

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Cara Baldari and Sarah Orrin-Vipond join a rally in front of the U.S. Capitol December 13, 2021 in Washington, D.C. to urge passage of the Build Back Better Act to extend the expanded Child Tax Credit. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
New polling revealed Wednesday that as Democratic lawmakers have failed in recent months to enact the Build Back Better Act, support for party members has dropped among U.S. voters affected by the expiration of the expanded child tax credit.
"You win by delivering for people and you lose by giving them nothing."
The House-approved Build Back Better package would have continued the popular child tax credit (CTC), which gave families monthly payments of up to $300 per child until it ended in December--but the bill stalled in the upper chamber, largely due to Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).
Some observers blamed the senator for the new Morning Consult survey results--an early signal of what Democratic congressional candidates could face in this year's midterms.
As journalist Jon Walker put it: "You win by delivering for people and you lose by giving them nothing. Manchin has probably doomed the party."
The Week's Ryan Cooper said it is "hard to imagine a better way to tank your own popularity than creating a nice program with a big constituency and then canceling it a few months before campaign season starts."
In a December survey conducted before Manchin declared the Build Back Better Act "dead," 49% of CTC recipients told Morning Consult they would more likely vote for a Democratic congressional candidate, compared with 37% who would back a Republican.
The latest poll, conducted earlier this month, found that now only 44% of recipients would support a Democrat, while the share who said they would vote for a Republican jumped to 43%. In both cases, 14% of recipients said they didn't know or had no opinion.
The share of CTC recipients with unfavorable views of Democrats in Congress rose from 35% to 50% between the December and February polls. Republicans saw a similar but smaller increase in unfavorability during that period--from 41% to 51%.
The Morning Consult polling also underscored how killing the program--which aided millions of families during the ongoing pandemic--affects recipients.
Of those eligible for the program, 68% confirmed they actually got payments in 2021. Among those CTC recipients, 75% said the expiration will undermine their financial security--including 38% who said it will have a "minor" impact and 37% who anticipate a "major" impact.
The new survey results follow research published this week by Fighting Chance for Families--a project of Data for Progress and Groundwork Collective--that found Democrats working to extend the CTC boosts voters' trust in party members while letter the program expire erodes that trust.
Meanwhile, Manchin--who has advocated for means-testing the CTC if it is brought back alone or as part of a broader package--made clear in a televised interview this week that the version of the Build Back Better agenda passed by House Democrats "no longer will exist."
Writing for Common Dreams last week, leaders of the Poor People's Campaign--Bishop William Barber II, Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis, and Shailly Gupta Barnes--warned that means-testing would be a "dangerous 'compromise.'"
"Manchin and his colleagues want to keep us in the fiction that was systemized through welfare reform: that poverty is only a marginal issue, facing a few million people, who need a little bit of help to get back on their feet again," the trio wrote. "They want to keep telling us the lie that welfare programs are bad for us, but good for the rich (remember, a tax cut or a subsidy is also welfare)."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
New polling revealed Wednesday that as Democratic lawmakers have failed in recent months to enact the Build Back Better Act, support for party members has dropped among U.S. voters affected by the expiration of the expanded child tax credit.
"You win by delivering for people and you lose by giving them nothing."
The House-approved Build Back Better package would have continued the popular child tax credit (CTC), which gave families monthly payments of up to $300 per child until it ended in December--but the bill stalled in the upper chamber, largely due to Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).
Some observers blamed the senator for the new Morning Consult survey results--an early signal of what Democratic congressional candidates could face in this year's midterms.
As journalist Jon Walker put it: "You win by delivering for people and you lose by giving them nothing. Manchin has probably doomed the party."
The Week's Ryan Cooper said it is "hard to imagine a better way to tank your own popularity than creating a nice program with a big constituency and then canceling it a few months before campaign season starts."
In a December survey conducted before Manchin declared the Build Back Better Act "dead," 49% of CTC recipients told Morning Consult they would more likely vote for a Democratic congressional candidate, compared with 37% who would back a Republican.
The latest poll, conducted earlier this month, found that now only 44% of recipients would support a Democrat, while the share who said they would vote for a Republican jumped to 43%. In both cases, 14% of recipients said they didn't know or had no opinion.
The share of CTC recipients with unfavorable views of Democrats in Congress rose from 35% to 50% between the December and February polls. Republicans saw a similar but smaller increase in unfavorability during that period--from 41% to 51%.
The Morning Consult polling also underscored how killing the program--which aided millions of families during the ongoing pandemic--affects recipients.
Of those eligible for the program, 68% confirmed they actually got payments in 2021. Among those CTC recipients, 75% said the expiration will undermine their financial security--including 38% who said it will have a "minor" impact and 37% who anticipate a "major" impact.
The new survey results follow research published this week by Fighting Chance for Families--a project of Data for Progress and Groundwork Collective--that found Democrats working to extend the CTC boosts voters' trust in party members while letter the program expire erodes that trust.
Meanwhile, Manchin--who has advocated for means-testing the CTC if it is brought back alone or as part of a broader package--made clear in a televised interview this week that the version of the Build Back Better agenda passed by House Democrats "no longer will exist."
Writing for Common Dreams last week, leaders of the Poor People's Campaign--Bishop William Barber II, Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis, and Shailly Gupta Barnes--warned that means-testing would be a "dangerous 'compromise.'"
"Manchin and his colleagues want to keep us in the fiction that was systemized through welfare reform: that poverty is only a marginal issue, facing a few million people, who need a little bit of help to get back on their feet again," the trio wrote. "They want to keep telling us the lie that welfare programs are bad for us, but good for the rich (remember, a tax cut or a subsidy is also welfare)."
New polling revealed Wednesday that as Democratic lawmakers have failed in recent months to enact the Build Back Better Act, support for party members has dropped among U.S. voters affected by the expiration of the expanded child tax credit.
"You win by delivering for people and you lose by giving them nothing."
The House-approved Build Back Better package would have continued the popular child tax credit (CTC), which gave families monthly payments of up to $300 per child until it ended in December--but the bill stalled in the upper chamber, largely due to Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).
Some observers blamed the senator for the new Morning Consult survey results--an early signal of what Democratic congressional candidates could face in this year's midterms.
As journalist Jon Walker put it: "You win by delivering for people and you lose by giving them nothing. Manchin has probably doomed the party."
The Week's Ryan Cooper said it is "hard to imagine a better way to tank your own popularity than creating a nice program with a big constituency and then canceling it a few months before campaign season starts."
In a December survey conducted before Manchin declared the Build Back Better Act "dead," 49% of CTC recipients told Morning Consult they would more likely vote for a Democratic congressional candidate, compared with 37% who would back a Republican.
The latest poll, conducted earlier this month, found that now only 44% of recipients would support a Democrat, while the share who said they would vote for a Republican jumped to 43%. In both cases, 14% of recipients said they didn't know or had no opinion.
The share of CTC recipients with unfavorable views of Democrats in Congress rose from 35% to 50% between the December and February polls. Republicans saw a similar but smaller increase in unfavorability during that period--from 41% to 51%.
The Morning Consult polling also underscored how killing the program--which aided millions of families during the ongoing pandemic--affects recipients.
Of those eligible for the program, 68% confirmed they actually got payments in 2021. Among those CTC recipients, 75% said the expiration will undermine their financial security--including 38% who said it will have a "minor" impact and 37% who anticipate a "major" impact.
The new survey results follow research published this week by Fighting Chance for Families--a project of Data for Progress and Groundwork Collective--that found Democrats working to extend the CTC boosts voters' trust in party members while letter the program expire erodes that trust.
Meanwhile, Manchin--who has advocated for means-testing the CTC if it is brought back alone or as part of a broader package--made clear in a televised interview this week that the version of the Build Back Better agenda passed by House Democrats "no longer will exist."
Writing for Common Dreams last week, leaders of the Poor People's Campaign--Bishop William Barber II, Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis, and Shailly Gupta Barnes--warned that means-testing would be a "dangerous 'compromise.'"
"Manchin and his colleagues want to keep us in the fiction that was systemized through welfare reform: that poverty is only a marginal issue, facing a few million people, who need a little bit of help to get back on their feet again," the trio wrote. "They want to keep telling us the lie that welfare programs are bad for us, but good for the rich (remember, a tax cut or a subsidy is also welfare)."