June, 08 2010, 11:19am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Lindsey M.
Williams (202) 342-1903
Swiss Parliament Rejects UBS DOJ Dea
NWC Condemns Failure of United States to Prosecute Tax Criminals
WASHINGTON
The Federal Assembly of the
Swiss parliament voted to reject a deal between the Department of
Justice (DOJ) and UBS in which UBS had agreed to turn over the names of
4,450 U.S. citizens who held secret and illegal bank accounts at UBS.
Stephen M. Kohn, Executive Director of the National Whistleblowers
Center and attorney for Bradley Birkenfeld, said:
Center and attorney for Bradley Birkenfeld, said:
"This vote is a setback to all U.S. taxpayers and demonstrates the
bankruptcy of the Department of Justice's negotiations with UBS. The DOJ
should demand that UBS produce all 19,000 tax violators, not just
4,450, shut down all UBS business in the United States until there is
full compliance, and reopen an active criminal investigation into the
American and Swiss bankers who conspired to commit these crimes. It is
an insult to every honest taxpayer that while the whistleblower is in
jail, UBS and its American clients are getting away with hiding billions
of dollars of taxable income."
bankruptcy of the Department of Justice's negotiations with UBS. The DOJ
should demand that UBS produce all 19,000 tax violators, not just
4,450, shut down all UBS business in the United States until there is
full compliance, and reopen an active criminal investigation into the
American and Swiss bankers who conspired to commit these crimes. It is
an insult to every honest taxpayer that while the whistleblower is in
jail, UBS and its American clients are getting away with hiding billions
of dollars of taxable income."
Dean A. Zerbe, co-counsel for Mr. Birkenfeld, said:
"The Obama administration put all its chips on a roll of the dice
and today with the rejection by the assembly in Switzerland they came up
snake-eyes. The Obama administration needs to show initiative and not
just sit and wait hoping for good news from Switzerland. The Obama
administration needs to be taking full advantage of the mountain of
information provided by the key whistleblower, Bradley Birkenfeld,
instead of letting it gather dust in government warehouses."
and today with the rejection by the assembly in Switzerland they came up
snake-eyes. The Obama administration needs to show initiative and not
just sit and wait hoping for good news from Switzerland. The Obama
administration needs to be taking full advantage of the mountain of
information provided by the key whistleblower, Bradley Birkenfeld,
instead of letting it gather dust in government warehouses."
The vote is the latest development in the case of former UBS banker
Bradley Birkenfeld. In 2007, Mr. Birkenfeld became
the first Swiss banker to blow the whistle on American citizens using
secret Swiss bank accounts to violate U.S. tax and securities law. As a
direct result of his disclosures, UBS closed its North American
division (with approximately $20 billion dollars in assets), agreed to
pay the U.S. government a $780 million dollar fine, and agreed to turn
over the names of 4,450 account holders.
Bradley Birkenfeld. In 2007, Mr. Birkenfeld became
the first Swiss banker to blow the whistle on American citizens using
secret Swiss bank accounts to violate U.S. tax and securities law. As a
direct result of his disclosures, UBS closed its North American
division (with approximately $20 billion dollars in assets), agreed to
pay the U.S. government a $780 million dollar fine, and agreed to turn
over the names of 4,450 account holders.
Throughout his disclosures to the DOJ, Mr. Birkenfeld warned that
Swiss politicians would stall and block the release of client names and
urged them to open a legitimate criminal investigation using the
detailed information he provided. Mr. Birkenfeld provided the DOJ with
detailed information that would have (and still could) permit them to
conduct a criminal investigation and identify the major UBS America
account holders. The Swiss Parliament will now try to reach a compromise
that would require UBS to turn over client information by August 20,
the deadline set by the deferred prosecution agreement between the DOJ
and UBS.
Swiss politicians would stall and block the release of client names and
urged them to open a legitimate criminal investigation using the
detailed information he provided. Mr. Birkenfeld provided the DOJ with
detailed information that would have (and still could) permit them to
conduct a criminal investigation and identify the major UBS America
account holders. The Swiss Parliament will now try to reach a compromise
that would require UBS to turn over client information by August 20,
the deadline set by the deferred prosecution agreement between the DOJ
and UBS.
The U.S. Justice Department admitted in court proceedings that "but
for Mr. Birkenfeld" the illegal $20 billion tax evasion "scheme" by the
Swiss banking giant UBS "would not have been discovered by the U.S.
government." Despite his undisputed contribution toward enforcement of
tax laws, Mr. Birkenfeld was the only banker prosecuted by the U.S.
government.
for Mr. Birkenfeld" the illegal $20 billion tax evasion "scheme" by the
Swiss banking giant UBS "would not have been discovered by the U.S.
government." Despite his undisputed contribution toward enforcement of
tax laws, Mr. Birkenfeld was the only banker prosecuted by the U.S.
government.
The National Whistleblowers Center urges all members of the public
to send letters in support of Mr. Birkenfeld's
clemency petition, which is pending before the Pardon Attorney.
to send letters in support of Mr. Birkenfeld's
clemency petition, which is pending before the Pardon Attorney.
Links:
Since 1988, the NWC and attorneys associated with it have supported whistleblowers in the courts and before Congress and achieved victories for environmental protection, government contract fraud, nuclear safety and government and corporate accountability.
LATEST NEWS
Grand Jury Indicts Top Trump Aides, 11 Arizona Republicans Over 'Fake Electors' Scheme
Had it succeeded, said the state's attorney general, the scheme would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
Apr 25, 2024
A grand jury in Arizona on Wednesday charged seven aides to Donald Trump and nearly a dozen Republican officials over a "fake electors" scheme in the state that aimed to keep the former president in power after his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.
Trump, who is currently facing nearly 90 charges across four criminal cases as he runs for another White House term, was described as "unindicted co-conspirator 1" in the 58-page indictment, which was announced by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.
"The people of Arizona elected President Biden," Mayes, a Democrat, said Wednesday. "Unwilling to accept this fact, the defendants charged by the state grand jury allegedly schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency. Whatever their reasoning was, the plot to violate the law must be answered for."
The indictment names former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward, sitting state Republican Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon, and seven others as the "fake electors" who sought to declare Trump the rightful winner of the state's presidential contest.
The names of other individuals indicted by the state grand jury are redacted, but the document's descriptions make clear that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, and top Trump legal strategist Boris Epshteyn are among those facing felony charges—including fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.
"In Arizona, defendants, unindicted coconspirators, and others pressured the three groups of election officials responsible for certifying election results to encourage them to change the election results," the document reads. "Discussions about using the Republican electors to change the outcome of the election began as early as November 4, 2020. Those plans evolved during
November based on memos drafted by [an attorney for the Trump campaign, Kenneth Chesebro]."
Mayes said Wednesday that had the fake elector scheme succeeded, it would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
"It effectively would have made their right to vote meaningless," said Mayes.
A state grand jury, made up of everyday, regular Arizonans, has handed down felony indictments in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona. pic.twitter.com/Nu8GcD4ZqJ
— AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes (@AZAGMayes) April 24, 2024
Alex Gulotta, state director of All Voting Is Local Action Arizona, said Wednesday that "the indictment of the eleven fake electors is one of the first steps required in holding these election deniers accountable for their alleged attempts to take power away from voters by disrupting our free and fair elections."
"Arizonans deserve to trust the election officials responsible for administering our elections and preserving our democracy," said Gulotta, "and this is a positive step forward as we continue to strengthen the foundations of our democracy and restore faith in our elections."
The Arizona Republicreported Wednesday that "several of the Arizona electors have previously claimed they were merely offering Congress a backup plan, though nothing in the documents they sent to Congress and the National Archives backs up that assertion."
"The indictment includes several statements the false electors made on social media that contradict those claims," the newspaper observed.
Jenny Guzman, director of Common Cause's Arizona program, said the indictment "marks the start of a new chapter for the fake elector scheme that has plagued Arizona."
"Arizonans are still dealing with the fallout from the false electors and the Big Lie about the 2020 elections," said Guzman. "We are relieved that the investigation by Attorney General Mayes has concluded and Arizonans can now know that what comes next is accountability. These efforts by these fake electors to undermine the will of Arizona’s voters have had implications far beyond their failed attempt to overthrow the 2020 election."
"This indictment can reassure all Arizonans that if anyone, regardless of their political affiliation, attempts to undermine their vote, consequences will follow," Guzman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 91 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'One Step Closer': Arizona House Votes to Repeal 1864 Abortion Ban
"With a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever," one state campaigner said of a November ballot measure.
Apr 24, 2024
Three Republicans in the Arizona House of Representatives on Wednesday joined with Democrats to advance legislation that would repeal an 1864 ban on abortion—a development rights advocates welcomed while stressing that the fight is far from over.
The 32-28 vote on House Bill 2677—with GOP Reps. Tim Dunn (25), Matt Gress (4), and Justin Wilmeth (2) voting in favor—was the third attempt in as many weeks to pass repeal legislation since the Arizona Supreme Court upheld the ban.
"The state Senate could vote on the repeal as early as next Wednesday, after the bill comes on the floor for a 'third reading,' as is required under chamber rules," according toNBC News. Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs on Wednesday toldThe Washington Post that "I am hopeful the Senate does the right thing and sends it to my desk so I can sign it."
Applauding the House passage of H.B. 2677, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona president and CEO Angela Florez said that "today, Arizona is one step closer to repealing the state's Civil War-era total abortion ban. While the repeal still must pass the Senate, this is a major win for reproductive freedom."
"We must celebrate today's vote in support of abortion rights and harness our enthusiasm to spread the word and urge lawmakers in the Senate to support this necessary repeal bill," she continued. "Despite this step forward, Arizonans cannot stop fighting."
Florez noted that "even with the repeal of the Civil War-era ban, the state will still have a ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy that denies people access to critical care. And lawmakers continue to attack Arizonans' ability to access reproductive healthcare. Our right to control our bodies and lives is hanging on by a thread."
"Thankfully, voters will have the opportunity to take back control if the Arizona Abortion Access Act is on the ballot this November," she added. "Abortion bans are out-of-step with the will of Arizonans and will force pregnant people to leave their communities for essential healthcare. Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona will continue fighting to ensure everyone has the right to make decisions about their health and futures."
The Arizona Abortion Access Act is a proposed state constitutional amendment that would prevent many limits on abortions before fetal viability and safeguard access to care after viability to protect the life or physical or mental health of the patient.
The coalition supporting the amendment, Arizona for Abortion Access, highlighted on social media that the House-approved bill "did not include the emergency clause required to stop the 1864 ban from taking effect on June 8," meaning H.B. 2677 wouldn't apply until 90 days after the end of the legislative session.
Coalition campaign manager Cheryl Bruce said that "with a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever. We remain committed to taking these decisions out of the hands of extremist politicians."
Arizona is one of multiple states where rights advocates are promoting abortion rights ballot measures this cycle. Reproductive freedom is also dominating political races at all levels, including the presidential contest. Democratic President Joe Biden is set to face former Republican President Donald Trump in November.
"Donald Trump is responsible for Arizona's abortion ban. Women in the state are still living under a ban with no exceptions for rape or incest and have been stripped of the freedom to make their own healthcare decisions," said Julie Chávez Rodriguez, Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' reelection campaign manager.
While the presumptive GOP nominee has tried to distance himself from the Arizona Supreme Court's reinstatement of a 160-year-old abortion ban, he has also campaigned on his three appointees to the U.S. Supreme Court who helped reverse Roe v. Wade.
"Trump brags that he is 'proudly' the person responsible for these bans and if he retakes power, the chaos and cruelty he has created will only get worse in all 50 states," Chávez Rodriguez said. "President Biden and Vice President Harris are the only candidates who will stop him."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular