

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Activists protest fossil fuels near the Inglewood Oil Field in the Baldwin Hills neighborhood of Los Angeles on September 13, 2021. (Photo: Citizens of the Planet/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
Climate and environmental justice campaigners cheered a unanimous vote Wednesday by the Los Angeles City Council to back a ban on all new oil and gas wells, with one group calling the move "the beginning of a new era" of an "equitable transition" toward a fossil-free future for the nation's second-largest city and beyond.
"This is a momentous step forward for Los Angeles, and a clear message we are sending to Big Oil."
The Associated Press reports the council approved a measure directing the city attorney to draft an ordinance that would ban fossil fuel extraction within municipal limits, change zoning laws to outlaw drilling, and study ways to phase out the more than 5,200 existing oil and gas wells--some hidden in plain sight--located throughout the nation's largest urban oilfield.
"This is a momentous step forward for Los Angeles, and a clear message we are sending to Big Oil,'' Council Member Mitch O'Farrell, a Democrat who chairs the body's Energy, Climate Change, Environmental Justice, and River committee, told City News Service.
Speaking at a press conference before Wednesday's vote, O'Farrell called the council's action "a model for the nation and the world."
Council President Nury Martinez--a Democrat who grew up in the city's polluted neighborhoods and introduced the measure with colleague Paul Krekorian--said at the press conference that "for far too long, neighborhood oil drilling has disproportionately affected the health of our low-income communities of color. From freeways to power plants, our frontline communities bear the brunt of pollution and climate impacts."
Ashley Hernandez--a youth organizer with STAND-L.A. and a resident of the Wilmington neighborhood--said outside City Hall following the vote, "I've lived in the frontlines of neighborhood oil drilling my entire life and can't begin to express what I'm feeling inside being here in this moment after all of the years of work frontline residents, partners and allies have fought for."
Hernandez, who hailed "the courage and resistance of Black and Brown communities rising up against oil extraction that does not belong in our neighborhoods," recounted how, while growing up, she experienced nosebleeds and eye infections and witnessed her teachers sickened by oil drilling in Wilmington.
"Days like today remind us that every single petition, every single voice, every single action, and every single person that's come from the frontlines of neighborhood oil drilling has mattered enough," said Hernandez.
Council Member Joe Buscaino, a Democrat who represents Hernandez's district--which is home to more than half of the active fossil fuel sites citywide--said that "to say that the issue before us hits close to home for my district would be a serious understatement."
According to The Guardian:
Thousands of residents live in close proximity to wells but the toxic effects are not evenly distributed, with less affluent Angelenos and people of color bearing the brunt of their environmental impact. A slew of studies have shown the toll drilling can have on public health, including higher rates of asthma and cardiovascular disease and increased risks of babies with low birth weights and other reproductive health issues.
In a paper published last year, researchers from the University of Southern California (USC) noted that South L.A. residents--predominantly Black and Latino families--who live near active oil development have lower lung function. Deficient lung capacity "may contribute to environmental health disparities," the researchers said, likening the health effects to daily exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke.
Adjacent and nearby areas, including Culver City and unincorporated parts of Los Angeles County, have moved to shut down fossil fuel extraction in recent years.
Local fossil fuel phaseouts are part of a statewide movement in California aimed at combating the climate emergency and improving public health. Last October, California fossil fuel regulators proposed a ban on new oil and gas wells within 3,200 feet of schools, homes, and hospitals.
"Starting today, I have a little bit more hope for our communities," said Hernandez. "Our futures will hopefully not be full of emergency room visits, bloody noses, or burdensome health impacts, but a cleaner future where Blackrown families are the ones protected and valued."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Climate and environmental justice campaigners cheered a unanimous vote Wednesday by the Los Angeles City Council to back a ban on all new oil and gas wells, with one group calling the move "the beginning of a new era" of an "equitable transition" toward a fossil-free future for the nation's second-largest city and beyond.
"This is a momentous step forward for Los Angeles, and a clear message we are sending to Big Oil."
The Associated Press reports the council approved a measure directing the city attorney to draft an ordinance that would ban fossil fuel extraction within municipal limits, change zoning laws to outlaw drilling, and study ways to phase out the more than 5,200 existing oil and gas wells--some hidden in plain sight--located throughout the nation's largest urban oilfield.
"This is a momentous step forward for Los Angeles, and a clear message we are sending to Big Oil,'' Council Member Mitch O'Farrell, a Democrat who chairs the body's Energy, Climate Change, Environmental Justice, and River committee, told City News Service.
Speaking at a press conference before Wednesday's vote, O'Farrell called the council's action "a model for the nation and the world."
Council President Nury Martinez--a Democrat who grew up in the city's polluted neighborhoods and introduced the measure with colleague Paul Krekorian--said at the press conference that "for far too long, neighborhood oil drilling has disproportionately affected the health of our low-income communities of color. From freeways to power plants, our frontline communities bear the brunt of pollution and climate impacts."
Ashley Hernandez--a youth organizer with STAND-L.A. and a resident of the Wilmington neighborhood--said outside City Hall following the vote, "I've lived in the frontlines of neighborhood oil drilling my entire life and can't begin to express what I'm feeling inside being here in this moment after all of the years of work frontline residents, partners and allies have fought for."
Hernandez, who hailed "the courage and resistance of Black and Brown communities rising up against oil extraction that does not belong in our neighborhoods," recounted how, while growing up, she experienced nosebleeds and eye infections and witnessed her teachers sickened by oil drilling in Wilmington.
"Days like today remind us that every single petition, every single voice, every single action, and every single person that's come from the frontlines of neighborhood oil drilling has mattered enough," said Hernandez.
Council Member Joe Buscaino, a Democrat who represents Hernandez's district--which is home to more than half of the active fossil fuel sites citywide--said that "to say that the issue before us hits close to home for my district would be a serious understatement."
According to The Guardian:
Thousands of residents live in close proximity to wells but the toxic effects are not evenly distributed, with less affluent Angelenos and people of color bearing the brunt of their environmental impact. A slew of studies have shown the toll drilling can have on public health, including higher rates of asthma and cardiovascular disease and increased risks of babies with low birth weights and other reproductive health issues.
In a paper published last year, researchers from the University of Southern California (USC) noted that South L.A. residents--predominantly Black and Latino families--who live near active oil development have lower lung function. Deficient lung capacity "may contribute to environmental health disparities," the researchers said, likening the health effects to daily exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke.
Adjacent and nearby areas, including Culver City and unincorporated parts of Los Angeles County, have moved to shut down fossil fuel extraction in recent years.
Local fossil fuel phaseouts are part of a statewide movement in California aimed at combating the climate emergency and improving public health. Last October, California fossil fuel regulators proposed a ban on new oil and gas wells within 3,200 feet of schools, homes, and hospitals.
"Starting today, I have a little bit more hope for our communities," said Hernandez. "Our futures will hopefully not be full of emergency room visits, bloody noses, or burdensome health impacts, but a cleaner future where Blackrown families are the ones protected and valued."
Climate and environmental justice campaigners cheered a unanimous vote Wednesday by the Los Angeles City Council to back a ban on all new oil and gas wells, with one group calling the move "the beginning of a new era" of an "equitable transition" toward a fossil-free future for the nation's second-largest city and beyond.
"This is a momentous step forward for Los Angeles, and a clear message we are sending to Big Oil."
The Associated Press reports the council approved a measure directing the city attorney to draft an ordinance that would ban fossil fuel extraction within municipal limits, change zoning laws to outlaw drilling, and study ways to phase out the more than 5,200 existing oil and gas wells--some hidden in plain sight--located throughout the nation's largest urban oilfield.
"This is a momentous step forward for Los Angeles, and a clear message we are sending to Big Oil,'' Council Member Mitch O'Farrell, a Democrat who chairs the body's Energy, Climate Change, Environmental Justice, and River committee, told City News Service.
Speaking at a press conference before Wednesday's vote, O'Farrell called the council's action "a model for the nation and the world."
Council President Nury Martinez--a Democrat who grew up in the city's polluted neighborhoods and introduced the measure with colleague Paul Krekorian--said at the press conference that "for far too long, neighborhood oil drilling has disproportionately affected the health of our low-income communities of color. From freeways to power plants, our frontline communities bear the brunt of pollution and climate impacts."
Ashley Hernandez--a youth organizer with STAND-L.A. and a resident of the Wilmington neighborhood--said outside City Hall following the vote, "I've lived in the frontlines of neighborhood oil drilling my entire life and can't begin to express what I'm feeling inside being here in this moment after all of the years of work frontline residents, partners and allies have fought for."
Hernandez, who hailed "the courage and resistance of Black and Brown communities rising up against oil extraction that does not belong in our neighborhoods," recounted how, while growing up, she experienced nosebleeds and eye infections and witnessed her teachers sickened by oil drilling in Wilmington.
"Days like today remind us that every single petition, every single voice, every single action, and every single person that's come from the frontlines of neighborhood oil drilling has mattered enough," said Hernandez.
Council Member Joe Buscaino, a Democrat who represents Hernandez's district--which is home to more than half of the active fossil fuel sites citywide--said that "to say that the issue before us hits close to home for my district would be a serious understatement."
According to The Guardian:
Thousands of residents live in close proximity to wells but the toxic effects are not evenly distributed, with less affluent Angelenos and people of color bearing the brunt of their environmental impact. A slew of studies have shown the toll drilling can have on public health, including higher rates of asthma and cardiovascular disease and increased risks of babies with low birth weights and other reproductive health issues.
In a paper published last year, researchers from the University of Southern California (USC) noted that South L.A. residents--predominantly Black and Latino families--who live near active oil development have lower lung function. Deficient lung capacity "may contribute to environmental health disparities," the researchers said, likening the health effects to daily exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke.
Adjacent and nearby areas, including Culver City and unincorporated parts of Los Angeles County, have moved to shut down fossil fuel extraction in recent years.
Local fossil fuel phaseouts are part of a statewide movement in California aimed at combating the climate emergency and improving public health. Last October, California fossil fuel regulators proposed a ban on new oil and gas wells within 3,200 feet of schools, homes, and hospitals.
"Starting today, I have a little bit more hope for our communities," said Hernandez. "Our futures will hopefully not be full of emergency room visits, bloody noses, or burdensome health impacts, but a cleaner future where Blackrown families are the ones protected and valued."