September, 14 2010, 11:55am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Brenda Bowser Soder,bowsersoderb@humanrightsfirst.org,O -202/370-3323, C - 301/906-4460
Retired Military Leaders To Urge Administration Officials Memebers Of Congress Campaign Committees To Press Ahead With Closing Guantanamo, Pursue Federal Trials For Terrorism Suspects
WASHINGTON
During meetings this week with Attorney General Eric Holder, members
of Congress and DC-based campaign committees, a contingent of retired
military leaders will push for the closure of the U.S. detention
facility at Guantanamo Bay and ask that terrorism suspects be brought to
justice in federal civilian courts. The meetings, slated to take place
between Sept. 14-16, will come as the retired military leaders return to
the nation's capital after months in the states educating candidates of
both parties about the national security benefits of carrying out these
policies.
"We are here to send a clear message that detention policy and
efforts to bring terrorists to justice in federal civil courts are not
issues that should be subject to political posturing," General Joseph
Hoar, USMC (Ret.), who served as Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Central
Command. "The politicization of these issues runs counter to America's
national security interests. It is imperative that we close the U.S.
detention facility at Guantanamo Bay as quickly as possible and bring
accused terrorists to justice in federal civilian courts, the only venue
with a proven track record of successfully handling these cases."
The group notes that federal civil courts have successfully convicted
more than 400 terrorists, but military commissions have secured only
four convictions. They also argue that treating accused terrorists as
warriors by trying them in military commissions does a disservice to
America's men and women in uniform who serve the nation honorably.
Joining General Hoar in Washington, DC will be Lieutenant General
Charles Otstott, USA (Ret.), former Deputy Chairman of the NATO Military
Committee; Major General Paul Eaton, USA (Ret.), former Commanding
General of the command charged with reestablishing Iraqi Security
Forces; Rear Admiral John Hutson, JAGC, USN (Ret.), former Navy Judge
Advocate General; and Brigadier General David R. Irvine, USA (Ret.),
former intelligence officer and Deputy Commander for the 96th Regional
Readiness Command. The group's meetings include sit-downs with Attorney
General Holder, CIA Director Panetta, Ambassador Daniel Fried,
High-Value Interrogation Groups (HIG) Director Andrew McCabe, and a half
dozen members of Congress. The group will also meet with the National
Republican Congressional Committee and the Republican Senatorial
Campaign Committee.
These retired military leaders are part of a group that works with
Human Rights First and came together in 2005, united by concern about
the report of abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere in U.S.
Custody. At that time, they urged that prisoner treatment and detention
policies comply with the Geneva Conventions and reflect U.S. laws,
values and security interests. The group was instrumental in winning
passage of legislation, known as the McCain amendment, which prohibited
the use of torture techniques such as waterboarding.
Since then, dozens of retired Generals and Admirals have joined this
nonpartisan effort. These same retired military leaders were active in
the last election cycle and met with eight of the presidential
candidates to urge action on these same issues. President Obama, Vice
President Biden, Governor Huckabee and Secretary Clinton have all
publicly credited this group with influencing their thinking on the
treatment of enemy prisoners. As a direct result of their efforts, on
his second full day in office, President Barack Obama signed Executive
Orders ending torture, secret prisons, and promising to close the
detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Many of this group of
retired military leaders stood with the President in the Oval Office as
he signed these orders.
This year, fueled by concerns regarding the politicized tenor that
has shaped the debate about these important national security issues,
the retired military leader groups has renewed its commitment to educate
candidates and make themselves available for candid discussions.
Earlier this summer, they held meetings with congressional candidates
from Delaware, Illinois, and Pennsylvania. Just this past weekend, they
aired a 30-second television advertisement during Sunday news programs
in Indiana. That state's U.S. Senate race has featured a debate over
each candidate's position on closing the Guantanamo Bay detention
facility.
"Guantanamo is a symbol of America's failure to adhere to the Geneva
Conventions and the country's fundamental principles. It remains a
primary recruiting tool for terrorists. It's time to turn the page on
this failed facility and the failed policies," Hoar concluded.
Bios of Participating Generals & Admirals
General Joseph Hoar, USMC (Ret.)
General
Hoar served as Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Central Command. After the first
Gulf War, General Hoar led the effort to enforce the naval embargo in
the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf, and to enforce the no-fly zone in the
south of Iraq. He oversaw the humanitarian and peacekeeping operations
in Kenya and Somalia and also supported operations in Rwanda, and the
evacuation of U.S. civilians from Yemen during the 1994 civil war. He
was the Deputy for Operations for the Marine Corps during the Gulf War
and served as General Norman Schwarzkopf's Chief of Staff at Central
Command. General Hoar currently runs a consulting business in
California.
Lieutenant General Charles Otstott, USA (Ret.)
General
Otstott served 32 years in the Army. As an Infantryman, he commanded at
every echelon including command of the 25th Infantry Division (Light)
from 1988-1990. His service included two combat tours in Vietnam. He
completed his service in uniform as Deputy Chairman, NATO Military
Committee, 1990-1992.
Major General Paul D. Eaton, USA (Ret.)
General
Eaton recently retired from the U.S. Army after more than 33 years
service. His assignments include Infantry command from the company to
brigade levels, command of the Infantry Center at Fort Benning and Chief
of Infantry. His most recent operational assignment was Commanding
General of the command charged with reestablishing Iraqi Security Forces
2003-2004, where he built the command and established the structure and
infrastructure for the Iraqi Armed Forces. Other operational
assignments include Somalia, Bosnia and Albania. Other assignments
include the Joint Staff, Deputy Commanding General for Transformation
and Stryker Unit Development and Assistant Professor and head of the
French Department at West Point. He is a 1972 graduate of West Point. He
and his wife PJ have three children, all Soldiers.
Rear Admiral John D. Hutson, JAGC, USN (Ret.)
Rear
Admiral John D. Hutson served in the U. S. Navy from 1973 to 2000. He
was the Navy's Judge Advocate General from 1997 to 2000. Admiral Hutson
now serves as President and Dean of the Franklin Pierce Law Center in
Concord, New Hampshire. He also joined Human Rights First's Board of
Directors in 2005.
Brigadier General David R. Irvine, USA (Ret.)
Brigadier
General Irvine enlisted in the 96th Infantry Division, United States
Army Reserve, in 1962. He received a direct commission in 1967 as a
strategic intelligence officer. He maintained a faculty assignment for
18 years with the Sixth U.S. Army Intelligence School, and taught
prisoner of war interrogation and military law for several hundred
soldiers, Marines, and airmen. He retired in 2002, and his last
assignment was Deputy Commander for the 96th Regional Readiness Command.
General Irvine is an attorney, and practices law in Salt Lake City,
Utah. He served 4 terms as a Republican legislator in the Utah House of
Representatives, has served as a congressional chief of staff, and
served as a commissioner on the Utah Public Utilities Commission.
Human Rights First is a non-profit, nonpartisan international human rights organization based in New York and Washington D.C. Human Rights First believes that building respect for human rights and the rule of law will help ensure the dignity to which every individual is entitled and will stem tyranny, extremism, intolerance, and violence.
LATEST NEWS
Senate Tosses 'Dangerous Provision' Preventing State-Level AI Regulation From GOP Megabill
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry," said one advocate.
Jul 01, 2025
With a 99-1 vote early Tuesday, the Republican-controlled Senate decided to remove a controversial provision that would have prevented state-level regulation on artificial intelligence for 10 years from U.S. President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill that is currently being debated in Congress.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) was the lone lawmaker who voted to keep the moratorium in the bill.
While far from the only controversial part of the reconciliation package, the provision drew opposition from an ideologically diverse group that included Democratic and Republican state attorneys general; over 140 groups working to support children's online safety, consumer protections, and responsible innovation; and faith leaders.
Senators struck Sen. Ted Cruz's (R-Texas) AI measure from the megabill by adopting an amendment introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.). They voted on Blackburn's amendment during a session known as a vote-a-rama. Blackburn introduced the amendment after considering an agreement that would have watered down the provision.
According to The Verge, the measure that was rejected on Tuesday required states to avoid regulation AI and "automated decision systems" if they wanted to get funding for their broadband programs.
The provision would have been a major win for Big Tech, which has made the case that state laws around AI are obstructing their ability to do business.
Advocates and Democratic lawmakers cheered the decision to strip the provision.
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry. It shows that Americans are aware of the proliferation of AI harms in real time," said J.B. Branch, Big Tech accountability advocate at the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) said Tuesday that "early this morning, the Senate overwhelmingly voted to reject a dangerous provision to block states from regulating artificial intelligence, including protecting kids online. This 99-1 vote sent a clear message that Congress will not sell out our kids and local communities in order to pad the pockets of Big Tech billionaires."
In addition to concerns focused on Big Tech, experts recently told The Guardian that in the absence of state-level AI regulation, untrammeled growth of AI would take a toll on the world's "dangerously overheating climate."
Sacha Haworth, the executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, credited the "massive" defeat of Cruz's provision to the "incredible mobilizing by advocates to beat back Big Tech lobbying and last-minute bullying."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Shred JD Vance as He Shrugs Off Millions of Americans Losing Medicaid as 'Minutiae'
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Jul 01, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance took heat from critics this week when he downplayed legislation that would result in millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as mere "minutiae."
Writing on X, Vance defended the budget megabill that's currently being pushed through the United States Senate by arguing that it will massively increase funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which he deemed to be a necessary component of carrying out the Trump administration's mass deportation operation.
"The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits," wrote Vance. "The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass."
He then added that "everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions."
It was this line that drew the ire of many critics, as the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Senate version of the budget bill would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period, which would result in more than 10 million people losing their coverage. Additionally, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has proposed an amendment that would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which would likely kick millions more off of the program.
Many congressional Democrats were quick to pounce on Vance for what they said were callous comments about a vital government program.
"So if the only thing that matters is immigration... why didn't you support the bipartisan Lankford-Murphy bill that tackled immigration far better than your Ugly Bill?" asked Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.). "And it didn't have 'minutiae' that will kick 12m+ Americans off healthcare or raise the debt by $4tn."
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Veteran healthcare reporter Jonathan Cohn put some numbers behind the policies that are being minimized by the vice president.
"11.8M projected to lose health insurance," he wrote. "Clinics and hospitals taking a hit, especially in rural areas. Low-income seniors facing higher costs. 'Minutiae.'"
Activist Leah Greenberg, the co-chair of progressive organizing group Indivisible, zeroed in on Vance's emphasis on ramping up ICE's funding as particularly problematic.
"They are just coming right out and saying they want an exponential increase in $$$ so they can build their own personal Gestapo," she warned.
Washington Post global affairs columnist Ishaan Tharoor also found himself disturbed by the sheer size of the funding increase for ICE that Vance is demanding and he observed that "nothing matters more apparently than giving ICE a bigger budget than the militaries of virtually every European country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular