SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Relatives and neighbors of the Ahmadi family gathered around the incinerated husk of a vehicle hit by a U.S. drone strike in Kabul, Afghanistan on August 30, 2021. (Photo: Marcus Yam/Los Angeles Times)
ACLU Demands 'Truly Systemic Overhaul' of US Civilian Harm Policies
"While a serious Defense Department focus on civilian harm is long overdue and welcome, it's unclear that this directive will be enough," says director of the legal group's National Security Project.
Jan 28, 2022
After the Pentagon chief moved to improve how the U.S. mitigates and responds to civilian harm, the ACLU on Thursday urged more sweeping action in light of recent tragedies, including an August drone strike that killed 10 people in Afghanistan.
"While a serious Defense Department focus on civilian harm is long overdue and welcome, it's unclear that this directive will be enough."
"While a serious Defense Department focus on civilian harm is long overdue and welcome, it's unclear that this directive will be enough," Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, said in a statement.
According to Shamsi, "What's needed is a truly systemic overhaul of our country's civilian harm policies to address the massive structural flaws, likely violations of international law, and probable war crimes that have occurred in the last 20 years."
"Any comprehensive review also needs to address and end unlawful and unaccountable lethal strikes even outside of war zones," she added. "Actions will speak louder than words, and we need urgent action to end 20 years of war-based approaches that have caused devastating harm to Muslim, Brown, and Black civilians around the world."
\u201cThe DoD has recognized at the highest level that much more needs to be done.\n\nBut remains to be seen whether forming new center, setting in motion new processes will lead to needed result: greater accountability to civilians harmed & public, and change to prevent future harm\u201d— Priyanka Motaparthy (@Priyanka Motaparthy) 1643382567
Annie Shiel, a senior adviser for the Center for Civilians in Conflict, was similarly cautious while welcoming that the Department of Defense (DoD) is focusing on the issue.
"The fact that civilian harm is being recognized as a priority at the highest levels of the department is a positive and welcome step," Shiel told The New York Times. "But the impact will depend entirely on results."
U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III on Thursday issued a memorandum ordering top civilian and military officials to craft a Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan within 90 days.
Austin's memo calls for the plan to enable the DoD to:
- Establish a civilian protection center of excellence to better expedite and institutionalize the advancement of our knowledge, practices, and tools for preventing, mitigating, and responding to civilian harm;
- Develop more standardized civilian-harm operational reporting and data management processes to improve how we collect, share, and learn from data related to civilian harm;
- Review guidance and its associated implementation of how the department responds to civilian harm, including, but not limited to, condolence payments and the public acknowledgment of harm; and
- Incorporate guidance for addressing civilian harm across the full spectrum of armed conflict into doctrine and operational plans, so that we are prepared to mitigate and respond to civilian harm in any future fight.
"We strive diligently to minimize the harm that armed conflict visits upon civilian populations, but we can and will improve upon efforts to protect civilians," the memo states, describing such efforts as "vital to the ultimate success of our operations" as well as "a significant strategic and moral imperative."
During the final days of the two-decade war in Afghanistan last year, the Biden administration conducted a drone strike that killed 10 people, seven of them children. While initially described by U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Mark Milley as a "righteous strike," the Pentagon later admitted it was "horrible mistake," prompting swift backlash.
"That was not a 'mistake,'" journalist Anand Giridharadas said in September. "War crimes are not oopsies."
The following month, Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby announced that the United States would issue "condolence payments" to relatives of 10 Afghans killed. In December, Kirby signaled that none of the U.S. military personnel involved in the attack would be punished.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
After the Pentagon chief moved to improve how the U.S. mitigates and responds to civilian harm, the ACLU on Thursday urged more sweeping action in light of recent tragedies, including an August drone strike that killed 10 people in Afghanistan.
"While a serious Defense Department focus on civilian harm is long overdue and welcome, it's unclear that this directive will be enough."
"While a serious Defense Department focus on civilian harm is long overdue and welcome, it's unclear that this directive will be enough," Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, said in a statement.
According to Shamsi, "What's needed is a truly systemic overhaul of our country's civilian harm policies to address the massive structural flaws, likely violations of international law, and probable war crimes that have occurred in the last 20 years."
"Any comprehensive review also needs to address and end unlawful and unaccountable lethal strikes even outside of war zones," she added. "Actions will speak louder than words, and we need urgent action to end 20 years of war-based approaches that have caused devastating harm to Muslim, Brown, and Black civilians around the world."
\u201cThe DoD has recognized at the highest level that much more needs to be done.\n\nBut remains to be seen whether forming new center, setting in motion new processes will lead to needed result: greater accountability to civilians harmed & public, and change to prevent future harm\u201d— Priyanka Motaparthy (@Priyanka Motaparthy) 1643382567
Annie Shiel, a senior adviser for the Center for Civilians in Conflict, was similarly cautious while welcoming that the Department of Defense (DoD) is focusing on the issue.
"The fact that civilian harm is being recognized as a priority at the highest levels of the department is a positive and welcome step," Shiel told The New York Times. "But the impact will depend entirely on results."
U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III on Thursday issued a memorandum ordering top civilian and military officials to craft a Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan within 90 days.
Austin's memo calls for the plan to enable the DoD to:
- Establish a civilian protection center of excellence to better expedite and institutionalize the advancement of our knowledge, practices, and tools for preventing, mitigating, and responding to civilian harm;
- Develop more standardized civilian-harm operational reporting and data management processes to improve how we collect, share, and learn from data related to civilian harm;
- Review guidance and its associated implementation of how the department responds to civilian harm, including, but not limited to, condolence payments and the public acknowledgment of harm; and
- Incorporate guidance for addressing civilian harm across the full spectrum of armed conflict into doctrine and operational plans, so that we are prepared to mitigate and respond to civilian harm in any future fight.
"We strive diligently to minimize the harm that armed conflict visits upon civilian populations, but we can and will improve upon efforts to protect civilians," the memo states, describing such efforts as "vital to the ultimate success of our operations" as well as "a significant strategic and moral imperative."
During the final days of the two-decade war in Afghanistan last year, the Biden administration conducted a drone strike that killed 10 people, seven of them children. While initially described by U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Mark Milley as a "righteous strike," the Pentagon later admitted it was "horrible mistake," prompting swift backlash.
"That was not a 'mistake,'" journalist Anand Giridharadas said in September. "War crimes are not oopsies."
The following month, Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby announced that the United States would issue "condolence payments" to relatives of 10 Afghans killed. In December, Kirby signaled that none of the U.S. military personnel involved in the attack would be punished.
After the Pentagon chief moved to improve how the U.S. mitigates and responds to civilian harm, the ACLU on Thursday urged more sweeping action in light of recent tragedies, including an August drone strike that killed 10 people in Afghanistan.
"While a serious Defense Department focus on civilian harm is long overdue and welcome, it's unclear that this directive will be enough."
"While a serious Defense Department focus on civilian harm is long overdue and welcome, it's unclear that this directive will be enough," Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, said in a statement.
According to Shamsi, "What's needed is a truly systemic overhaul of our country's civilian harm policies to address the massive structural flaws, likely violations of international law, and probable war crimes that have occurred in the last 20 years."
"Any comprehensive review also needs to address and end unlawful and unaccountable lethal strikes even outside of war zones," she added. "Actions will speak louder than words, and we need urgent action to end 20 years of war-based approaches that have caused devastating harm to Muslim, Brown, and Black civilians around the world."
\u201cThe DoD has recognized at the highest level that much more needs to be done.\n\nBut remains to be seen whether forming new center, setting in motion new processes will lead to needed result: greater accountability to civilians harmed & public, and change to prevent future harm\u201d— Priyanka Motaparthy (@Priyanka Motaparthy) 1643382567
Annie Shiel, a senior adviser for the Center for Civilians in Conflict, was similarly cautious while welcoming that the Department of Defense (DoD) is focusing on the issue.
"The fact that civilian harm is being recognized as a priority at the highest levels of the department is a positive and welcome step," Shiel told The New York Times. "But the impact will depend entirely on results."
U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III on Thursday issued a memorandum ordering top civilian and military officials to craft a Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan within 90 days.
Austin's memo calls for the plan to enable the DoD to:
- Establish a civilian protection center of excellence to better expedite and institutionalize the advancement of our knowledge, practices, and tools for preventing, mitigating, and responding to civilian harm;
- Develop more standardized civilian-harm operational reporting and data management processes to improve how we collect, share, and learn from data related to civilian harm;
- Review guidance and its associated implementation of how the department responds to civilian harm, including, but not limited to, condolence payments and the public acknowledgment of harm; and
- Incorporate guidance for addressing civilian harm across the full spectrum of armed conflict into doctrine and operational plans, so that we are prepared to mitigate and respond to civilian harm in any future fight.
"We strive diligently to minimize the harm that armed conflict visits upon civilian populations, but we can and will improve upon efforts to protect civilians," the memo states, describing such efforts as "vital to the ultimate success of our operations" as well as "a significant strategic and moral imperative."
During the final days of the two-decade war in Afghanistan last year, the Biden administration conducted a drone strike that killed 10 people, seven of them children. While initially described by U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Mark Milley as a "righteous strike," the Pentagon later admitted it was "horrible mistake," prompting swift backlash.
"That was not a 'mistake,'" journalist Anand Giridharadas said in September. "War crimes are not oopsies."
The following month, Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby announced that the United States would issue "condolence payments" to relatives of 10 Afghans killed. In December, Kirby signaled that none of the U.S. military personnel involved in the attack would be punished.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.