March, 25 2010, 03:29pm EDT
WWF and TRAFFIC: Marine Species Get a Raw Deal at CITES Wildlife Convention
Atlantic Bluefin Tuna, Corals and Sharks Lose Out, Further Endangering Populations
WASHINGTON
World Wildlife Fund and TRAFFIC called on nations to focus on
science instead of politics as marine species emerged the big losers
from a United Nations conference on endangered species trade that ended
today. Proposals to better protect marine species such as the Atlantic
bluefin tuna, corals and several shark species were repeatedly rejected
at the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild
Fauna and Flora (CITES),
which meets once every three years.
"It is shameful that science
lost out to politics on marine species at CITES," said Mark
Stevens, senior program officer for Fisheries at WWF-US. "CITES
governments have to set aside political considerations and follow
scientific evidence. If they don't, the implications for conservation,
sustainable use of marine species and coastal livelihoods are
worrisome."
Despite the failure of high-profile marine species
including corals, sharks, and in particular the critically endangered
Atlantic bluefin tuna, governments did make progress toward implementing
better protection for rhinos, tigers and Humphead Wrasse.
Of the
marine species, Porbeagle shark was the only proposal initially
accepted, but it was overturned today, during the final day of the
meeting.
Stevens said the Doha meeting may someday be seen as a
turning point for the recovery of Atlantic bluefin tuna populations.
"We
hope to turn the disappointing results of this CITES meeting into an
opportunity," Stevens said. "We're seeing a new pro-conservation
attitude in the run-up to the next meeting of the International
Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) in November in
Paris. Fishing nations started to talk-the-talk at CITES, the ball is
now in their court and regional fisheries management organizations like
ICCAT must now muster the political courage for what they have been too
timid to do for years - put in place scientifically sound recovery plans
for this spectacular predator."
Stevens added that this must
include a temporary suspension of fishing for Atlantic bluefin tuna to
give the species a chance to recover and provide the political courage
to follow the science.
"The United States must lead the charge,
as it did in Doha, by making conservation a priority at ICCAT and resist
the temptation to focus on fights over quota allocation," Stevens said.
He added that he was encouraged by a statement ICCAT chair Dr Fabio
Hazin made at the end of the CITES meeting that said, "Setting
management measures not in line with scientific advice is no longer an
option. (...) The commitment to recover bluefin tuna stocks in the
Atlantic must be strengthened at ICCAT's forthcoming meeting in Paris in
November." Japan also intervened at the end of the CITES meeting,
committing to lead a global effort to ensure the recovery of Atlantic
bluefin tuna.
In other issues, red and pink corals - species that
are heavily exploited for the jewelry trade, but greatly overharvested
in many parts of their range failed to gain greater protections for the
second CITES meeting in a row.
Separately, requests by two
countries - Tanzania and Zambia - to relax trade restrictions on their
elephant populations and allow a one-time sell-off of government-owned
ivory stockpiles were both voted down at the meeting.
"African
nations now seem further away from a consensus on how to deal with the
ivory issue than at any time since 1989," said Steven Broad, Executive
Director TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network of WWF and the
International Union for the Conservation of Nature.
There were a
couple of bright spots this year related to tigers and rhinos, which are
facing a global poaching crisis. Tiger range countries, including
China, reached a strong consensus in Qatar on how to address pressing
concerns of illegal trade that threaten wild populations of tiger and
other Asian big cat species.
CITES governments maintained their
position against farming of tigers for trade in parts and derivatives.
In
addition, countries with rhino populations agreed to focus on
increasing law enforcement and training of guards, strengthening border
controls, improving rhino population monitoring, creating awareness
raising campaigns in consumer countries such as Vietnam, and rooting out
organized crime syndicates that are behind the increase in poaching and
illegal trade.
CITES governments agreed to increase financial
resources for tackling enforcement. Also, the recently-formed
International Consortium on Combating Wildlife Crime (ICCWC) committed
to engage on a number of joint activities to bring wildlife criminals to
justice. ICCWC is made up of the CITES Secretariat, INTERPOL, the
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, the World Bank and the World
Customs Organization,
"CITES trade rules can only deliver
conservation and economic benefits if they are enforced properly and all
too often this is simply not the case" Broad said. "The new commitments
to CITES compliance and wildlife trade law enforcement announced at
this conference are crucial steps in the right direction."
World Wildlife Fund is the largest multinational conservation organization in the world, works in 100 countries and is supported by 1.2 million members in the United States and close to 5 million globally. WWF's unique way of working combines global reach with a foundation in science, involves action at every level from local to global, and ensures the delivery of innovative solutions that meet the needs of both people and nature.
LATEST NEWS
Senate Tosses 'Dangerous Provision' Preventing State-Level AI Regulation From GOP Megabill
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry," said one advocate.
Jul 01, 2025
With a 99-1 vote early Tuesday, the Republican-controlled Senate decided to remove a controversial provision that would have prevented state-level regulation on artificial intelligence for 10 years from U.S. President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill that is currently being debated in Congress.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) was the lone lawmaker who voted to keep the moratorium in the bill.
While far from the only controversial part of the reconciliation package, the provision drew opposition from an ideologically diverse group that included Democratic and Republican state attorneys general; over 140 groups working to support children's online safety, consumer protections, and responsible innovation; and faith leaders.
Senators struck Sen. Ted Cruz's (R-Texas) AI measure from the megabill by adopting an amendment introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.). They voted on Blackburn's amendment during a session known as a vote-a-rama. Blackburn introduced the amendment after considering an agreement that would have watered down the provision.
According to The Verge, the measure that was rejected on Tuesday required states to avoid regulation AI and "automated decision systems" if they wanted to get funding for their broadband programs.
The provision would have been a major win for Big Tech, which has made the case that state laws around AI are obstructing their ability to do business.
Advocates and Democratic lawmakers cheered the decision to strip the provision.
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry. It shows that Americans are aware of the proliferation of AI harms in real time," said J.B. Branch, Big Tech accountability advocate at the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) said Tuesday that "early this morning, the Senate overwhelmingly voted to reject a dangerous provision to block states from regulating artificial intelligence, including protecting kids online. This 99-1 vote sent a clear message that Congress will not sell out our kids and local communities in order to pad the pockets of Big Tech billionaires."
In addition to concerns focused on Big Tech, experts recently told The Guardian that in the absence of state-level AI regulation, untrammeled growth of AI would take a toll on the world's "dangerously overheating climate."
Sacha Haworth, the executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, credited the "massive" defeat of Cruz's provision to the "incredible mobilizing by advocates to beat back Big Tech lobbying and last-minute bullying."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Shred JD Vance as He Shrugs Off Millions of Americans Losing Medicaid as 'Minutiae'
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Jul 01, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance took heat from critics this week when he downplayed legislation that would result in millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as mere "minutiae."
Writing on X, Vance defended the budget megabill that's currently being pushed through the United States Senate by arguing that it will massively increase funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which he deemed to be a necessary component of carrying out the Trump administration's mass deportation operation.
"The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits," wrote Vance. "The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass."
He then added that "everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions."
It was this line that drew the ire of many critics, as the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Senate version of the budget bill would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period, which would result in more than 10 million people losing their coverage. Additionally, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has proposed an amendment that would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which would likely kick millions more off of the program.
Many congressional Democrats were quick to pounce on Vance for what they said were callous comments about a vital government program.
"So if the only thing that matters is immigration... why didn't you support the bipartisan Lankford-Murphy bill that tackled immigration far better than your Ugly Bill?" asked Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.). "And it didn't have 'minutiae' that will kick 12m+ Americans off healthcare or raise the debt by $4tn."
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Veteran healthcare reporter Jonathan Cohn put some numbers behind the policies that are being minimized by the vice president.
"11.8M projected to lose health insurance," he wrote. "Clinics and hospitals taking a hit, especially in rural areas. Low-income seniors facing higher costs. 'Minutiae.'"
Activist Leah Greenberg, the co-chair of progressive organizing group Indivisible, zeroed in on Vance's emphasis on ramping up ICE's funding as particularly problematic.
"They are just coming right out and saying they want an exponential increase in $$$ so they can build their own personal Gestapo," she warned.
Washington Post global affairs columnist Ishaan Tharoor also found himself disturbed by the sheer size of the funding increase for ICE that Vance is demanding and he observed that "nothing matters more apparently than giving ICE a bigger budget than the militaries of virtually every European country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular