SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Former U.S. President George W. Bush shaking hands with Benjamin Netanyahu, then head of the Likud opposition, at the Knesset on May 15, 2008.
(Photo: Lior Mizrahi/pool/FLASH90)
Pulling the Masks of the Hideous 'Terrorists'—Us
How can humanity be so blatantly flippant about its own suicide? Why are we so divided from ourselves?
Dec 16, 2023
There are a number of blatant ways for terrorist organizations—by which I mean national governments—to justify committing mass murder.
Once you start killing, it’s hard to stop. But you have to justify what you’re doing—a process humanity has been engaged in since the dawn of civilization. We call it “war,” which turns mass murder into a necessary abstraction and gives us a far simpler way of dealing with conflict than . . . oh my God, understanding counter points of view and creating solutions rather than enemies.
This involves more than merely “negotiating” peace—it requires believing in peace, which is a concept far more complex than simply a ceasefire. It’s a living concept. And it seems to me that trying to reorganize our planet around this shimmering possibility is, as I have said previously, “the largest project the human race has ever undertaken.” And it involves all of us.
No matter how many bombs we drop, how many civilians we kill, our aims are just and righteous. But those other folks are acting on nothing but hatred: They have zero moral rectitude.
So we have to stop being spectators, though this is the role the mass of humanity has been tucked into – either that or participants in the game of war, which is in full horror all around the planet right now, with nuclear war . . . planetary suicide . . . ever looming in the background. Why?
How can humanity be so blatantly flippant about its own suicide? Why are we so divided from ourselves? Let’s undo the chains, shall we?
As a starting place, I revisit the State of the Union address George W. Bush delivered in 2002, in the wake of 9/11, with the United States waging war in Afghanistan and prepping for an even bigger war in Iraq. The address, known to history as the Axis of Evil speech, pulsates with spurious justifications for mass murder.
Justification #1 is that war is simple, clean and precise, producing outcomes that serve the good of the whole world: “The American flag,” Bush declared, “flies again over our embassy in Kabul. Terrorists who once occupied Afghanistan now occupy cells at Guantanamo Bay. . . .
“America and Afghanistan are now allies against terror. We will be partners in rebuilding that country.”
Uh, the prez was a little off about this, since the U.S. didn’t scuttle out of Afghanistan for nearly twenty more years, with several hundred thousand people killed and nothing accomplished. Somehow this never seems to matter—you know, the actual outcome of a particular war—since the next war always looms with so much excitement and necessity.
Justification #2 is what feeds this insanity. It’s what you might call “takes one to know one.” No matter how many bombs we drop, how many civilians we kill, our aims are just and righteous. But those other folks are acting on nothing but hatred: They have zero moral rectitude.
“And the depth of their hatred is equaled by the madness of the destruction they design,” Bush said. “. . . What we have found in Afghanistan confirms that, far from ending there, our war against terror is only beginning. . . .
“These enemies view the entire world as a battlefield, and we must pursue them wherever they are.”
But Bush really gets going when he brings in the planet’s three premiere evil regimes: North Korea, Iran and Iraq, especially that last one:
“Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and to support terror. The Iraqi regime has plotted to develop anthrax and nerve gas and nuclear weapons for over a decade. This is a regime that has already used poison gas to murder thousands of its own citizens, leaving the bodies of mothers huddled over their dead children.”
While in no way would I downplay, for instance, Saddam Hussein’s dropping of mustard gas canisters on the Kurdish city of Halabja during the Iran-Iraq war, killing as many as 60,000 people, the legitimacy of Bush’s moral outrage disintegrates pretty quickly, when the actions of his own country are taken into account. Takes one to know one!
This country inflicted hell on Planet Earth during the Vietnam war, dropping some 12 million gallons of Agent Orange and other herbicides on the country, ravaging some five million acres of forests, rivers and cropland. It’s been linked to cancer, diabetes, birth defects and more.
“The Red Cross estimates that three million Vietnamese have been affected by dioxin, including at least 150,000 children born with serious birth defects,” according to the Aspen Institute. “Millions of Americans and Vietnamese are still affected, directly and indirectly, by the wartime U.S. spraying of Agent Orange and other herbicides over southern and central Vietnam.”
The institute adds: “Large tracts of that land remain degraded and unproductive to this day.”
But Bush nonetheless declared: “History has called America and our allies to action, and it is both our responsibility and our privilege to fight freedom’s fight.”
Carl Jung’s words may be a bit more on target: “Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.”
We all, as individuals, have a shadow side to our nature, as Jung pointed out: a dark place, where rage and despair seethe. There is also a collective human shadow, which morphs into armies and, ultimately, into wars. Evil is externalized. The enemy easily becomes what we fear and hate about ourselves – which means we can kill it. But first we must dehumanize the “other,” and dehumanization is seductive. It’s also addictive. Is a world beyond war possible? Yes, I believe so – if we can face the collective shadow.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Robert C. Koehler
Robert Koehler is an award-winning, Chicago-based journalist and nationally syndicated writer. Koehler has been the recipient of multiple awards for writing and journalism from organizations including the National Newspaper Association, Suburban Newspapers of America, and the Chicago Headline Club. He's a regular contributor to such high-profile websites as Common Dreams and the Huffington Post. Eschewing political labels, Koehler considers himself a "peace journalist. He has been an editor at Tribune Media Services and a reporter, columnist and copy desk chief at Lerner Newspapers, a chain of neighborhood and suburban newspapers in the Chicago area. Koehler launched his column in 1999. Born in Detroit and raised in suburban Dearborn, Koehler has lived in Chicago since 1976. He earned a master's degree in creative writing from Columbia College and has taught writing at both the college and high school levels. Koehler is a widower and single parent. He explores both conditions at great depth in his writing. His book, "Courage Grows Strong at the Wound" (2016). Contact him or visit his website at commonwonders.com.
There are a number of blatant ways for terrorist organizations—by which I mean national governments—to justify committing mass murder.
Once you start killing, it’s hard to stop. But you have to justify what you’re doing—a process humanity has been engaged in since the dawn of civilization. We call it “war,” which turns mass murder into a necessary abstraction and gives us a far simpler way of dealing with conflict than . . . oh my God, understanding counter points of view and creating solutions rather than enemies.
This involves more than merely “negotiating” peace—it requires believing in peace, which is a concept far more complex than simply a ceasefire. It’s a living concept. And it seems to me that trying to reorganize our planet around this shimmering possibility is, as I have said previously, “the largest project the human race has ever undertaken.” And it involves all of us.
No matter how many bombs we drop, how many civilians we kill, our aims are just and righteous. But those other folks are acting on nothing but hatred: They have zero moral rectitude.
So we have to stop being spectators, though this is the role the mass of humanity has been tucked into – either that or participants in the game of war, which is in full horror all around the planet right now, with nuclear war . . . planetary suicide . . . ever looming in the background. Why?
How can humanity be so blatantly flippant about its own suicide? Why are we so divided from ourselves? Let’s undo the chains, shall we?
As a starting place, I revisit the State of the Union address George W. Bush delivered in 2002, in the wake of 9/11, with the United States waging war in Afghanistan and prepping for an even bigger war in Iraq. The address, known to history as the Axis of Evil speech, pulsates with spurious justifications for mass murder.
Justification #1 is that war is simple, clean and precise, producing outcomes that serve the good of the whole world: “The American flag,” Bush declared, “flies again over our embassy in Kabul. Terrorists who once occupied Afghanistan now occupy cells at Guantanamo Bay. . . .
“America and Afghanistan are now allies against terror. We will be partners in rebuilding that country.”
Uh, the prez was a little off about this, since the U.S. didn’t scuttle out of Afghanistan for nearly twenty more years, with several hundred thousand people killed and nothing accomplished. Somehow this never seems to matter—you know, the actual outcome of a particular war—since the next war always looms with so much excitement and necessity.
Justification #2 is what feeds this insanity. It’s what you might call “takes one to know one.” No matter how many bombs we drop, how many civilians we kill, our aims are just and righteous. But those other folks are acting on nothing but hatred: They have zero moral rectitude.
“And the depth of their hatred is equaled by the madness of the destruction they design,” Bush said. “. . . What we have found in Afghanistan confirms that, far from ending there, our war against terror is only beginning. . . .
“These enemies view the entire world as a battlefield, and we must pursue them wherever they are.”
But Bush really gets going when he brings in the planet’s three premiere evil regimes: North Korea, Iran and Iraq, especially that last one:
“Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and to support terror. The Iraqi regime has plotted to develop anthrax and nerve gas and nuclear weapons for over a decade. This is a regime that has already used poison gas to murder thousands of its own citizens, leaving the bodies of mothers huddled over their dead children.”
While in no way would I downplay, for instance, Saddam Hussein’s dropping of mustard gas canisters on the Kurdish city of Halabja during the Iran-Iraq war, killing as many as 60,000 people, the legitimacy of Bush’s moral outrage disintegrates pretty quickly, when the actions of his own country are taken into account. Takes one to know one!
This country inflicted hell on Planet Earth during the Vietnam war, dropping some 12 million gallons of Agent Orange and other herbicides on the country, ravaging some five million acres of forests, rivers and cropland. It’s been linked to cancer, diabetes, birth defects and more.
“The Red Cross estimates that three million Vietnamese have been affected by dioxin, including at least 150,000 children born with serious birth defects,” according to the Aspen Institute. “Millions of Americans and Vietnamese are still affected, directly and indirectly, by the wartime U.S. spraying of Agent Orange and other herbicides over southern and central Vietnam.”
The institute adds: “Large tracts of that land remain degraded and unproductive to this day.”
But Bush nonetheless declared: “History has called America and our allies to action, and it is both our responsibility and our privilege to fight freedom’s fight.”
Carl Jung’s words may be a bit more on target: “Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.”
We all, as individuals, have a shadow side to our nature, as Jung pointed out: a dark place, where rage and despair seethe. There is also a collective human shadow, which morphs into armies and, ultimately, into wars. Evil is externalized. The enemy easily becomes what we fear and hate about ourselves – which means we can kill it. But first we must dehumanize the “other,” and dehumanization is seductive. It’s also addictive. Is a world beyond war possible? Yes, I believe so – if we can face the collective shadow.
Robert C. Koehler
Robert Koehler is an award-winning, Chicago-based journalist and nationally syndicated writer. Koehler has been the recipient of multiple awards for writing and journalism from organizations including the National Newspaper Association, Suburban Newspapers of America, and the Chicago Headline Club. He's a regular contributor to such high-profile websites as Common Dreams and the Huffington Post. Eschewing political labels, Koehler considers himself a "peace journalist. He has been an editor at Tribune Media Services and a reporter, columnist and copy desk chief at Lerner Newspapers, a chain of neighborhood and suburban newspapers in the Chicago area. Koehler launched his column in 1999. Born in Detroit and raised in suburban Dearborn, Koehler has lived in Chicago since 1976. He earned a master's degree in creative writing from Columbia College and has taught writing at both the college and high school levels. Koehler is a widower and single parent. He explores both conditions at great depth in his writing. His book, "Courage Grows Strong at the Wound" (2016). Contact him or visit his website at commonwonders.com.
There are a number of blatant ways for terrorist organizations—by which I mean national governments—to justify committing mass murder.
Once you start killing, it’s hard to stop. But you have to justify what you’re doing—a process humanity has been engaged in since the dawn of civilization. We call it “war,” which turns mass murder into a necessary abstraction and gives us a far simpler way of dealing with conflict than . . . oh my God, understanding counter points of view and creating solutions rather than enemies.
This involves more than merely “negotiating” peace—it requires believing in peace, which is a concept far more complex than simply a ceasefire. It’s a living concept. And it seems to me that trying to reorganize our planet around this shimmering possibility is, as I have said previously, “the largest project the human race has ever undertaken.” And it involves all of us.
No matter how many bombs we drop, how many civilians we kill, our aims are just and righteous. But those other folks are acting on nothing but hatred: They have zero moral rectitude.
So we have to stop being spectators, though this is the role the mass of humanity has been tucked into – either that or participants in the game of war, which is in full horror all around the planet right now, with nuclear war . . . planetary suicide . . . ever looming in the background. Why?
How can humanity be so blatantly flippant about its own suicide? Why are we so divided from ourselves? Let’s undo the chains, shall we?
As a starting place, I revisit the State of the Union address George W. Bush delivered in 2002, in the wake of 9/11, with the United States waging war in Afghanistan and prepping for an even bigger war in Iraq. The address, known to history as the Axis of Evil speech, pulsates with spurious justifications for mass murder.
Justification #1 is that war is simple, clean and precise, producing outcomes that serve the good of the whole world: “The American flag,” Bush declared, “flies again over our embassy in Kabul. Terrorists who once occupied Afghanistan now occupy cells at Guantanamo Bay. . . .
“America and Afghanistan are now allies against terror. We will be partners in rebuilding that country.”
Uh, the prez was a little off about this, since the U.S. didn’t scuttle out of Afghanistan for nearly twenty more years, with several hundred thousand people killed and nothing accomplished. Somehow this never seems to matter—you know, the actual outcome of a particular war—since the next war always looms with so much excitement and necessity.
Justification #2 is what feeds this insanity. It’s what you might call “takes one to know one.” No matter how many bombs we drop, how many civilians we kill, our aims are just and righteous. But those other folks are acting on nothing but hatred: They have zero moral rectitude.
“And the depth of their hatred is equaled by the madness of the destruction they design,” Bush said. “. . . What we have found in Afghanistan confirms that, far from ending there, our war against terror is only beginning. . . .
“These enemies view the entire world as a battlefield, and we must pursue them wherever they are.”
But Bush really gets going when he brings in the planet’s three premiere evil regimes: North Korea, Iran and Iraq, especially that last one:
“Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and to support terror. The Iraqi regime has plotted to develop anthrax and nerve gas and nuclear weapons for over a decade. This is a regime that has already used poison gas to murder thousands of its own citizens, leaving the bodies of mothers huddled over their dead children.”
While in no way would I downplay, for instance, Saddam Hussein’s dropping of mustard gas canisters on the Kurdish city of Halabja during the Iran-Iraq war, killing as many as 60,000 people, the legitimacy of Bush’s moral outrage disintegrates pretty quickly, when the actions of his own country are taken into account. Takes one to know one!
This country inflicted hell on Planet Earth during the Vietnam war, dropping some 12 million gallons of Agent Orange and other herbicides on the country, ravaging some five million acres of forests, rivers and cropland. It’s been linked to cancer, diabetes, birth defects and more.
“The Red Cross estimates that three million Vietnamese have been affected by dioxin, including at least 150,000 children born with serious birth defects,” according to the Aspen Institute. “Millions of Americans and Vietnamese are still affected, directly and indirectly, by the wartime U.S. spraying of Agent Orange and other herbicides over southern and central Vietnam.”
The institute adds: “Large tracts of that land remain degraded and unproductive to this day.”
But Bush nonetheless declared: “History has called America and our allies to action, and it is both our responsibility and our privilege to fight freedom’s fight.”
Carl Jung’s words may be a bit more on target: “Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.”
We all, as individuals, have a shadow side to our nature, as Jung pointed out: a dark place, where rage and despair seethe. There is also a collective human shadow, which morphs into armies and, ultimately, into wars. Evil is externalized. The enemy easily becomes what we fear and hate about ourselves – which means we can kill it. But first we must dehumanize the “other,” and dehumanization is seductive. It’s also addictive. Is a world beyond war possible? Yes, I believe so – if we can face the collective shadow.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.