

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

This October 14, 2014 photo shows an oil rig in Vernal, Utah, in the Uintah Basin. (Photo: RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post via Getty Images)
Seven young people on Tuesday launched a new climate case against the Utah government, arguing that fossil fuel development violates their state constitutional rights.
"Utah's fossil fuel development policy poses an existential threat to Utah's children, sacrificing their health, safety, and lives for the short-term profits of the fossil fuel industry."
The lawsuit--which names Utah as well as various officials, including Republican Gov. Spencer Cox, as defendants--was filed in state court.
"The past and continuing development of Utah's fossil fuels presents an existential threat to Utah's youth. Because of the development and combustion of fossil fuels, Utah has the worst average air quality in the nation and is already experiencing profoundly dangerous climate changes, including increasing temperatures and deadly heatwaves, increasingly frequent and severe wildfires and wildfire smoke, exceptional drought, exacerbation of medical conditions and health risks, and other harms," the complaint says.
"Dangerous air quality and climate change in Utah are harming the health and safety of Utah's youth, interfering with their healthy development, and taking years off of their lives," the complaint continues. "Yet, despite the dangers of Utah's critical air quality and climate emergencies to its youth, Utah's government continues to throw fuel on the fire, maximizing, promoting, and systematically authorizing fossil fuel development in the state as a matter of official state policy, codified in statute."
The plaintiffs in Natalie R. v. State of Utah range in age from nine to 18. One of them, Dallin R., said in a statement that "maintaining a livable planet is a fundamental necessity in guaranteeing the right to life which is promised in our constitution, but the climate crisis is putting that right in danger."
"I have personally experienced dangerously poor air quality, high temperatures, drought, and the fear of living in an unrecognizable world ravaged by climate change," the plaintiff explained.
"That's why I am proud to be working with Our Children's Trust to step up to the plate and challenge those who are responsible," Dallin added. "The role of Utah's state government in the causation and perpetuation of this crisis is unacceptable, and young Utahns like me and my fellow youth plaintiffs will hold them accountable for their reckless endangerment of our state and our planet."
The youth are represented by attorneys at Our Children's Trust--an Oregon-based firm known for other similar cases, including Juliana v. United States and a suit filed last month in Virginia--and Deiss Law PC in Salt Lake City.
Related Content

Andrew Deiss, who serves as local counsel for the plaintiffs, said that "my colleagues and I are honored to represent these youth who are working through the courts to vindicate rights which will benefit Utah's children now, and for generations to come."
Echoing the complaint, lead counsel Andrew Welle of Our Children's Trust declared that "Utah's fossil fuel development policy poses an existential threat to Utah's children, sacrificing their health, safety, and lives for the short-term profits of the fossil fuel industry."
"The state's policy has placed these youth in an emergency and every day it remains on the books brings them into further danger," he warned. "Only Utah's courts can provide the relief these youth urgently need. Only the courts can decide whether the state's policy violates their rights."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Seven young people on Tuesday launched a new climate case against the Utah government, arguing that fossil fuel development violates their state constitutional rights.
"Utah's fossil fuel development policy poses an existential threat to Utah's children, sacrificing their health, safety, and lives for the short-term profits of the fossil fuel industry."
The lawsuit--which names Utah as well as various officials, including Republican Gov. Spencer Cox, as defendants--was filed in state court.
"The past and continuing development of Utah's fossil fuels presents an existential threat to Utah's youth. Because of the development and combustion of fossil fuels, Utah has the worst average air quality in the nation and is already experiencing profoundly dangerous climate changes, including increasing temperatures and deadly heatwaves, increasingly frequent and severe wildfires and wildfire smoke, exceptional drought, exacerbation of medical conditions and health risks, and other harms," the complaint says.
"Dangerous air quality and climate change in Utah are harming the health and safety of Utah's youth, interfering with their healthy development, and taking years off of their lives," the complaint continues. "Yet, despite the dangers of Utah's critical air quality and climate emergencies to its youth, Utah's government continues to throw fuel on the fire, maximizing, promoting, and systematically authorizing fossil fuel development in the state as a matter of official state policy, codified in statute."
The plaintiffs in Natalie R. v. State of Utah range in age from nine to 18. One of them, Dallin R., said in a statement that "maintaining a livable planet is a fundamental necessity in guaranteeing the right to life which is promised in our constitution, but the climate crisis is putting that right in danger."
"I have personally experienced dangerously poor air quality, high temperatures, drought, and the fear of living in an unrecognizable world ravaged by climate change," the plaintiff explained.
"That's why I am proud to be working with Our Children's Trust to step up to the plate and challenge those who are responsible," Dallin added. "The role of Utah's state government in the causation and perpetuation of this crisis is unacceptable, and young Utahns like me and my fellow youth plaintiffs will hold them accountable for their reckless endangerment of our state and our planet."
The youth are represented by attorneys at Our Children's Trust--an Oregon-based firm known for other similar cases, including Juliana v. United States and a suit filed last month in Virginia--and Deiss Law PC in Salt Lake City.
Related Content

Andrew Deiss, who serves as local counsel for the plaintiffs, said that "my colleagues and I are honored to represent these youth who are working through the courts to vindicate rights which will benefit Utah's children now, and for generations to come."
Echoing the complaint, lead counsel Andrew Welle of Our Children's Trust declared that "Utah's fossil fuel development policy poses an existential threat to Utah's children, sacrificing their health, safety, and lives for the short-term profits of the fossil fuel industry."
"The state's policy has placed these youth in an emergency and every day it remains on the books brings them into further danger," he warned. "Only Utah's courts can provide the relief these youth urgently need. Only the courts can decide whether the state's policy violates their rights."
Seven young people on Tuesday launched a new climate case against the Utah government, arguing that fossil fuel development violates their state constitutional rights.
"Utah's fossil fuel development policy poses an existential threat to Utah's children, sacrificing their health, safety, and lives for the short-term profits of the fossil fuel industry."
The lawsuit--which names Utah as well as various officials, including Republican Gov. Spencer Cox, as defendants--was filed in state court.
"The past and continuing development of Utah's fossil fuels presents an existential threat to Utah's youth. Because of the development and combustion of fossil fuels, Utah has the worst average air quality in the nation and is already experiencing profoundly dangerous climate changes, including increasing temperatures and deadly heatwaves, increasingly frequent and severe wildfires and wildfire smoke, exceptional drought, exacerbation of medical conditions and health risks, and other harms," the complaint says.
"Dangerous air quality and climate change in Utah are harming the health and safety of Utah's youth, interfering with their healthy development, and taking years off of their lives," the complaint continues. "Yet, despite the dangers of Utah's critical air quality and climate emergencies to its youth, Utah's government continues to throw fuel on the fire, maximizing, promoting, and systematically authorizing fossil fuel development in the state as a matter of official state policy, codified in statute."
The plaintiffs in Natalie R. v. State of Utah range in age from nine to 18. One of them, Dallin R., said in a statement that "maintaining a livable planet is a fundamental necessity in guaranteeing the right to life which is promised in our constitution, but the climate crisis is putting that right in danger."
"I have personally experienced dangerously poor air quality, high temperatures, drought, and the fear of living in an unrecognizable world ravaged by climate change," the plaintiff explained.
"That's why I am proud to be working with Our Children's Trust to step up to the plate and challenge those who are responsible," Dallin added. "The role of Utah's state government in the causation and perpetuation of this crisis is unacceptable, and young Utahns like me and my fellow youth plaintiffs will hold them accountable for their reckless endangerment of our state and our planet."
The youth are represented by attorneys at Our Children's Trust--an Oregon-based firm known for other similar cases, including Juliana v. United States and a suit filed last month in Virginia--and Deiss Law PC in Salt Lake City.
Related Content

Andrew Deiss, who serves as local counsel for the plaintiffs, said that "my colleagues and I are honored to represent these youth who are working through the courts to vindicate rights which will benefit Utah's children now, and for generations to come."
Echoing the complaint, lead counsel Andrew Welle of Our Children's Trust declared that "Utah's fossil fuel development policy poses an existential threat to Utah's children, sacrificing their health, safety, and lives for the short-term profits of the fossil fuel industry."
"The state's policy has placed these youth in an emergency and every day it remains on the books brings them into further danger," he warned. "Only Utah's courts can provide the relief these youth urgently need. Only the courts can decide whether the state's policy violates their rights."