April, 30 2009, 01:49pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Kristin Schafer 415-981-1771
Heather Pilatic 415-694-8596
Global Chemical Treaty Tests New US Leadership
Shift on pesticide lindane may signal more positive US role
WASHINGTON
Hundreds of government officials, industry groups, and public interest observers will
gather next week in Geneva to assess global progress on phasing out a set of
dangerous chemicals. Many are looking to the new U.S. Administration to demonstrate
renewed leadership in international efforts to address these priority pollutants.
"For toxic chemicals, this is the Obama Administration's debut on the international
stage," says Daryl Ditz of the Center for International Environmental Law. "The world
will be watching for signals that the U.S. will emerge as a strong leader, committed to
protecting children and future generations from chemical contamination."
Governments that are party to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic
Pollutants (POPs) will convene May 4-8 for the fourth Conference of the Parties, or
COP-4. The treaty sets global phase out schedules for a targeted list of toxic chemicals
that build up in the food supply, accumulate in the tissue of humans and other animals,
persist in the environment for years and travel the globe on wind and water currents.
Under President Bush, the United States signed but never ratified the treaty, yet
participated in meetings as an active and influential observer.
A key focus of the Geneva meeting will be adding other pollutants to the original list of
12 POPs, which includes dioxins, PCBs, DDT, and others. An international scientific
review panel has recommended adding nine new chemicals to the treaty - each
warranting global action because of the danger they pose to human health and the
environment. Governments will now decide whether use of these chemicals will be
banned worldwide. Some of the chemicals being considered for addition include
pentabromodiphenyl ether, pentachlorobenzene, chlordecone and perfluorooctane
sulfonic acid (see below for link to full list).
The organochlorine pesticide lindane, nominated for addition to the treaty by Mexico,
provides one test for the Obama Administration. Lindane's agricultural uses were
withdrawn in the U.S. in 2006, with its only remaining uses now being pharmaceutical
shampoos and lotions to control lice and scabies. Under the Bush Administration, the
U.S. government pressed for an exemption to allow continued pharmaceutical use of
lindane, while most other countries supported a full phaseout of the pesticide.
"We've heard the U.S. position on lindane is shifting under the new Administration to
support phaseout of all uses," says Kristin Schafer of Pesticide Action Network. "This is
very good news - lindane production is extremely dirty, lindane-based products are
unnecessary and can be dangerous, and other countries have been using safer
alternatives for years."
California phased out pharmaceutical uses of lindane in 2001, and Michigan is
considering similar restrictions. While the United States is expected to support listing of
lindane in the POPs Convention with no exemptions, the Food and Drug Administration
still allows pharmaceutical use here.
"Persistent chemicals like lindane are contaminating the Arctic environment and
poisoning the traditional foods of indigenous communities," says Shawna Larson-
Carmen of Alaska Community Action on Toxics, who will be coordinating a delegation of
indigenous leaders at the Geneva meeting. "The United States must act now to phase
out use of these chemicals here at home and support a global ban as well. POPs
chemicals pose a serious threat to the health of families and communities that don't
even use them - addressing this injustice has been a core purpose of the Stockholm
Convention from the beginning."
Governments will also report in Geneva on progress toward phasing out the use of DDT
for malaria control. The iconic pesticide has been targeted for phaseout under the
treaty, with a limited exemption for malaria control under WHO guidelines for those
countries that demonstrate a need for its continued use. The international community
is encouraged to help those countries battling malaria to reduce their reliance on DDT
spraying by adopting more sustainable, effective solutions.
The Stockholm Convention meeting in Geneva will be immediately followed by another
important international chemical policy meeting, the International Conference on
Chemicals Management. Observers will closely watch positions of the United States in
this forum as well.
Available for interviews from the Geneva meeting
(email to arrange phone interviews):
Karl Tupper, Staff Scientist, Pesticide Action Network North America, karl@panna.org
Pam Miller, Executive Director, Alaska Community Action on Toxics,
pkmiller@akaction.net
Shawna Larson-Carmen, Environmental Justice Director at Alaska Community Action on
Toxics and staff member of Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands,
shawna@akaction.org
Daryl Ditz, Ph.D., Senior Policy Advisor, Center for International Environmental Law,
dditz@ciel.org
Joseph DiGangi, Ph.D., Director, Global Chemical Safety Program, Environmental Health
Fund, digangi@environmentalhealthfund.org
Resources:
Stockholm Convention documents re: recommended new chemicals:
https://chm.pops.int/Convention/POPsReviewCommittee/Recommendationsofthe...
/tabid/440/language/en-US/Default.aspx
Pesticide Action Network information on lindane: www.panna.org/lindane
CIEL information on persistent organic pollutants and Stockholm Convention:
https://www.ciel.org/Chemicals/chem_POPs.html
New report: Persistent Organic Pollutants in the Arctic: https://www.akaction.org
Pesticide Action Network information on DDT use for malaria control, including
Pesticide Action Network Germany report on DDT and the Stockholm Convention:
www.panna.org/ddt
PANNA (Pesticide Action Network North America) works to replace pesticide use with ecologically sound and socially just alternatives. As one of five autonomous PAN Regional Centers worldwide, we link local and international consumer, labor, health, environment and agriculture groups into an international citizens' action network. This network challenges the global proliferation of pesticides, defends basic rights to health and environmental quality, and works to ensure the transition to a just and viable society.
LATEST NEWS
Sanders: 'Oligarchy on Steroids' Poses Existential Threat to Democracy
"If we don't address that issue, the American people will continue to turn their backs on democracy."
Apr 27, 2025
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders said Sunday that Democrats lack a "vision for the future," warning that Americans will "turn their backs on democracy" if elected officials fail to tackle an "oligarchy on steroids."
Appearing on NBC News' "Meet the Press," Sanders (I-Vt.) was asked about Sen. Elissa Slotkin's (D-Mich.) recent assertion that Democrats should stop saying "oligarchy" because it only resonates with coastal institutions, and whether he's "missing a chance to speak to a wider audience."
"Well... we had 36,000 people out in Los Angeles, 34,000 people in Colorado, we had 30,000 people in Folsom, California," Sanders replied, referring to the wildly popular Fighting Oligarchy Tour he's currently on with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.).
"I think the American people are not quite as dumb as Ms. Slotkin thinks they are. I think they understand very well," the senator continued. "When the top 1% owns more wealth than the bottom 90%, when big money interests are able to control both political parties, they are living in an oligarchy."
"And these are precisely the issues that have got to be talked about," Sanders said. "Are you living in a democracy when [Elon] Musk can spend $270 million to elect [President Donald] Trump, and then becomes the most important person in government?"
Sanders called out the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and other super PACs "that have enormous power over Democratic candidates."
"Those are issues that we have got to talk about. That is the reality of American society today. The very rich getting richer, working-class people are struggling, 800,000 people [are] sleeping out on the streets," the democratic socialist contended.
"If we don't address that issue, the American people will continue to turn their backs on democracy, because they're looking around them and they're saying, 'Does anybody understand what I am going through?'" he added. "And unfortunately right now, to a large degree, neither party does."
Sanders urged Democrats to embrace policies like fixing the nation's "broken healthcare system" and raising the minimum wage, pointing to issues on which he is working with colleagues.
"You have Democrats... talking about Trump's movement toward authoritarianism; vigorously opposing the so-called reconciliation bill to give over a trillion dollars in tax breaks for the 1% and make massive cuts to Medicaid, nutrition, and housing; opposing what Musk is doing to dismember the Social Security Administration and the Veterans Administration, making it hard for our veterans to get decent health care or benefits on time," he said.
Sanders argued that the country needs more working-class people to run for office—and not necessarily as Democrats.
"You want to run as a Democrat? Great," he said. "You want to run as an Independent? That's great, but you've got to get involved in the political process, because right now the two-party system is failing the working class of this country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hundreds Rally in Milwaukee Against Trump Admin's 'Unprecedented' Arrest of Judge
"We reject this lawless escalation against an immigration judge who appears to be showing a commonsense and humane approach to immigrants, and stands for due process for all," said one campaigner.
Apr 26, 2025
Hundreds of people rallied in Wisconsin's largest city on Saturday to protest the Trump administration's arrest of Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan on what critics called "baseless" charges of felony obstruction after she allegedly helped an undocumented immigrant evade arrest during an appearance in her courtroom.
FBI agents arrested Dugan, 65, on Friday following an investigation, accusing her of escorting an undocumented man and his attorney through her courtroom's jury door after learning that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents showed up to arrest him.
Protesters chanted slogans including, "No ICE, No KKK, No Fascist USA!" and "No Hate, No Fear, Immigrants Are Welcome Here!" They held signs with messages like "Liberty and Justice for All" and "Resist Fascism!"
HAPPENING NOW: A HUGE crowd of protesters march through the streets outside an FBI office in Milwaukee in support of Judge Hannah Dugan (Video: @unraveledpress.com)
[image or embed]
— Marco Foster ( @marcofoster.bsky.social) April 26, 2025 at 3:05 PM
"I have never heard of a state court judge being arrested by the federal government because she chose to control her own courtroom. This is unprecedented," Sara Dady, an immigration attorney who traveled more than 90 miles from Rockford, Illinois to attend the demonstration outside the FBI field office in Milwaukee, told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
Wisconsin state Rep. Ryan Clancy (D-19) told the crowd: "The judiciary acts as a check to unchecked executive power. And functioning democracies do not lock up judges."
"I hope that we can all be as brave as Judge Dugan was," Clancy added.
Janan Najeeb, one of the leaders of the Wisconsin Coalition for Justice in Palestine, told rallygoers: "The courtroom is not a hunting ground for ICE. It is a sanctuary. When our government turns our courtrooms into traps, they are betraying the very laws that they claim to defend."
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights director Angelica Salas said in a statement that "in an unprecedented move against members of the judicial branch, the Trump administration is exercising authoritarianism to degrees that should alarm us all."
"We reject this lawless escalation against an immigration judge who appears to be showing a commonsense and humane approach to immigrants, and stands for due process for all, and against wanton disregard for our Constitution," Salas added.
Critics have called Dugan's arrest part and parcel of President Donald Trump's attacks on immigrants, the nation's system of checks and balances, and the rule of law.
"The Trump administration deserves zero benefit of the doubt here. It has evinced utter contempt for due process and the rule of law since inauguration day," Ryan Cooper, managing editor of The American Prospect, wrote on Friday. "It has deported numerous legal residents, most notably Kilmar Abrego García, to an El Salvador torture dungeon, and is openly disobeying a 9-0 Supreme Court decision to bring García back."
"The ongoing mass layoffs of federal workers and outright dismantling of legislatively mandated agencies being carried out by Elon Musk and DOGE is blatantly unconstitutional," Cooper added, referring to the Department of Government Efficiency.
Among those pushing back against Dugan's arrest are Wisconsin Circuit Judge Monica Isham, who wrote in an email to other judges: "Enough is enough. I no longer feel protected or respected as a judge in this administration. If there is no guidance for us and no support for us, I will refuse to hold court."
"I have no intention of allowing anyone to be taken out of my courtroom by ICE and sent to a concentration camp, especially without due process as BOTH of the constitutions we swore to support require," Isham added. "If this costs me my job or gets me arrested, then at least I know I did the right thing."
Keep ReadingShow Less
DOJ Memo Shows Trump Admin Ordered ICE to Conduct Warrantless Home Invasions
"There's no Alien Enemies Act exception to the Fourth Amendment," said one law professor.
Apr 26, 2025
The U.S. Department of Justice dubiously invoked a centuries-old law in directing immigration agents to carry out home invasion searches without warrants, an internal memo revealed.
USA Today—which obtained a copy of the March 14 memo issued by the office of U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi—reported Friday that the Trump administration ordered Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to pursue suspected members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua into homes, sometimes without warrants, under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA).
The 1798 law has been invoked to deport hundreds of undocumented immigrants—the majority of whom have no criminal records in the United States—many of whom have been sent to the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT), a notorious super-maximum security prison in El Salvador, regardless of their nationality.
According to the memo:
As much as practicable, officers should follow the proactive procedures above—and have an executed warrant of apprehension and removal—before contacting an alien enemy. However, that will not always be realistic or effective in swiftly identifying and removing alien enemies... An officer may encounter a suspected alien enemy in the natural course of the officer's enforcement activity, such as when apprehending other validated members of Tren de Aragua. Given the dynamic nature of enforcement operations, officers in the field are authorized to apprehend aliens upon a reasonable belief that the alien meets all four requirements to be validated as an alien enemy. This authority includes entering an alien enemy's residence to make an AEA apprehension where circumstances render it impracticable to first obtain a signed notice and warrant of apprehension and removal.
The Trump administration's controversially broad interpretation of the AEA and questionable criteria for targeting immigrants has led to the arrest and wrongful deportation of individuals including makeup artist Andry José Hernández Romero and Kilmar Abrego García, both of whom were sent to CECOT. The Trump administration is defying a U.S. Supreme Court order to facilitate Abrego García's return to the United States.
Earlier this month, the ACLU and allied groups sued to block the Trump administration's AEA deportations, arguing that "no one should face the horrifying prospect of lifelong imprisonment without a fair hearing, let alone in another country."
On Friday, U.S. District Judge David Briones ordered ICE to free a Venezuelan couple detained in El Paso under the AEA, finding that the government "has not demonstrated they have any lawful basis to continue detaining" the pair. Briones also warned ICE to not deport anyone else it is holding as an alleged "alien enemy" in West Texas.
Lee Gelernt, the ACLU's lead counsel in cases challenging use of the AEA, told USA Today: "The administration's unprecedented use of a wartime authority during peacetime was bad enough. Now we find out the Justice Department was authorizing officers to ignore the most bedrock principle of the Fourth Amendment by authorizing officers to enter homes without a judicial warrant."
Monique Sherman, an attorney at the Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network, expressed alarm over the DOJ memo.
"The home under all constitutional law is the most sacred place where you have a right to privacy," Sherman told USA Today. "By this standard, spurious allegations of gang affiliation means the government can knock down your door."
As Georgetown University Law Center professor Steve Vladeck
said, "There's no Alien Enemies Act exception to the Fourth Amendment."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular