October, 28 2009, 04:40pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Inga Sarda-Sorensen, Director of Communications
(Office) 646.358.1463
isorensen@theTaskForce.org
Task Force: Signing of Hate Crimes Measure Is Historic
"Laws embody the values of our nation, and through the enactment of this hate crimes law, our country has — once and for all — sent a clear and unequivocal message that it rejects and condemns all forms of hate violence, including crimes motivated by hatred of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people."
WASHINGTON
President Obama today signed federal hate crimes legislation
into law. The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes
Prevention Act will help protect people against violence based on
sexual orientation, gender identity, race, religion, gender, national
origin and disability by extending the federal hate crimes statute. It
will provide critical federal resources to state and local agencies to
equip local officers with the tools they need to prosecute hate crimes.
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Executive Director Rea Carey will
attend the commemorative event later today at the White House.
The Task Force has been a key leader in the effort to secure an
effective and full government response to hate crimes against lesbian,
gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in the United States,
beginning with the launch of its groundbreaking anti-violence project
in 1982, up to today's victory. Get more details here about the Task Force's longtime work on hate crimes.
Statement by Rea Carey, Executive Director
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
"Today marks a historic milestone for lesbian, gay, bisexual and
transgender people, and for the entire country. With the president's
signing of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes
Prevention Act, both sexual orientation and gender identity have, for
the first time in U.S. history, been explicitly included in federal law.
"It has taken over a decade of perseverance to get to this momentous
day, and we thank all those who have worked to achieve this incredible
victory. Laws embody the values of our nation, and through the
enactment of this hate crimes law, our country has - once and for all -
sent a clear and unequivocal message that it rejects and condemns all
forms of hate violence, including crimes motivated by hatred of
lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.
"We look forward to the days ahead when we will join together again
to celebrate full equality and recognition of our community, including
in employment, the military and in the full recognition of our
families. The Task Force is committed to the work necessary to bring
full equality to the lives of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender
people. We know that we have much work ahead of us. Today, we must
pause and shine a light on this critical first step taken by Congress,
and the willingness of this president to follow through on his promise
to sign this legislation ensuring the laws of the land will protect all
of us."
More on the Task Force's work on hate crimes legislation
- Passage of hate crimes legislation stems from decades of work, much of it spearheaded by the Task Force, including:
- In 1982, the Task Force founded the groundbreaking
anti-violence project, the first national organizing project for
anti-LGBT hate crimes. - In 1990, the Task Force secured the Hate Crimes Statistics
Act, which included sexual orientation, in large part justified by the
Task Force's own statistics on hate crimes. The Hate Crimes Statistics
Act was pushed so that national data could build the foundation for a
hate crimes law. - Murders and arsons, some anti-LGBT and others based on race
and other characteristics, led President Bill Clinton to call for a
White House Summit on Hate Crimes in 1997, attended by then-Task Force
Executive Director Kerry Lobel, where she delivered a petition signed
by LGBT people all over the country asking for a serious response to
anti-LGBT hate crimes. Out of this meeting, the Hate Crimes Prevention
Act (the predecessor to today's legislation) was written; it fixed
several problems with the existing hate crimes law on race, religion
and national origin, and added sexual orientation, gender and
disability to the law. - In 2001, the Task Force started its work to add gender
identity to the bill. Over the course of years and bringing along
coalition partners, the Task Force secured a "gender identity" addition
into the House legislation in 2005, with the Senate bill becoming
transgender-inclusive in 2007. - The Task Force continued to advocate for the bill's passage, repeatedly activating its membership.
- In 2009, when the hate crimes bill was added to the Department
of Defense authorization bill and a death penalty provision was added
in the Senate, the Task Force spoke out about the immorality of
inclusion of the death penalty and activated its grassroots to urge the
provision be struck from the final language. The conference committee
ultimately removed the capital punishment language.
The National LGBTQ Task Force advances full freedom, justice and equality for LGBTQ people. We are building a future where everyone can be free to be their entire selves in every aspect of their lives. Today, despite all the progress we've made to end discrimination, millions of LGBTQ people face barriers in every aspect of their lives: in housing, employment, healthcare, retirement, and basic human rights. These barriers must go. That's why the Task Force is training and mobilizing millions of activists across our nation to deliver a world where you can be you. Join us!
LATEST NEWS
Billionaire Palantir Co-Founder Pushes Return of Public Hangings as Part of 'Masculine Leadership' Initiative
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," said one critic in response.
Dec 07, 2025
Venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of data platform company Palantir, is calling for the return of public hangings as part of a broader push to restore what he describes as "masculine leadership" to the US.
In a statement posted on X Friday, Lonsdale said that he supported changing the so-called "three strikes" anti-crime law to ensure that anyone who is convicted of three violent crimes gets publicly executed, rather than simply sent to prison for life.
"If I’m in charge later, we won’t just have a three strikes law," he wrote. "We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others."
Lonsdale then added that "our society needs balance," and said that "it's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable."
Lonsdale's views on public hangings being necessary to restore "masculine leadership" drew swift criticism.
Gil Durán, a journalist who documents the increasingly authoritarian politics of Silicon Valley in his newsletter "The Nerd Reich," argued in a Saturday post that Lonsdale's call for public hangings showed that US tech elites are "entering a more dangerous and desperate phase of radicalization."
"For months, Peter Thiel guru Curtis Yarvin has been squawking about the need for more severe measures to cement Trump's authoritarian rule," Durán explained. "Peter Thiel is ranting about the Antichrist in a global tour. And now Lonsdale—a Thiel protégé—is fantasizing about a future in which he will have the power to unleash state violence at mass scale."
Taulby Edmondson, an adjunct professor of history, religion, and culture at Virginia Tech, wrote in a post on Bluesky that the rhetoric Lonsdale uses to justify the return of public hangings has even darker intonations than calls for state-backed violence.
"A point of nuance here: 'masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable' is how lynch mobs are described, not state-sanctioned executions," he observed.
Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll argued that Lonsdale's remarks were symbolic of a kind of performative masculinity that has infected US culture.
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," he wrote.
Tech entrepreneur Anil Dash warned Lonsdale that his call for public hangings could have unintended consequences for members of the Silicon Valley elite.
"Well, Joe, Mark Zuckerberg has sole control over Facebook, which directly enabled the Rohingya genocide," he wrote. "So let’s have the conversation."
And Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin noted that Lonsdale has been a major backer of the University of Austin, an unaccredited liberal arts college that has been pitched as an alternative to left-wing university education with the goal of preparing "thoughtful and ethical innovators, builders, leaders, public servants and citizens through open inquiry and civil discourse."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications
The boat targeted in the infamous September 2 "double-tap" strike was not even headed for the US, Adm. Frank Bradley revealed to lawmakers.
Dec 07, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.
According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.
"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."
However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.
CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.
While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.
Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."
This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”
While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.
Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."
"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Memo Shows Pam Bondi Wants List of 'Domestic Terrorism' Groups Who Express 'Anti-American Sentiment'
"Millions of Americans like you and I could be the target," warned journalist Ken Klippenstein of the new memo.
Dec 07, 2025
A leaked memo written by US Attorney General Pam Bondi directs the Department of Justice to compile a list of potential "domestic terrorism" organizations that espouse "extreme viewpoints on immigration, radical gender ideology, and anti-American sentiment."
The memo, which was obtained by journalist Ken Klippenstein, expands upon National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7), a directive signed by President Donald Trump in late September that demanded a "national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts."
The new Bondi memo instructs law enforcement agencies to refer "suspected" domestic terrorism cases to the Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), which will then undertake an "exhaustive investigation contemplated by NSPM-7" that will incorporate "a focused strategy to root out all culpable participants—including organizers and funders—in all domestic terrorism activities."
The memo identifies the "domestic terrorism threat" as organizations that use "violence or the threat of violence" to advance political goals such as "opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and morality."
Commenting on the significance of the memo, Klippenstein criticized mainstream media organizations for largely ignoring the implications of NSPM-7, which was drafted and signed in the wake of the murder of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
"For months, major media outlets have largely blown off the story of NSPM-7, thinking it was all just Trump bluster and too crazy to be serious," he wrote. "But a memo like this one shows you that the administration is absolutely taking this seriously—even if the media are not—and is actively working to operationalize NSPM-7."
Klippenstein also warned that NSPM-7 appeared to be the start of a new "war on terrorism," but "only this time, millions of Americans like you and I could be the target."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular