A Russian nuclear submarine prepares to launch a 3M-54 Kalibr cruise missile as part of the strategic deterrence force drills in the Black Sea on February 19, 2022. (Photo: Russian Defense Ministry/TASS via Getty Images)
Mar 01, 2022
Russia further elevated concerns about global catastrophe on Tuesday as its "nuclear submarines sailed off for drills in the Barents Sea and mobile missile launchers roamed snow forests" in Siberia just days after Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine and put his nation's nuclear forces on "special alert."
"Drills with nuclear weapons are never acceptable and are particularly dangerous in tense times."
Anti-nuclear campaigners who have condemned the Russian leader's actions over the past week also blasted the military exercises that Russia's Northern Fleet said were designed to "train maneuvering in stormy conditions," according to the Associated Press.
The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) tweeted the report and said that "drills with nuclear weapons are never acceptable and are particularly dangerous in tense times."
\u201cDrills with nuclear weapons are never acceptable and are particularly dangerous in tense times. \n\nRussia should heed 2021 @NobelPrize Laureate Dmitry Muratov & @BeaFihn's joint call in @novaya_gazeta to join #nuclearban: https://t.co/btoNjMV5Zj\u201d— ICAN (@ICAN) 1646160597
The AP reported that the Russian military "didn't say whether the drills were linked to Putin's order on Sunday to put the country's nuclear forces on high alert amid Russia's war in Ukraine. It also was unclear whether the exercises represented a change in the country's normal nuclear training activities or posture."
Along with demanding an end to the "illegal" invasion, ICAN said Sunday that Putin's alert order "is incredibly dangerous and irresponsible, especially during a time of war and high tension."
The group urged all nuclear-armed states to stand down their forces and "refrain from threatening to use weapons of mass destruction," warning that any use of them "would cause catastrophic humanitarian suffering and the fallout--radioactive, economic, political."
ICAN continued:
Right now, the dangerous policy of so-called nuclear deterrence is used to enable the continued invasion of Ukraine by Russia. It does not keep the peace, it allows for war to be carried out against Ukrainian people.
Any theory which is based on the willingness to mass murder civilians and is kept in check by little more than sheer luck will eventually lead to a horrific humanitarian catastrophe. That's what is being risked right now, and it must stop.
Russia and the United States collectively account for about 90% of all nuclear warheads, according to the Federation of American Scientists. Both countries have subs, land-based systems, and bombers capable of launching the weapons.
During Putin's speech last week announcing the invasion of Ukraine--an air and land assault that has included alleged war crimes--the Russian leader made what was widely seen as a thinly veiled threat to retaliate with nuclear weapons if any other nation intervenes.
Anti-war campaigners have also responded with alarm to a Monday referendum that paves the path for Belarus to host Russian nuclear weapons.
\u201cThe US and NATO have done well to avoid engaging in nuclear threats and signaling, condemning Putin\u2019s reckless nuclear saber-rattling. They should also make clear that a US/NATO nuclear first strike is off the table in Putin\u2019s war in Ukraine. https://t.co/tT3nzzgeaY\u201d— Global Zero (@Global Zero) 1646156723
Despite the recent developments, the Biden administration so far has not changed U.S. nuclear alert levels.
While denouncing Putin's war in Ukraine and imposing economic sanctions, U.S. President Joe Biden has indicated he does not plan to engage in a military conflict with Russia.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki made clear Monday that the Biden administration will not impose a no-fly zone, emphasizing that implementation could require the U.S. military to shoot down Russian planes, which could lead to a full-blown war with Russia.
[twitter_embed https://twitter.com/derekjGZ/statuses/1498446293110341632 text="\u201cYes, you\u2019re absolutely right, the United States and NATO are 100% capable of obliterating that Russian convoy headed for Kyiv and establishing a no-fly zone over Ukraine.\n\nAnd all we\u2019d have to be willing to risk is\u2026 \u2026 the fate of all life on Earth as we know it.\u201d" name="Derek Johnson" screen_name="derekjGZ" id="1498446293110341632" created_ts=1646092410 iframe_id="twitter-embed-1498446293110341632" expand=1 embed_desktop_width=550 embed_desktop_height=369 embed_mobile_width=375 embed_mobile_height=417]
Writing Tuesday for Responsible Statecraft, Emma Claire Foley of Global Zero outlined various scenarios that could result in nuclear action over Ukraine, from Putin making good on his threats to "an accidental first strike in response to misinterpreted or incorrect intelligence or uncontrolled escalation of a relatively small-scale, conventional military incident."
"Very little seems certain about the tragic situation in Ukraine or the future of U.S.-Russia relations," she wrote. "But as long as the status quo around nuclear weapons persists, the real risk of escalation from a regional conflict to a global conflagration will be with us. The difficult question that must be answered is how we build a path out of the darkness of the present moment to a world free from their threat."
ICAN continues to call on all countries, especially the nine nuclear-armed nations, to join the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which entered into force last year.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Russia further elevated concerns about global catastrophe on Tuesday as its "nuclear submarines sailed off for drills in the Barents Sea and mobile missile launchers roamed snow forests" in Siberia just days after Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine and put his nation's nuclear forces on "special alert."
"Drills with nuclear weapons are never acceptable and are particularly dangerous in tense times."
Anti-nuclear campaigners who have condemned the Russian leader's actions over the past week also blasted the military exercises that Russia's Northern Fleet said were designed to "train maneuvering in stormy conditions," according to the Associated Press.
The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) tweeted the report and said that "drills with nuclear weapons are never acceptable and are particularly dangerous in tense times."
\u201cDrills with nuclear weapons are never acceptable and are particularly dangerous in tense times. \n\nRussia should heed 2021 @NobelPrize Laureate Dmitry Muratov & @BeaFihn's joint call in @novaya_gazeta to join #nuclearban: https://t.co/btoNjMV5Zj\u201d— ICAN (@ICAN) 1646160597
The AP reported that the Russian military "didn't say whether the drills were linked to Putin's order on Sunday to put the country's nuclear forces on high alert amid Russia's war in Ukraine. It also was unclear whether the exercises represented a change in the country's normal nuclear training activities or posture."
Along with demanding an end to the "illegal" invasion, ICAN said Sunday that Putin's alert order "is incredibly dangerous and irresponsible, especially during a time of war and high tension."
The group urged all nuclear-armed states to stand down their forces and "refrain from threatening to use weapons of mass destruction," warning that any use of them "would cause catastrophic humanitarian suffering and the fallout--radioactive, economic, political."
ICAN continued:
Right now, the dangerous policy of so-called nuclear deterrence is used to enable the continued invasion of Ukraine by Russia. It does not keep the peace, it allows for war to be carried out against Ukrainian people.
Any theory which is based on the willingness to mass murder civilians and is kept in check by little more than sheer luck will eventually lead to a horrific humanitarian catastrophe. That's what is being risked right now, and it must stop.
Russia and the United States collectively account for about 90% of all nuclear warheads, according to the Federation of American Scientists. Both countries have subs, land-based systems, and bombers capable of launching the weapons.
During Putin's speech last week announcing the invasion of Ukraine--an air and land assault that has included alleged war crimes--the Russian leader made what was widely seen as a thinly veiled threat to retaliate with nuclear weapons if any other nation intervenes.
Anti-war campaigners have also responded with alarm to a Monday referendum that paves the path for Belarus to host Russian nuclear weapons.
\u201cThe US and NATO have done well to avoid engaging in nuclear threats and signaling, condemning Putin\u2019s reckless nuclear saber-rattling. They should also make clear that a US/NATO nuclear first strike is off the table in Putin\u2019s war in Ukraine. https://t.co/tT3nzzgeaY\u201d— Global Zero (@Global Zero) 1646156723
Despite the recent developments, the Biden administration so far has not changed U.S. nuclear alert levels.
While denouncing Putin's war in Ukraine and imposing economic sanctions, U.S. President Joe Biden has indicated he does not plan to engage in a military conflict with Russia.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki made clear Monday that the Biden administration will not impose a no-fly zone, emphasizing that implementation could require the U.S. military to shoot down Russian planes, which could lead to a full-blown war with Russia.
[twitter_embed https://twitter.com/derekjGZ/statuses/1498446293110341632 text="\u201cYes, you\u2019re absolutely right, the United States and NATO are 100% capable of obliterating that Russian convoy headed for Kyiv and establishing a no-fly zone over Ukraine.\n\nAnd all we\u2019d have to be willing to risk is\u2026 \u2026 the fate of all life on Earth as we know it.\u201d" name="Derek Johnson" screen_name="derekjGZ" id="1498446293110341632" created_ts=1646092410 iframe_id="twitter-embed-1498446293110341632" expand=1 embed_desktop_width=550 embed_desktop_height=369 embed_mobile_width=375 embed_mobile_height=417]
Writing Tuesday for Responsible Statecraft, Emma Claire Foley of Global Zero outlined various scenarios that could result in nuclear action over Ukraine, from Putin making good on his threats to "an accidental first strike in response to misinterpreted or incorrect intelligence or uncontrolled escalation of a relatively small-scale, conventional military incident."
"Very little seems certain about the tragic situation in Ukraine or the future of U.S.-Russia relations," she wrote. "But as long as the status quo around nuclear weapons persists, the real risk of escalation from a regional conflict to a global conflagration will be with us. The difficult question that must be answered is how we build a path out of the darkness of the present moment to a world free from their threat."
ICAN continues to call on all countries, especially the nine nuclear-armed nations, to join the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which entered into force last year.
Russia further elevated concerns about global catastrophe on Tuesday as its "nuclear submarines sailed off for drills in the Barents Sea and mobile missile launchers roamed snow forests" in Siberia just days after Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine and put his nation's nuclear forces on "special alert."
"Drills with nuclear weapons are never acceptable and are particularly dangerous in tense times."
Anti-nuclear campaigners who have condemned the Russian leader's actions over the past week also blasted the military exercises that Russia's Northern Fleet said were designed to "train maneuvering in stormy conditions," according to the Associated Press.
The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) tweeted the report and said that "drills with nuclear weapons are never acceptable and are particularly dangerous in tense times."
\u201cDrills with nuclear weapons are never acceptable and are particularly dangerous in tense times. \n\nRussia should heed 2021 @NobelPrize Laureate Dmitry Muratov & @BeaFihn's joint call in @novaya_gazeta to join #nuclearban: https://t.co/btoNjMV5Zj\u201d— ICAN (@ICAN) 1646160597
The AP reported that the Russian military "didn't say whether the drills were linked to Putin's order on Sunday to put the country's nuclear forces on high alert amid Russia's war in Ukraine. It also was unclear whether the exercises represented a change in the country's normal nuclear training activities or posture."
Along with demanding an end to the "illegal" invasion, ICAN said Sunday that Putin's alert order "is incredibly dangerous and irresponsible, especially during a time of war and high tension."
The group urged all nuclear-armed states to stand down their forces and "refrain from threatening to use weapons of mass destruction," warning that any use of them "would cause catastrophic humanitarian suffering and the fallout--radioactive, economic, political."
ICAN continued:
Right now, the dangerous policy of so-called nuclear deterrence is used to enable the continued invasion of Ukraine by Russia. It does not keep the peace, it allows for war to be carried out against Ukrainian people.
Any theory which is based on the willingness to mass murder civilians and is kept in check by little more than sheer luck will eventually lead to a horrific humanitarian catastrophe. That's what is being risked right now, and it must stop.
Russia and the United States collectively account for about 90% of all nuclear warheads, according to the Federation of American Scientists. Both countries have subs, land-based systems, and bombers capable of launching the weapons.
During Putin's speech last week announcing the invasion of Ukraine--an air and land assault that has included alleged war crimes--the Russian leader made what was widely seen as a thinly veiled threat to retaliate with nuclear weapons if any other nation intervenes.
Anti-war campaigners have also responded with alarm to a Monday referendum that paves the path for Belarus to host Russian nuclear weapons.
\u201cThe US and NATO have done well to avoid engaging in nuclear threats and signaling, condemning Putin\u2019s reckless nuclear saber-rattling. They should also make clear that a US/NATO nuclear first strike is off the table in Putin\u2019s war in Ukraine. https://t.co/tT3nzzgeaY\u201d— Global Zero (@Global Zero) 1646156723
Despite the recent developments, the Biden administration so far has not changed U.S. nuclear alert levels.
While denouncing Putin's war in Ukraine and imposing economic sanctions, U.S. President Joe Biden has indicated he does not plan to engage in a military conflict with Russia.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki made clear Monday that the Biden administration will not impose a no-fly zone, emphasizing that implementation could require the U.S. military to shoot down Russian planes, which could lead to a full-blown war with Russia.
[twitter_embed https://twitter.com/derekjGZ/statuses/1498446293110341632 text="\u201cYes, you\u2019re absolutely right, the United States and NATO are 100% capable of obliterating that Russian convoy headed for Kyiv and establishing a no-fly zone over Ukraine.\n\nAnd all we\u2019d have to be willing to risk is\u2026 \u2026 the fate of all life on Earth as we know it.\u201d" name="Derek Johnson" screen_name="derekjGZ" id="1498446293110341632" created_ts=1646092410 iframe_id="twitter-embed-1498446293110341632" expand=1 embed_desktop_width=550 embed_desktop_height=369 embed_mobile_width=375 embed_mobile_height=417]
Writing Tuesday for Responsible Statecraft, Emma Claire Foley of Global Zero outlined various scenarios that could result in nuclear action over Ukraine, from Putin making good on his threats to "an accidental first strike in response to misinterpreted or incorrect intelligence or uncontrolled escalation of a relatively small-scale, conventional military incident."
"Very little seems certain about the tragic situation in Ukraine or the future of U.S.-Russia relations," she wrote. "But as long as the status quo around nuclear weapons persists, the real risk of escalation from a regional conflict to a global conflagration will be with us. The difficult question that must be answered is how we build a path out of the darkness of the present moment to a world free from their threat."
ICAN continues to call on all countries, especially the nine nuclear-armed nations, to join the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which entered into force last year.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.