SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
An excavator is working at a tailing pond at the Syncrude open pit oil excavation mine in Fort McMurray; the top soil is removed to give access to the controversial tar sands.
There is a bad guy in this discussion, and that is Big Oil.
With outright climate denialism largely behind us, we keep moving on through more sophisticated stages of climate inaction.
Currently, even as large swaths of North America became engulfed in wildfire smoke last week, we seem lodged in a new stage of inaction based on the notion “we’re all to blame.”
Or, as Majid Al Suwaidi put it: “There’s no simple bad guy, good guy in this discussion.”
Framed this way—that it’s up to all of us to reduce emissions—climate action takes on the feel of a communal effort with us all rooting for the same team.
A fascinating study by the corporate mapping project of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives documents that the oil industry lobbied government officials 11,452 times—with a heavy focus on lobbying senior officials responsible for climate policies—during a seven-year period spanning the governments of Stephen Harper’s Conservatives and Justin Trudeau’s Liberals.
Of course, there’s nothing wrong with communal effort. But this framing prevents us from seeing what’s really going on: Yes, we all behave in ways that emit carbon (although some of us emit way more than others).
But—and this is the nub of it—we’re not all actively blocking climate action.
Rather, most of us are trying in small ways to reduce our carbon footprint. The problem is that there are immensely powerful forces out there using their clout to block the world from taking the urgent action needed to avert ever-worsening climate chaos.
So, sorry Mr. Al Suwaidi, but there is a bad guy in this discussion and that is Big Oil.
It’s not surprising that Al Suwaidi would avoid acknowledging this. After all, he’s an aide to Sultan al-Jaber, who heads up the national oil company of the United Arab Emirates, as well as heading up the U.N. climate negotiations to be held there next November. The fact that the sultan is heading up both is a perfect example of the sort of communal effort on climate change that feels good, but has gotten us nowhere.
To get somewhere, we have to start center-staging the truly immoral role played by Big Oil. Otherwise, we end up duped into believing that what holds us back is the refusal of ordinary Canadians to give up their fossil-fuel-guzzling cars.
True, some Canadians would refuse, and they would be goaded on by the oil lobby and the Freedom Convoy crowd. But the majority of Canadians are sufficiently freaked out by wildfires, heat domes, and flooding to be ready to transition to clean energy (especially since it wouldn’t have to impact their lifestyles that much)—if only there was some serious government leadership.
But there isn’t. Justin Trudeau, knowing the public fears climate change, fashions himself a climate warrior. But he largely succumbs to oil industry demands, revealing his warrior posture to be more fashion accessory than commitment.
It’s easy to see how this happens; Big Oil is relentless in its opposition to climate action.
A fascinating study by the corporate mapping project of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives documents that the oil industry lobbied government officials 11,452 times—with a heavy focus on lobbying senior officials responsible for climate policies—during a seven-year period spanning the governments of Stephen Harper’s Conservatives and Justin Trudeau’s Liberals.
Both governments appear to have responded to this constant pressure by giving Big Oil a say in our climate policies, leaving Canada with a terrible record on reducing emissions—far worse than many comparable nations.
As climate journalist Barry Saxifrage has documented, key nations—including Germany, France, the U.K., Sweden, and Norway—have significantly reduced vehicle emissions, largely by raising taxes on gas-guzzlers and cutting taxes on battery-electric vehicles.
In case you’re tempted to excuse Canada’s dismal performance because we’re economically reliant on oil, Saxifrage notes that oil is also central to Norway’s economy, yet Norway has dramatically reduced emissions. (Last year, 78% of new vehicles purchased in Norway were battery-electric, compared to just 6%—and 1% in Alberta.)
Canadians are just as reasonable as Norwegians. If only we had a government willing to stand up to the menace of Big Oil.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
With outright climate denialism largely behind us, we keep moving on through more sophisticated stages of climate inaction.
Currently, even as large swaths of North America became engulfed in wildfire smoke last week, we seem lodged in a new stage of inaction based on the notion “we’re all to blame.”
Or, as Majid Al Suwaidi put it: “There’s no simple bad guy, good guy in this discussion.”
Framed this way—that it’s up to all of us to reduce emissions—climate action takes on the feel of a communal effort with us all rooting for the same team.
A fascinating study by the corporate mapping project of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives documents that the oil industry lobbied government officials 11,452 times—with a heavy focus on lobbying senior officials responsible for climate policies—during a seven-year period spanning the governments of Stephen Harper’s Conservatives and Justin Trudeau’s Liberals.
Of course, there’s nothing wrong with communal effort. But this framing prevents us from seeing what’s really going on: Yes, we all behave in ways that emit carbon (although some of us emit way more than others).
But—and this is the nub of it—we’re not all actively blocking climate action.
Rather, most of us are trying in small ways to reduce our carbon footprint. The problem is that there are immensely powerful forces out there using their clout to block the world from taking the urgent action needed to avert ever-worsening climate chaos.
So, sorry Mr. Al Suwaidi, but there is a bad guy in this discussion and that is Big Oil.
It’s not surprising that Al Suwaidi would avoid acknowledging this. After all, he’s an aide to Sultan al-Jaber, who heads up the national oil company of the United Arab Emirates, as well as heading up the U.N. climate negotiations to be held there next November. The fact that the sultan is heading up both is a perfect example of the sort of communal effort on climate change that feels good, but has gotten us nowhere.
To get somewhere, we have to start center-staging the truly immoral role played by Big Oil. Otherwise, we end up duped into believing that what holds us back is the refusal of ordinary Canadians to give up their fossil-fuel-guzzling cars.
True, some Canadians would refuse, and they would be goaded on by the oil lobby and the Freedom Convoy crowd. But the majority of Canadians are sufficiently freaked out by wildfires, heat domes, and flooding to be ready to transition to clean energy (especially since it wouldn’t have to impact their lifestyles that much)—if only there was some serious government leadership.
But there isn’t. Justin Trudeau, knowing the public fears climate change, fashions himself a climate warrior. But he largely succumbs to oil industry demands, revealing his warrior posture to be more fashion accessory than commitment.
It’s easy to see how this happens; Big Oil is relentless in its opposition to climate action.
A fascinating study by the corporate mapping project of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives documents that the oil industry lobbied government officials 11,452 times—with a heavy focus on lobbying senior officials responsible for climate policies—during a seven-year period spanning the governments of Stephen Harper’s Conservatives and Justin Trudeau’s Liberals.
Both governments appear to have responded to this constant pressure by giving Big Oil a say in our climate policies, leaving Canada with a terrible record on reducing emissions—far worse than many comparable nations.
As climate journalist Barry Saxifrage has documented, key nations—including Germany, France, the U.K., Sweden, and Norway—have significantly reduced vehicle emissions, largely by raising taxes on gas-guzzlers and cutting taxes on battery-electric vehicles.
In case you’re tempted to excuse Canada’s dismal performance because we’re economically reliant on oil, Saxifrage notes that oil is also central to Norway’s economy, yet Norway has dramatically reduced emissions. (Last year, 78% of new vehicles purchased in Norway were battery-electric, compared to just 6%—and 1% in Alberta.)
Canadians are just as reasonable as Norwegians. If only we had a government willing to stand up to the menace of Big Oil.
With outright climate denialism largely behind us, we keep moving on through more sophisticated stages of climate inaction.
Currently, even as large swaths of North America became engulfed in wildfire smoke last week, we seem lodged in a new stage of inaction based on the notion “we’re all to blame.”
Or, as Majid Al Suwaidi put it: “There’s no simple bad guy, good guy in this discussion.”
Framed this way—that it’s up to all of us to reduce emissions—climate action takes on the feel of a communal effort with us all rooting for the same team.
A fascinating study by the corporate mapping project of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives documents that the oil industry lobbied government officials 11,452 times—with a heavy focus on lobbying senior officials responsible for climate policies—during a seven-year period spanning the governments of Stephen Harper’s Conservatives and Justin Trudeau’s Liberals.
Of course, there’s nothing wrong with communal effort. But this framing prevents us from seeing what’s really going on: Yes, we all behave in ways that emit carbon (although some of us emit way more than others).
But—and this is the nub of it—we’re not all actively blocking climate action.
Rather, most of us are trying in small ways to reduce our carbon footprint. The problem is that there are immensely powerful forces out there using their clout to block the world from taking the urgent action needed to avert ever-worsening climate chaos.
So, sorry Mr. Al Suwaidi, but there is a bad guy in this discussion and that is Big Oil.
It’s not surprising that Al Suwaidi would avoid acknowledging this. After all, he’s an aide to Sultan al-Jaber, who heads up the national oil company of the United Arab Emirates, as well as heading up the U.N. climate negotiations to be held there next November. The fact that the sultan is heading up both is a perfect example of the sort of communal effort on climate change that feels good, but has gotten us nowhere.
To get somewhere, we have to start center-staging the truly immoral role played by Big Oil. Otherwise, we end up duped into believing that what holds us back is the refusal of ordinary Canadians to give up their fossil-fuel-guzzling cars.
True, some Canadians would refuse, and they would be goaded on by the oil lobby and the Freedom Convoy crowd. But the majority of Canadians are sufficiently freaked out by wildfires, heat domes, and flooding to be ready to transition to clean energy (especially since it wouldn’t have to impact their lifestyles that much)—if only there was some serious government leadership.
But there isn’t. Justin Trudeau, knowing the public fears climate change, fashions himself a climate warrior. But he largely succumbs to oil industry demands, revealing his warrior posture to be more fashion accessory than commitment.
It’s easy to see how this happens; Big Oil is relentless in its opposition to climate action.
A fascinating study by the corporate mapping project of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives documents that the oil industry lobbied government officials 11,452 times—with a heavy focus on lobbying senior officials responsible for climate policies—during a seven-year period spanning the governments of Stephen Harper’s Conservatives and Justin Trudeau’s Liberals.
Both governments appear to have responded to this constant pressure by giving Big Oil a say in our climate policies, leaving Canada with a terrible record on reducing emissions—far worse than many comparable nations.
As climate journalist Barry Saxifrage has documented, key nations—including Germany, France, the U.K., Sweden, and Norway—have significantly reduced vehicle emissions, largely by raising taxes on gas-guzzlers and cutting taxes on battery-electric vehicles.
In case you’re tempted to excuse Canada’s dismal performance because we’re economically reliant on oil, Saxifrage notes that oil is also central to Norway’s economy, yet Norway has dramatically reduced emissions. (Last year, 78% of new vehicles purchased in Norway were battery-electric, compared to just 6%—and 1% in Alberta.)
Canadians are just as reasonable as Norwegians. If only we had a government willing to stand up to the menace of Big Oil.