

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

NASA's DART spacecraft deliberately collided with the asteroid Dimorphos on September 26, 2022. (Photo: NASA/Johns Hopkins APL/Steve Gribben)
Critics of a NASA planetary defense mission said this week that instead of spending hundreds of millions of dollars learning how to manage the infinitesimal danger of Earth-bound asteroids, the government should focus on tackling the immediate--and ever-worsening--threat of climate catastrophe.
" Climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed."
Hurtling through space at 14,000 miles per hour, NASA's $330 million Double Asteroid Redirection Test spacecraft--DART, for short--successfully impacted the small asteroid Dimorphos on Monday evening. DART's cameras recorded the collision, whose effects won't be known until ground-based telescopes conduct new observations.
While dinosaur fossils are an irrefutable reminder of the destructive potential posed by rocks from outer space, most astronomers agree that the risk of a catastrophic collision is negligible--as opposed to the accelerating climate emergency.
"Climate change is the asteroid coming straight for us," wrote Twitter user @Ecowarriorrs.
That was also the message of last year's hit climate denial satire film Don't Look Up, although politicians and pundits in the movie mostly ignore the comet hurtling toward Earth instead of trying to destroy it, at least until a billionaire businessman discovers it contains a fortune in rare earth minerals.
"No asteroid >1 km in diameter can impact Earth any time in the next few hundred years," tweeted planetary astronomer Michael Busch. "But climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed."
While NASA climate scientist Peter Kalmus said that "it's great that NASA is testing the ability to deflect an asteroid or comet if necessary," the activist researcher added that "the actual clear and present danger to humanity is of course Earth breakdown from burning fossil fuels."
British cultural consultant William Norris wrote on Twitter, "Got to love that we're trialing a way of diverting 'killer asteroids,' a very unlikely threat to our future, while basically ignoring an actual, happening now, quite-possibly-will-wipe-humanity-out threat in the form of climate change."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Critics of a NASA planetary defense mission said this week that instead of spending hundreds of millions of dollars learning how to manage the infinitesimal danger of Earth-bound asteroids, the government should focus on tackling the immediate--and ever-worsening--threat of climate catastrophe.
" Climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed."
Hurtling through space at 14,000 miles per hour, NASA's $330 million Double Asteroid Redirection Test spacecraft--DART, for short--successfully impacted the small asteroid Dimorphos on Monday evening. DART's cameras recorded the collision, whose effects won't be known until ground-based telescopes conduct new observations.
While dinosaur fossils are an irrefutable reminder of the destructive potential posed by rocks from outer space, most astronomers agree that the risk of a catastrophic collision is negligible--as opposed to the accelerating climate emergency.
"Climate change is the asteroid coming straight for us," wrote Twitter user @Ecowarriorrs.
That was also the message of last year's hit climate denial satire film Don't Look Up, although politicians and pundits in the movie mostly ignore the comet hurtling toward Earth instead of trying to destroy it, at least until a billionaire businessman discovers it contains a fortune in rare earth minerals.
"No asteroid >1 km in diameter can impact Earth any time in the next few hundred years," tweeted planetary astronomer Michael Busch. "But climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed."
While NASA climate scientist Peter Kalmus said that "it's great that NASA is testing the ability to deflect an asteroid or comet if necessary," the activist researcher added that "the actual clear and present danger to humanity is of course Earth breakdown from burning fossil fuels."
British cultural consultant William Norris wrote on Twitter, "Got to love that we're trialing a way of diverting 'killer asteroids,' a very unlikely threat to our future, while basically ignoring an actual, happening now, quite-possibly-will-wipe-humanity-out threat in the form of climate change."
Critics of a NASA planetary defense mission said this week that instead of spending hundreds of millions of dollars learning how to manage the infinitesimal danger of Earth-bound asteroids, the government should focus on tackling the immediate--and ever-worsening--threat of climate catastrophe.
" Climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed."
Hurtling through space at 14,000 miles per hour, NASA's $330 million Double Asteroid Redirection Test spacecraft--DART, for short--successfully impacted the small asteroid Dimorphos on Monday evening. DART's cameras recorded the collision, whose effects won't be known until ground-based telescopes conduct new observations.
While dinosaur fossils are an irrefutable reminder of the destructive potential posed by rocks from outer space, most astronomers agree that the risk of a catastrophic collision is negligible--as opposed to the accelerating climate emergency.
"Climate change is the asteroid coming straight for us," wrote Twitter user @Ecowarriorrs.
That was also the message of last year's hit climate denial satire film Don't Look Up, although politicians and pundits in the movie mostly ignore the comet hurtling toward Earth instead of trying to destroy it, at least until a billionaire businessman discovers it contains a fortune in rare earth minerals.
"No asteroid >1 km in diameter can impact Earth any time in the next few hundred years," tweeted planetary astronomer Michael Busch. "But climate change is a thousands of times greater problem and must be addressed."
While NASA climate scientist Peter Kalmus said that "it's great that NASA is testing the ability to deflect an asteroid or comet if necessary," the activist researcher added that "the actual clear and present danger to humanity is of course Earth breakdown from burning fossil fuels."
British cultural consultant William Norris wrote on Twitter, "Got to love that we're trialing a way of diverting 'killer asteroids,' a very unlikely threat to our future, while basically ignoring an actual, happening now, quite-possibly-will-wipe-humanity-out threat in the form of climate change."