An illustrative image of a person holding a medical syringe and a vaccine vial in front of the AstraZeneca logo on October 21, 2021 in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. (Photo: Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Outrage as AstraZeneca Ditches Pledge Not to Profit From Publicly Funded Vaccine
"AstraZeneca's decision to start profiting from Oxford University's coronavirus vaccine mid-pandemic shows the utter folly of giving away publicly funded science to Big Pharma."
The multinational pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca drew immediate backlash Friday for announcing an end to its pledge not to profit from its publicly funded coronavirus vaccine until the end of the pandemic, which is still killing more than 7,000 people worldwide each day.
"Corporations will always put profits first if you give them control over who lives and who dies."
Developed in partnership with the University of Oxford, the AstraZeneca vaccine was almost entirely financed by taxpayers and charitable trusts, with just around 2% of the money coming from private industry.
Nick Dearden, director of the U.K.-based advocacy group Global Justice Now, said in a statement that "AstraZeneca's decision to start profiting from Oxford University's coronavirus vaccine mid-pandemic shows the utter folly of giving away publicly funded science to Big Pharma."
"The non-profit pledge was never a gift to the world from a benevolent company," said Dearden. "It was the most Oxford could get from a manufacturer playing hardball during a global health emergency. And AstraZeneca has still refused to share the vaccine recipe with the [World Health Organization], which would allow poorer countries to manufacture it for themselves."
"This moment was always going to come--and it's exactly why public health experts have demanded a waiver of intellectual property on Covid-19 vaccines," he continued. "Corporations will always put profits first if you give them control over who lives and who dies."
In a press release on Friday, AstraZeneca said it expects to "progressively transition the vaccine to modest profitability as new orders are received." The company said the shot generated just over $1 billion in revenue in the third quarter.
The Financial Times reported that AstraZeneca's shot will "remain non-profit for developing countries," but the company's contract with the University of Oxford gives it the ability to charge some low-income nations higher prices once it decides the pandemic has ended.
Pascal Soriot, AstraZeneca's CEO, claimed Friday that Covid-19 "is becoming endemic, which means we have to learn to live with it."
According to a recent report by Amnesty International, AstraZeneca has delivered more coronavirus vaccine doses to lower-income countries than its major competitors, including Pfizer and Moderna--both of which reported major vaccine profits in the third quarter. AstraZeneca has also "issued some voluntary licenses to other manufacturers," the humanitarian group observed.
"However," Amnesty noted, "it has refused to openly share its knowledge and technology with WHO initiatives and has opposed" India and South Africa's proposed patent waiver.
Anna Marriott, health policy manager at Oxfam International, said in a statement Friday that AstraZeneca is "breaking its repeated and celebrated public promises of a non-profit vaccine for all countries for the duration of this pandemic and to never to make a profit in any low- and middle-income country from this publicly funded vaccine."
"Broken promises from pharmaceutical corporations and rich country governments have been an enduring theme of this pandemic when it comes to vaccine access," Marriott added. "This is a further example of why the U.K. government can no longer defend the pharmaceutical monopolies driving today's vaccine apartheid."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The multinational pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca drew immediate backlash Friday for announcing an end to its pledge not to profit from its publicly funded coronavirus vaccine until the end of the pandemic, which is still killing more than 7,000 people worldwide each day.
"Corporations will always put profits first if you give them control over who lives and who dies."
Developed in partnership with the University of Oxford, the AstraZeneca vaccine was almost entirely financed by taxpayers and charitable trusts, with just around 2% of the money coming from private industry.
Nick Dearden, director of the U.K.-based advocacy group Global Justice Now, said in a statement that "AstraZeneca's decision to start profiting from Oxford University's coronavirus vaccine mid-pandemic shows the utter folly of giving away publicly funded science to Big Pharma."
"The non-profit pledge was never a gift to the world from a benevolent company," said Dearden. "It was the most Oxford could get from a manufacturer playing hardball during a global health emergency. And AstraZeneca has still refused to share the vaccine recipe with the [World Health Organization], which would allow poorer countries to manufacture it for themselves."
"This moment was always going to come--and it's exactly why public health experts have demanded a waiver of intellectual property on Covid-19 vaccines," he continued. "Corporations will always put profits first if you give them control over who lives and who dies."
In a press release on Friday, AstraZeneca said it expects to "progressively transition the vaccine to modest profitability as new orders are received." The company said the shot generated just over $1 billion in revenue in the third quarter.
The Financial Times reported that AstraZeneca's shot will "remain non-profit for developing countries," but the company's contract with the University of Oxford gives it the ability to charge some low-income nations higher prices once it decides the pandemic has ended.
Pascal Soriot, AstraZeneca's CEO, claimed Friday that Covid-19 "is becoming endemic, which means we have to learn to live with it."
According to a recent report by Amnesty International, AstraZeneca has delivered more coronavirus vaccine doses to lower-income countries than its major competitors, including Pfizer and Moderna--both of which reported major vaccine profits in the third quarter. AstraZeneca has also "issued some voluntary licenses to other manufacturers," the humanitarian group observed.
"However," Amnesty noted, "it has refused to openly share its knowledge and technology with WHO initiatives and has opposed" India and South Africa's proposed patent waiver.
Anna Marriott, health policy manager at Oxfam International, said in a statement Friday that AstraZeneca is "breaking its repeated and celebrated public promises of a non-profit vaccine for all countries for the duration of this pandemic and to never to make a profit in any low- and middle-income country from this publicly funded vaccine."
"Broken promises from pharmaceutical corporations and rich country governments have been an enduring theme of this pandemic when it comes to vaccine access," Marriott added. "This is a further example of why the U.K. government can no longer defend the pharmaceutical monopolies driving today's vaccine apartheid."
The multinational pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca drew immediate backlash Friday for announcing an end to its pledge not to profit from its publicly funded coronavirus vaccine until the end of the pandemic, which is still killing more than 7,000 people worldwide each day.
"Corporations will always put profits first if you give them control over who lives and who dies."
Developed in partnership with the University of Oxford, the AstraZeneca vaccine was almost entirely financed by taxpayers and charitable trusts, with just around 2% of the money coming from private industry.
Nick Dearden, director of the U.K.-based advocacy group Global Justice Now, said in a statement that "AstraZeneca's decision to start profiting from Oxford University's coronavirus vaccine mid-pandemic shows the utter folly of giving away publicly funded science to Big Pharma."
"The non-profit pledge was never a gift to the world from a benevolent company," said Dearden. "It was the most Oxford could get from a manufacturer playing hardball during a global health emergency. And AstraZeneca has still refused to share the vaccine recipe with the [World Health Organization], which would allow poorer countries to manufacture it for themselves."
"This moment was always going to come--and it's exactly why public health experts have demanded a waiver of intellectual property on Covid-19 vaccines," he continued. "Corporations will always put profits first if you give them control over who lives and who dies."
In a press release on Friday, AstraZeneca said it expects to "progressively transition the vaccine to modest profitability as new orders are received." The company said the shot generated just over $1 billion in revenue in the third quarter.
The Financial Times reported that AstraZeneca's shot will "remain non-profit for developing countries," but the company's contract with the University of Oxford gives it the ability to charge some low-income nations higher prices once it decides the pandemic has ended.
Pascal Soriot, AstraZeneca's CEO, claimed Friday that Covid-19 "is becoming endemic, which means we have to learn to live with it."
According to a recent report by Amnesty International, AstraZeneca has delivered more coronavirus vaccine doses to lower-income countries than its major competitors, including Pfizer and Moderna--both of which reported major vaccine profits in the third quarter. AstraZeneca has also "issued some voluntary licenses to other manufacturers," the humanitarian group observed.
"However," Amnesty noted, "it has refused to openly share its knowledge and technology with WHO initiatives and has opposed" India and South Africa's proposed patent waiver.
Anna Marriott, health policy manager at Oxfam International, said in a statement Friday that AstraZeneca is "breaking its repeated and celebrated public promises of a non-profit vaccine for all countries for the duration of this pandemic and to never to make a profit in any low- and middle-income country from this publicly funded vaccine."
"Broken promises from pharmaceutical corporations and rich country governments have been an enduring theme of this pandemic when it comes to vaccine access," Marriott added. "This is a further example of why the U.K. government can no longer defend the pharmaceutical monopolies driving today's vaccine apartheid."