January, 18 2011, 12:30pm EDT
High-Capacity Magazine Sellers Raise Millions for NRA
MidwayUSA
is a Missouri company well known among gun enthusiasts for its firearms
accessories: the company website boasts that the firm stocks "Just
about everything for shooting, reloading, gunsmithing and hunting."
These wares include high-capacity magazines similar to those used
in the Arizona shooting spree that enabled the accused assailant to
kill six people and wound 14 others -- including Rep.
WASHINGTON
MidwayUSA
is a Missouri company well known among gun enthusiasts for its firearms
accessories: the company website boasts that the firm stocks "Just
about everything for shooting, reloading, gunsmithing and hunting."
These wares include high-capacity magazines similar to those used
in the Arizona shooting spree that enabled the accused assailant to
kill six people and wound 14 others -- including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords --
by rapidly firing a fusillade of shots without pausing to reload.
Over the last two decades, MidwayUSA has done just about everything to help the National Rifle Association flourish financially.
In 1992 MidwayUSA developed a fundraising tactic to boost the NRA's
fortunes, dubbed "Round-Up," that has yielded $5.7 million for the NRA's
lobbying operations. The MidwayUSA money drive asks customers to "round
up" the total of each order to the nearest dollar or higher. Then the
company donates the difference to the NRA's Institute for Legislative
Action, a lobbying arm of the gun rights group.
For good measure, Brenda Potterfield, the wife of Midway CEO Larry
Potterfield and a co-owner of the firm, serves as vice president of the
NRA Foundation's board of trustees. Little wonder that the firm's
website declares that no company in the country is "more dedicated to,
and more supportive of, the goals of the National Rifle Association than
MidwayUSA."
A Center for Public Integrity review uncovered several little-noticed symbiotic ties between gun companies and the NRA.
Other companies that sell high-capacity magazines and gun gear also
embraced the round up idea to boost the NRA's finances. The website of
MidwayUSA notes that since 1992 other companies have deployed the same
round up fundraising tool: together with MidwayUSA, other firearms
industry players have funneled a total of $7.5 million to the NRA's
Institute for Legislative Action.
During the first nine months of last year, the NRA and its ILA unit spent a total of $2 million on lobbying, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Further, some of these vendors of high-capacity magazines also boast
executives who are board members of the NRA. Ronnie Barrett, the CEO of
Tennessee-based Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, which makes a
military-style rifle sold with high-capacity magazines, was elected to
the NRA board in 2009. And Pete Brownell, who runs Iowa-based Brownells
Inc., which also makes high-capacity magazines, joined the NRA board in
2010.
The strong financial and corporate ties to the NRA underscore how the
gun rights goliath has become increasingly intertwined with some of the
nation's leading accessory vendors that sell high-capacity magazines.
All have big stakes in fighting a pending gun control measure in
Washington.
The links between the NRA and the firms that sell high-capacity
magazines are likely going to get more scrutiny as Congress weighs
legislation that will be introduced Tuesday by Rep. Carolyn McCarthy,
D-N.Y., to ban the transfer, importation or possession of high-capacity
magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. (It would "grandfather"
high-capacity magazines already in the possession of gunowners). A
companion bill will be introduced in the Senate by Sen. Frank
Lautenberg, D-N.J.
The NRA seems poised to launch a lobbying blitzkrieg to defeat the legislation. Last week the NRA issued a statement
calling high-capacity magazines "standard equipment for self-defense
handguns and other firearms owned by tens of millions of Americans." And
the NRA also vowed to "stand front and center in defense of the rights
of gun owners."
Gun control advocates are hoping to undercut some of the NRA's
famously strong support among congressional Republicans and moderate
Democrats by targeting these close ties between the NRA and
high-capacity magazine distributors.
"The NRA acts as a trade association for the firearms industry," said
Josh Sugarmann, the executive director of the Violence Policy Center, a
gun control advocacy group that backs the new legislation. "The NRA's
priorities are not gun owners but the manufacturers of guns and
accessories."
The NRA's opposition to gun control measures, Sugarmann added, often
"isn't about protecting the rights of millions of gun owners [so much]
as protecting the financial interests of NRA board members and the NRA
itself."
Both MidwayUSA and Brownells are major distributors of gun
accessories including high-capacity magazines. And Barrett's
high-capacity magazines are sold with one of their military-style
rifles. For example, MidwayUSA offers magazines at 10, 15, 30, 33 and 40
rounds, all of which won 5-star reviews from users. "Well worth the
money," said one buyer. Another wrote, "It doesn't get any better than
this!"
Top executives from the three firearms companies were in Las Vegas this week for an annual trade show,
dubbed the "SHOT Show," where numerous companies display their wares.
None of the companies returned phone calls or emails seeking comment.
Members of Congress who back bans on the sale and manufacture of
high-capacity magazines stressed that they are unnecessary for hunting.
"The only purpose for the existence of these devices is to be able to
shoot as many people as possible as quickly as possible," said Rep.
Carolyn McCarthy, whose husband was killed and her son wounded in a
commuter train mass shooting in 1993. In a "Dear Colleague" letter
that she wrote as her House bill was being prepared. "There is no
reason these devices should be available to the general public."
A weaker version of the McCarthy bill was part of the assault weapons
ban which became law in 1994 and expired in 2004 -- despite support for
its renewal by President George W. Bush.
The Center for Public Integrity is a nonprofit organization dedicated to producing original, responsible investigative journalism on issues of public concern. The Center is non-partisan and non-advocacy. We are committed to transparent and comprehensive reporting both in the United States and around the world.
LATEST NEWS
'Flawed and Dangerous': US Appeals Panel Upholds Potential TikTok Ban
"This is a deeply misguided ruling that reads important First Amendment precedents too narrowly and gives the government sweeping power to restrict Americans' access to information, ideas, and media from abroad."
Dec 06, 2024
First Amendment advocates on Friday criticized a U.S. appellate court for upholding a law that would ban TikTok in the United States if its Chinese parent company does not swiftly sell the social media platform used by an estimated 170 million Americans.
Signed by President Joe Biden in April, the law gives ByteDance until January 19 to divest from TikTok. Three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found that the parts of the law considered by the panel "do not contravene the First Amendment" nor other parts of the Constitution of the United States.
"The First Amendment exists to protect free speech in the United States. Here the government acted solely to protect that freedom from a foreign adversary nation and to limit that adversary's ability to gather data on people in the United States," Judge Douglas Ginsburg wrote in an opinion the company is expected to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Responding to the decision on social media Friday, Ashley Gorski, senior staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project, said that "the D.C. Circuit's decision today to uphold the TikTok ban is enormously disappointing. If allowed to stand, it would give the government far too much power to restrict Americans' speech online."
Jameel Jaffer, who was on a friend-of-the-court brief as director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, issued a similar warning after the ruling was released.
"This is a deeply misguided ruling that reads important First Amendment precedents too narrowly and gives the government sweeping power to restrict Americans' access to information, ideas, and media from abroad," he said. "I hope the D.C. Circuit's ruling won't be the last word—and I doubt it will be."
Kate Ruane, director of the Center for Democracy & Technology's Free Expression Project, also looked ahead to the next court fight.
"The D.C. Circuit decision upholding the TikTok ban will immeasurably harm the free expression of hundreds of millions of TikTok users in the U.S. and globally who use the app to create, to share information, to get their news, and promote their businesses," she said in a statement. "We hope the next phase of review of this misguided and overbroad law will be a chance to right this wrong and prevent it from going into effect."
In addition to arguing the law is unconstitutional, attorneys for TikTok and ByteDance "have claimed it's impossible to divest the platform commercially and technologically,"
The Associated Pressreported. "They also say any sale of TikTok without the coveted algorithm—the platform's secret sauce that Chinese authorities would likely block under any divesture plan—would turn the U.S. version of TikTok into an island disconnected from other global content."
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, who is set to take office one day after the law's divestment deadline, previously supported banning the platform, but during the latest campaign, he pledged to try to "save TikTok." According toThe Washington Post:
Trump is expected to try to halt the TikTok ban, people familiar with his views on the matter told The Washington Post in early November, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.
Alan Rozenshtein, a former national security adviser to the Justice Department, said Trump could take any of three actions to help TikTok fend off the ban: persuading Congress to repeal the law, directing his new attorney general not to enforce it, and declaring that ByteDance has satisfied the statute by performing a "qualified divestiture" of TikTok.
Although the president-elect hasn't yet weighed in on the new court decision, on Thursday he shared on his Truth Social platform a post-election overview of how his campaign performed on TikTok.
While Trump may move to preserve TikTok in the United States, civil rights attorney and Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Clinic instructor Alejandra Caraballo noted that the court decision's "terrible precedent" is also a concern as he returns to office.
"This will be a test of the U.S.'s ability to shut down access to websites they dislike," Caraballo stressed. "Really bad to do with Trump in office! We could enter a new era of government censorship."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Brutal Murder of Insurance CEO Sparks Wave of Dark Humor, Including Fictionalized Denial of Coverage Letter
"You don't have to sanction murder to see why so many Americans detest health insurance corporations who prioritize profit goals by routinely creating arbitrary reasons to deny patient needs," said one labor movement voice.
Dec 06, 2024
The killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson outside of a Manhattan hotel Wednesday has sparked a wave of dark humor and fresh fury at the for-profit U.S. healthcare system.
The barbs at UnitedHealthcare—the country's largest private insurer—included a mock denial of coverage letter posted to the subreddit r/nursing in a thread on Thompson’s murder.
"We regret to inform you that your request for coverage has been denied," the letter reads. "Our records indicate that you failed to obtain prior authorization before seeking care for the gunshot wound to your chest." The Daily Beastreported a spoof rejection letter was also posted to a since closed thread on r/medicine.
Police are in their third day searching for Thompson's killer, who shot the healthcare executive multiple times in front of a Hilton hotel in Midtown before fleeing the scene. The New York Police Department has released an image that shows a man authorities deem "a person of interest wanted for questioning" in connection to the Wednesday killing, perCNN. The image was captured at a hostel in Manhattan, according to CNN, citing law enforcement.
The words "deny," "defend," and "depose" were found written on the ammunition used by the gunman, three words that partially echo the title of the book "Delay, Deny, Defend," which details how the insurance industry avoids paying claims.
In addition to dark humor, reactions to Thompson's assassination have brought to the fore the public's downright rage at the health insurance industry.
In the comment section of Common Dreams' coverage of the murder, one commenter wrote: "I guess if you steal people's labor and deny them healthcare in order to line your own pockets, you might occasionally expect retaliation." Another wrote: "For profit health care is unethical and immoral."
"Thoughts and deductibles to the family," read one comment below a video of the shooting posted by CNN, according to The New York Times. "Unfortunately my condolences are out-of-network."
One woman whose mother with stage four breast cancer was forced to battle insurance to get new treatments approved toldNew York magazine that she experienced "a little surge of Schadenfreude," when she heard of Thompson's death.
"UnitedHealth CEO Brian Thompson was just 50 years old at the time of his murder, which is a lot more tragic when you know that his life expectancy as a member of the Top 1% was 88, or 15 years longer than the life expectancy of the average American male," wrote journalist and editor Moe Tkacik on X. Later, in a piece for The American Prospect, Tkacik framed the situation like this: "Only about 50 million customers of America’s reigning medical monopoly might have a motive to exact revenge upon the UnitedHealthcare CEO."
Others said that the reaction to the murder was an indication that the Democratic party ought to embrace economic populism and end their close association with corporate power.
"The mass reaction to the healthcare CEO’s murder is a reminder that there is a constant deadly class war being waged against working class Americans. If Dems ditched their billionaires and fully joined the side of the working class in that struggle they would easily win FDR style majorities," said the political commentator Krystal Ball.
Charles Idelson, former communications strategist for National Nurses United, said that "you don’t have to sanction murder to see why so many Americans detest health insurance corporations who prioritize profit goals by routinely creating arbitrary reasons to deny patient needs."
"It's not unique to UnitedHealth," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Agency Trump and Musk Want to 'Delete' Set to Deliver $1.8 Billion to Scammed US Consumers
"When the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is allowed to fully do its job, Americans only stand to benefit."
Dec 06, 2024
In the coming weeks, as President-elect Donald Trump's second term approaches and his pledge to dismantle key agencies potentially comes closer to fruition, 4.3 million consumers are set to receive checks from one of the agencies the incoming administration wants to "delete."
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced Thursday that it will soon begin distributing a historic $1.8 billion to millions of people who were charged illegal junk fees or defrauded by credit repair companies including Lexington Law and CreditRepair.com.
The money will be distributed from the CFPB's victim relief fund, which was created by Congress and is financed entirely by civil penalties paid by companies and individuals who violate consumer financial protection laws.
The fund has distributed $3.3 billion to consumers since its inception, and the CFPB said the forthcoming payment will be its largest ever.
"Lexington Law and CreditRepair.com exploited vulnerable consumers who were trying to rebuild their credit, charging them illegal junk fees for results they hadn't delivered," said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra. "This historic distribution of $1.8 billion demonstrates the CFPB's commitment to making consumers whole."
A district court ruled in August 2023 that the two companies had violated the Telemarketing Sales Rule's prohibition on advance fees, which bars credit repair firms from collecting fees from consumers until they prove they have achieved the results they promise to their customers.
If the CFPB payments are divided equally among those who were wrongly charged fees by the two companies, each consumer would receive about $419.
The payments are being sent days after the CFPB proposed a rule aimed at reining in data brokers who sell people's personal information.
As Common Dreamsreported, billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has expressed concern about the practices of data brokers—but as Trump's nominee to co-lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a yet-to-be-created commission that would cut regulations and government spending, Musk has pledged to "delete" the CFPB.
Filmmaker and media activist Danny Ledonne said Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, another businessman nominated to lead DOGE, likely want to do away with the CFPB because the agency acts "in the interest of regular people."
Liz Zelnick, director of the Economic Security and Corporate Power Program at government watchdog Accountable.US, said the upcoming $1.8 billion payout shows why the CFPB should remain in operation.
"When the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is allowed to fully do its job, Americans only stand to benefit," said Zelnick. "Between surprise fees and misleading business practices, today's victory affirms the importance of the CFPB for defending people across the country from shady industry actors."
Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) said supporters of consumer protections in Congress will "fight any attempts to dismantle [CFPB], whether from Trump, Musk, or their billionaire buddies."
"The CFPB fights for everyday Americans against corporate greed, junk fees, and predatory lenders," he said. "This watchdog agency protects normal people like you and me."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular