April, 30 2009, 01:49pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Kristin Schafer 415-981-1771
Heather Pilatic 415-694-8596
Global Chemical Treaty Tests New US Leadership
Shift on pesticide lindane may signal more positive US role
WASHINGTON
Hundreds of government officials, industry groups, and public interest observers will
gather next week in Geneva to assess global progress on phasing out a set of
dangerous chemicals. Many are looking to the new U.S. Administration to demonstrate
renewed leadership in international efforts to address these priority pollutants.
"For toxic chemicals, this is the Obama Administration's debut on the international
stage," says Daryl Ditz of the Center for International Environmental Law. "The world
will be watching for signals that the U.S. will emerge as a strong leader, committed to
protecting children and future generations from chemical contamination."
Governments that are party to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic
Pollutants (POPs) will convene May 4-8 for the fourth Conference of the Parties, or
COP-4. The treaty sets global phase out schedules for a targeted list of toxic chemicals
that build up in the food supply, accumulate in the tissue of humans and other animals,
persist in the environment for years and travel the globe on wind and water currents.
Under President Bush, the United States signed but never ratified the treaty, yet
participated in meetings as an active and influential observer.
A key focus of the Geneva meeting will be adding other pollutants to the original list of
12 POPs, which includes dioxins, PCBs, DDT, and others. An international scientific
review panel has recommended adding nine new chemicals to the treaty - each
warranting global action because of the danger they pose to human health and the
environment. Governments will now decide whether use of these chemicals will be
banned worldwide. Some of the chemicals being considered for addition include
pentabromodiphenyl ether, pentachlorobenzene, chlordecone and perfluorooctane
sulfonic acid (see below for link to full list).
The organochlorine pesticide lindane, nominated for addition to the treaty by Mexico,
provides one test for the Obama Administration. Lindane's agricultural uses were
withdrawn in the U.S. in 2006, with its only remaining uses now being pharmaceutical
shampoos and lotions to control lice and scabies. Under the Bush Administration, the
U.S. government pressed for an exemption to allow continued pharmaceutical use of
lindane, while most other countries supported a full phaseout of the pesticide.
"We've heard the U.S. position on lindane is shifting under the new Administration to
support phaseout of all uses," says Kristin Schafer of Pesticide Action Network. "This is
very good news - lindane production is extremely dirty, lindane-based products are
unnecessary and can be dangerous, and other countries have been using safer
alternatives for years."
California phased out pharmaceutical uses of lindane in 2001, and Michigan is
considering similar restrictions. While the United States is expected to support listing of
lindane in the POPs Convention with no exemptions, the Food and Drug Administration
still allows pharmaceutical use here.
"Persistent chemicals like lindane are contaminating the Arctic environment and
poisoning the traditional foods of indigenous communities," says Shawna Larson-
Carmen of Alaska Community Action on Toxics, who will be coordinating a delegation of
indigenous leaders at the Geneva meeting. "The United States must act now to phase
out use of these chemicals here at home and support a global ban as well. POPs
chemicals pose a serious threat to the health of families and communities that don't
even use them - addressing this injustice has been a core purpose of the Stockholm
Convention from the beginning."
Governments will also report in Geneva on progress toward phasing out the use of DDT
for malaria control. The iconic pesticide has been targeted for phaseout under the
treaty, with a limited exemption for malaria control under WHO guidelines for those
countries that demonstrate a need for its continued use. The international community
is encouraged to help those countries battling malaria to reduce their reliance on DDT
spraying by adopting more sustainable, effective solutions.
The Stockholm Convention meeting in Geneva will be immediately followed by another
important international chemical policy meeting, the International Conference on
Chemicals Management. Observers will closely watch positions of the United States in
this forum as well.
Available for interviews from the Geneva meeting
(email to arrange phone interviews):
Karl Tupper, Staff Scientist, Pesticide Action Network North America, karl@panna.org
Pam Miller, Executive Director, Alaska Community Action on Toxics,
pkmiller@akaction.net
Shawna Larson-Carmen, Environmental Justice Director at Alaska Community Action on
Toxics and staff member of Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands,
shawna@akaction.org
Daryl Ditz, Ph.D., Senior Policy Advisor, Center for International Environmental Law,
dditz@ciel.org
Joseph DiGangi, Ph.D., Director, Global Chemical Safety Program, Environmental Health
Fund, digangi@environmentalhealthfund.org
Resources:
Stockholm Convention documents re: recommended new chemicals:
https://chm.pops.int/Convention/POPsReviewCommittee/Recommendationsofthe...
/tabid/440/language/en-US/Default.aspx
Pesticide Action Network information on lindane: www.panna.org/lindane
CIEL information on persistent organic pollutants and Stockholm Convention:
https://www.ciel.org/Chemicals/chem_POPs.html
New report: Persistent Organic Pollutants in the Arctic: https://www.akaction.org
Pesticide Action Network information on DDT use for malaria control, including
Pesticide Action Network Germany report on DDT and the Stockholm Convention:
www.panna.org/ddt
PANNA (Pesticide Action Network North America) works to replace pesticide use with ecologically sound and socially just alternatives. As one of five autonomous PAN Regional Centers worldwide, we link local and international consumer, labor, health, environment and agriculture groups into an international citizens' action network. This network challenges the global proliferation of pesticides, defends basic rights to health and environmental quality, and works to ensure the transition to a just and viable society.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular