SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A vaccination center is closed due to shortage of Covid vaccine doses on June 5, 2021 in New Delhi, India. (Photo: Sanchit Khanna/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
Human Rights Defenders Threaten Legal Action Against Countries Fueling Vaccine Inequality
Legal experts and civil society groups in Canada, the U.K., Norway, and Germany outlined how officials are violating international and domestic laws by blocking an intellectual property waiver for Covid-19 vaccines.
Nov 25, 2021
More than a year after South African and Indian officials first proposed waiving intellectual property barriers for Covid-19 treatments and vaccines, human rights lawyers and advocacy groups on Thursday threatened legal action against the governments of several wealthy countries that are opposing the waiver.
"The consequences of a failure to adopt the TRIPS waiver could be millions of lives."
The European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) in Germany, law professor Mads Adenas of the University of Oslo in Norway, a coalition of dozens of human rights groups in Canada, and U.K.-based advocacy groups Global Justice Now and Just Fair warned officials in the four countries that they are violating international human rights law by failing to support a waiver of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement at the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Public health experts have warned that the failure to waive intellectual property rights for vaccines and treatments has fueled global vaccine inequality; fewer than 1% of vaccine doses have been administered in the Global South, while 74% of doses have gone to people in high-income countries. Only 5.5% of people in low-income countries have received at least one dose.
As the groups issued their warnings on Thursday, scientists in South Africa announced a new variant with an "unusually large number of mutations" has caused "serious concern."
In a letter to the U.K. secretary of state for international trade, Just Fair and Global Justice Now said the government's refusal to support a TRIPS waiver "is contrary to the U.K.'s obligation to perform its obligations under international human rights treaties in good faith."
"The vast majority of the international community has settled upon the TRIPS waiver as a necessary aspect of international cooperation to protect the rights to life and health of millions of people across the world," reads the letter, in which the groups said the U.K. is violating Article 28 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 55 and 56 of the United Nations Charter, and Article 2 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), among other treaties, including trade agreements.
From the letter:
Supporting the proposed waiver of TRIPS obligations is consistent with WTO Members' own previous agreements regarding the interpretation and application of TRIPS. In fact, the WTO Agreement explicitly contemplates this possibility of a waiver (WTO Agreement article IX:3(b)). Moreover, there is precedent for a waiver in response to the widespread and uncontrolled outbreak of a disease, in the form of the WTO General Council's decision to implement paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration. The Doha Declaration in respect of public health was adopted by the Ministerial Conference, as a result of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Southern Africa in 2001.
The letter came as more than 130 civil society groups called on the WTO to postpone its ministerial conference, planned for next week, and instead work to urgently approve a TRIPS waiver.
In Canada, signatories including the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Oxfam Canada, and Partners in Health Canada warned the country's minister of international trade that a failure to support a TRIPS waiver could amount to a violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well as international law.
"It would violate the rights of vulnerable residents of Canada to life and security of the person under section 7 of the Canadian Charter and the rights of women, the elderly, persons with disabilities, Indigenous peoples, Black people, other racialized persons, persons experiencing poverty and other groups... that are [disproportionately] affected" by the coronavirus pandemic, the groups wrote.
"Germany can no longer defend a position that enforces vaccine apartheid and which unnecessarily prolongs the pandemic situation worldwide."
The Canadian government could face legal challenges in domestic courts "in co-ordination with similar litigation initiatives in several other countries that have failed to support the proposed waiver," the groups wrote.
The ECCHR filed its letter of claim against the German government on behalf of Ugandan citizens. More than 70% of Germany's population has received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, compared to 8.7% in Uganda.
"It is important that the German government lives up to its extraterritorial human rights obligations and does everything within its power to enable equitable access to the most effective Covid-19 vaccines," said Miriam Saage-Maass, vice legal director at ECCHR. "Germany can no longer defend a position that enforces vaccine apartheid and which unnecessarily prolongs the pandemic situation worldwide."
Under pressure from civil society groups, more than 100 countries including the United States have expressed support for waiving the TRIPS agreement to allow countries in the Global South to develop generic versions of the most effective Covid-19 vaccines. The Canadian advocacy groups noted that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has "repeatedly stated" that the vaccines must be made widely available in all countries, even as his government has persisted in blocking a waiver.
"The consequences of a failure to adopt the TRIPS waiver could be millions of lives," wrote the Canadian groups, "both in those countries that have little or no access to necessary products and technologies" and in the Global North, where people remain vulnerable to new variants of Covid-19.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
More than a year after South African and Indian officials first proposed waiving intellectual property barriers for Covid-19 treatments and vaccines, human rights lawyers and advocacy groups on Thursday threatened legal action against the governments of several wealthy countries that are opposing the waiver.
"The consequences of a failure to adopt the TRIPS waiver could be millions of lives."
The European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) in Germany, law professor Mads Adenas of the University of Oslo in Norway, a coalition of dozens of human rights groups in Canada, and U.K.-based advocacy groups Global Justice Now and Just Fair warned officials in the four countries that they are violating international human rights law by failing to support a waiver of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement at the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Public health experts have warned that the failure to waive intellectual property rights for vaccines and treatments has fueled global vaccine inequality; fewer than 1% of vaccine doses have been administered in the Global South, while 74% of doses have gone to people in high-income countries. Only 5.5% of people in low-income countries have received at least one dose.
As the groups issued their warnings on Thursday, scientists in South Africa announced a new variant with an "unusually large number of mutations" has caused "serious concern."
In a letter to the U.K. secretary of state for international trade, Just Fair and Global Justice Now said the government's refusal to support a TRIPS waiver "is contrary to the U.K.'s obligation to perform its obligations under international human rights treaties in good faith."
"The vast majority of the international community has settled upon the TRIPS waiver as a necessary aspect of international cooperation to protect the rights to life and health of millions of people across the world," reads the letter, in which the groups said the U.K. is violating Article 28 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 55 and 56 of the United Nations Charter, and Article 2 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), among other treaties, including trade agreements.
From the letter:
Supporting the proposed waiver of TRIPS obligations is consistent with WTO Members' own previous agreements regarding the interpretation and application of TRIPS. In fact, the WTO Agreement explicitly contemplates this possibility of a waiver (WTO Agreement article IX:3(b)). Moreover, there is precedent for a waiver in response to the widespread and uncontrolled outbreak of a disease, in the form of the WTO General Council's decision to implement paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration. The Doha Declaration in respect of public health was adopted by the Ministerial Conference, as a result of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Southern Africa in 2001.
The letter came as more than 130 civil society groups called on the WTO to postpone its ministerial conference, planned for next week, and instead work to urgently approve a TRIPS waiver.
In Canada, signatories including the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Oxfam Canada, and Partners in Health Canada warned the country's minister of international trade that a failure to support a TRIPS waiver could amount to a violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well as international law.
"It would violate the rights of vulnerable residents of Canada to life and security of the person under section 7 of the Canadian Charter and the rights of women, the elderly, persons with disabilities, Indigenous peoples, Black people, other racialized persons, persons experiencing poverty and other groups... that are [disproportionately] affected" by the coronavirus pandemic, the groups wrote.
"Germany can no longer defend a position that enforces vaccine apartheid and which unnecessarily prolongs the pandemic situation worldwide."
The Canadian government could face legal challenges in domestic courts "in co-ordination with similar litigation initiatives in several other countries that have failed to support the proposed waiver," the groups wrote.
The ECCHR filed its letter of claim against the German government on behalf of Ugandan citizens. More than 70% of Germany's population has received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, compared to 8.7% in Uganda.
"It is important that the German government lives up to its extraterritorial human rights obligations and does everything within its power to enable equitable access to the most effective Covid-19 vaccines," said Miriam Saage-Maass, vice legal director at ECCHR. "Germany can no longer defend a position that enforces vaccine apartheid and which unnecessarily prolongs the pandemic situation worldwide."
Under pressure from civil society groups, more than 100 countries including the United States have expressed support for waiving the TRIPS agreement to allow countries in the Global South to develop generic versions of the most effective Covid-19 vaccines. The Canadian advocacy groups noted that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has "repeatedly stated" that the vaccines must be made widely available in all countries, even as his government has persisted in blocking a waiver.
"The consequences of a failure to adopt the TRIPS waiver could be millions of lives," wrote the Canadian groups, "both in those countries that have little or no access to necessary products and technologies" and in the Global North, where people remain vulnerable to new variants of Covid-19.
More than a year after South African and Indian officials first proposed waiving intellectual property barriers for Covid-19 treatments and vaccines, human rights lawyers and advocacy groups on Thursday threatened legal action against the governments of several wealthy countries that are opposing the waiver.
"The consequences of a failure to adopt the TRIPS waiver could be millions of lives."
The European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) in Germany, law professor Mads Adenas of the University of Oslo in Norway, a coalition of dozens of human rights groups in Canada, and U.K.-based advocacy groups Global Justice Now and Just Fair warned officials in the four countries that they are violating international human rights law by failing to support a waiver of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement at the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Public health experts have warned that the failure to waive intellectual property rights for vaccines and treatments has fueled global vaccine inequality; fewer than 1% of vaccine doses have been administered in the Global South, while 74% of doses have gone to people in high-income countries. Only 5.5% of people in low-income countries have received at least one dose.
As the groups issued their warnings on Thursday, scientists in South Africa announced a new variant with an "unusually large number of mutations" has caused "serious concern."
In a letter to the U.K. secretary of state for international trade, Just Fair and Global Justice Now said the government's refusal to support a TRIPS waiver "is contrary to the U.K.'s obligation to perform its obligations under international human rights treaties in good faith."
"The vast majority of the international community has settled upon the TRIPS waiver as a necessary aspect of international cooperation to protect the rights to life and health of millions of people across the world," reads the letter, in which the groups said the U.K. is violating Article 28 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 55 and 56 of the United Nations Charter, and Article 2 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), among other treaties, including trade agreements.
From the letter:
Supporting the proposed waiver of TRIPS obligations is consistent with WTO Members' own previous agreements regarding the interpretation and application of TRIPS. In fact, the WTO Agreement explicitly contemplates this possibility of a waiver (WTO Agreement article IX:3(b)). Moreover, there is precedent for a waiver in response to the widespread and uncontrolled outbreak of a disease, in the form of the WTO General Council's decision to implement paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration. The Doha Declaration in respect of public health was adopted by the Ministerial Conference, as a result of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Southern Africa in 2001.
The letter came as more than 130 civil society groups called on the WTO to postpone its ministerial conference, planned for next week, and instead work to urgently approve a TRIPS waiver.
In Canada, signatories including the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Oxfam Canada, and Partners in Health Canada warned the country's minister of international trade that a failure to support a TRIPS waiver could amount to a violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well as international law.
"It would violate the rights of vulnerable residents of Canada to life and security of the person under section 7 of the Canadian Charter and the rights of women, the elderly, persons with disabilities, Indigenous peoples, Black people, other racialized persons, persons experiencing poverty and other groups... that are [disproportionately] affected" by the coronavirus pandemic, the groups wrote.
"Germany can no longer defend a position that enforces vaccine apartheid and which unnecessarily prolongs the pandemic situation worldwide."
The Canadian government could face legal challenges in domestic courts "in co-ordination with similar litigation initiatives in several other countries that have failed to support the proposed waiver," the groups wrote.
The ECCHR filed its letter of claim against the German government on behalf of Ugandan citizens. More than 70% of Germany's population has received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, compared to 8.7% in Uganda.
"It is important that the German government lives up to its extraterritorial human rights obligations and does everything within its power to enable equitable access to the most effective Covid-19 vaccines," said Miriam Saage-Maass, vice legal director at ECCHR. "Germany can no longer defend a position that enforces vaccine apartheid and which unnecessarily prolongs the pandemic situation worldwide."
Under pressure from civil society groups, more than 100 countries including the United States have expressed support for waiving the TRIPS agreement to allow countries in the Global South to develop generic versions of the most effective Covid-19 vaccines. The Canadian advocacy groups noted that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has "repeatedly stated" that the vaccines must be made widely available in all countries, even as his government has persisted in blocking a waiver.
"The consequences of a failure to adopt the TRIPS waiver could be millions of lives," wrote the Canadian groups, "both in those countries that have little or no access to necessary products and technologies" and in the Global North, where people remain vulnerable to new variants of Covid-19.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.