icons through the people they’d influenced. “Dear Jane” was episode seven, and I was one of those people. I got to tell Jane just how much she had meant to me and how she had shaped my life. I got to thank her.
The world has lost one of the best of us. The animals have lost one of their greatest allies to have ever lived. We in the humane education movement have lost a groundbreaking advocate, and, for so many of us, a role model. But Jane left us everything we need to carry on her legacy. She left us Roots and Shoots, a humane education program any of us can implement; countless videos to learn from; books and stories to read and put into practice in our lives and to spread through our own efforts as humane educators and changemakers. Most of all, she left us hope, something she talked about frequently, reminding us that hope is generated by our individual and collective acts of positive change.
Jane once wrote: “You cannot get through a single day without having an impact on the world around you. What you do makes a difference, and you have to decide what kind of difference you want to make.”
Millions have been impacted by Jane Goodall. Countless people have experienced the joy and honor of hearing her speak and meeting her, and they have their own stories to tell about how she affected them. I hope we’ll all tell our stories. And if Jane Goodall impacted you; if you are heartbroken about her passing, I hope you’ll ask yourself what kind of difference you want to make and then go make that difference. Imagine the world we could create if we all did that.
"Jane Goodall was the best of us. May she rest peacefully, as we carry on."
Legendary English conservationist and primatologist Jane Goodall died Wednesday at the age of 91, eliciting a flood of remembrances from fellow scientists, activists, politicians, and fans of her decades of dedication to protecting the natural world.
Goodall died of natural causes in Los Angeles, California, while on a US speaking tour, according to the Jane Goodall Institute.
"Dr. Goodall's life and work not only made an indelible mark on our understanding of chimpanzees and other species, but also of humankind and the environments we all share," the institute said. "She inspired curiosity, hope, and compassion in countless people around the world, and paved the way for many others—particularly young people who gave her hope for the future."
"In 1960 Dr. Goodall established the longest-running wild chimpanzee study in Gombe National Park, Tanzania, which continues to this day," the institute continued. Footage from her early research in Africa was featured in the 2017 documentary Jane.
"She inspired curiosity, hope, and compassion in countless people around the world, and paved the way for many others—particularly young people who gave her hope for the future."
"She pioneered and sustained the Jane Goodall Institute's community-centered conservation initiatives across the chimpanzee range for over four decades," the organization added. "Her legacy includes the creation of JGI's international environmental and humanitarian youth program Roots & Shoots, which is actively driving change in 75 countries and counting around the world."
Social media networks swiftly filled with posts honoring Goodall as a "childhood hero," "patient, passionate revolutionary," and "incredible force for good" whose "love and knowledge and care with animals like chimpanzees helped us all transcend the too often vicious human world."

Abigail Ruth Freeman, director of Science for Society at Research Ireland, wrote on social media Wednesday: "Such a loss for humanity. Her work showed us that traits we conveniently ascribe to humans only are widespread in other animals. That they deserve more respect and compassion, and we could use a little more humility."
The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund said that "we are deeply saddened by the passing of Dr. Jane Goodall, a groundbreaking primatologist and tireless conservationist. Her pioneering work with chimpanzees transformed our understanding of the species, and her lifelong advocacy inspired generations to protect wildlife and their habitats. Her legacy will continue to guide and inspire all of us in the fight to conserve our planet's precious species."
Goodall was named a United Nations messenger of peace in 2002. Highlighting that honor, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said that he was also "deeply saddened" to learn of her passing, adding: "She is leaving an extraordinary legacy for humanity and our planet. I'm grateful for her lifelong environmental protection efforts and her strong support for the UN."
Author and former US political candidate Marianne Williamson said: "For millions of us she was the consummate role model. Few people have left an imprint on the world of such beauty and significance. A huge spirit was here with us. May she rest in eternal bliss."

American journalist Yashar Ali wrote on his website that "few other people have had an impact on my life like Dr. Goodall."
"Because of her, countless women have pursued careers in biology, ecology, conservation, and other fields in STEM," Ali added. "Over the years, as I have traveled through the world and met some of the most prominent women in all areas of conservation and environmental sciences, all but a few told me they were inspired to get into their field by Jane Goodall's example."
Jane Goodall has died. She devoted her life to advocacy on behalf of chimpanzees and, after living among them,shared valuable insight into their lives. She advocated too for the wellbeing of other primates and the environmentShe has been a magnificent inspiration. Thank you Jane Goodall ♥️🙏🏽♥️
[image or embed]
— Mia Farrow (@miafarrow.bsky.social) October 1, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Some people shared their personal experiences with Goodall. American reporter Leigh Giangreco recalled that "Jane Goodall was one of my first ever interviews as a college journalist, and she had an immense respect for young people, I remember she wanted to hear from us specifically. I will never forget her discoveries or her empathy."
Scottish broadcaster Nicky Campbell said: "We have lost one of the greatest naturalists, zoologists, and activists. A great woman. I had the pleasure of meeting Jane Goodall. I was in awe of her. I will forever be in awe. She gave us so much. She gave her beloved chimps so much. She helped us understand them. And thereby understand ourselves. May this gentle, kind, wise, and wonderful woman rest in peace."
US Congressman Cory Booker (D-NJ) recorded a video about his experience meeting the renowned conservationist.
Thank you Jane Goodall for a lasting legacy of conservation, service to all of us, and for always being brave.
[image or embed]
— Cory Booker (@corybooker.com) October 1, 2025 at 2:46 PM
The US group 314 Action, which works to elect scientists and doctors, pointed out that just last week, its president, Shaughnessy Naughton, "was in the same room with Jane at Climate Week as she continued her lifetime of advocacy, until the very end."
"Jane Goodall was the best of us," the organization added. "May she rest peacefully, as we carry on."
"As long as non-human primates are used in scientific experiments, we are morally obligated to provide them with sufficient social conditions that ensure their emotional wellbeing," one researcher argued.
Hundreds of scientists, doctors, and academics from around the world—including renowned primatologist Jane Goodall—on Wednesday urged the U.S. National Institutes of Health to review and ultimately end funding for "cruel experiments" on non-human primates at Harvard University.
In a letter led by Harvard Law School's Animal Law & Policy Clinic and the Wild Minds Lab at the University of St. Andrews School of Psychology and Neuroscience in the United Kingdom, 380 signatories urge senior National Institutes of Health officials to "review the protocols and justifications" related to the "funding of unethical experiments on macaque monkeys and other non-human primates taking place at Harvard Medical School."
As the letter details:
An NIH-funded Harvard Medical School lab run by neurobiologist Dr. Margaret S. Livingstone has used infant macaque monkeys to study visual recognition by depriving them of the ability to see faces, either by sewing their eyes shut or by requiring staff to wear welders’ masks around them. In some cases, the lab implants electrode arrays into the monkeys' brains.
By design, these experiments require maternal deprivation—a fact that drew the ire of scientists last fall, when Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) published an Inaugural Article by Dr. Livingstone entitled Triggers for Mother Love. The article describes the lab's practice of taking infant macaques from their mothers shortly after birth and attempting to appease the mothers' distress by giving them plush toys as "surrogate infants."
"As a primatologist with decades of experience in the field, I can say with complete confidence that we know that infant primates and their mothers suffer greatly when they are separated. We also know that depriving infants of the ability to see faces will have adverse impacts on their brain and eye development," Richard Wrangham, an anthropologist and primatologist at Harvard, said in a statement.
"Taking infant monkeys from their mothers to use in invasive brain experiments could only be justified by expectations of extraordinarily important benefits for the monkeys themselves, or for humans," he added. "Because that high ethical bar has not been met, I see no legitimate need for any such research."
"These studies fail on both scientific and ethical grounds."
Catherine Hobaiter, the principal investigator at Wild Minds Lab, asserted that "these studies fail on both scientific and ethical grounds."
"The doublethink argument that maternally separated individuals represent appropriate models for conditions such as anxiety, while arguing these methods do not cause significant distress, is fundamentally flawed," she said. "Our fundamental role as scientists is to update, refine, and redefine our understanding of the world around us. Doing so must include not only our theoretical positions, but our ethical responsibility to the animals we have given no choice in becoming our subjects of study."
Gal Badihi, a graduate research student at Wild Minds Lab, argued that "as long as non-human primates are used in scientific experiments, we are morally obligated to provide them with sufficient social conditions that ensure their emotional wellbeing."
"This is not only an ethical requirement," Badihi added, "but essential for research validity and integrity."
For two days, I was treated like royalty. I had a young man as my personal assistant who kept offering to carry my backpack and get me anything I wanted. I had a hair and make-up artist by my side. Everywhere I went, I had a bathroom with a sign that indicated it was just for me. And if I was hungry, vegan food was special-ordered at the drop of a hat.
Why was I treated this way?
"Too many endure deprivations in the present and feel despair about the future. Without hope and a sense of agency, why bother learning how to be a solutionary?"
Apple TV+ had selected me to appear on their "Dear..." series, a show profiling iconic figures and the people they've influenced. I was one of four chosen to be on Episode 7, "Dear Jane Goodall." In the series, those influenced by these famous people share letters we'd written to our heroes, in various settings depicting the ways we've manifested what we learned from them. What an honor it was to read my letter to Dr. Jane Goodall and recount how I'd wanted to be like her when I grew up; how I did get to work with animals, including chimpanzees, before realizing it was more important that I work for animals (as well as for environmental sustainability and social justice). And what a privilege it was to speak on the same stage as she when we both keynoted a humane education conference sponsored by our respective organizations.
I've been on TV shows before, but never on this scale, and never over two days of taping in multiple locations. At first, I resisted the pampering. I didn't want my assistant to carry my backpack, or the make-up artist to touch up my hair every few minutes. I certainly didn't need a private bathroom, nor to eat before everyone else. When my assistant and I got to a new set, and he used his headset to announce "the talent" would be arriving momentarily, I didn't know whom he was talking about. I'd never before been referred to as "the talent."
The first day, I was reluctant to order special food and figured I'd just eat whatever I could find that was vegan. Nor did I give my stuff to anyone else to carry. The second day, however, I found myself asking my make-up artist to hold onto my lip balm and beckoning her for my water bottle between takes. I enthusiastically asked my assistant to order me food from a vegetarian restaurant I liked. How quickly I'd adjusted to being treated like a queen. And it had only been 24 hours!
What a wake-up call my two-day experience was. I viscerally discovered how easy it is to become how we're treated. This isn't some great new insight, of course. Dorothy Law Nolte's poem, "Children Learn What They Live," made this point decades ago, and the comedy Trading Places (perhaps my all-time favorite movie) drove home this message by demonstrating its extremes. But experiencing for myself the speed with which my attitudes and expectations could change, even subtly, shocked me.
Since my blog is about helping people become solutionaries, it's time to pivot to a bigger question: What might we learn from such experiences that would be valuable for understanding how to better educate people - especially youth - to be system-changing solutionaries?
One of the challenges with teaching young people about the problems in the world, and motivating them to work on solving them, is the discouragement (or worse) that so many feel about the possibilities for lasting positive change. Too many endure deprivations in the present and feel despair about the future. Without hope and a sense of agency, why bother learning how to be a solutionary?
Students with significant privilege due to their family's status, wealth, education, parental availability, societal expectations and treatment, and other factors, may more easily feel empowered to contribute to a more just, humane, and sustainable society if given the opportunity to learn about issues of injustice and cruelty. In my experience, most such students are able to acknowledge their unearned privileges once they are pointed out. They then often feel compelled to contribute to the creation of more equitable and humane systems.
Students who have borne the brunt of structural forms of oppression and/or poverty, neglect, or violence, however, need to be provided not only with support but with acknowledgement that their negative life experiences are equally undeserved. If they feel disempowered, angry, resentful, depressed, sad, and/or afraid, there's good reason.
Structural forms of oppression, abuse, and injustice are deeply embedded in societies, but many have been transformed over time. It's important that we remind ourselves and young people that positive changes have happened and continue to happen through the work of people committed to building more just and compassionate societies. Knowing that problems have been and can be solved by dedicated people, and that collaboratively solving problems is meaningful and often joy-inducing, is key to sparking a solutionary revolution that will benefit everyone, but especially those suffering most, including nonhuman animals.
Just as we can become entitled by receiving royal treatment and become despairing by enduring cruel or unjust treatment - both of which lead to feedback loops that create ever greater inequities and injustices - we can also become empowered by experiencing the impacts of our efforts to transform systems. Recognizing our capacity to make a difference spurs us to action. Action then leads to positive change. Positive change then leads to hope. Hope may then spur us to more action. That's a beautiful feedback loop.
Last week, Jane Goodall agreed to be interviewed for a mini-documentary on my organization's efforts to educate a solutionary generation. The show will air early next year on PBS TV stations and reach millions of people. The seed Jane planted in me as a child helped lead directly to my work in humane education. That she is going to speak about the importance of such education is not just one of the greatest honors of my life, but also a powerful example that when we inspire others to have agency, they become agents of change. So let's treat each other as people capable of making a positive difference.
Renowned conservationist and primatologist Jane Goodall has stressed the need for humanity to seize the coronavirus pandemic as a turning point to forge "a new relationship with the natural world."
Goodall made the comment in an interview with Agence France-Presse published Friday--a day after she received the Templeton Prize for "her unrelenting effort to connect humanity to a greater purpose" over her 60-year career.
In the interview, 87-year-old Goodall expressed hope the "pandemic has woken people up." Leveling a charge she's made before, Goodall put blame for the outbreak on the world's "disrespect" for nature, citing as one example "very, very cruel intensive factory farms."
As global governments roll out plans for a Covid-19 recovery, she said those who choose to simply go back to "business as usual" must urgently chart a different course.
"We have to have a new mindset for our survival," she said.
Ahead of the award, Goodall also spoke with the Associated Press and addressed the global biodiversity crisis.
"Every time a little species vanishes, it may not seem important," she told AP. "But the thread is pulled from that tapestry and the picture gets weaker as more threads are pulled, until that tapestry, once so beautiful, is hanging in tatters."
Goodall on Thursday was awarded the Templeton Prize, whose previous winners include Desmond Tutu in 2013, the Dalai Lama in 2012, and Mother Teresa in 1973. It includes a monetary prize of over $1.5 million.
Heather Templeton Dill, president of the John Templeton Foundation, said in a statement that Goodall's "achievements go beyond the traditional parameters of scientific research to define our perception of what it means to be human."
"Her discoveries have profoundly altered the world's view of animal intelligence and enriched our understanding of humanity in a way that is both humbling and exalting," said Templeton Dill.
In accepting the prize, Goodall reflected on a career that has included "the best days of my life" at the Gombe research station in Tanzania where she conducted groundbreaking research on chimpanzees, as well as the Roots and Shoots program she founded in 1991, which she said "has changed thousands of lives."
Goodall also stressed the importance of hope, saying that without it, "we sink into apathy, do nothing--and that will be the end."
"I have learned more about the two sides of human nature, and I am convinced that there are more good than bad people. There are so many tackling seemingly impossible tasks and succeeding," she said.
"Only when head and heart work in harmony," said Goodall, "can we attain our true human potential."
In a webinar Tuesday about pandemics, wildlife, and intensive animal farming, world renowned primatologist and conservationist Jane Goodall warned of dire consequences if humanity fails to rapidly reform the global food system and stop destroying natural habitats.
"One of the lessons learnt from this crisis is that we must change our ways."
--Jane Goodall, primatologist
"If we do not do things differently, we are finished," said Goodall, a United Nations messenger of peace, during the Compassion in World Farming event. "We can't go on very much longer like this."
The 86-year-old founder of the Jane Goodall Institute, famous for her research on wild chimpanzees at Gombe National Park in Tanzania, delivered the online speech as the international community continued to battle the coronavirus pandemic, which has killed over 382,000 and infected more than 6.4 million people worldwide.
As the Guardian reported: "She blamed the emergence of Covid-19 on the over-exploitation of the natural world, which has seen forests cut down, species made extinct, and natural habitats destroyed... Intensive farming was also creating a reservoir of animal diseases that would spill over and hurt human society, said Goodall."
"We have brought this on ourselves because of our absolute disrespect for animals and the environment," Goodall said of the ongoing pandemic. "Our disrespect for wild animals and our disrespect for farmed animals has created this situation where disease can spill over to infect human beings."
"We have come to a turning point in our relationship with the natural world," she added. "One of the lessons learnt from this crisis is that we must change our ways. Scientists warn that to avoid future crises, we must drastically change our diets and move to plant-rich foods--for the sake of the animals, planet, and the health of our children."
In addition to urging the world to urgently shift away from factory farming and the destruction of wildlife, Goodall acknowledged the need to end poverty, war, and violence worldwide to protect nature. Her speech was celebrated by animal rights and climate campaigners who tweeted the Guardian's reporting about the webinar:
The event also featured remarks from Compassion in World Farming Global CEO Philip Lymbery, who introduced Goodall, and seven Members of the European Parliament (MEPs). It came as governments and international bodies are faced with mounting calls from activists, healthcare providers, progressive policymakers, and other experts to pursue a #PeoplesBailout, Just Recovery, Healthy Recovery, Green Recovery, Green Stimulus, and Global Green New Deal.
The webinar also came amid the emergence of new research bolstering Goodall's warnings about the impacts of intensive animal agriculture and humanity's destruction of nature.
As Common Dreams reported, a study published Monday concluded that the current mass extinction crisis is "human caused and accelerating," and "may be the most serious environmental threat to the persistence of civilization, because it is irreversible."
The study's authors warned that continued environmental destruction could result in more threats to human health. "The vaccine for Covid-19 was natural habitat," lead author Gerardo Ceballos Gonzalez told the New York Times. "The pandemic is a great example of how badly we've treated nature."
Research published Wednesday by the London-based investor initiative Farm Animal Investment Risk and Return (FAIRR) found that 73% of world's 60 largest meat, fish, and dairy companies are at "high risk" for fostering future zoonotic pandemics.
The group's new report features a "Pandemic Ranking" that combines six risks from the 2019 Coller FAIRR Protein Producer Index: deforestation and biodiversity loss, antibiotics, waste and pollution, working conditions, food safety, and animal welfare.
"Factory farming is both vulnerable to pandemics, and guilty of creating them," Jeremy Coller, founder of FAIRR and CIO of Coller Capital, said in a statement announcing the report. "It's a self-sabotaging cycle that destroys value and risks lives."
"To avoid causing the next pandemic, the meat industry must tackle lax safety standards for food and workers alike, closely confined animals, and overused antibiotics," he said. "This will disrupt a supply chain already cracking from fundamental land, water, and emissions constraints."
In a real head-scratcher, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in June 2016 that sexual contact with an animal was legal, as long as there was no penetration.
Whatever uncertainty that created for Canadians is now gone. The Trudeau government's new animal welfare legislation, passed by Parliament last month, stipulates that any sexual contact with an animal is illegal, and toughens up the rules against bestiality and other off-beat animal abuse practices.
In a real head-scratcher, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in June 2016 that sexual contact with an animal was legal, as long as there was no penetration.
Whatever uncertainty that created for Canadians is now gone. The Trudeau government's new animal welfare legislation, passed by Parliament last month, stipulates that any sexual contact with an animal is illegal, and toughens up the rules against bestiality and other off-beat animal abuse practices.
One might conclude that, perhaps in response to increased public sensitivity, the government is cracking down on the worst mistreatment of animals.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
While the new legislation will help protect a relatively small number of animals from unwanted sexual advances from their owners, it provides no protection whatsoever for the hundreds of millions of animals living miserable, pain-filled lives trapped inside our factory farming system.
Most people can imagine that these animals experience some unpleasantness the last day or two of their lives.
But few people realize that -- while there are some minimal regulations governing the transport and slaughter of animals -- there are effectively no laws protecting their welfare during the rest of their lives.
According to the eminent anthropologist Jane Goodall: "Farm animals feel pleasure and sadness, excitement and resentment, depression, fear and pain. They are far more aware and intelligent than we ever imagined."The powerful factory farming industry has managed to keep its animal practices largely beyond the reach of government regulation.
Instead, in a classic case of allowing the fox to guard the henhouse, governments have handed the industry the power to draw up its own "codes of conduct" to govern how the animals in its custody will be treated.
These industry-written codes permit some brutal procedures, including common practices such as sawing off the horns of cows and the beaks of chickens -- practices known to cause excruciating pain.
And Trudeau's new legislation won't stop any of this, according to U of T adjunct law professor and litigator Lesli Bisgould.
The new legislation is an update of legislation originally enacted in 1892 to ensure humane practices. Bisgould says the laws haven't been strengthened much in the past 127 years -- even though the family farm, where animals grazed in open pastures, has largely been replaced by today's industrial farms, where animals are confined in cramped quarters, with pigs and cows often chained in crates and cages too small for them to even turn around.
Typically, these animals experience the outdoors for the first time -- often after years of confinement -- as they're loaded onto trucks bound for the slaughterhouse.
"With increasingly mechanized operations hurriedly processing 700 million animals every year, the notion of humane practices becomes absurd," observes Bisgould in her powerful book Animals and the Law.
The failure of our legal system to keep pace with the new reality of farming is at odds with the considerable evolution that's taken place in popular attitudes toward animals.
While animals were historically seen as creatures with little resemblance to humans, modern scientists, starting with Charles Darwin, have identified a much closer connection between humans and higher animals. Darwin observed that the difference is "one of degree not of kind."
According to the eminent anthropologist Jane Goodall: "Farm animals feel pleasure and sadness, excitement and resentment, depression, fear and pain. They are far more aware and intelligent than we ever imagined."
Of course, animals can't talk, compose piano concertos, or understand the laws of thermodynamics.
To their credit, however, they lack some of the worst traits found in humans -- deceitfulness, cruelty, greed, sexual treachery. It's hard to imagine an animal version of Jeffrey Epstein or Donald Trump.
Certainly the dividing line between humans and animals isn't as clear as once believed. Yet the legal divide remains vast -- on one side, humans enjoy extensive legal protections covering all aspects of our lives. On the other side, animals have virtually no protections, even against the infliction of extreme pain.
It's hard to see much of a moral justification for this vast difference, beyond the fact that we make the rules.
In recent years, concern about animals has become something of a hot-button issue among progressives. And the Trudeau government clearly wants to be seen to be in sync with this wave -- even as it leaves utterly unprotected hundreds of millions of animals trapped in horrendous conditions inside the secretive world of factory farming.
Sixteen-year-old climate activist Greta Thunberg just told a group of the elite gathered in Davos for the World Economic Forum--as they were seated just feet away from her--that they are among those directly responsible for the climate crisis.
"It takes deep courage to go to Davos and tell the masters-of-the-universe *to their faces* that they knowingly torched the planet in order to get filthy rich."
-- Naomi KleinSpeaking Thursday before a panel that included U2 frontman Bono, former United Nations climate chief Christiana Figueres, acclaimed conservationist Jane Goodall, and panel host and billionaire Marc Benioff, Thunberg echoed themes from a video she created to share with Davos-goers.
"Some people say that that the climate crisis is something that we all have created. But that is not true--because if everyone is guilty, then no one is to blame. And someone is to blame," Thunberg said to the peope in the room. "Some people, some companies, some decision-makers in particular have known exactly what priceless values they have been sacrificing to make unimaginable amounts of money, and I think many of you here today belong to that group of people."
Her statement was followed by silence until Bono began applauding. Other audience members and panelists then followed suit.
The teen activist shared the moment on Twitter:
Journalist and climate activist Naomi Klein applauded Thunberg's bravery, writing on Twitter: "It takes deep courage to go to Davos and tell the masters-of-the-universe *to their faces* that they knowingly torched the planet in order [to] get filthy rich."
It takes deep courage to go to Davos and tell the masters-of-the-universe *to their faces* that they knowingly torched the planet in order get filthy rich. @GretaThunberg did that. She's 15. https://t.co/66koheOsUq
-- Naomi Klein (@NaomiAKlein) January 24, 2019
Speaking to CNN Business about the talk, Thunberg said, "It was pretty fun."
"I think it's very insane and weird that people come here in private jets to discuss climate change. It's not reasonable," Thunberg--who arrived at the gathering by train and has been sleeping in a tent--told the outlet.
Benioff also shared clips of some of the others on the panel speaking, including Goodall:
On Friday, the last day of the forum, Thunberg continued her criticism of the Davos attendees in an address that demanded action above all else from the world's so-called leaders. "I want you to act as you would in a crisis," she said. "I want you to act as if our house is on fire. Because it is."
A global gathering of world elites is taking place in Davos, Switzerland, this week, claiming--as it does every year--to "define priorities and shape global, industry and regional agendas." The World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting, held in the rarified elite space of the snow-capped Swiss Alps, consists, in its own words, of "leaders of global society." In reality, it represents no formal body. There is no public mandate, no accountability for crafting goals or achieving them. It is a private, invitation-only gathering bringing together corporate elites and liberal technocrats, along with elected representatives and nonprofit leaders, for discussions about how to solve the world's problems--on their terms.
The WEF's attendees are so cut off from the rest of society that of the 3,000 attendees, about 1,500 flew into Davos in their own private jets. Most are men, and a majority are either North American or European. The WEF does not like to focus on how wealthy private interests dominate the forum, boasting instead of the myriad high-profile political officials and human rights leaders who have been invited. They will tout speeches by Jane Goodall and David Attenborough--but not by the CEOs of GE or ExxonMobil. Indeed, more than half the attendees are from the business sector--a fact that is revealed on the WEF's website in only a fragment of a sentence: "... the private sector will be represented by more than 1,700 leaders." The influence of these representatives on the WEF, and by extension, on government policies, is as invisible as their identities.
Among the human rights leaders invited to Davos is Oxfam International's Executive Director, Winnie Byanyima, a woman who pulls no punches in the presence of global elites. She wrote ahead of the forum, "Every January I get a glimpse into a different world. A world of billionaires, of business and political elites." Byanyima explained, "For Oxfam, Davos is an opportunity to take stock of the crisis of extreme inequality." In fact, each year Oxfam releases its report on global inequality to coincide with the start of the WEF, and this year's report clearly blames global inequality on the continuously lowered tax rates of the wealthy.
In "Public Good or Private Wealth," Oxfam asserts that "While governments are under-taxing the wealthy and big corporations, public services are suffering from chronic underfunding or being outsourced to private companies that exclude the poorest people." Oxfam America's Vice President for Policy and Advocacy, Paul O'Brien, explained to me in an interview that "If you want to address poverty in this economy, you're going to have to deal with global tax rates and structural inequality."
The entire gamut of public services that ordinary people the world over are entitled to--free of charge--are going unfunded or underfunded thanks in large part to the insatiable greed of the fabulously wealthy. Access to services like education and health care, and the stockpiling of cash by billionaires, are two sides of the same coin. One stark example of the impact of dwindling government revenues is that "262 million kids are not going to be able to go to school somewhere in the world because their public institutions don't have the funding to put them into school," O'Brien said.
The example of underfunded education drives home the fact that inequality is not just the scourge of so-called Third World nations, but affects the world's wealthiest nation as well. Think about the wave of teacher-led revolts across the U.S., such as the Los Angeles public teachers strike about which I wrote last week. Wealthy elites like school superintendent Austin Beutner and several of the Los Angeles Unified School District board members have been reluctant to fully fund the school system, leading to poor-quality education. This, in turn, has forced teachers to take a stand, lose pay and risk their livelihoods in a fight for the basic rights of the kids they teach.
There is plenty of money in the U.S. to fully fund schools across the nation so that all kids can have a well-rounded, quality education and all teachers can be generously compensated. But much of that money is either funding the military or being siphoned away from the Treasury through tax cuts.
Meanwhile, Americans who consider themselves to be firmly in the middle-class are often one or two paychecks away from a financial crisis. The ongoing government shutdown illustrates this, as about the 800,000 federal employees are going unpaid. The solution to these myriad problems is to simply, in O'Brien's words, "Go where the real money is--which is sitting mostly idly in the pockets of the extreme wealthy and corporations." That money is essentially not being taxed or being undertaxed--a goal that Davos' attendees have successfully pursued for decades.
Oxfam's report wisely focuses on women's wellbeing as a measure of social health. "Investments in public services, particularly health care, education, and social protection, have a disproportionate impact for women and girls," O'Brien said. For example, educating a young girl "Has this three-generational effect where communities benefit directly and indirectly." In other words, when girls and women are educated, they are more likely to encourage education in the rest of the family.
Private interests of the sort gathered in Davos show plenty of concern for education, health care and other social services. Philanthropic efforts across the world are filling in gaps created by a lack of government-funded programs and offering great public relations opportunities for billionaires. But those efforts are piecemeal and controlled by the whims of the wealthy. They are often skewed toward feel-good technological innovations and a measurable return on investment rather than long-term outcomes and social good for its own sake. Privately funded charities are no substitute for squeezing much-needed revenues from the tightly closed fists of the wealthy and having those revenues be spent by elected representatives rather than unelected, unaccountable, nameless aristocrats.
Here in the U.S., there is majority public support for raising taxes on the nation's wealthy--and why wouldn't there be? The Republican Party's signature tax reform law passed in December 2017 did exactly what Oxfam's report warns against--it reduced taxes on the already-rich. A new poll by Business Insider has found that more Americans favor Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's plan to tax the rich at the rate of 70 percent than those who back the 2017 tax reform law. Davos attendees have good reason to be worried that the world's inhabitants are onto the con game that the wealthy capitalist class has played on us.
Ultimately, if the many are to have more, the wealthy must make do with less. A lot less. Rhetorically addressing the WEF attendees, O'Brien said, "If we are going to have a world in which wealth and power are more equally distributed, you must do your part, [which means] having less wealth and less power to determine the well-being of so many others."