5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
May, 13 2010, 11:20am EDT
Contact:
Tel: +1-212-216-1832,Email:,hrwpress@hrw.org
UN Human Rights Council: Competitive Vote Would Improve Membership
New Members Should Take Visible Steps to Improve Practices Before Joining in June
NEW YORK
The absence of competitive slates in today's elections for the
United Nations Human Rights Council undermined membership standards and
deprived the General Assembly of the opportunity to elect the most
qualified countries, the NGO Coalition for an Effective Human Rights
Council said.
The election results for the 14 new Human Rights Council members
were largely a foregone conclusion, as all five UN geographical regions
for the first time put forward slates in which the number of candidates
equaled the number of seats allotted to the region.
"The council elections have become a pre-cooked process that strips
the meaning from the membership standards established by the General
Assembly," said Peggy Hicks, global advocacy director at Human Rights
Watch. "States serious about the role the council can play in
promoting human rights should push for competitive slates in all
regions, and should be willing to compete for a seat themselves."
Human Rights Council members are expected to "uphold the highest
standards" of human rights and "fully cooperate" with the council under
the General Assembly resolution that established the council. The NGO
coalition had called for Angola, Libya, Malaysia, Thailand, and Uganda
to take specific steps
to improve their human rights records in advance of today's election.
The NGO coalition focused its attention on those five states based on
the availability of direct research concerning the human rights
situation in those countries and on the extent of human rights concerns
identified.
The countries elected to the Human Rights Council today are Angola,
Libya, Mauritania, and Uganda from the Africa Group; Maldives,
Malaysia, Qatar, and Thailand from the Asia Group; Moldova and Poland
from the Eastern European Group; Ecuador and Guatemala from the Latin
America and Caribbean Group; and Spain and Switzerland from the Western
European and Other Group. The Eastern European Group began the year
with a competitive election, but Croatia withdrew its candidacy in
February.
The Asia Group also had a competitive election under way until Iran
withdrew its candidacy in April in the face of mounting global
opposition based on its record of serious human rights violations.
"Iran's withdrawal showed that international pressure can improve
the membership of the council, and demonstrated the importance of
competitive elections for seats," said Bahey el-din Hassan, director of
the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS).
Nongovernmental organizations have had an impact on the competitive
election process each year, successfully opposing the election of Iran
and Venezuela in 2006, Belarus in 2007, Sri Lanka in 2008, and
Azerbaijan in 2009.
Substantial attention has been focused on the election of states
with poor human rights records to the council, but too little notice
has been given to the flaws in the election system itself, the NGO
coalition said. The Latin American and Caribbean Group has had a closed
slate every year after the council's first elections in 2006. While
Africa had a competitive slate last year, the rotation system that the
African region uses virtually guarantees that states that do not meet
the standards set for council membership will nonetheless become
members. States with stronger human rights records in the region have
been unwilling to challenge Africa's standing practice of putting
forward "closed" slates.
In addition to having a closed slate this year, the Western European
and Others Group offered no competition in 2009, when New Zealand
withdrew its candidacy after the United States entered the race.
"No region is well-served by a closed selection process that ignores
the council's membership standards," said Hassan Shire Sheikh, director
of the East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Network. "States
in each region with stronger human rights records deserve to be on the
council and would represent their regions more effectively."
The states elected today will take their seats on the council on
June 19, 2010. The NGO coalition called for newly elected states to
take concrete steps to meet membership standards by that date. In
particular, new members should respond immediately to all outstanding
requests for visits by human rights experts appointed by the council.
"New members should welcome the council's own rights experts, rather
than ignoring or stalling their requests to visit," said Yap Swee Seng,
executive director of Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development
(FORUM-ASIA). "We are looking for each new member to take visible
steps to address outstanding human rights concerns before they take
their seats in June."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
On Conspiracy Theorist Laura Loomer's Orders, Rubio Announces Arrest of 2 Women for Supporting Iran
The State Department said the women were related to the assassinated Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani, but Iranian media said they had no connection to him.
Apr 04, 2026
With a majority of Americans including President Donald Trump's own base demanding a swift end to the war in Iran—and Iran's military capabilities proving difficult to overpower—observers suggested on Saturday that the White House was looking elsewhere to score "victories," as Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that federal agents had arrested relatives of the late Major General Qasem Soleimani, the Iranian military commander who the US assassinated in 2020 during President Donald Trump's first term.
Rubio accused Soleimani's niece, Hamideh Soleimani Afshar, of promoting "regime propaganda" and voicing support for the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and said she had been living a "lavish lifestyle" in the US. Afshar's husband has been barred from entering the US and the lawful permanent resident status she and her daughter had has been terminated, said the State Department.
"Are we losing so badly we need to arrest the distant relatives of long-since-dead Iranian commanders?" asked Ryan Grim of Drop Site News.
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council noted that the administration had used the same legal authority to arrest Soleimani's reported family members as it did to detain former Columbia University student organizer Mahmoud Khalil and Tufts University scholar Rümeysa Öztürk for speaking out against US support for Israel—a tactic which is being challenged in court as unconstitutional.
Far-right conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer, who has wielded influence in the White House during the second Trump administration, claimed credit for the arrest of the two women, saying that in communications with the State Department, she had "exposed the fact that Qasem Soleimani’s Niece Hamideh Soleimani Afshar has been living in the United States (Los Angeles, California) where she posts pro-Iranian regime and pro-IRGC content on her social media while she lives a life of luxury."
"She has been arrested and will be deported back to Iran!" she added. "Over the last few months, I have quietly been documenting all of Hamideh Soleimani Afshar’s social media activity. I uploaded it all to a secure file and shared it with [the Department of Homeland Security] and Department of State, and now she has been arrested and she will be deported from our country."
In Iran on Saturday, media outlets were reporting that the two women arrested by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement were not related to Soleimani—who had no nieces, according to journalist Kourosh Ziabari.
Soleimani's daughter told the news outlet Jamaran that "none" of her extended family has ever lived in the US.
Regardless of the women's relation to Soleimani or lack thereof, journalist Ryan Grim said the arbitrary arrest "actively puts innocent Americans around the world at risk."
Rubio's explanation for the detention and his move to revoke the women's green cards is the latest evidence that "the US is now deporting people for thought crimes," said historian Zachary Foster.
Journalist Sana Saeed said the case shows that constitutional protections for due process and free speech, which are supposed to apply to green card holders, "no longer mean anything."
"People cannot lose their green card status simply because of familial relationships, so the justification shifts here to their alleged support for the Iranian government," said Saeed. "But supporting a foreign government is not a criminal offense. And if you begin to treat it as one—as the US government effectively is in this case—then expect a lot more of this."
"It will not stop here, and it will not remain limited to Iranians," she said. "The logic does not contain itself, it expands."
Keep Reading
Show Less
As Search for US Airman Continues, Trump Issues Latest 'Countdown to Massive War Crimes'
The president demanded once again that Iran open the Strait of Hormuz and said that "all Hell will reign down" on the country if officials don't "make a deal."
Apr 04, 2026
As the US military's frantic search continued Saturday for an airman who was aboard an F-15E fighter jet when it was downed by Iranian forces a day earlier, and analysts and Iranian media alike suggested the Trump administration has lost control of its war against Iran, President Donald Trump issued his latest threat against the country—once again appearing to threaten tens of millions of Iranians with war crimes.
Renewing his demand that Iran "MAKE A DEAL or OPEN UP THE HORMUZ STRAIT," the president said he was giving the Iranian government "48 hours before all Hell will reign down on them," appearing to confuse the word "reign" with "rain."
"Time is running out," said Trump in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social.
In his post, Trump did not directly address the ongoing search for the airman, who was one of two who ejected from the fighter jet when Iran reportedly used new air defense systems to shoot down the plane. One crew member was found and rescued on Friday.
Iranian officials were also looking for the missing airman on Saturday, raising concerns that the service member could be taken as a hostage and used as leverage.
The president has said little about the ongoing search, but spoke briefly to The Independent in a phone call Saturday about the possibility that Iran could find the service member first.
"We hope that’s not going to happen,” he said.
Trump's comments on social media, meanwhile, appeared to signal "a countdown to massive war crimes," said New York University law professor Ryan Goodman.
The president has also previously warned Iran with an ultimatum, only to delay the threatened action. He said on March 22 that the US would "hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST!" if officials did not reopen the strait—prompting critics to condemn him as a "maniacal tyrant."
The March 22 threat was likely a reference to Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, the vicinity of which was struck by a projectile on Saturday, prompting condemnation from the International Atomic Energy Agency. Human rights experts have repeated warnings in recent weeks that striking power plants would constitute war crimes.
At least five people were killed and 170 were injured in airstrikes on a petrochemical hub in Iran's Khuzestan province on Saturday morning, in addition to the Bushehr attack.
After his initial threat, Trump later said direct strikes on energy infrastructure would not be launched until April 6, and demanded that Iran open the key waterway before then.
Despite Trump's increasingly belligerent threats of "hell" and destruction of civilian infrastructure, a number of media critics noted on Saturday that mainstream Western news outlets including The New York Times, The Economist, and Bloomberg described Iran's use of air defense systems to shoot down US war planes involved in the invasion as an "escalation from Iran's leadership."
"Does Iran have a right to defend itself? Does Palestine? Does Lebanon?" asked commentator Hasan Piker, noting that the US and Israel have claimed they launched the invasion of Iran to "defend" themselves against an imminent attack, contrary to US intelligence analysis. "Or is it just Israel and America who get to claim self-defense as they engage in wars of conquest?"
Keep Reading
Show Less
Nuclear Plants 'Must Never Be Attacked,' Says Watchdog as Iran Reports US-Israeli Strike at Bushehr Facility
The International Atomic Energy Agency warned of "the paramount importance of adhering to the seven pillars for ensuring nuclear safety and security during a conflict."
Apr 04, 2026
The director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency on Saturday demanded "maximum military restraint" from the US and Israel as it confirmed reports that strikes had targeted a location close to Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, killing at least one person.
In a statement released via social media, the IAEA relayed a message from Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi, who expressed "deep concern about the reported incident."
Grossi warned that nuclear power plants or nearby areas "must never be attacked, noting that auxiliary site buildings may contain vital safety equipment" and stressed "the paramount importance of adhering to the seven pillars for ensuring nuclear safety and security during a conflict."
The IAEA said the attack near the Bushehr plant, Iran's only operational nuclear power facility, was the fourth such attack since Israel and the US began its invasion of Iran on February 28. The plant lies in a city inhabited by about 250,000 people.
A security staff member was killed by a projectile fragment and a building on the Bushehr site was impacted by shockwaves and fragments. Grossi said that no increase in radiation levels was reported.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also condemned the Bushehr strike and issued a reminder of the "Western outrage about hostilities near Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine" when Russia attacked the site.
"Israel-US have bombed our Bushehr plant four times now. Radioactive fallout will end life in [Gulf Cooperation Council] capitals, not Tehran. Attacks on our petrochemicals also convey real objectives," said Araghchi.
Al Jazeera reported that at least two petrochemical facilities had been hit by the US and Israel in southern Iran’s Khuzestan province, an energy hub in the country. At least five people were injured in those attacks,
Iranian news agency Mehr reported that the state-run Bandar Imam petrochemical complex, which produces liquefied petroleum gas and chemicals as well as other products, sustained damage.
President Donald Trump said late last month that he would delay any attacks on Iran's energy infrastructure until April 6 and said the delay was "subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions.”
He has threatened to destroy Iran's power plants and other civilian infrastructure if Iranian leaders don't end the blockade on the oil export waterway the Strait of Hormuz, which they began in retaliation for the US-Israeli strikes that started more than a month ago and which has fueled skyrocketing global energy prices.
The threat amounted to Trump warning that he could soon commit a war crime, said international law experts.
Keep Reading
Show Less
Most Popular