

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
During meetings this week with Attorney General Eric Holder, members
of Congress and DC-based campaign committees, a contingent of retired
military leaders will push for the closure of the U.S. detention
facility at Guantanamo Bay and ask that terrorism suspects be brought to
justice in federal civilian courts. The meetings, slated to take place
between Sept. 14-16, will come as the retired military leaders return to
the nation's capital after months in the states educating candidates of
both parties about the national security benefits of carrying out these
policies.
"We are here to send a clear message that detention policy and
efforts to bring terrorists to justice in federal civil courts are not
issues that should be subject to political posturing," General Joseph
Hoar, USMC (Ret.), who served as Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Central
Command. "The politicization of these issues runs counter to America's
national security interests. It is imperative that we close the U.S.
detention facility at Guantanamo Bay as quickly as possible and bring
accused terrorists to justice in federal civilian courts, the only venue
with a proven track record of successfully handling these cases."
The group notes that federal civil courts have successfully convicted
more than 400 terrorists, but military commissions have secured only
four convictions. They also argue that treating accused terrorists as
warriors by trying them in military commissions does a disservice to
America's men and women in uniform who serve the nation honorably.
Joining General Hoar in Washington, DC will be Lieutenant General
Charles Otstott, USA (Ret.), former Deputy Chairman of the NATO Military
Committee; Major General Paul Eaton, USA (Ret.), former Commanding
General of the command charged with reestablishing Iraqi Security
Forces; Rear Admiral John Hutson, JAGC, USN (Ret.), former Navy Judge
Advocate General; and Brigadier General David R. Irvine, USA (Ret.),
former intelligence officer and Deputy Commander for the 96th Regional
Readiness Command. The group's meetings include sit-downs with Attorney
General Holder, CIA Director Panetta, Ambassador Daniel Fried,
High-Value Interrogation Groups (HIG) Director Andrew McCabe, and a half
dozen members of Congress. The group will also meet with the National
Republican Congressional Committee and the Republican Senatorial
Campaign Committee.
These retired military leaders are part of a group that works with
Human Rights First and came together in 2005, united by concern about
the report of abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere in U.S.
Custody. At that time, they urged that prisoner treatment and detention
policies comply with the Geneva Conventions and reflect U.S. laws,
values and security interests. The group was instrumental in winning
passage of legislation, known as the McCain amendment, which prohibited
the use of torture techniques such as waterboarding.
Since then, dozens of retired Generals and Admirals have joined this
nonpartisan effort. These same retired military leaders were active in
the last election cycle and met with eight of the presidential
candidates to urge action on these same issues. President Obama, Vice
President Biden, Governor Huckabee and Secretary Clinton have all
publicly credited this group with influencing their thinking on the
treatment of enemy prisoners. As a direct result of their efforts, on
his second full day in office, President Barack Obama signed Executive
Orders ending torture, secret prisons, and promising to close the
detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Many of this group of
retired military leaders stood with the President in the Oval Office as
he signed these orders.
This year, fueled by concerns regarding the politicized tenor that
has shaped the debate about these important national security issues,
the retired military leader groups has renewed its commitment to educate
candidates and make themselves available for candid discussions.
Earlier this summer, they held meetings with congressional candidates
from Delaware, Illinois, and Pennsylvania. Just this past weekend, they
aired a 30-second television advertisement during Sunday news programs
in Indiana. That state's U.S. Senate race has featured a debate over
each candidate's position on closing the Guantanamo Bay detention
facility.
"Guantanamo is a symbol of America's failure to adhere to the Geneva
Conventions and the country's fundamental principles. It remains a
primary recruiting tool for terrorists. It's time to turn the page on
this failed facility and the failed policies," Hoar concluded.
Bios of Participating Generals & Admirals
General Joseph Hoar, USMC (Ret.)
General
Hoar served as Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Central Command. After the first
Gulf War, General Hoar led the effort to enforce the naval embargo in
the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf, and to enforce the no-fly zone in the
south of Iraq. He oversaw the humanitarian and peacekeeping operations
in Kenya and Somalia and also supported operations in Rwanda, and the
evacuation of U.S. civilians from Yemen during the 1994 civil war. He
was the Deputy for Operations for the Marine Corps during the Gulf War
and served as General Norman Schwarzkopf's Chief of Staff at Central
Command. General Hoar currently runs a consulting business in
California.
Lieutenant General Charles Otstott, USA (Ret.)
General
Otstott served 32 years in the Army. As an Infantryman, he commanded at
every echelon including command of the 25th Infantry Division (Light)
from 1988-1990. His service included two combat tours in Vietnam. He
completed his service in uniform as Deputy Chairman, NATO Military
Committee, 1990-1992.
Major General Paul D. Eaton, USA (Ret.)
General
Eaton recently retired from the U.S. Army after more than 33 years
service. His assignments include Infantry command from the company to
brigade levels, command of the Infantry Center at Fort Benning and Chief
of Infantry. His most recent operational assignment was Commanding
General of the command charged with reestablishing Iraqi Security Forces
2003-2004, where he built the command and established the structure and
infrastructure for the Iraqi Armed Forces. Other operational
assignments include Somalia, Bosnia and Albania. Other assignments
include the Joint Staff, Deputy Commanding General for Transformation
and Stryker Unit Development and Assistant Professor and head of the
French Department at West Point. He is a 1972 graduate of West Point. He
and his wife PJ have three children, all Soldiers.
Rear Admiral John D. Hutson, JAGC, USN (Ret.)
Rear
Admiral John D. Hutson served in the U. S. Navy from 1973 to 2000. He
was the Navy's Judge Advocate General from 1997 to 2000. Admiral Hutson
now serves as President and Dean of the Franklin Pierce Law Center in
Concord, New Hampshire. He also joined Human Rights First's Board of
Directors in 2005.
Brigadier General David R. Irvine, USA (Ret.)
Brigadier
General Irvine enlisted in the 96th Infantry Division, United States
Army Reserve, in 1962. He received a direct commission in 1967 as a
strategic intelligence officer. He maintained a faculty assignment for
18 years with the Sixth U.S. Army Intelligence School, and taught
prisoner of war interrogation and military law for several hundred
soldiers, Marines, and airmen. He retired in 2002, and his last
assignment was Deputy Commander for the 96th Regional Readiness Command.
General Irvine is an attorney, and practices law in Salt Lake City,
Utah. He served 4 terms as a Republican legislator in the Utah House of
Representatives, has served as a congressional chief of staff, and
served as a commissioner on the Utah Public Utilities Commission.
Human Rights First is a non-profit, nonpartisan international human rights organization based in New York and Washington D.C. Human Rights First believes that building respect for human rights and the rule of law will help ensure the dignity to which every individual is entitled and will stem tyranny, extremism, intolerance, and violence.
"I will give," said the Republican mega-donor with a smile.
Billionaire Miram Adelson on Tuesday night suggested the legal obstacles for President Donald Trump to serve an additional term in office after 2028 are not insurmountable as the far-right Republican megadonor vowed another $250 million to bolster a run that experts say would be unlawful and unconstitutional on its face.
Adelson, a hardline Zionist who, along with her now deceased husband, Sheldon Adelson, has given hundreds of millions to US lawmakers who back a strong relationship between the US and Israeli governments, was sharing the podium with Trump during a Hanukkah candlelighting event at the White House when she made the remarks.
With a reference to Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, Adelson said they had discussed "the legal thing of four more years"—something Trump has repeatedly gestured toward and many of his backers have called for—and told Trump, “So, we can do it, think about it.”
A chant in the crowd then broke out for "For four more years!" as Adelson whispered something in Trump's ear.
“She said, ‘Think about it, I’ll give you another $250 million,’” Trump then said into the microphone. "I will give," Adelson said with a smile.
Watch the exchange:
Adelson: I met Alan Dershowitz.. he said.. four more years. We can do it. Think about it.
Crowd: *chants four more years*
Trump: She said think about it, I’ll give you another 250 million pic.twitter.com/eOc7Zazyns
— Acyn (@Acyn) December 17, 2025
For Trump's 2024 presidential campaign alone, Adelson gave at least $100 million to support the Republican candidate with Super PAC she established, according to federal filings.
In his remarks on Tuesday, Trump credited Adelson with providing him $250 million overall—"directly and indirectly"—during his 2024 bid.
"When someone can you $250 million, I think that we should give her the opportunity to say hello," Trump said, when introducing her. "And Miriam, make it quick, because $250 million is not what it used to be."
"This is the Iraq War 2.0 with a South American flavor to it," warned one Democratic senator.
US President Donald Trump late Tuesday declared a blockade on "all sanctioned oil tankers" approaching and leaving Venezuela, a major escalation in what's widely seen as an accelerating march to war with the South American country.
The "total and complete blockade," Trump wrote on his social media platform, will only be lifted when Venezuela returns to the US "all of the Oil, Land, and other Assets that they previously stole from us."
"Venezuela is completely surrounded by the largest Armada ever assembled in the History of South America," Trump wrote, referring to the massive US military buildup in the Caribbean. "It will only get bigger, and the shock to them will be like nothing they have ever seen before."
The government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, which has mobilized its military in response to the US president's warmongering, denounced Trump's comments as a "grotesque threat" aimed at "stealing the riches that belong to our homeland."
The US-based anti-war group CodePink said in a statement that "Trump’s assertion that Venezuela must 'return' oil, land, and other assets to the United States exposes the true objective" of his military campaign.
"Venezuela did not steal anything from the United States. What Trump describes as 'theft' is Venezuela’s lawful assertion of sovereignty over its own natural resources and its refusal to allow US corporations to control its economy," said CodePink. "A blockade, a terrorist designation, and a military buildup are steps toward war. Congress must act immediately to stop this escalation, and the international community must reject this lawless threat."
The announced naval blockade—an act of aggression under international law—came a week after the Trump administration seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela and made clear that it intends to intercept more.
US Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas), one of the leaders of a war powers resolution aimed at preventing the Trump administration from launching a war on Venezuela without congressional approval, said Tuesday that "a naval blockade is unquestionably an act of war."
"A war that the Congress never authorized and the American people do not want," Castro added, noting that a vote on his resolution is set for Thursday. "Every member of the House of Representatives will have the opportunity to decide if they support sending Americans into yet another regime change war."
"This is absolutely an effort to get us involved in a war in Venezuela."
Human rights organizations have accused the Republican-controlled Congress of abdicating its responsibilities as the Trump administration takes belligerent and illegal actions in international waters and against Venezuela directly, claiming without evidence to be combating drug trafficking.
Last month, Senate Republicans—some of whom are publicly clamoring for the US military to overthrow Maduro's government—voted down a Venezuela war powers resolution. Two GOP senators, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, joined Democrats in supporting the resolution.
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy, wrote Tuesday that "the White House minimized Republican 'yes' votes by promising that Trump would seek Congress’ authorization before initiating hostilities against Venezuela itself."
"Trump today broke that promise to his own party’s lawmakers by ordering a partial blockade on Venezuelan ships," wrote Williams. "A blockade, including a partial one, definitively constitutes an act of war. Trump is starting a war against Venezuela without congressional authorization."
Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) warned in a television appearance late Monday that members of the Trump administration are "going to do everything they can to get us into this war."
"This is the Iraq War 2.0 with a South American flavor to it," he added. "This is absolutely an effort to get us involved in a war in Venezuela."
"Obviously, they have issues with what is in that video, and that’s why they don’t want everybody to see it," Sen. Mark Kelly said of administration officials after the meeting.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday that the Pentagon will not release unedited video footage of a September airstrike that killed two men who survived an initial strike on a boat allegedly carrying drugs in the Caribbean Sea, a move that followed a briefing with congressional lawmakers described by one Democrat as an "exercise in futility" and by another as "a joke."
Hegseth said that members of the House and Senate Armed Services committees would be given a chance to view video of the September 2 "double-tap" strike, which experts said was illegal like all the other boat bombings. The secretary did not say whether all congressional lawmakers would be provided access to the footage.
“Of course we’re not going to release a top secret, full, unedited video of that to the general public,” Hegseth told reporters following a closed-door briefing during which he and Secretary of State Marco Rubio fielded questions from lawmakers.
As with a similar briefing earlier this month, Tuesday's meeting left some Democrat attendees with more questions than answers.
“The administration came to this briefing empty-handed,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) told reporters. “If they can’t be transparent on this, how can you trust their transparency on all the other issues swirling about in the Caribbean?”
That includes preparations for a possible attack on oil-rich Venezuela, which include the deployment of US warships and thousands of troops to the region and the authorization of covert action aimed at toppling the government of longtime Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
Tuesday's briefing came as House lawmakers prepare to vote this week on a pair of war powers resolutions aimed at preventing President Donald Trump from waging war on Venezuela. A similar bipartisan resolution recently failed in the Senate.
Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY), the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and co-author of one of the new war powers resolution, said in a statement: “Today’s briefing from Secretaries Rubio and Hegseth was an exercise in futility. It did nothing to address the serious legal, strategic, and moral concerns surrounding the administration’s unprecedented use of US military force in the Caribbean and Pacific."
"As of today, the administration has already carried out 25 such strikes over three months, extrajudicially killing 95 people," Meeks noted. "That this briefing to members of Congress only occurred more than three months since the strikes began—despite numerous requests for classified and public briefings—further proves these operations are unable to withstand scrutiny and lack a defensible legal rationale."
Briefing attendee Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.)—who is in the administration's crosshairs for reminding US troops that military rules and international law require them to disobey illegal orders—said of Trump officials, "Obviously, they have issues with what is in that video, and that’s why they don’t want everybody to see it."
Defending Hegseth's decision to not make the boat strike video public, Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) argued that “there’s a lot of members that’s gonna walk out there and that’s gonna leak classified information and there’s gonna be certain ones that you hold accountable."
Mullin singled out Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), who, along with the Somalian American community at large, has been the target of mounting Islamophobic and racist abuse by Trump and his supporters.
“Not everybody can go through the same background checks that need to be cleared on this,” he said. “Do you think Omar needs all this information? I will say no.”
Rejecting GOP arguments against releasing the video, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said after attending Tuesday's briefing: “I found the legal explanations and the strategic explanations incoherent, but I think the American people should see this video. And all members of Congress should have that opportunity. I certainly want it for myself.”