The silhouette of a man is seen in front of Amazon and Apple logos on September 5, 2018. (Photo: Aytac Unal/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images)
New Project Launched as 'Direct Counterweight' to Big Tech
"We are at a watershed moment with bipartisan support to finally break up the Big Tech monopolies that hurt consumers and small businesses."
The Tech Oversight Project launched Tuesday in an effort to push back against major technology companies' lobbying on Capitol Hill and advocate for greater regulation of the industry.
The project is beginning with a focus on federal antitrust legislation, employing a "campaign-style" strategy to fight for passage of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (H.R. 3816/S. 2992), which would outlaw certain anti-competitive conduct by major platforms.
Warning that "Big Tech's monopolies are putting our country, our children, and our future at risk," the group's website details the industry behavior that has motivated the new effort:
Despite stifling online competition, spreading disinformation, contributing to online harassment and real-world hate crimes, undermining small businesses, and knowingly harming our collective mental health, Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon continue to operate without accountability and to profit from these practices. These corporations have platformed terrorists, lied to Congress, and weaponized our personal data against us, while leveraging their power to crush small business and innovation. Along the way, they have robbed consumers of the diverse and useful services a once-pluralistic web offered.
Such conduct--which has been exposed by whistleblowers as well as investigations by reporters, state attorneys general, and Congress--has fueled support for sweeping action by both federal lawmakers and regulators.
While some have pushed for reforming Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, as Common Dreams has reported, digital rights advocates have long warned that doing so "would be devastating for human rights, social movements, and marginalized people."
Sacha Haworth, executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, told The Washington Post that the battle over Section 230 is "a distraction" and a "red herring."
In a statement reported by The Hill, Haworth explained what the project sees as politically possible, saying that "we are at a watershed moment with bipartisan support to finally break up the Big Tech monopolies that hurt consumers and small businesses."
"Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon all know that; that's why they're pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into swampy lobbying efforts to deceive voters and run down the clock on antitrust reform," she said. "Simply put: we won't let that happen."
According to the Post, the project is a response to Big Tech-funded groups such as the Connected Commerce Council and NetChoice, which fight against regulation.
"Our aim is to be a direct counterweight to those organizations that have been lobbying for the status quo for years," Haworth said, adding that because Democrats could soon lose control of Congress, "pouncing upon this moment right now is critical."
The newspaper noted that "Haworth, a veteran of Democratic politics, said she wants to bring the 'aggressiveness' and single-minded focus of a campaign to the fight to regulate Big Tech."
The Tech Oversight Project is primarily funded by the Omidyar Network and the Economic Security Project, which were started by Big Tech critics who previously worked in the industry.
The Omidyar Network is the philanthropic venture of eBay founder Pierre Omidyar, also known for backing The Intercept. The Economic Security Project is co-chaired by Chris Hughes, who has advocated for breaking up Facebook, which he co-founded.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The Tech Oversight Project launched Tuesday in an effort to push back against major technology companies' lobbying on Capitol Hill and advocate for greater regulation of the industry.
The project is beginning with a focus on federal antitrust legislation, employing a "campaign-style" strategy to fight for passage of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (H.R. 3816/S. 2992), which would outlaw certain anti-competitive conduct by major platforms.
Warning that "Big Tech's monopolies are putting our country, our children, and our future at risk," the group's website details the industry behavior that has motivated the new effort:
Despite stifling online competition, spreading disinformation, contributing to online harassment and real-world hate crimes, undermining small businesses, and knowingly harming our collective mental health, Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon continue to operate without accountability and to profit from these practices. These corporations have platformed terrorists, lied to Congress, and weaponized our personal data against us, while leveraging their power to crush small business and innovation. Along the way, they have robbed consumers of the diverse and useful services a once-pluralistic web offered.
Such conduct--which has been exposed by whistleblowers as well as investigations by reporters, state attorneys general, and Congress--has fueled support for sweeping action by both federal lawmakers and regulators.
While some have pushed for reforming Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, as Common Dreams has reported, digital rights advocates have long warned that doing so "would be devastating for human rights, social movements, and marginalized people."
Sacha Haworth, executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, told The Washington Post that the battle over Section 230 is "a distraction" and a "red herring."
In a statement reported by The Hill, Haworth explained what the project sees as politically possible, saying that "we are at a watershed moment with bipartisan support to finally break up the Big Tech monopolies that hurt consumers and small businesses."
"Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon all know that; that's why they're pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into swampy lobbying efforts to deceive voters and run down the clock on antitrust reform," she said. "Simply put: we won't let that happen."
According to the Post, the project is a response to Big Tech-funded groups such as the Connected Commerce Council and NetChoice, which fight against regulation.
"Our aim is to be a direct counterweight to those organizations that have been lobbying for the status quo for years," Haworth said, adding that because Democrats could soon lose control of Congress, "pouncing upon this moment right now is critical."
The newspaper noted that "Haworth, a veteran of Democratic politics, said she wants to bring the 'aggressiveness' and single-minded focus of a campaign to the fight to regulate Big Tech."
The Tech Oversight Project is primarily funded by the Omidyar Network and the Economic Security Project, which were started by Big Tech critics who previously worked in the industry.
The Omidyar Network is the philanthropic venture of eBay founder Pierre Omidyar, also known for backing The Intercept. The Economic Security Project is co-chaired by Chris Hughes, who has advocated for breaking up Facebook, which he co-founded.
The Tech Oversight Project launched Tuesday in an effort to push back against major technology companies' lobbying on Capitol Hill and advocate for greater regulation of the industry.
The project is beginning with a focus on federal antitrust legislation, employing a "campaign-style" strategy to fight for passage of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (H.R. 3816/S. 2992), which would outlaw certain anti-competitive conduct by major platforms.
Warning that "Big Tech's monopolies are putting our country, our children, and our future at risk," the group's website details the industry behavior that has motivated the new effort:
Despite stifling online competition, spreading disinformation, contributing to online harassment and real-world hate crimes, undermining small businesses, and knowingly harming our collective mental health, Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon continue to operate without accountability and to profit from these practices. These corporations have platformed terrorists, lied to Congress, and weaponized our personal data against us, while leveraging their power to crush small business and innovation. Along the way, they have robbed consumers of the diverse and useful services a once-pluralistic web offered.
Such conduct--which has been exposed by whistleblowers as well as investigations by reporters, state attorneys general, and Congress--has fueled support for sweeping action by both federal lawmakers and regulators.
While some have pushed for reforming Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, as Common Dreams has reported, digital rights advocates have long warned that doing so "would be devastating for human rights, social movements, and marginalized people."
Sacha Haworth, executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, told The Washington Post that the battle over Section 230 is "a distraction" and a "red herring."
In a statement reported by The Hill, Haworth explained what the project sees as politically possible, saying that "we are at a watershed moment with bipartisan support to finally break up the Big Tech monopolies that hurt consumers and small businesses."
"Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon all know that; that's why they're pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into swampy lobbying efforts to deceive voters and run down the clock on antitrust reform," she said. "Simply put: we won't let that happen."
According to the Post, the project is a response to Big Tech-funded groups such as the Connected Commerce Council and NetChoice, which fight against regulation.
"Our aim is to be a direct counterweight to those organizations that have been lobbying for the status quo for years," Haworth said, adding that because Democrats could soon lose control of Congress, "pouncing upon this moment right now is critical."
The newspaper noted that "Haworth, a veteran of Democratic politics, said she wants to bring the 'aggressiveness' and single-minded focus of a campaign to the fight to regulate Big Tech."
The Tech Oversight Project is primarily funded by the Omidyar Network and the Economic Security Project, which were started by Big Tech critics who previously worked in the industry.
The Omidyar Network is the philanthropic venture of eBay founder Pierre Omidyar, also known for backing The Intercept. The Economic Security Project is co-chaired by Chris Hughes, who has advocated for breaking up Facebook, which he co-founded.