March, 03 2009, 11:07am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Brandon Hersh (202) 471-3205,bhersh@mediamatters.org
Question For Media: Is Rush Limbaugh Conservative Movement's 'Unofficial Leader?'
WASHINGTON
Rush Limbaugh rose to prominence in the early 1990s through a
relentless series of smears leveled at President Clinton, his administration,
and his family. With a progressive back in the White House, Limbaugh has
returned to regular attacks on the president. The Los Angeles Times described
him as "the politically wounded party's unofficial leader"
and his keynote speech at this weekend's Conservative Political Action
Conference (CPAC) was broadcast live on Fox News and CNN and then rebroadcast
on Fox News the next day - a treatment that, according to Fox News'
Greg Jarrett, "not even the president" gets.
Limbaugh started a media firestorm with his comments in January -- just
days before President Barack Obama's inauguration -- that he
"hopes" Obama "fails." Since then Limbaugh has
continued his drumbeat repeating this theme, recently asserting that it is not
only him but "every Republican in this country" who "wants
Obama to fail."
Among top conservatives, reaction to
Limbaugh's sentiment has been mixed. Former Rep. Tom
DeLay and former
Sen. Rick Santorum have publicly agreed with Limbaugh's sentiment
while some
conservative
figures have
distanced themselves the conservative commentator. RNC Chairman
Michael Steele recently joined Rep.
Phil Gingrey in the list of conservative leaders who have bowed down to
Limbaugh after publicly
criticizing him.
With Republican at a crossroads on whether Limbaugh speaks for the
party, it might be best, as White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said in
yesterday's briefing "to ask individual Republicans whether they
agree with what Rush Limbaugh said this weekend." Media Matters today launched "Rush
Watch," a resource center for all of the latest research on the top-rated
radio talk show host:
www.mediamatters.org/rushwatch/
Below are some of Limbaugh's attacks on President Obama and his
policies since the inauguration as well as conservative commentary on
Limbaugh's rhetoric:
Limbaugh's "I
Hope He Fails" Mantra Against President Obama
During the broadcast of his January 16 show, in response to the invitation
of "a major American print publication" to describe his "hope
for the Obama administration," Limbaugh replied "I hope he
fails." Limbaugh has continued to pound this theme on his show, not only
saying that he wants "the stimulus package" to fail but that
"every Republican in the country wants Obama to fail."
- Limbaugh: "The dirty little secret ... is that
every Republican in this country wants Obama to fail, but none of them
have the guts to say so; I am willing to say it" - Limbaugh: "I want the stimulus package to
fail," "I want everything he's doing to fail." - Limbaugh on GOP strategy for Obama era: "Hoping
he fails"
A Limbaugh Fissure Within
Conservative Movement?
Since President Obama's inauguration, there has been a wide range
of reactions from conservative officials and media figures to Limbaugh's
rhetoric.
Conservatives in Congress such as Rep. Eric Cantor and other prominent
leaders such as Republican strategist Mike Murphy have distanced themselves
from Limbaugh.
House Minority Whip Eric Cantor
- Responding to George
Stephanopolous' question whether "the Rush Limbaugh approach
of hoping the president fails" is "the Eric Cantor House
Republican approach," Cantor replied "absolutely not." [Media Matters' County Fair, 3/1/09]
South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sanford, when
about the "view that perhaps Republicans are rooting for President
Obama to fail," replied: "I don't want him to fail. Anybody who wants him to fail is an idiot,
because it means we're all in trouble."
[Center for American Progress' Think Progress, 2/25/09]
GOP Strategist Mike
Murphy
- Mike Murphy disagreed with Limbaugh saying "Republicans want the country to succeed,"
and warned against a "party of 25
percent of the vote going to Limbaugh rallies." [Media Matters' County Fair, 3/1/09]
While other conservative leaders and
personalities such as Tom DeLay and Rick Santorum have echoed Limbaugh's
comments.
Former House Minority
Leader Tom DeLay
- When asked if he agreed with Rush Limbaugh that we
shouldn't hope for President Obama to succeed, DeLay replied "Well, exactly right. I don't want this for
our nation. That's for sure." [Center for American
Progress' Think Progress, 2/27/09]
Former Pennsylvania
Senator Rick Santorum
- Similarly, when asked "do you hope, should we hope
that President Obama fails," Santorum replied that "absolutely we hope that his policies fail," adding "I believe his policies will fail, I don't
know, but I hope they fail." [Center for American
Progress' Think Progress, 2/28/09]
RNC chairman Michael Steele and Rep. Phil Gingrey actually backed down
from their respective criticisms of Limbaugh.
RNC chairman Michael Steele
- RNC Chairman Michael
Steele originally said "Rush
Limbaugh, his whole thing is entertainment. Yes it's incendiary, yes
it's ugly." [Politico,
3/2/09]
- After Limbaugh addressed
those comments on his radio show, asserting that Steele that he is
"head of the RNC" and not "head of the Republican
Party," Steele soon was backing down on his comments. Steele said
his "intent was not to go after
Rush" and that "[t]here
was no attempt on my part to diminish is voice or his leadership."
Steele further claimed that what he was trying to say was that "a lot of people...want to make Rush the
scapegoat, the bogeyman, and he's not." [Politico, 3/2/09]
Rep. Phil Gingrey
- Responding to
Limbaugh's assertion that Obama is "obviously more frightened
of me than he is Mitch McConnell" and "John Boehner,"
Rep. Gingrey said "I mean, it's easy if you're Sean
Hannity or Rush Limbaugh or even sometimes Newt Gingrich to stand back and
throw bricks." Gingrey continued: "You know you're just
on these talk shows and you're living well and plus you stir up a
bit of controversy and gin up the base and that sort of thing." [Politico, 1/27/09]
- Gingrey appeared on
Limbaugh's show the following day to express his "very sincere
regret for those comments" and said "I clearly ended up
putting my foot in my mouth on some of those comments." [Center for
American Progress' Think Progress, 1/28/09]
Limbaugh's Influence on
Conservative Echo Chamber: Health IT falsehoods and Other Attacks on
Obama's Policies
As evidence of Limbaugh's influence among both
conservative and mainstream media, he was the first to unabashedly advance
former New York Lt. Gov. Betsy McCaughey's falsehood that a provision in the
House-passed version of the economic recovery bill grants the government
authority to "monitor treatments" and "make sure your doctor
is doing what the federal government deems appropriate." This dubious
claim was soon being parroted by several conservative media figures. Limbaugh
took credit, saying "I found it. I detailed it for you and now it's
all over the mainstream media."
Media Matters has documented Limbaugh leading
the conservative echo chamber in advancing other false and misleading
information about President Obama's economic proposals.
Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.
LATEST NEWS
'Tragic Outcome' for Gig Workers as California Supreme Court Hands Win to Uber, DoorDash
"Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers," the case plaintiff said.
Jul 25, 2024
Labor advocates on Thursday decried a ruling by the California Supreme Court upholding a lower court's affirmation of a state ballot measure allowing app-based ride and delivery companies to classify their drivers as independent contractors, limiting their worker rights.
The court's seven justices ruled unanimously in Castellanos v. State of California that Proposition 22, which was approved by 58% of California voters in 2020, complies with the state constitution. Prop 22—which was overturned in 2021 by an Alameda County Superior Court judge in 2021—was upheld in March 2023 by the state's 1st District Court of Appeals.
The business models of app-based companies including DoorDash, Instacart, Lyft, and Uber rely upon minimizing frontline worker compensation by categorizing drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. Independent contractors are not entitled to unemployment insurance, health insurance, or compensation for business expenses.
There are approximately 1.4 million app-based gig workers in California, according to industry estimates.
While DoorDash hailed Thursday's ruling as "not only a victory for Dashers, but also for democracy itself," gig worker advocates condemned the decision.
"Over the last three years, gig workers across California have experienced firsthand that Prop 22 is nothing more than a bait-and-switch meant to enrich global corporations at the expense of the Black, brown, and immigrant workers who power their earnings," plaintiff Hector Castellanos, who drives for Uber and Lyft, said in a statement.
"Prop 22 has allowed gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash to deprive us of a living wage, access to workers compensation, paid sick leave, and meaningful healthcare coverage," Castellanos added. "Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers."
Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO, said that "we are deeply disappointed that the state Supreme Court has allowed tech corporations to buy their way out of basic labor laws despite Proposition 22's inconsistencies with our state constitution."
"These companies have upended our social contract, forcing workers and the public to take on the inherent risk created by this work, while they profit," she continued. "A.B. 5 granted virtually all California workers the right to be paid for all hours worked, health and safety standards, unemployment insurance, workers compensation, and the right to organize."
"Rideshare and delivery drivers deserve those rights as well," Gonzalez stressed.
The Gig Workers Rising campaign said on social media that "Uber and other app corporations spent $220 million to buy this law, and they did it by tricking Californians."
Prop 22's passage in November 2020 with nearly 59% of the vote was the culmination of what was by far the most expensive ballot measure in California history. App-based companies and their backers outspent labor and progressive groups by more than 10 to 1, with proponents pouring a staggering $204.5 million into the "yes" campaign's coffers against just $19 million for the "no" side.
"Voters were told the initiative would provide us with 'historic new benefits' and guaranteed earnings," said Gig Workers Rising. "But since it went into effect, drivers have seen our pay go down, learned the benefits are a sham, and have to accept unsafe rides because of the constant threat of being 'deactivated,' kicked off the app with little explanation or warning."
"If Uber really cared about good benefits and fair wages, it could make that happen tomorrow," the campaign added. "Instead, it has shown it would rather slash pay, bamboozle voters, and put drivers' lives and livelihoods in danger—all while promising $7 billion in stock buybacks to banks and billionaires."
Veena Dubal, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine who focuses on labor and inequality, toldCalMatters that Thursday's ruling was "a really tragic outcome," but "it's not the end of the road."
Dubal's sentiment was echoed by some California state legislators, who said the ruling presents an opportunity to act.
"While this decision is frustrating, it must also be motivating," said state Senate Labor Committee Chair Lola Smallwood-Cuevas (D-28). "I'm more determined than ever to ensure that all workers—including our diverse and Black, Indigenous, and people of color-led gig workforce—have the basic protections of workers compensation, paid sick leave, family leave, disability insurance, and the right to form a union."
Prop 22 has served as a template for lawmakers in other states seeking to deny or limit basic worker rights, benefits, and protections.
In Massachusetts, app-based companies have been fighting for years to get a measure to classify drivers as contractors on the state ballot. In 2022, Lyft made the largest political donation in state history—$14.4 million—to a coalition funding one such proposal.
Last month, Uber and Lyft reached an agreement with the office of Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, a Democrat, to pay $175 million to settle a lawsuit filed in 2020. As part of the deal, the companies also agreed to increase driver pay and provide paid sick leave, accident insurance, and some health benefits. The agreement does not address how app-based gig workers should be classified.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Young Voters Tell Kamala Harris to 'Fight for Our Future'
"This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Jul 25, 2024
Four youth-led groups on Thursday urged Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, to "fight for our future" by pursuing a policy agenda the coalition unveiled in a March letter to U.S. President Joe Biden.
It's been less than a week since Biden left the race and endorsed Harris, who is expected to face former Republican Donald Trump and his running mate, U.S. Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), in the November election. Since then, she's racked up endorsements from Democratic members of Congress and progressive groups focused on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
March for Our Lives, which was launched after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, honored Harris with the group's first-ever endorsement on Wednesday, calling her "the right person to stand up for us and fight for the country we deserve."
"To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters."
The gun violence prevention organization is part of the youth-led coalition behind the new letter, which also includes the climate-focused Sunrise Movement; Gen-Z for Change, which advocates on a range of issues; and the national immigrant network United We Dream Action.
"You have an urgent and important task. To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters," the coalition told Harris on Thursday, noting that she sought the Democratic nomination during the last cycle. "You should build on your 2020 campaign platform where you put forward a strong vision to make the economy work for everyday people and ensure a livable future for us all."
The groups urged Harris to support the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and the Reverse Mass Incarceration Act. They pushed her to expand pathways to citizenship, keep families together, end fossil fuel subsidies, and create good, union jobs. They also called on her to prioritize gun violence prevention and investments in public health solutions and green, affordable housing.
"Democrats are at a critical crossroads with young people," the coalition wrote to Harris on Thursday. "Polls showed Biden and Trump neck-and-neck among young voters."
ANew York Times/Siena College poll conducted July 22-24 shows Trump leading Harris 48% to 47% among likely voters and 48% to 46% among registered voters—differences that fall within the margin of error.
Forbesnoted Thursday that "Democrats are far more enthusiastic about Harris than they were Biden, the Times/Siena survey found, with nearly 80% of voters who lean Democrat saying they would like Harris to be the nominee, compared to 48% of Democrats who said the same about Biden three weeks ago."
The outlet also pointed to two other polls conducted by Morning Consult and Reuters/Ipsos since Biden dropped out, which both show Harris with a narrow lead over Trump.
"You have an opportunity to win the youth vote by turning the page and differentiating yourself from Biden policies that are deeply unpopular with us, such as approving new oil and gas projects, denying people their right to seek refuge and asylum, and funding the Israeli government's killing of civilians in Gaza," the youth coalition highlighted Thursday. "You must speak to the economic pain young people are facing from crushing student debt and skyrocketing housing and food prices."
Looking beyond November, the groups told Harris—who could be the first Black woman and person of Asian descent elected to the country's highest office—that "you could be a historic president. Not just because of who you are, but what you can accomplish."
"Young people are energized and ready to organize against fascism and for the future we deserve," they concluded. "This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Video Game Actors Strike for AI Protections
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said one union leader. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games."
Jul 25, 2024
After nearly two years of negotiations with video game giants and no deal that would protect performers from artificial intelligence, unionized voice and motion capture actors who work in video game development announced Thursday that they will go on strike starting at 12:01 am on Friday, July 26.
The performers are represented by Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), which last year won a contract for TV and film actors that included "unprecedented provisions for consent and compensation that will protect members from the threat of AI," after the union went on strike for four months.
The union has been negotiating on behalf of video game actors with major production companies including Disney Character Voices Inc., Activision Productions Inc., and WB Games Inc., and has won concessions over wages and job safety—but "AI protections remain the sticking point," said SAG-AFTRA on Thursday as the impending strike was announced.
Unionized actors want protections that would stop video game companies from training AI to replicate actors' voices or likeness without their consent and without compensating them.
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, national executive director and chief negotiator for SAG-AFTRA. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games. That includes the SAG-AFTRA members who bring memorable and beloved game characters to life, and they deserve and demand the same fundamental protections as performers in film, television, streaming, and music: fair compensation and the right of informed consent for the AI use of their faces, voices, and bodies."
"Frankly, it's stunning that these video game studios haven't learned anything from the lessons of last year—that our members can and will stand up and demand fair and equitable treatment with respect to AI, and the public supports us in that," he added.
Sarah Elmaleh, negotiating committee chair for the union's interactive media agreement, said the negotiations have shown the companies "are not interested in fair, reasonable AI protections, but rather flagrant exploitation."
"We look forward to collaborating with teams on our interim and independent contracts, which provide AI transparency, consent, and compensation to all performers, and to continuing to negotiate in good faith with this bargaining group when they are ready to join us in the world we all deserve," said Elmaleh.
The unionized actors voted in favor of the strike authorization with a 98.32% yes vote, said SAG-AFTRA.
The strike was announced as more than 500 workers who help develop the popular World of Warcraft video game franchise voted to join the Communications Workers of America (CWA), with the games publisher, Blizzard Entertainment, recognizing the bargaining unit.
CWA noted that the workers' journey to union representation began with a walkout in 2021 at Activision Blizzard, which was later bought by Microsoft, over sexual harassment and discrimination.
"What we've accomplished at World of Warcraft is just the beginning," Eric Lanham, a World of Warcraft test analyst, said in a statement. "We know that when workers have a protected voice, it's a win-win for employee standards, the studio, and World of Warcraft fans looking for the best gaming experience."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular