May, 06 2009, 09:00am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Ben Lilliston, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
612-870-3416
Karen Lyons , Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota
651-662-1415
Report Finds Faith Organizations Building Community, Improving Health Through Healthy Foods
Parishioners at Guardian Angels Catholic Church in
Minnesota do more than donate food to a local food shelf--they actually grow it themselves. The
project is one of many case studies highlighted in a new report by the Institute for Agriculture
and Trade Policy (IATP) and funded by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota (Blue Cross)
that demonstrate a growing nationwide movement within the faith community to put into
practice the belief that healthy foods will help feed the body and soul.
MINNEAPOLIS, Minn.
Parishioners at Guardian Angels Catholic Church in
Minnesota do more than donate food to a local food shelf--they actually grow it themselves. The
project is one of many case studies highlighted in a new report by the Institute for Agriculture
and Trade Policy (IATP) and funded by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota (Blue Cross)
that demonstrate a growing nationwide movement within the faith community to put into
practice the belief that healthy foods will help feed the body and soul.
The report, Faith and Food: Action Strategies for Healthy Eating, found that churches,
synagogues and other faith organizations throughout the United States are building community--
and healthier lives--by making healthy foods available to their members and others. Faith-based
organizations are embracing healthy eating, local foods, and sustainable agriculture and see it as
an effective way to improve their members' health and make a difference in their communities. Examples include hosting farmers markets, connecting members with local sources of halal or
kosher foods, and growing produce at a church garden to donate to a neighboring food shelf.
"Faith communities are important supporters of healthy eating because of their strong
presence in neighborhoods and their commitment to the well-being of community members,"
said JoAnne Berkenkamp, director of IATP's Local Foods program. "It is our hope that faith
members across the country will be inspired by these stories and take action in their own places
of worship."
IATP joined forces with Blue Cross' Prevention Minnesota initiative, which works to
improve the health of Minnesotans by combating the root causes of cancer and heart disease, of
which unhealthy eating is a leading factor. Physical inactivity and unhealthy eating combined
contribute to obesity, cancer, cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Together, they are the second
leading cause of preventable death and disease in the United States.
"With two-thirds of Americans overweight or obese, we need many solutions to stop this
alarming trend," said Dr. Marc Manley, vice president and medical director for Population
Health at Blue Cross. "If we surround people with healthy food options where they live, work
and play--including their place of worship--people will be much more successful in improving
their diets. We're excited to be working with IATP to encourage more faith communities to
make healthy foods the easy choice and in turn improve the health of their members."
Case studies in the report include:
St. Alban's Episcopal Church in Bolivar, Mo., manages three gardens and three orchards
from which they harvest and provide both fresh and preserved fruits and vegetables for
anyone who wants them.
Guardian Angels Catholic Church in Oakdale, Minn., manages a volunteer-based
community garden that provides fruits and vegetables for local food shelves.
Taqwa Eco-Food, a food cooperative in Chicago, Ill., works to meet the needs of people
wanting to purchase local meats raised and processed within the principles of Islam.
Central Baptist Church and Bethlehem Baptist Church of Columbia, S.C., runs the --Dash
of Faith|| cooking program to help church cooks prepare healthier foods.
Sixteen Interfaith Communities in Eugene, Ore., connect urban residents with local
farmers and community-supported agriculture (CSA) farms in which residents purchase
shares and receive deliveries of harvested fruits and vegetables.
St. Paul Jewish Community Center in St. Paul, Minn., arranges for members to purchase
shares in a local CSA farm that uses farming practices based on Jewish beliefs.
Plymouth Congregational Church and Stevens Square Community Organization of
Minneapolis, Minn., operate a community garden, food shelf and farmers market at the
church.
Central Presbyterian Church in downtown St. Paul, Minn., provides a weekly healthy
community lunch program for members and the surrounding community.Upper Sand Mountain Parish of northeastern Alabama operates a food pantry, community
and church gardens, cannery and healthy eating education program.
Body and Soul healthy eating program throughout the U.S. helps African-American
congregations improve eating among their members.
The Hindu Temple of Minnesota in Maple Grove, Minn., organizes a weekend healthy
lunch program for both members and non-members.
IATP is working to identify and expand opportunities for faith communities to support
local foods, sustainable agriculture and healthy eating. They invite others to share the efforts of
their own faith community to improve access to healthy food by visiting www.iatp.org/faith and
adding their stories to complement the case studies highlighted in this report.
A PDF of the complete Faith and Food: Action Strategies for Healthy Eating report can
be downloaded at www.iatp.org/faith or www.bluecrossmn.com/preventionminnesota.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, with headquarters in the St. Paul suburb of Eagan, was
chartered in 1933 as Minnesota's first health plan and continues to carry out its charter mission today: to
promote a wider, more economical and timely availability of health services for the people of Minnesota.
A nonprofit, taxable organization, Blue Cross is the largest health plan based in Minnesota, covering 2.8
million members in Minnesota and nationally through its health plans or plans administered by its
affiliated companies. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota is an independent licensee of the Blue
Cross and Blue Shield Association, headquartered in Chicago. Go to www.bluecrossmn.com to learn
more about Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota.
The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.
LATEST NEWS
Senate Tosses 'Dangerous Provision' Preventing State-Level AI Regulation From GOP Megabill
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry," said one advocate.
Jul 01, 2025
With a 99-1 vote early Tuesday, the Republican-controlled Senate decided to remove a controversial provision that would have prevented state-level regulation on artificial intelligence for 10 years from U.S. President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill that is currently being debated in Congress.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) was the lone lawmaker who voted to keep the moratorium in the bill.
While far from the only controversial part of the reconciliation package, the provision drew opposition from an ideologically diverse group that included Democratic and Republican state attorneys general; over 140 groups working to support children's online safety, consumer protections, and responsible innovation; and faith leaders.
Senators struck Sen. Ted Cruz's (R-Texas) AI measure from the megabill by adopting an amendment introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.). They voted on Blackburn's amendment during a session known as a vote-a-rama. Blackburn introduced the amendment after considering an agreement that would have watered down the provision.
According to The Verge, the measure that was rejected on Tuesday required states to avoid regulation AI and "automated decision systems" if they wanted to get funding for their broadband programs.
The provision would have been a major win for Big Tech, which has made the case that state laws around AI are obstructing their ability to do business.
Advocates and Democratic lawmakers cheered the decision to strip the provision.
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry. It shows that Americans are aware of the proliferation of AI harms in real time," said J.B. Branch, Big Tech accountability advocate at the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) said Tuesday that "early this morning, the Senate overwhelmingly voted to reject a dangerous provision to block states from regulating artificial intelligence, including protecting kids online. This 99-1 vote sent a clear message that Congress will not sell out our kids and local communities in order to pad the pockets of Big Tech billionaires."
In addition to concerns focused on Big Tech, experts recently told The Guardian that in the absence of state-level AI regulation, untrammeled growth of AI would take a toll on the world's "dangerously overheating climate."
Sacha Haworth, the executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, credited the "massive" defeat of Cruz's provision to the "incredible mobilizing by advocates to beat back Big Tech lobbying and last-minute bullying."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Shred JD Vance as He Shrugs Off Millions of Americans Losing Medicaid as 'Minutiae'
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Jul 01, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance took heat from critics this week when he downplayed legislation that would result in millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as mere "minutiae."
Writing on X, Vance defended the budget megabill that's currently being pushed through the United States Senate by arguing that it will massively increase funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which he deemed to be a necessary component of carrying out the Trump administration's mass deportation operation.
"The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits," wrote Vance. "The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass."
He then added that "everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions."
It was this line that drew the ire of many critics, as the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Senate version of the budget bill would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period, which would result in more than 10 million people losing their coverage. Additionally, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has proposed an amendment that would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which would likely kick millions more off of the program.
Many congressional Democrats were quick to pounce on Vance for what they said were callous comments about a vital government program.
"So if the only thing that matters is immigration... why didn't you support the bipartisan Lankford-Murphy bill that tackled immigration far better than your Ugly Bill?" asked Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.). "And it didn't have 'minutiae' that will kick 12m+ Americans off healthcare or raise the debt by $4tn."
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Veteran healthcare reporter Jonathan Cohn put some numbers behind the policies that are being minimized by the vice president.
"11.8M projected to lose health insurance," he wrote. "Clinics and hospitals taking a hit, especially in rural areas. Low-income seniors facing higher costs. 'Minutiae.'"
Activist Leah Greenberg, the co-chair of progressive organizing group Indivisible, zeroed in on Vance's emphasis on ramping up ICE's funding as particularly problematic.
"They are just coming right out and saying they want an exponential increase in $$$ so they can build their own personal Gestapo," she warned.
Washington Post global affairs columnist Ishaan Tharoor also found himself disturbed by the sheer size of the funding increase for ICE that Vance is demanding and he observed that "nothing matters more apparently than giving ICE a bigger budget than the militaries of virtually every European country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular