

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) speaks alongside fellow progressive lawmakers following a meeting with President Joe Biden at the White House on October 19, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Rep. Pramila Jayapal, the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, urged the House Democratic leadership on Tuesday to hold a vote on legislation that would expand Social Security benefits by making wealthy Americans contribute more to the beloved New Deal-era program.
" Republicans are against expanding Social Security, even as millions of seniors are struggling to survive."
In 2022, Social Security contributions are capped at the first $147,000 of wage income, meaning that much of the income of millionaires and billionaires is exempt from the program's payroll tax. People who make $1 million a year stopped paying into Social Security on February 24 of this year, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
In a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Jayapal (D-Wash.) notes that the across-the-board benefit increase proposed by Rep. John Larson's (D-Conn.) Social Security 2100: A Sacred Trust would be "paid for by making millionaires and billionaires pay the same rate as everyone else by ensuring the payroll tax is applied to wages above $400,000."
"This bill's rapid adoption by the House of Representatives will demonstrate Democrats' commitment to furthering the legacy of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and strengthening the most important anti-poverty program in America's history," Jayapal wrote. "It increases benefits across the board at a time of higher inflation, protects low-income seniors, widows, and widowers, ends wait-times for those with disabilities needing support, and more."
Larson's bill, the latest version of which was introduced in October, currently has 201 co-sponsors in the House. Notably, Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.)--the second-ranking Democrat in the lower chamber--are not among the legislation's supporters.
A companion measure in the Senate led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) has just four co-sponsors.
According to a summary released by Larson's office, Social Security 2100 would provide a modest benefit increase "equivalent to an average of 2% of benefits to make up for inadequate Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLA) since 1983."
The bill would also adjust the existing COLA formula to protect Social Security's tens of millions of beneficiaries from inflation--which is currently at its highest level in decades--and set the minimum benefit at 25% above the poverty line.
"The expeditious House passage of this legislation will show the American people that Democrats are delivering on their promise to protect and improve this lifesaving program," Jayapal argued.
Jayapal's demand came weeks after Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), the chair of the Senate GOP's campaign arm, unveiled a legislative agenda that would sunset "all federal legislation" after five years--a policy that would result in the repeal of Social Security.
"Republicans are against expanding Social Security, even as millions of seniors are struggling to survive," the progressive advocacy group Social Security Works tweeted Tuesday. "And they want to 'sunset' (AKA terminate) Social Security within five years if they gain control of the Senate."
Social Security Works applauded Jayapal for demanding a vote on Social Security 2100, noting that "90% of House Democrats are already co-sponsors of the bill."
"It's time for a vote on protecting and expanding Social Security," the group wrote. "Not only is [Larson's bill] the right policy, it's also smart politics for Democrats. Make it clear to voters that Democrats are working to expand Social Security. Meanwhile, Republicans want to destroy it."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Rep. Pramila Jayapal, the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, urged the House Democratic leadership on Tuesday to hold a vote on legislation that would expand Social Security benefits by making wealthy Americans contribute more to the beloved New Deal-era program.
" Republicans are against expanding Social Security, even as millions of seniors are struggling to survive."
In 2022, Social Security contributions are capped at the first $147,000 of wage income, meaning that much of the income of millionaires and billionaires is exempt from the program's payroll tax. People who make $1 million a year stopped paying into Social Security on February 24 of this year, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
In a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Jayapal (D-Wash.) notes that the across-the-board benefit increase proposed by Rep. John Larson's (D-Conn.) Social Security 2100: A Sacred Trust would be "paid for by making millionaires and billionaires pay the same rate as everyone else by ensuring the payroll tax is applied to wages above $400,000."
"This bill's rapid adoption by the House of Representatives will demonstrate Democrats' commitment to furthering the legacy of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and strengthening the most important anti-poverty program in America's history," Jayapal wrote. "It increases benefits across the board at a time of higher inflation, protects low-income seniors, widows, and widowers, ends wait-times for those with disabilities needing support, and more."
Larson's bill, the latest version of which was introduced in October, currently has 201 co-sponsors in the House. Notably, Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.)--the second-ranking Democrat in the lower chamber--are not among the legislation's supporters.
A companion measure in the Senate led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) has just four co-sponsors.
According to a summary released by Larson's office, Social Security 2100 would provide a modest benefit increase "equivalent to an average of 2% of benefits to make up for inadequate Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLA) since 1983."
The bill would also adjust the existing COLA formula to protect Social Security's tens of millions of beneficiaries from inflation--which is currently at its highest level in decades--and set the minimum benefit at 25% above the poverty line.
"The expeditious House passage of this legislation will show the American people that Democrats are delivering on their promise to protect and improve this lifesaving program," Jayapal argued.
Jayapal's demand came weeks after Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), the chair of the Senate GOP's campaign arm, unveiled a legislative agenda that would sunset "all federal legislation" after five years--a policy that would result in the repeal of Social Security.
"Republicans are against expanding Social Security, even as millions of seniors are struggling to survive," the progressive advocacy group Social Security Works tweeted Tuesday. "And they want to 'sunset' (AKA terminate) Social Security within five years if they gain control of the Senate."
Social Security Works applauded Jayapal for demanding a vote on Social Security 2100, noting that "90% of House Democrats are already co-sponsors of the bill."
"It's time for a vote on protecting and expanding Social Security," the group wrote. "Not only is [Larson's bill] the right policy, it's also smart politics for Democrats. Make it clear to voters that Democrats are working to expand Social Security. Meanwhile, Republicans want to destroy it."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal, the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, urged the House Democratic leadership on Tuesday to hold a vote on legislation that would expand Social Security benefits by making wealthy Americans contribute more to the beloved New Deal-era program.
" Republicans are against expanding Social Security, even as millions of seniors are struggling to survive."
In 2022, Social Security contributions are capped at the first $147,000 of wage income, meaning that much of the income of millionaires and billionaires is exempt from the program's payroll tax. People who make $1 million a year stopped paying into Social Security on February 24 of this year, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
In a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Jayapal (D-Wash.) notes that the across-the-board benefit increase proposed by Rep. John Larson's (D-Conn.) Social Security 2100: A Sacred Trust would be "paid for by making millionaires and billionaires pay the same rate as everyone else by ensuring the payroll tax is applied to wages above $400,000."
"This bill's rapid adoption by the House of Representatives will demonstrate Democrats' commitment to furthering the legacy of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and strengthening the most important anti-poverty program in America's history," Jayapal wrote. "It increases benefits across the board at a time of higher inflation, protects low-income seniors, widows, and widowers, ends wait-times for those with disabilities needing support, and more."
Larson's bill, the latest version of which was introduced in October, currently has 201 co-sponsors in the House. Notably, Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.)--the second-ranking Democrat in the lower chamber--are not among the legislation's supporters.
A companion measure in the Senate led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) has just four co-sponsors.
According to a summary released by Larson's office, Social Security 2100 would provide a modest benefit increase "equivalent to an average of 2% of benefits to make up for inadequate Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLA) since 1983."
The bill would also adjust the existing COLA formula to protect Social Security's tens of millions of beneficiaries from inflation--which is currently at its highest level in decades--and set the minimum benefit at 25% above the poverty line.
"The expeditious House passage of this legislation will show the American people that Democrats are delivering on their promise to protect and improve this lifesaving program," Jayapal argued.
Jayapal's demand came weeks after Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), the chair of the Senate GOP's campaign arm, unveiled a legislative agenda that would sunset "all federal legislation" after five years--a policy that would result in the repeal of Social Security.
"Republicans are against expanding Social Security, even as millions of seniors are struggling to survive," the progressive advocacy group Social Security Works tweeted Tuesday. "And they want to 'sunset' (AKA terminate) Social Security within five years if they gain control of the Senate."
Social Security Works applauded Jayapal for demanding a vote on Social Security 2100, noting that "90% of House Democrats are already co-sponsors of the bill."
"It's time for a vote on protecting and expanding Social Security," the group wrote. "Not only is [Larson's bill] the right policy, it's also smart politics for Democrats. Make it clear to voters that Democrats are working to expand Social Security. Meanwhile, Republicans want to destroy it."