SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
U.S. Reps. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) talk during a House Judiciary Committee hearing in Washington, D.C. on June 30, 2021. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
The House on Wednesday passed bipartisan legislation that prohibits employers from using pre-dispute non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) or non-disparagement clauses to silence survivors of workplace sexual assault and harassment.
President Joe Biden is expected to sign the Speak Out Act, which had already been approved in the Senate by unanimous consent, as soon as it reaches his desk.
But 109 Republicans voted against protecting the rights of employees to share their stories and pursue justice without fear of retribution for violating NDAs signed prior to instances of sexual misconduct.
\u201cHere are the 109 Republicans who just voted AGAINST banning non-disclosure agreements in cases of sexual assault and harassment.\u201d— No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen (@No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen) 1668626017
"We live in a society that makes it incredibly difficult for survivors of sexual assault and harassment to get justice," Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) wrote Wednesday on social media.
"This bill empowers survivors of sexual assault and harassment to speak openly about their experiences and pursue the justice they deserve," she added. "I was proud to be a co-lead on this bill and I'm so glad we got it done."
As The New Republic noted:
Thwarting the use of NDAs is important, as they have been weaponized to bind victims from speaking out against abusive employers or workplace superiors. That prevents victims from stopping potential future harm to be inflicted upon colleagues. Gretchen Carlson and Julie Rognisky, former Fox News employees and advocates for the bill, are familiar with this dynamic. Both bound by NDAs, the pair filed lawsuits against late Fox executive Roger Ailes, alleging sexual assault.
"The goal of the silencing mechanisms is to isolate you, to make you feel like you're the only one that this is happening to, to protect predators by ensuring that nobody will know," Roginsky told The 19th. "What survivors go through is something that has driven countless women out of the workforce because they have to choose between staying in an untenable situation silently or leaving their chosen careers."
According to The 19th:
One in three women report having faced sexual harassment in the workplace, and often they can't talk about it: More than one-third of the U.S. workforce is bound by non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) that can silence victims of abuse and shield employers from accountability. But now, five years after the #MeToo movement took off, Congress is limiting an employer's ability to keep its employees quiet.
In addition to banning the use of NDAs between employers and current, former, and prospective workers in cases of sexual assault and harassment, the Speak Out Act also invalidates existing NDAs in cases not already filed.
"This is a great step forward, especially for women in this country," said Rep. Lois Frankel (D-Fla.), who co-introduced the bill in June with Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.). "The goal of this legislation is really to change the culture in the workplace right now."
Research shows that state-level laws similar to the Speak Out Act led workers to disclose information about sexual misconduct and other negative elements of their jobs more freely.
In March, Biden signed a related bill that bars companies from "resolving" claims of sexual assault and harassment through forced arbitration. As The New Republic observed, "Such resolution processes allowed superiors to discreetly deal with cases away from public scrutiny, enabling them to get away with abusing employees at will."
In the words of Frankel, "This is a one-two punch."
"When you think about how many people are subjected to these agreements and how rampant sexual assault and abuse is in this country," she said, "these are two incredibly significant new laws that are going to change the culture and force corporations to protect their workers instead of trying to hide the dirty little secrets."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The House on Wednesday passed bipartisan legislation that prohibits employers from using pre-dispute non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) or non-disparagement clauses to silence survivors of workplace sexual assault and harassment.
President Joe Biden is expected to sign the Speak Out Act, which had already been approved in the Senate by unanimous consent, as soon as it reaches his desk.
But 109 Republicans voted against protecting the rights of employees to share their stories and pursue justice without fear of retribution for violating NDAs signed prior to instances of sexual misconduct.
\u201cHere are the 109 Republicans who just voted AGAINST banning non-disclosure agreements in cases of sexual assault and harassment.\u201d— No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen (@No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen) 1668626017
"We live in a society that makes it incredibly difficult for survivors of sexual assault and harassment to get justice," Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) wrote Wednesday on social media.
"This bill empowers survivors of sexual assault and harassment to speak openly about their experiences and pursue the justice they deserve," she added. "I was proud to be a co-lead on this bill and I'm so glad we got it done."
As The New Republic noted:
Thwarting the use of NDAs is important, as they have been weaponized to bind victims from speaking out against abusive employers or workplace superiors. That prevents victims from stopping potential future harm to be inflicted upon colleagues. Gretchen Carlson and Julie Rognisky, former Fox News employees and advocates for the bill, are familiar with this dynamic. Both bound by NDAs, the pair filed lawsuits against late Fox executive Roger Ailes, alleging sexual assault.
"The goal of the silencing mechanisms is to isolate you, to make you feel like you're the only one that this is happening to, to protect predators by ensuring that nobody will know," Roginsky told The 19th. "What survivors go through is something that has driven countless women out of the workforce because they have to choose between staying in an untenable situation silently or leaving their chosen careers."
According to The 19th:
One in three women report having faced sexual harassment in the workplace, and often they can't talk about it: More than one-third of the U.S. workforce is bound by non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) that can silence victims of abuse and shield employers from accountability. But now, five years after the #MeToo movement took off, Congress is limiting an employer's ability to keep its employees quiet.
In addition to banning the use of NDAs between employers and current, former, and prospective workers in cases of sexual assault and harassment, the Speak Out Act also invalidates existing NDAs in cases not already filed.
"This is a great step forward, especially for women in this country," said Rep. Lois Frankel (D-Fla.), who co-introduced the bill in June with Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.). "The goal of this legislation is really to change the culture in the workplace right now."
Research shows that state-level laws similar to the Speak Out Act led workers to disclose information about sexual misconduct and other negative elements of their jobs more freely.
In March, Biden signed a related bill that bars companies from "resolving" claims of sexual assault and harassment through forced arbitration. As The New Republic observed, "Such resolution processes allowed superiors to discreetly deal with cases away from public scrutiny, enabling them to get away with abusing employees at will."
In the words of Frankel, "This is a one-two punch."
"When you think about how many people are subjected to these agreements and how rampant sexual assault and abuse is in this country," she said, "these are two incredibly significant new laws that are going to change the culture and force corporations to protect their workers instead of trying to hide the dirty little secrets."
The House on Wednesday passed bipartisan legislation that prohibits employers from using pre-dispute non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) or non-disparagement clauses to silence survivors of workplace sexual assault and harassment.
President Joe Biden is expected to sign the Speak Out Act, which had already been approved in the Senate by unanimous consent, as soon as it reaches his desk.
But 109 Republicans voted against protecting the rights of employees to share their stories and pursue justice without fear of retribution for violating NDAs signed prior to instances of sexual misconduct.
\u201cHere are the 109 Republicans who just voted AGAINST banning non-disclosure agreements in cases of sexual assault and harassment.\u201d— No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen (@No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen) 1668626017
"We live in a society that makes it incredibly difficult for survivors of sexual assault and harassment to get justice," Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) wrote Wednesday on social media.
"This bill empowers survivors of sexual assault and harassment to speak openly about their experiences and pursue the justice they deserve," she added. "I was proud to be a co-lead on this bill and I'm so glad we got it done."
As The New Republic noted:
Thwarting the use of NDAs is important, as they have been weaponized to bind victims from speaking out against abusive employers or workplace superiors. That prevents victims from stopping potential future harm to be inflicted upon colleagues. Gretchen Carlson and Julie Rognisky, former Fox News employees and advocates for the bill, are familiar with this dynamic. Both bound by NDAs, the pair filed lawsuits against late Fox executive Roger Ailes, alleging sexual assault.
"The goal of the silencing mechanisms is to isolate you, to make you feel like you're the only one that this is happening to, to protect predators by ensuring that nobody will know," Roginsky told The 19th. "What survivors go through is something that has driven countless women out of the workforce because they have to choose between staying in an untenable situation silently or leaving their chosen careers."
According to The 19th:
One in three women report having faced sexual harassment in the workplace, and often they can't talk about it: More than one-third of the U.S. workforce is bound by non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) that can silence victims of abuse and shield employers from accountability. But now, five years after the #MeToo movement took off, Congress is limiting an employer's ability to keep its employees quiet.
In addition to banning the use of NDAs between employers and current, former, and prospective workers in cases of sexual assault and harassment, the Speak Out Act also invalidates existing NDAs in cases not already filed.
"This is a great step forward, especially for women in this country," said Rep. Lois Frankel (D-Fla.), who co-introduced the bill in June with Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.). "The goal of this legislation is really to change the culture in the workplace right now."
Research shows that state-level laws similar to the Speak Out Act led workers to disclose information about sexual misconduct and other negative elements of their jobs more freely.
In March, Biden signed a related bill that bars companies from "resolving" claims of sexual assault and harassment through forced arbitration. As The New Republic observed, "Such resolution processes allowed superiors to discreetly deal with cases away from public scrutiny, enabling them to get away with abusing employees at will."
In the words of Frankel, "This is a one-two punch."
"When you think about how many people are subjected to these agreements and how rampant sexual assault and abuse is in this country," she said, "these are two incredibly significant new laws that are going to change the culture and force corporations to protect their workers instead of trying to hide the dirty little secrets."