Aug 06, 2022
The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) raised grave concerns on Saturday about the shelling the previous day at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine, saying the action showed the risk of a nuclear disaster.
IAEA chief Rafael Mariano Grossi said he was "extremely concerned" by the attacks on Europe's largest nuclear power plant.
These strikes threaten "the very real risk of a nuclear disaster that could threaten public health and the environment in Ukraine and beyond," Grossi said.
"Any military firepower directed at or from the facility would amount to playing with fire, with potentially catastrophic consequences," he added.
The New York Times reported Saturday: "Fighting raged on Saturday near a sprawling nuclear power plant in the south of Ukraine, despite warnings from nuclear safety watchdogs earlier this week that conditions there were posing risks and "out of control."
The Times also reported: "Mr. Grossi said he was far more worried about Zaporizhzhia than he was about Chernobyl, the site of the 1986 nuclear disaster, also in Ukraine, that radiated the surrounding area and imperiled Europe."
\u201cIAEA Chief @RafaelMGrossi's statement expresses alarm over shelling at Ukraine\u2019s #Zaporizhzya nuclear plant. Info received by IAEA \u201cunderlines very real risk of a nuclear disaster that could threaten public health and the environment in #Ukraine & beyond\u201d. https://t.co/fXOw6ZSr9F\u201d— IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency \u269b\ufe0f (@IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency \u269b\ufe0f) 1659801029
Ukraine said parts of the facility were "seriously damaged" by Russian military strikes.
Energoatom, the Ukrainian state enterprise operating all four nuclear power stations in Ukraine said in a statement Saturday: "It is highly probable that all of this will cause a nuclear and radiation disaster."
"As a result of the attack, the nitrogen-oxygen unit and the combined auxiliary building have been severely damaged. The risks of hydrogen leakage and emission of radioactive substances persist, the fire hazard is also high," Energoatom said.
Russia's defense ministry denied shelling the plant and accused Ukrainian forces of being responsible.
\u201cLive briefing: Russia and Ukraine are accusing one another of shelling Europe\u2019s largest nuclear power plant, the Zaporizhzhia plant, triggering fears of an international nuclear crisis. https://t.co/GOk6s1nN6p\u201d— The Washington Post (@The Washington Post) 1659799984
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) raised grave concerns on Saturday about the shelling the previous day at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine, saying the action showed the risk of a nuclear disaster.
IAEA chief Rafael Mariano Grossi said he was "extremely concerned" by the attacks on Europe's largest nuclear power plant.
These strikes threaten "the very real risk of a nuclear disaster that could threaten public health and the environment in Ukraine and beyond," Grossi said.
"Any military firepower directed at or from the facility would amount to playing with fire, with potentially catastrophic consequences," he added.
The New York Times reported Saturday: "Fighting raged on Saturday near a sprawling nuclear power plant in the south of Ukraine, despite warnings from nuclear safety watchdogs earlier this week that conditions there were posing risks and "out of control."
The Times also reported: "Mr. Grossi said he was far more worried about Zaporizhzhia than he was about Chernobyl, the site of the 1986 nuclear disaster, also in Ukraine, that radiated the surrounding area and imperiled Europe."
\u201cIAEA Chief @RafaelMGrossi's statement expresses alarm over shelling at Ukraine\u2019s #Zaporizhzya nuclear plant. Info received by IAEA \u201cunderlines very real risk of a nuclear disaster that could threaten public health and the environment in #Ukraine & beyond\u201d. https://t.co/fXOw6ZSr9F\u201d— IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency \u269b\ufe0f (@IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency \u269b\ufe0f) 1659801029
Ukraine said parts of the facility were "seriously damaged" by Russian military strikes.
Energoatom, the Ukrainian state enterprise operating all four nuclear power stations in Ukraine said in a statement Saturday: "It is highly probable that all of this will cause a nuclear and radiation disaster."
"As a result of the attack, the nitrogen-oxygen unit and the combined auxiliary building have been severely damaged. The risks of hydrogen leakage and emission of radioactive substances persist, the fire hazard is also high," Energoatom said.
Russia's defense ministry denied shelling the plant and accused Ukrainian forces of being responsible.
\u201cLive briefing: Russia and Ukraine are accusing one another of shelling Europe\u2019s largest nuclear power plant, the Zaporizhzhia plant, triggering fears of an international nuclear crisis. https://t.co/GOk6s1nN6p\u201d— The Washington Post (@The Washington Post) 1659799984
The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) raised grave concerns on Saturday about the shelling the previous day at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine, saying the action showed the risk of a nuclear disaster.
IAEA chief Rafael Mariano Grossi said he was "extremely concerned" by the attacks on Europe's largest nuclear power plant.
These strikes threaten "the very real risk of a nuclear disaster that could threaten public health and the environment in Ukraine and beyond," Grossi said.
"Any military firepower directed at or from the facility would amount to playing with fire, with potentially catastrophic consequences," he added.
The New York Times reported Saturday: "Fighting raged on Saturday near a sprawling nuclear power plant in the south of Ukraine, despite warnings from nuclear safety watchdogs earlier this week that conditions there were posing risks and "out of control."
The Times also reported: "Mr. Grossi said he was far more worried about Zaporizhzhia than he was about Chernobyl, the site of the 1986 nuclear disaster, also in Ukraine, that radiated the surrounding area and imperiled Europe."
\u201cIAEA Chief @RafaelMGrossi's statement expresses alarm over shelling at Ukraine\u2019s #Zaporizhzya nuclear plant. Info received by IAEA \u201cunderlines very real risk of a nuclear disaster that could threaten public health and the environment in #Ukraine & beyond\u201d. https://t.co/fXOw6ZSr9F\u201d— IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency \u269b\ufe0f (@IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency \u269b\ufe0f) 1659801029
Ukraine said parts of the facility were "seriously damaged" by Russian military strikes.
Energoatom, the Ukrainian state enterprise operating all four nuclear power stations in Ukraine said in a statement Saturday: "It is highly probable that all of this will cause a nuclear and radiation disaster."
"As a result of the attack, the nitrogen-oxygen unit and the combined auxiliary building have been severely damaged. The risks of hydrogen leakage and emission of radioactive substances persist, the fire hazard is also high," Energoatom said.
Russia's defense ministry denied shelling the plant and accused Ukrainian forces of being responsible.
\u201cLive briefing: Russia and Ukraine are accusing one another of shelling Europe\u2019s largest nuclear power plant, the Zaporizhzhia plant, triggering fears of an international nuclear crisis. https://t.co/GOk6s1nN6p\u201d— The Washington Post (@The Washington Post) 1659799984
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.