October, 08 2009, 03:55pm EDT
Human Rights First Praises Final Passage of Hate Crimes Prevention Legislation
Says victory is an opportunity to renew U.S. influence abroad
WASHINGTON
Praising
House passage of the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act,
legislation that was included in the Department of Defense
authorization bill, Human Rights First noted the victory sets the stage
for renewed U.S. influence to combat hate crimes abroad. The bill is
expected to gain Senate approval next week.
"Today's victory is an important step forward in
strengthening the U.S. government's response to these vicious and
violent acts," stated Tad Stahnke, Human Rights First's Director of
Policy and Programs. "This measure fills critical gaps in the response
to this problem at home, while also sending an important message to
foreign governments who struggle with similar problems in their
countries. It demonstrates that U.S. lawmakers are committed to
tackling these problems at home and will enable the U.S. to more
effectively encourage other governments to strengthen their responses
to hate crimes."
The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act strengthens existing laws by
giving the Department of Justice (DOJ) the power in certain cases to
investigate and prosecute bias-motivated violence by providing the DOJ
with jurisdiction over crimes of violence where the perpetrator has
selected the victim because of the person's actual or perceived race,
color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender
identity or disability. It also makes grants available to state and
local communities to train law enforcement officers or assist in state
and local investigations and prosecutions of bias-motivated crimes. The
measure has been endorsed by 26 state Attorneys General, a number of
the nation's most important law enforcement organizations, more than
275 national civil rights, professional, civic, education, and
religious groups. President Obama has also indicated his support for
these much-needed reforms.
Human Rights First noted that, in 2007, the
Federal Bureau of Investigations documented 7,624 U.S. hate crimes
directed against institutions and individuals because of their race,
religion, sexual orientation, national origin, or disability. According
to HRF's 2008 Hate Crimes Survey,
similar violent hate crimes are on the rise across Europe and the
former Soviet Union, a region where the majority of governments are
failing to adequately address the problem. The United States has led
efforts to confront this scourge through its foreign policy and
engagement in multilateral institutions such as the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe. While an increasing number of
European states are adopting hate crime legislation, there are few
signs that it is consistently applied and only 13 of the 56 states
reviewed by Human Rights First have legislation that extends to bias
based on sexual orientation. The adoption and enforcement of the
Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act and implementation of a
series of other key reforms would carry significant weight as the
United States seeks to encourage foreign leaders to toughen their own
hate crimes response.
We call on the government of the United States to
demonstrate continued international leadership in multilateral
organizations, advocate measures to combat hate crime in bilateral
relationships, and expand efforts to support civil society
organizations, by taking the following steps:
- Raising
violent hate crime issues with representatives of foreign governments
and encouraging, where appropriate, legal and other policy responses,
including those contained in Human Rights First's ten-point plan for governments to combat violent hate crime.
- Offer
appropriate technical assistance and other forms of cooperation,
including training of police and prosecutors in investigating,
recording, reporting and prosecuting violent hate crimes as well as
translation of Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) materials on hate crimes.
- Ensuring
that groups working to combat all forms of violent hate crime have
access to support under existing U.S. funding programs, including the
Human Rights and Democracy Fund and programs for human rights
defenders.
- Take
the lead in the adoption of Ministerial Council of the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) decision in December 2009
that reaffirms the commitment of member states to combat all hate
crimes, including those motivated by sexual orientation and gender
identity bias.
- Provide
for extrabudgetary contributions, secondment of personnel, and other
in-kind support for OSCE programs to combat violent hate crimes through
reporting on states' responses as well as programs to train law
enforcement officials and civil society organizations.
- Maintain
strong and inclusive State Department monitoring and public reporting
on racist, antisemitic, xenophobic, anti-Muslim, homophobic, anti-Roma
and other bias-motivated violence-including by consulting with civil
society groups as well as providing appropriate training for human
rights officers and other relevant mission staff abroad.
For more information about Human Rights First's work to combat hate crimes in the U.S. and abroad, visit https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/discrimination/index.aspx.
Human Rights First is a non-profit, nonpartisan international human rights organization based in New York and Washington D.C. Human Rights First believes that building respect for human rights and the rule of law will help ensure the dignity to which every individual is entitled and will stem tyranny, extremism, intolerance, and violence.
LATEST NEWS
Senate Tosses 'Dangerous Provision' Preventing State-Level AI Regulation From GOP Megabill
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry," said one advocate.
Jul 01, 2025
With a 99-1 vote early Tuesday, the Republican-controlled Senate decided to remove a controversial provision that would have prevented state-level regulation on artificial intelligence for 10 years from U.S. President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill that is currently being debated in Congress.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) was the lone lawmaker who voted to keep the moratorium in the bill.
While far from the only controversial part of the reconciliation package, the provision drew opposition from an ideologically diverse group that included Democratic and Republican state attorneys general; over 140 groups working to support children's online safety, consumer protections, and responsible innovation; and faith leaders.
Senators struck Sen. Ted Cruz's (R-Texas) AI measure from the megabill by adopting an amendment introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.). They voted on Blackburn's amendment during a session known as a vote-a-rama. Blackburn introduced the amendment after considering an agreement that would have watered down the provision.
According to The Verge, the measure that was rejected on Tuesday required states to avoid regulation AI and "automated decision systems" if they wanted to get funding for their broadband programs.
The provision would have been a major win for Big Tech, which has made the case that state laws around AI are obstructing their ability to do business.
Advocates and Democratic lawmakers cheered the decision to strip the provision.
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry. It shows that Americans are aware of the proliferation of AI harms in real time," said J.B. Branch, Big Tech accountability advocate at the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) said Tuesday that "early this morning, the Senate overwhelmingly voted to reject a dangerous provision to block states from regulating artificial intelligence, including protecting kids online. This 99-1 vote sent a clear message that Congress will not sell out our kids and local communities in order to pad the pockets of Big Tech billionaires."
In addition to concerns focused on Big Tech, experts recently told The Guardian that in the absence of state-level AI regulation, untrammeled growth of AI would take a toll on the world's "dangerously overheating climate."
Sacha Haworth, the executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, credited the "massive" defeat of Cruz's provision to the "incredible mobilizing by advocates to beat back Big Tech lobbying and last-minute bullying."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Shred JD Vance as He Shrugs Off Millions of Americans Losing Medicaid as 'Minutiae'
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Jul 01, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance took heat from critics this week when he downplayed legislation that would result in millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as mere "minutiae."
Writing on X, Vance defended the budget megabill that's currently being pushed through the United States Senate by arguing that it will massively increase funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which he deemed to be a necessary component of carrying out the Trump administration's mass deportation operation.
"The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits," wrote Vance. "The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass."
He then added that "everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions."
It was this line that drew the ire of many critics, as the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Senate version of the budget bill would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period, which would result in more than 10 million people losing their coverage. Additionally, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has proposed an amendment that would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which would likely kick millions more off of the program.
Many congressional Democrats were quick to pounce on Vance for what they said were callous comments about a vital government program.
"So if the only thing that matters is immigration... why didn't you support the bipartisan Lankford-Murphy bill that tackled immigration far better than your Ugly Bill?" asked Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.). "And it didn't have 'minutiae' that will kick 12m+ Americans off healthcare or raise the debt by $4tn."
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Veteran healthcare reporter Jonathan Cohn put some numbers behind the policies that are being minimized by the vice president.
"11.8M projected to lose health insurance," he wrote. "Clinics and hospitals taking a hit, especially in rural areas. Low-income seniors facing higher costs. 'Minutiae.'"
Activist Leah Greenberg, the co-chair of progressive organizing group Indivisible, zeroed in on Vance's emphasis on ramping up ICE's funding as particularly problematic.
"They are just coming right out and saying they want an exponential increase in $$$ so they can build their own personal Gestapo," she warned.
Washington Post global affairs columnist Ishaan Tharoor also found himself disturbed by the sheer size of the funding increase for ICE that Vance is demanding and he observed that "nothing matters more apparently than giving ICE a bigger budget than the militaries of virtually every European country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular