SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
From left, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger, Micron CEO Sanjay Mehrotra, and Lam Research CEO Tim Archer testify during a Senate hearing on March 23, 2022. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)
Sanders Blasts 'Rigged Economy' as Chipmakers Cut Investments After Big Handout
"Intel announced it will be cutting back on plans to increase jobs by $4 billion while increasing dividends for its wealthy shareholders," the Vermont senator wrote on Twitter.
Aug 18, 2022
News that the U.S. semiconductor giants Intel and Micron are slashing manufacturing investments despite the recent passage of a major subsidies bill drew the ire of Sen. Bernie Sanders, the Senate's most outspoken critic of industry handouts in the CHIPS and Science Act.
"This is what a rigged economy looks like," Sanders (I-Vt.) said Wednesday. "On the same day a bill was signed into law to give a $76 billion blank check to microchip companies, Intel announced it will be cutting back on plans to increase jobs by $4 billion while increasing dividends for its wealthy shareholders."
The Vermont senator was referring to Intel's move to cut spending on manufacturing plant buildouts and other investments by $4 billion in the coming months--even as it continues to pay a sizable dividend.
"We paid dividends of $1.5 billion, a 5% increase year-over-year, and remain committed to growing the dividend over time," David Zinsner, Intel's chief financial officer, said during the company's second-quarter earnings call late last month.
Led by lavishly compensated CEO Pat Gelsinger, Intel lobbied aggressively for the CHIPS and Science Act, threatening to move more of its operations outside the U.S. if the subsidies bill wasn't approved. President Joe Biden signed the measure into law last week after it passed both chambers of Congress with overwhelming bipartisan support.
Sanders, the chair of the Senate Budget Committee, was the only member of the Senate Democratic caucus to vote no.
Micron, for its part, said last week that it plans to "cut its capital spending 'meaningfully' next year" in response to worsening conditions in the chip industry and the global economy, the Financial Times reported.
The company's announcement came a day after it hailed passage of the CHIPS and Science Act and vowed to make good use of the law's "grants and credits."
Overall, the newly enacted law includes $52 billion in taxpayer subsidies and a $24 billion investment tax credit for the semiconductor industry.
In several speeches on the Senate floor ahead of the measure's final passage, Sanders blasted the legislation as "corporate welfare" and proposed amendments aimed at ensuring companies wouldn't use the taxpayer funds to reward shareholders, bust unions, and offshore more jobs.
Democrats and Republicans rejected the senator's proposed changes.
"The five biggest semiconductor companies that will likely receive the lion's share of this taxpayer handout--Intel, Texas Instruments, Micron Technology, Global Foundries, and Samsung--made $70 billion in profits last year," Sanders said in a July speech. "Does it sound like these companies really need corporate welfare?"
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
News that the U.S. semiconductor giants Intel and Micron are slashing manufacturing investments despite the recent passage of a major subsidies bill drew the ire of Sen. Bernie Sanders, the Senate's most outspoken critic of industry handouts in the CHIPS and Science Act.
"This is what a rigged economy looks like," Sanders (I-Vt.) said Wednesday. "On the same day a bill was signed into law to give a $76 billion blank check to microchip companies, Intel announced it will be cutting back on plans to increase jobs by $4 billion while increasing dividends for its wealthy shareholders."
The Vermont senator was referring to Intel's move to cut spending on manufacturing plant buildouts and other investments by $4 billion in the coming months--even as it continues to pay a sizable dividend.
"We paid dividends of $1.5 billion, a 5% increase year-over-year, and remain committed to growing the dividend over time," David Zinsner, Intel's chief financial officer, said during the company's second-quarter earnings call late last month.
Led by lavishly compensated CEO Pat Gelsinger, Intel lobbied aggressively for the CHIPS and Science Act, threatening to move more of its operations outside the U.S. if the subsidies bill wasn't approved. President Joe Biden signed the measure into law last week after it passed both chambers of Congress with overwhelming bipartisan support.
Sanders, the chair of the Senate Budget Committee, was the only member of the Senate Democratic caucus to vote no.
Micron, for its part, said last week that it plans to "cut its capital spending 'meaningfully' next year" in response to worsening conditions in the chip industry and the global economy, the Financial Times reported.
The company's announcement came a day after it hailed passage of the CHIPS and Science Act and vowed to make good use of the law's "grants and credits."
Overall, the newly enacted law includes $52 billion in taxpayer subsidies and a $24 billion investment tax credit for the semiconductor industry.
In several speeches on the Senate floor ahead of the measure's final passage, Sanders blasted the legislation as "corporate welfare" and proposed amendments aimed at ensuring companies wouldn't use the taxpayer funds to reward shareholders, bust unions, and offshore more jobs.
Democrats and Republicans rejected the senator's proposed changes.
"The five biggest semiconductor companies that will likely receive the lion's share of this taxpayer handout--Intel, Texas Instruments, Micron Technology, Global Foundries, and Samsung--made $70 billion in profits last year," Sanders said in a July speech. "Does it sound like these companies really need corporate welfare?"
News that the U.S. semiconductor giants Intel and Micron are slashing manufacturing investments despite the recent passage of a major subsidies bill drew the ire of Sen. Bernie Sanders, the Senate's most outspoken critic of industry handouts in the CHIPS and Science Act.
"This is what a rigged economy looks like," Sanders (I-Vt.) said Wednesday. "On the same day a bill was signed into law to give a $76 billion blank check to microchip companies, Intel announced it will be cutting back on plans to increase jobs by $4 billion while increasing dividends for its wealthy shareholders."
The Vermont senator was referring to Intel's move to cut spending on manufacturing plant buildouts and other investments by $4 billion in the coming months--even as it continues to pay a sizable dividend.
"We paid dividends of $1.5 billion, a 5% increase year-over-year, and remain committed to growing the dividend over time," David Zinsner, Intel's chief financial officer, said during the company's second-quarter earnings call late last month.
Led by lavishly compensated CEO Pat Gelsinger, Intel lobbied aggressively for the CHIPS and Science Act, threatening to move more of its operations outside the U.S. if the subsidies bill wasn't approved. President Joe Biden signed the measure into law last week after it passed both chambers of Congress with overwhelming bipartisan support.
Sanders, the chair of the Senate Budget Committee, was the only member of the Senate Democratic caucus to vote no.
Micron, for its part, said last week that it plans to "cut its capital spending 'meaningfully' next year" in response to worsening conditions in the chip industry and the global economy, the Financial Times reported.
The company's announcement came a day after it hailed passage of the CHIPS and Science Act and vowed to make good use of the law's "grants and credits."
Overall, the newly enacted law includes $52 billion in taxpayer subsidies and a $24 billion investment tax credit for the semiconductor industry.
In several speeches on the Senate floor ahead of the measure's final passage, Sanders blasted the legislation as "corporate welfare" and proposed amendments aimed at ensuring companies wouldn't use the taxpayer funds to reward shareholders, bust unions, and offshore more jobs.
Democrats and Republicans rejected the senator's proposed changes.
"The five biggest semiconductor companies that will likely receive the lion's share of this taxpayer handout--Intel, Texas Instruments, Micron Technology, Global Foundries, and Samsung--made $70 billion in profits last year," Sanders said in a July speech. "Does it sound like these companies really need corporate welfare?"
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy