SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
NASA's DART spacecraft deliberately collided with the asteroid Dimorphos on September 26, 2022. (Photo: NASA/Johns Hopkins APL/Steve Gribben)
'Climate Change Is the Asteroid,' Say Critics of NASA Earth Defense Mission
"The actual clear and present danger to humanity is of course Earth breakdown from burning fossil fuels," said one NASA climate scientist.
Sep 26, 2022
Critics of a NASA planetary defense mission said this week that instead of spending hundreds of millions of dollars learning how to manage the infinitesimal danger of Earth-bound asteroids, the government should focus on tackling the immediate--and ever-worsening--threat of climate catastrophe.
"Climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed."
Hurtling through space at 14,000 miles per hour, NASA's $330 million Double Asteroid Redirection Test spacecraft--DART, for short--successfully impacted the small asteroid Dimorphos on Monday evening. DART's cameras recorded the collision, whose effects won't be known until ground-based telescopes conduct new observations.
While dinosaur fossils are an irrefutable reminder of the destructive potential posed by rocks from outer space, most astronomers agree that the risk of a catastrophic collision is negligible--as opposed to the accelerating climate emergency.
"Climate change is the asteroid coming straight for us," wrote Twitter user @Ecowarriorrs.
That was also the message of last year's hit climate denial satire film Don't Look Up, although politicians and pundits in the movie mostly ignore the comet hurtling toward Earth instead of trying to destroy it, at least until a billionaire businessman discovers it contains a fortune in rare earth minerals.
\u201cThe US is spending $324.5 million on the #DARTMission, which will crash a probe into an asteroid, which poses no threat to the planet, but it will not commit to fulfilling its climate obligations in the midst of a crisis that is currently putting millions of lives at risk.\u201d— Nida Kirmani (@Nida Kirmani) 1664118814
\u201c@JawadTokhai @NidaKirmani No asteroid >1 km in diameter can impact Earth any time in the next few hundred years.\n\nSmaller impactors that would cause regional disaster remain possible. Hence DART testing asteroid deflection.\n\nBut climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed.\u201d— Nida Kirmani (@Nida Kirmani) 1664118814
"No asteroid >1 km in diameter can impact Earth any time in the next few hundred years," tweeted planetary astronomer Michael Busch. "But climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed."
While NASA climate scientist Peter Kalmus said that "it's great that NASA is testing the ability to deflect an asteroid or comet if necessary," the activist researcher added that "the actual clear and present danger to humanity is of course Earth breakdown from burning fossil fuels."
British cultural consultant William Norris wrote on Twitter, "Got to love that we're trialing a way of diverting 'killer asteroids,' a very unlikely threat to our future, while basically ignoring an actual, happening now, quite-possibly-will-wipe-humanity-out threat in the form of climate change."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Critics of a NASA planetary defense mission said this week that instead of spending hundreds of millions of dollars learning how to manage the infinitesimal danger of Earth-bound asteroids, the government should focus on tackling the immediate--and ever-worsening--threat of climate catastrophe.
"Climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed."
Hurtling through space at 14,000 miles per hour, NASA's $330 million Double Asteroid Redirection Test spacecraft--DART, for short--successfully impacted the small asteroid Dimorphos on Monday evening. DART's cameras recorded the collision, whose effects won't be known until ground-based telescopes conduct new observations.
While dinosaur fossils are an irrefutable reminder of the destructive potential posed by rocks from outer space, most astronomers agree that the risk of a catastrophic collision is negligible--as opposed to the accelerating climate emergency.
"Climate change is the asteroid coming straight for us," wrote Twitter user @Ecowarriorrs.
That was also the message of last year's hit climate denial satire film Don't Look Up, although politicians and pundits in the movie mostly ignore the comet hurtling toward Earth instead of trying to destroy it, at least until a billionaire businessman discovers it contains a fortune in rare earth minerals.
\u201cThe US is spending $324.5 million on the #DARTMission, which will crash a probe into an asteroid, which poses no threat to the planet, but it will not commit to fulfilling its climate obligations in the midst of a crisis that is currently putting millions of lives at risk.\u201d— Nida Kirmani (@Nida Kirmani) 1664118814
\u201c@JawadTokhai @NidaKirmani No asteroid >1 km in diameter can impact Earth any time in the next few hundred years.\n\nSmaller impactors that would cause regional disaster remain possible. Hence DART testing asteroid deflection.\n\nBut climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed.\u201d— Nida Kirmani (@Nida Kirmani) 1664118814
"No asteroid >1 km in diameter can impact Earth any time in the next few hundred years," tweeted planetary astronomer Michael Busch. "But climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed."
While NASA climate scientist Peter Kalmus said that "it's great that NASA is testing the ability to deflect an asteroid or comet if necessary," the activist researcher added that "the actual clear and present danger to humanity is of course Earth breakdown from burning fossil fuels."
British cultural consultant William Norris wrote on Twitter, "Got to love that we're trialing a way of diverting 'killer asteroids,' a very unlikely threat to our future, while basically ignoring an actual, happening now, quite-possibly-will-wipe-humanity-out threat in the form of climate change."
Critics of a NASA planetary defense mission said this week that instead of spending hundreds of millions of dollars learning how to manage the infinitesimal danger of Earth-bound asteroids, the government should focus on tackling the immediate--and ever-worsening--threat of climate catastrophe.
"Climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed."
Hurtling through space at 14,000 miles per hour, NASA's $330 million Double Asteroid Redirection Test spacecraft--DART, for short--successfully impacted the small asteroid Dimorphos on Monday evening. DART's cameras recorded the collision, whose effects won't be known until ground-based telescopes conduct new observations.
While dinosaur fossils are an irrefutable reminder of the destructive potential posed by rocks from outer space, most astronomers agree that the risk of a catastrophic collision is negligible--as opposed to the accelerating climate emergency.
"Climate change is the asteroid coming straight for us," wrote Twitter user @Ecowarriorrs.
That was also the message of last year's hit climate denial satire film Don't Look Up, although politicians and pundits in the movie mostly ignore the comet hurtling toward Earth instead of trying to destroy it, at least until a billionaire businessman discovers it contains a fortune in rare earth minerals.
\u201cThe US is spending $324.5 million on the #DARTMission, which will crash a probe into an asteroid, which poses no threat to the planet, but it will not commit to fulfilling its climate obligations in the midst of a crisis that is currently putting millions of lives at risk.\u201d— Nida Kirmani (@Nida Kirmani) 1664118814
\u201c@JawadTokhai @NidaKirmani No asteroid >1 km in diameter can impact Earth any time in the next few hundred years.\n\nSmaller impactors that would cause regional disaster remain possible. Hence DART testing asteroid deflection.\n\nBut climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed.\u201d— Nida Kirmani (@Nida Kirmani) 1664118814
"No asteroid >1 km in diameter can impact Earth any time in the next few hundred years," tweeted planetary astronomer Michael Busch. "But climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed."
While NASA climate scientist Peter Kalmus said that "it's great that NASA is testing the ability to deflect an asteroid or comet if necessary," the activist researcher added that "the actual clear and present danger to humanity is of course Earth breakdown from burning fossil fuels."
British cultural consultant William Norris wrote on Twitter, "Got to love that we're trialing a way of diverting 'killer asteroids,' a very unlikely threat to our future, while basically ignoring an actual, happening now, quite-possibly-will-wipe-humanity-out threat in the form of climate change."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.