March, 23 2021, 12:00am EDT
Sen. Bernie Sanders, Rep. Madeleine Dean Joined One Fair Wage Advocates for Equal Pay Day Event on Equal Pay & Sexual Harassment in the Restaurant Industry
Experts and advocates unveiled findings of the new research documenting how the subminimum wage perpetuates gender pay inequality and contributes to the restaurant industry having the highest rates of sexual harassment of any industry in the US.
WASHINGTON
Earlier today, the day before Equal Pay Day, One Fair Wage, a national nonprofit representing subminimum wage workers, hosted an Equal Pay Day press call featuring Senator Bernie Sanders to discuss the findings of a new report documenting how the subminimum wage for tipped workers keeps suppresses the income of service workers while allowing for sexual harassment to run rampent in the resturant industry.
The call featured restaurant workers, employers, experts and leaders at women's advocacy organizations like TimesUp, UltraViolet, United States of Women, and Futures Without Violence, who highlighted how the subminimum wage for tipped workers serves as a major source not only of poverty and gender pay inequity among service workers in the restaurant industry --but also of sexual harassment and abuse on the job, which disproportionately affects women and Black tipped workers making a subminimum wage --particularly during the pandemic.
LISTEN HERE: https://us02web.zoom.us/rec/share/6BWTAgQhrDg5vvol3aZ09K4ofCcTMcJBjnHGm9FyZXtzs5MynjaYZXK9TJDRgyzG.vQCCcJJWO7bzT3Fo
PASSCODE: o.Piep3$
- The report, titled, "The Tipping Point: How the Subminimum Wage Keeps Incomes Low and Harassment High," found that:
- Overall, 71% of women restaurant workers have beensexually harassed at least once during their time in the restaurant industry. This percentage is the highest of any industry reporting statistics on sexual harassment.
- These experiences represented not one-time harassment, but often persisted over days, weeks, and in some cases, months. Thirty-seven percent of the workers interviewed described situations in which the harassment continued for a month or more, and that the behaviors during this period occurred frequently or almost every shift (35%).
- While women restaurant workers are most frequently harassed by customers,they are also pervasively sexualized and sexually harassed by supervisors, managers, or restaurant owners. Combining tipped and non-tipped workers, 44% stated they had been victims of sexual harassment from someone in a management or ownership role.
- Tipped workers who receive a subminimum wage experience sexual harassment at a rate far higher than their non-tipped counterparts. Tipped workers were significantly more likely to have been sexually harassed than their non-tipped counterparts: over three quarters versus over half (76% vs. 52%).
When workers reported the sexual harassment, tipped workers were less likely to say that the situation was corrected than their non-tipped counterparts. - Virtually all (98%) of the harassed women workers reported experiencing at least one incident of retaliation when all forms of retaliation were taken into account; tipped workers experienced significantly and substantially more retaliation than their non-tipped counterparts.
SEE THE FULL REPORT HERE: https://onefairwage.site/ofw_thetippingpoint_3-1
One Fair Wage, a national organization representing subminimum wage workers, and host of today's call, also released a briefing on how the subminimum wage for tipped workers creates legislated gender pay inequity in the restaurant industry, perpetuating the gender pay gap and leading to disproportionately higher rates of poverty for women. Specifically, the briefing reports:
- In the U.S, the average female restaurant worker earns 80 percent of what their male counterpart earns. This disparity costs women more than $200,000 over a lifetime.
- In the U.S., female restaurant workers are 1.3 times more likely to live in poverty as male restaurant workers. In general, tipped workers are 2.3 times more likely to live in poverty than the overall workforce. Among tipped workers, female tipped workers have a 38% higher poverty rate than male tipped workers. Female tipped workers are also 1.4 times more likely to to rely on food stamps and medicaid compared to male tipped workers.
- The seven states with One Fair Wage - a full minimum wage with tips on top, as called for by the Raise the Wage Act, have gender pay gaps that are one quarter (25%) less for all restaurant workers and nearly one third (31%) less for tipped restaurant workers than states with a subminimum wage of $2.13 an hour. The Raise the Wage Act can thus reduce the gender pay gap in the restaurant industry by over one quarter.
SEE THE FULL BRIEFING HERE: https://onefairwage.site/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/OFW_TimeToEndSubWage_Nat_1.pdf
On Monday, a massive coalition of nearly 100 women leaders sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, as well as President Joe Biden and Speaker Nancy Pelosi urging the nation's top Democrats to not compromise for anything less than 100% of the full minimum wage for tipped workers, arguing that anything less than a full minimum wage with tips on top results in the restaurant industry having the highest levels of sexual harassment and gender based violence of any industry. Senators are expected to be negotiating this week over the passage of the Raise the Wage Act - legislation raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour and ending the subminimum wage for tipped workers. In the letter, the nearly 100 women leaders propose compromises such as adding tax breaks for small businesses and expanding timelines to achieve the full minimum wage for tipped workers - but firmly asserts that anything less than a full minimum wage, even if it takes a longer timeline, is not acceptable.
READ THE LETTER TO PRESIDENT BIDEN, MAJORITY LEADER SCHUMER & SPEAKER PELOSI HERE: https://drive.google.com/file/d/16IVnmYInGcaceSTVGQOIIzy4YTZ_9iQz/view?usp=sharing
"COVID-19's devastation of the service sector has been well documented, including the closure of thousands of independently-owned restaurants and the unemployment, underemployment, and destitution of millions of food service workers nationwide," said Saru Jayaraman, President of One Fair Wage. "Destitution among these workers can be traced in large part to the sub-minimum wage for tipped workers, still an unthinkable $2.13 an hour at the federal level. A legacy of slavery, the subminimum wage for tipped workers persists in 43 states, and has subjected a largely female workforce of servers, bartenders, bussers, and others to economic instability and the highest rates of sexual harassment of any industry for decades.
"Now, thousands of tipped workers, disproportionately women and women of color in particular, are returning to work as restaurants have re-opened for indoor or outdoor dining. Until now, however, no study has thoroughly documented service workers' experiences of working in restaurants during the pandemic. Understanding these workers' experiences is critical not only to address the needs of these workers and their families, but also to stem the public health crisis. The CDC reported in September 2020 that adults are twice as likely to contract the virus after eating in a restaurant. Food service workers have thus become at once essential workers and public health marshals, enforcing critical mask and social distancing protocols in one of the most dangerous social environments for spreading the pandemic. Unfortunately, unlike all other essential workers, they are not paid even a minimum wage and thus continue to live at the mercy of customers' tips," added Jayaraman.
This Wednesday, March 24th, the United States commemorates Equal Pay Day is the symbolic day dedicated to raising awareness of the gender pay gap. In the United States, this date symbolizes how far into the year the average woman must work in order to earn what the average man earns in the previous year regardless of experience or job type.
LATEST NEWS
Mistrial Declared in Abu Ghraib Torture Suit Against US Contractor
"This will not be the final word; what happened in Abu Ghraib is engraved into our memories and will never be forgotten in history," one plaintiff vowed.
May 02, 2024
The federal judge presiding over a case filed by three Iraqis who were tortured by U.S. military contractors in the notorious Abu Ghraib prison two decades ago declared a mistrial Thursday after jurors were unable to reach a unanimous verdict.
After eight days of deliberation—a longer period than the trial itself—the eight civil jurors in Alexandria deadlocked over whether employees of CACI conspired with soldiers to torture detainees. The Virginia-based professional services and information technology firm was hired in 2003 during the George W. Bush administration to provide translators and interrogators in Iraq during the U.S.-led invasion and occupation, conspired with soldiers to torture detainees.
U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema—who said Wednesday that "it's a very difficult case"—declared a mistrial.
Plaintiff Salah Al-Ejaili toldThe Guardian that "it is enough that we tried and didn't remain silent."
"We might not have received justice yet in our just case today, but what is more important is that we made it to trial and spoke up so the world could hear from us directly," he added. "This will not be the final word; what happened in Abu Ghraib is engraved into our memories and will never be forgotten in history."
Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights—which filed the case—said that "we are, of course, disappointed by the jury's failure to reach a unanimous verdict in favor of our plaintiffs despite the wealth of evidence."
"But we remain awed by the courage of our clients, who have fought for justice for their torment for 16 years," Azmy added. "We look forward to the opportunity to present our case again."
Al Shimari v. CACI, which was first filed in 2008 under the Alien Tort Statute—a law allowing non-U.S. citizens to sue for human rights abuses committed abroad—plaintiffs Suhail Al Shimari, Asa'ad Zuba'e, and Al-Ejaili accused CACI of conspiring with the U.S. military to perpetrate war crimes including torture at Abu Ghraib. The men suffered broken bones, electric shocks, sexual abuse, extreme temperatures, and death threats at the hands of their U.S. interrogators.
The case marked the first time a U.S. jury heard a case brought by Abu Ghraib survivors. Along with the Guantánamo Bay detention camp in Cuba, the prison became synonymous worldwide with U.S. torture during the War on Terror. Dozens of Abu Ghraib detainees died while in U.S. custody, some of them as a result of being tortured to death. Abu Ghraib prisoners suffered torture and abuse ranging from rape and being attacked with dogs to being forced to eat pork and renounce Islam.
A 2004 probe by Maj. Gen. Anthony Taguba found that the majority of Abu Ghraib prisoners—the Red Cross said 70-90%—were innocent. Women and girls were also imprisoned at Abu Ghraib as bargaining chips to lure militants wanted for resisting the U.S.-led invasion and occupation of their homeland. Some reported rape and sexual abuse by their captors, which reportedly led to the "honor killing" murders of multiple women.
CACI denies any wrongdoing and still gets millions of dollars worth of U.S. government contracts each year. In February, Fortunenamed CACI one of the "World's Most Admired Companies" for the seventh consecutive year.
Keep ReadingShow Less
As Hobbs Signs Repeal, Arizonans Push Abortion Rights Ballot Measure
"We cannot afford to celebrate or lose momentum. The threat to our reproductive freedom is as immediate today as it ever was," said the campaign behind the ballot initiative.
May 02, 2024
While Democratic Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs on Thursday signed legislation repealing an 1864 abortion ban, reproductive rights advocates in the state reiterated that fuller freedom over family planning requires passing a November ballot measure.
In response to an
Arizona Republic opinion piece noting that there is no emergency clause in House Bill 2677, the law repealing the ban, "which means it won't go off the books until 90 days after the Legislature adjourns," Arizona for Abortion Access stressed that "Arizonans will still be living under a law that denies us the right to make decisions about our own health."
"We cannot afford to celebrate or lose momentum. The threat to our reproductive freedom is as immediate today as it ever was," the campaign behind the ballot initiative said, adding that only passing the Arizona Abortion Access Act "changes that for good."
The Arizona Abortion Access Act is a proposed state constitutional amendment that would prohibit many limits on abortions before fetal viability and safeguard access to care after viability to protect the life or physical or mental health of the patient. Arizonans were fighting for it even before the state Supreme Court reinstated the 160-year-old ban.
Even Hobbs recognized that the battle for reproductive freedom is far from over, saying Thursday that "today, we should not rest, but we should recommit to protecting women's bodily autonomy, their ability to make their own healthcare decisions, and the ability to control their lives."
"Let me be clear: I will do everything in my power to protect our reproductive freedoms, because I trust women to make the decisions that are best for them, and know politicians do not belong in the doctor's office," the Democrat pledged.
Her signature came just a day after the Arizona Senate approved H.B. 2677, following its state House passage last month. In both cases, a couple of Republican lawmakers voted with Democrats to advance the legislation—defying not only party members in the state but a national GOP that is hellbent on ending access to abortion care.
Democratic Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes said Wednesday that the Senate vote "to repeal the draconian 1864 abortion ban is a win for freedom in our state" and she was looking forward to Hobbs signing the bill.
"However, without an emergency clause that would allow the repeal to take effect immediately, the people of Arizona may still be subjected to the near-total abortion ban for a period of time this year," Mayes acknowledged. "Rest assured, my office is exploring every option available to prevent this outrageous 160-year-old law from ever taking effect."
Law Dork's Chris Geidner pointed out that "on Tuesday—though technically unrelated—Mayes' office asked the Arizona Supreme Court to stay the issuance of the mandate in the case holding the near-total ban enforceable."
According to Geidner:
If granted, that would push the issuance of the mandate to July 25—90 days beyond the date when the Arizona Supreme Court denied Mayes' request for reconsideration—which would then block enforcement to at least 45 days beyond that, to September 8.
At that point, the repeal law passed on Wednesday likely will have gone into effect—meaning that the 15-week ban would remain the applicable law throughout this entire time—and the expected vote on the proposed constitutional amendment will be less than two months away.
Planned Parenthood Arizona took similar action after the Senate vote on Wednesday. The group's CEO, Angela Florez, explained that "we have said all along that we will use every possible avenue to safeguard essential care for our patients and all Arizonans, and that's exactly what we're doing with today's motion."
"While anti-abortion extremists in the state Legislature will continue to do everything in their power to undermine Arizonans' freedom and criminalize essential healthcare, Planned Parenthood Arizona is taking action to prevent a harmful total ban on abortion from taking effect in our state," Florez continued. "The court's April 9 ruling was both tragic and wrong, but it rested on trying to discern legislative intent. The Legislature has now spoken and clearly does not want the 1864 ban to be enforced."
"We hope the court stays true to its word and respects this long-overdue legislative action, by quickly granting our motion to end the uncertainty over the future of abortion in Arizona," added Florez, whose group supports the ballot measure.
Keep ReadingShow Less
DOE Investigating Columbia University for Anti-Palestinian Harassment
"Students have the right to speak out against the genocide of Palestinians, without fear of unequal treatment, racist attacks, or being denied access to an education by their university," one lawyer said.
May 02, 2024
Palestine Legal announced Thursday that the U.S. Department of Education has launched a federal investigation into "extreme anti-Palestinian, anti-Arab, and Islamophobic harassment" at Columbia University a week after the advocacy group filed a complaint on behalf of four students and a campus organization.
"While the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) looks into all complaints it receives, it only opens a formal investigation when it determines the facts warrant a deeper look," Palestine Legal pointed out on social media. "The complaint explains how Columbia has allowed and contributed to a pervasive anti-Palestinian environment on campus—including students receiving death threats, being harassed for wearing keffiyehs or hijab, doxxed, harassed by [administration], suspended, locked out of campus, and more."
"Instead of protecting Palestinian and associated students when their voices are most needed to oppose an ongoing genocide, Columbia has taken actions to reinforce this hostile climate in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964," added the group.
"The law is clear, if universities do not cease their racist crackdowns against Palestinians and their supporters—they will be at risk of losing federal funding."
Palestine Legal senior staff attorney Radhika Sainath stressed that "the law is clear, if universities do not cease their racist crackdowns against Palestinians and their supporters—they will be at risk of losing federal funding."
"Students have the right to speak out against the genocide of Palestinians, without fear of unequal treatment, racist attacks, or being denied access to an education by their university," the lawyer added.
Since the filing, which highlighted that Columbia University President Minouche Shafik invited "the New York Police Department (NYPD) onto campus for the first time in decades to arrest over 100 students who had been peacefully protesting Israel's genocide of Palestinians," the Ivy League leader has called officers back to the school for more arrests.
On Tuesday night, the NYPD "violently arrested and brutalized dozens of student protestors, some with guns drawn, using sledgehammers, batons, and flash-bang explosives," noted Palestine Legal, which represents Maryam Alwan, Deen Haleem, Daria Mateescu, and Layla Saliba as well as Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP).
Columbia is one of many American campuses where administrators have called the police, who have behaved aggressively toward students and faculty nonviolently demonstrating to demand that their schools and the U.S. government stop supporting the Israeli assault of Gaza, which has killed at least 34,596 Palestinians in under seven months.
The Interceptrevealed last week that OCR opened an investigation into the University of Massachusetts Amherst after Palestine Legal filed a complaint "on behalf of 18 UMass students who have been the target of extreme anti-Palestinian and anti-Arab harassment and discrimination by fellow UMass students, including receiving racial slurs, death threats and in one instance, actually being assaulted."
Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)—who has supported peaceful student protests and whose daughter Isra Hirsi was suspended from Columbia's Barnard College for protesting last month—highlighted the reporting on social media and some of the verbal attacks that students have endured.
OCR has opened a probe into Emory University following a complaint filed by Palestine Legal and the Council on American Islamic Relations, Georgia (CAIR-GA), according toThe Guardian. The newspaper noted Thursday that complaints have also been filed about Rutgers University in New Jersey and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Emory spokesperson Laura Diamond said in a statement that the university "does not tolerate behavior or actions that threaten, harm or target individuals because of their identities or backgrounds."
CAIR-GA executive director Azka Mahmood said that she hopes the investigation into Emory helps "make sure that the systems put in place against bias are used for everyone across the board—so we can produce a comfortable, equitable place for Palestinian, Muslim, and Arab students in the future."
The probes and complaints are notably being conducted and reviewed by an administration that has condemned campus protests while arming Israeli forces engaged in what the International Court of Justice has called a plausibly genocidal campaign in Gaza.
After U.S. President Joe Biden delivered brief remarks on the demonstrations Thursday morning, Edward Ahmed Mitchell, a civil rights attorney and national deputy director at CAIR, said his "claim that 'dissent must never lead to disorder' defies American history, from the Boston Tea Party to the tactics that civil rights activists, Vietnam War protesters, and anti-apartheid activists used to confront injustice."
"And if President Biden is truly concerned about the conflict on college campuses," Mitchell added, "he should specifically condemn law enforcement and pro-Israel mobs for attacking students, and stop enabling the genocide in Gaza that has triggered the protests."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular