SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
National Geographic Explorer-at-Large Sylvia Earle attends the National Geographic Awards on June 12, 2019, at Lisner Auditorium in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Paul Morigi/Getty Images for National Geographic)
Renowned oceanographer Sylvia Earle is calling for world leaders at the United Nations climate summit to support a ban on industrial fishing in international waters to "safeguard the blue heart of the planet."
"We must protect nature as if our lives depend on it."
"All of that wildlife taken out of the ocean not only affects biodiversity and fosters extinctions at an accelerated rate. It breaks the carbon cycle--the nutrient chain that maintains the fabric of life on Earth," said Earle, who was at COP26 this week, The Guardian reported Wednesday.
The deep-sea researcher said tackling the issue of overfishing is as important to the climate crisis as curbing fossil fuel emissions. A industrial fishing ban, said Earle, would help protect oceans "in a stroke."
\u201cYou can't address climate change without taking care of the ocean.\u201d— Sylvia A. Earle (@Sylvia A. Earle) 1634615619
Due to poor management and regulation, overfishing occurs when fish species are removed from the ocean at such high rates they become too depleted to recover, destroying fish populations around the world. Commercial fishing also employs tactics that perpetuate unnecessary waste, when massive amounts of unwanted fish and animals are caught in nets and then discarded.
According to a 2018 report by the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, a third of commercial fish populations are being harvested at biologically unsustainable levels and the world's fisheries are in deep trouble.
While three billion people worldwide rely on wild-caught or farmed seafood as a food source, Earle noted that just five nations were "benefiting disproportionately on an industrial scale from the wild animals that live [in international waters]," for means of profit. Earle argued that the coastal communities who survived on fishing could do so within national waters.
Eighty-six-year-old Earle, president of Mission Blue, an organization that aims to establish marine protected areas (MPAs), welcomed COP26's "30x30" initiative to secure at least 30% of world's oceans by 2030, but says the proposal does not go far enough.
"We must protect nature as if our lives depend on it," she said. "Achieving 30% of full protection for land and sea... doesn't mean we can trash the rest."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Renowned oceanographer Sylvia Earle is calling for world leaders at the United Nations climate summit to support a ban on industrial fishing in international waters to "safeguard the blue heart of the planet."
"We must protect nature as if our lives depend on it."
"All of that wildlife taken out of the ocean not only affects biodiversity and fosters extinctions at an accelerated rate. It breaks the carbon cycle--the nutrient chain that maintains the fabric of life on Earth," said Earle, who was at COP26 this week, The Guardian reported Wednesday.
The deep-sea researcher said tackling the issue of overfishing is as important to the climate crisis as curbing fossil fuel emissions. A industrial fishing ban, said Earle, would help protect oceans "in a stroke."
\u201cYou can't address climate change without taking care of the ocean.\u201d— Sylvia A. Earle (@Sylvia A. Earle) 1634615619
Due to poor management and regulation, overfishing occurs when fish species are removed from the ocean at such high rates they become too depleted to recover, destroying fish populations around the world. Commercial fishing also employs tactics that perpetuate unnecessary waste, when massive amounts of unwanted fish and animals are caught in nets and then discarded.
According to a 2018 report by the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, a third of commercial fish populations are being harvested at biologically unsustainable levels and the world's fisheries are in deep trouble.
While three billion people worldwide rely on wild-caught or farmed seafood as a food source, Earle noted that just five nations were "benefiting disproportionately on an industrial scale from the wild animals that live [in international waters]," for means of profit. Earle argued that the coastal communities who survived on fishing could do so within national waters.
Eighty-six-year-old Earle, president of Mission Blue, an organization that aims to establish marine protected areas (MPAs), welcomed COP26's "30x30" initiative to secure at least 30% of world's oceans by 2030, but says the proposal does not go far enough.
"We must protect nature as if our lives depend on it," she said. "Achieving 30% of full protection for land and sea... doesn't mean we can trash the rest."
Renowned oceanographer Sylvia Earle is calling for world leaders at the United Nations climate summit to support a ban on industrial fishing in international waters to "safeguard the blue heart of the planet."
"We must protect nature as if our lives depend on it."
"All of that wildlife taken out of the ocean not only affects biodiversity and fosters extinctions at an accelerated rate. It breaks the carbon cycle--the nutrient chain that maintains the fabric of life on Earth," said Earle, who was at COP26 this week, The Guardian reported Wednesday.
The deep-sea researcher said tackling the issue of overfishing is as important to the climate crisis as curbing fossil fuel emissions. A industrial fishing ban, said Earle, would help protect oceans "in a stroke."
\u201cYou can't address climate change without taking care of the ocean.\u201d— Sylvia A. Earle (@Sylvia A. Earle) 1634615619
Due to poor management and regulation, overfishing occurs when fish species are removed from the ocean at such high rates they become too depleted to recover, destroying fish populations around the world. Commercial fishing also employs tactics that perpetuate unnecessary waste, when massive amounts of unwanted fish and animals are caught in nets and then discarded.
According to a 2018 report by the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, a third of commercial fish populations are being harvested at biologically unsustainable levels and the world's fisheries are in deep trouble.
While three billion people worldwide rely on wild-caught or farmed seafood as a food source, Earle noted that just five nations were "benefiting disproportionately on an industrial scale from the wild animals that live [in international waters]," for means of profit. Earle argued that the coastal communities who survived on fishing could do so within national waters.
Eighty-six-year-old Earle, president of Mission Blue, an organization that aims to establish marine protected areas (MPAs), welcomed COP26's "30x30" initiative to secure at least 30% of world's oceans by 2030, but says the proposal does not go far enough.
"We must protect nature as if our lives depend on it," she said. "Achieving 30% of full protection for land and sea... doesn't mean we can trash the rest."