To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Trans rights supporters rally in Austin, Texas on March 20, 2023.
"The fight is far from over," said the groups that sued Texas over the ban.
The Texas Supreme Court, made up entirely of Republicans, decided Thursday to allow a ban on gender-affirming healthcare for trans youth to take effect on September 1, rejecting an emergency effort by advocacy groups to block the law.
The decision came a week after a Texas district judge temporarily halted the Republican-authored law, arguing that S.B. 14 infringes on the "fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children."
Texas officials swiftly appealed the district judge's decision, prompting the rights groups that sued over the law to file an emergency request urging the state's high court to prevent enforcement of the ban, which Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed into law in June.
The Supreme Court's order allowing the law to take effect on Friday offered no explanation for the decision.
As The Associated Presssummarized, S.B. 14 "would prevent transgender minors from accessing hormone therapies, puberty blockers, and transition surgeries, even though medical experts say such surgical procedures are rarely performed on children."
"Children who already started the medications being banned are required to be weaned off in a 'medically appropriate' manner," the outlet added.
Lambda Legal, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Texas, and the Transgender Law Center issued a joint statement on Thursday declaring that "the fight is far from over."
"Today's cruel ruling places Texas' transgender youth, and the families and medical professionals who love and care for them, directly in harm's way," the organizations said. "The district court heard two days of testimony, weighed the evidence, and made a reasoned and thoughtful determination that the ban likely violated the Texas Constitution, and thus should be delayed while the full case plays out in court."
"Inexplicably, the Texas Supreme Court disagreed, and transgender Texas youth and their families are forced to confront the start of the school year fearful of what awaits them," the coalition added. "The district court clearly articulated the ways in which S.B. 14 likely violates the Texas Constitution by infringing upon the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children, infringing upon Texas physicians' right of occupational freedom, and discriminating against transgender adolescents with gender dysphoria because of their sex, sex stereotypes, and transgender status. We couldn't agree more and look forward to continuing this fight."
With the enactment of S.B. 14, Texas will become one of more than a dozen U.S. states that have imposed legal restrictions on gender-affirming care.
If it was left in place, the district court's injunction against the law "would have blocked the state attorney general's office, the Texas Medical Board, and the Texas Health and Human Services Commission from enforcing the law," The Texas Tribunereported Thursday.
The judge in the case "wrote that transgender youth and their families would 'suffer probable, imminent, and irreparable injury' if S.B. 14 went into effect while the legal battle ensues," the newspaper added. "A trial is set to begin May 6."
This story has been updated to clarify that the joint statement was issued by advocacy groups, not the law firms involved in the case.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
The Texas Supreme Court, made up entirely of Republicans, decided Thursday to allow a ban on gender-affirming healthcare for trans youth to take effect on September 1, rejecting an emergency effort by advocacy groups to block the law.
The decision came a week after a Texas district judge temporarily halted the Republican-authored law, arguing that S.B. 14 infringes on the "fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children."
Texas officials swiftly appealed the district judge's decision, prompting the rights groups that sued over the law to file an emergency request urging the state's high court to prevent enforcement of the ban, which Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed into law in June.
The Supreme Court's order allowing the law to take effect on Friday offered no explanation for the decision.
As The Associated Presssummarized, S.B. 14 "would prevent transgender minors from accessing hormone therapies, puberty blockers, and transition surgeries, even though medical experts say such surgical procedures are rarely performed on children."
"Children who already started the medications being banned are required to be weaned off in a 'medically appropriate' manner," the outlet added.
Lambda Legal, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Texas, and the Transgender Law Center issued a joint statement on Thursday declaring that "the fight is far from over."
"Today's cruel ruling places Texas' transgender youth, and the families and medical professionals who love and care for them, directly in harm's way," the organizations said. "The district court heard two days of testimony, weighed the evidence, and made a reasoned and thoughtful determination that the ban likely violated the Texas Constitution, and thus should be delayed while the full case plays out in court."
"Inexplicably, the Texas Supreme Court disagreed, and transgender Texas youth and their families are forced to confront the start of the school year fearful of what awaits them," the coalition added. "The district court clearly articulated the ways in which S.B. 14 likely violates the Texas Constitution by infringing upon the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children, infringing upon Texas physicians' right of occupational freedom, and discriminating against transgender adolescents with gender dysphoria because of their sex, sex stereotypes, and transgender status. We couldn't agree more and look forward to continuing this fight."
With the enactment of S.B. 14, Texas will become one of more than a dozen U.S. states that have imposed legal restrictions on gender-affirming care.
If it was left in place, the district court's injunction against the law "would have blocked the state attorney general's office, the Texas Medical Board, and the Texas Health and Human Services Commission from enforcing the law," The Texas Tribunereported Thursday.
The judge in the case "wrote that transgender youth and their families would 'suffer probable, imminent, and irreparable injury' if S.B. 14 went into effect while the legal battle ensues," the newspaper added. "A trial is set to begin May 6."
This story has been updated to clarify that the joint statement was issued by advocacy groups, not the law firms involved in the case.
The Texas Supreme Court, made up entirely of Republicans, decided Thursday to allow a ban on gender-affirming healthcare for trans youth to take effect on September 1, rejecting an emergency effort by advocacy groups to block the law.
The decision came a week after a Texas district judge temporarily halted the Republican-authored law, arguing that S.B. 14 infringes on the "fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children."
Texas officials swiftly appealed the district judge's decision, prompting the rights groups that sued over the law to file an emergency request urging the state's high court to prevent enforcement of the ban, which Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed into law in June.
The Supreme Court's order allowing the law to take effect on Friday offered no explanation for the decision.
As The Associated Presssummarized, S.B. 14 "would prevent transgender minors from accessing hormone therapies, puberty blockers, and transition surgeries, even though medical experts say such surgical procedures are rarely performed on children."
"Children who already started the medications being banned are required to be weaned off in a 'medically appropriate' manner," the outlet added.
Lambda Legal, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Texas, and the Transgender Law Center issued a joint statement on Thursday declaring that "the fight is far from over."
"Today's cruel ruling places Texas' transgender youth, and the families and medical professionals who love and care for them, directly in harm's way," the organizations said. "The district court heard two days of testimony, weighed the evidence, and made a reasoned and thoughtful determination that the ban likely violated the Texas Constitution, and thus should be delayed while the full case plays out in court."
"Inexplicably, the Texas Supreme Court disagreed, and transgender Texas youth and their families are forced to confront the start of the school year fearful of what awaits them," the coalition added. "The district court clearly articulated the ways in which S.B. 14 likely violates the Texas Constitution by infringing upon the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children, infringing upon Texas physicians' right of occupational freedom, and discriminating against transgender adolescents with gender dysphoria because of their sex, sex stereotypes, and transgender status. We couldn't agree more and look forward to continuing this fight."
With the enactment of S.B. 14, Texas will become one of more than a dozen U.S. states that have imposed legal restrictions on gender-affirming care.
If it was left in place, the district court's injunction against the law "would have blocked the state attorney general's office, the Texas Medical Board, and the Texas Health and Human Services Commission from enforcing the law," The Texas Tribunereported Thursday.
The judge in the case "wrote that transgender youth and their families would 'suffer probable, imminent, and irreparable injury' if S.B. 14 went into effect while the legal battle ensues," the newspaper added. "A trial is set to begin May 6."
This story has been updated to clarify that the joint statement was issued by advocacy groups, not the law firms involved in the case.
