SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A Chinese laborer loads coal into a furnace as smoke and steam rises from an unauthorized steel factory on November 3, 2016 in Inner Mongolia, China. (Photo: Kevin Frayer/Getty Images)
A major new investigation from the Washington Post has found "a giant gap" between the greenhouse gas emissions nations are reporting to the United Nations and what their planet-heating emissions actually are.
Published Sunday, the investigation is being heralded as "a must-read story" based on "amazing" and "incredibly helpful" reporting.
The Post team assessed 196 countries' emissions data for 2019, plugging in information for the 45 countries that submitted reports to the U.N. that year and making projections for the others.
Comparing that data with independent global emissions measurements, the Post found there was at least 8.4 billion tons and as much as 13.3 billion tons in underreported emissions. Carbon dioxide made up the majority of the gap, with methane following. Nitrous oxide and fluorinated gases, sometimes known as f-gases, accounted for smaller portions of the gap.
Pointing to the ongoing COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland, the reporting notes that "the numbers they are using to help guide the world's effort to curb greenhouse gases represent a flawed road map" and that the challenge of reigning in emissions "is even larger than world leaders have acknowledged."
Flaws in the emissions reporting methods have been previously acknowledged, the Post noted, attributing the gap to "questionably drawn rules, incomplete reporting in some countries, and apparently willful mistakes in others--and the fact that in some cases, humanity's full impacts on the planet are not even required to be reported."
A key factor in the under-reporting, according to the investigation, are nations' dodgy figures on CO2 emissions from land use, like doubtful numbers on how much carbon forests are able to absorb, and thus how much countries can subtract from their reported emissions.
As a prime example, the Post used the palm oil industry in Malaysia, a country that most recently submitted its emissions figures in 2016. In a likely exaggeration, the country claimed its forests were sinking over 243 million tons of carbon, "slashing 73 percent of emissions from its bottom line."
In a Monday tweet sharing the Post's investigation, the Washington, D.C. branch of climate group Extinction Rebellion accused politicians of "fudg[ing] the numbers."
"When will the lying, the deception, the false promises stop?" the group tweeted. "Only systemic change at a scale and speed unprecedented in human history can get us out of this mess."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A major new investigation from the Washington Post has found "a giant gap" between the greenhouse gas emissions nations are reporting to the United Nations and what their planet-heating emissions actually are.
Published Sunday, the investigation is being heralded as "a must-read story" based on "amazing" and "incredibly helpful" reporting.
The Post team assessed 196 countries' emissions data for 2019, plugging in information for the 45 countries that submitted reports to the U.N. that year and making projections for the others.
Comparing that data with independent global emissions measurements, the Post found there was at least 8.4 billion tons and as much as 13.3 billion tons in underreported emissions. Carbon dioxide made up the majority of the gap, with methane following. Nitrous oxide and fluorinated gases, sometimes known as f-gases, accounted for smaller portions of the gap.
Pointing to the ongoing COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland, the reporting notes that "the numbers they are using to help guide the world's effort to curb greenhouse gases represent a flawed road map" and that the challenge of reigning in emissions "is even larger than world leaders have acknowledged."
Flaws in the emissions reporting methods have been previously acknowledged, the Post noted, attributing the gap to "questionably drawn rules, incomplete reporting in some countries, and apparently willful mistakes in others--and the fact that in some cases, humanity's full impacts on the planet are not even required to be reported."
A key factor in the under-reporting, according to the investigation, are nations' dodgy figures on CO2 emissions from land use, like doubtful numbers on how much carbon forests are able to absorb, and thus how much countries can subtract from their reported emissions.
As a prime example, the Post used the palm oil industry in Malaysia, a country that most recently submitted its emissions figures in 2016. In a likely exaggeration, the country claimed its forests were sinking over 243 million tons of carbon, "slashing 73 percent of emissions from its bottom line."
In a Monday tweet sharing the Post's investigation, the Washington, D.C. branch of climate group Extinction Rebellion accused politicians of "fudg[ing] the numbers."
"When will the lying, the deception, the false promises stop?" the group tweeted. "Only systemic change at a scale and speed unprecedented in human history can get us out of this mess."
A major new investigation from the Washington Post has found "a giant gap" between the greenhouse gas emissions nations are reporting to the United Nations and what their planet-heating emissions actually are.
Published Sunday, the investigation is being heralded as "a must-read story" based on "amazing" and "incredibly helpful" reporting.
The Post team assessed 196 countries' emissions data for 2019, plugging in information for the 45 countries that submitted reports to the U.N. that year and making projections for the others.
Comparing that data with independent global emissions measurements, the Post found there was at least 8.4 billion tons and as much as 13.3 billion tons in underreported emissions. Carbon dioxide made up the majority of the gap, with methane following. Nitrous oxide and fluorinated gases, sometimes known as f-gases, accounted for smaller portions of the gap.
Pointing to the ongoing COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland, the reporting notes that "the numbers they are using to help guide the world's effort to curb greenhouse gases represent a flawed road map" and that the challenge of reigning in emissions "is even larger than world leaders have acknowledged."
Flaws in the emissions reporting methods have been previously acknowledged, the Post noted, attributing the gap to "questionably drawn rules, incomplete reporting in some countries, and apparently willful mistakes in others--and the fact that in some cases, humanity's full impacts on the planet are not even required to be reported."
A key factor in the under-reporting, according to the investigation, are nations' dodgy figures on CO2 emissions from land use, like doubtful numbers on how much carbon forests are able to absorb, and thus how much countries can subtract from their reported emissions.
As a prime example, the Post used the palm oil industry in Malaysia, a country that most recently submitted its emissions figures in 2016. In a likely exaggeration, the country claimed its forests were sinking over 243 million tons of carbon, "slashing 73 percent of emissions from its bottom line."
In a Monday tweet sharing the Post's investigation, the Washington, D.C. branch of climate group Extinction Rebellion accused politicians of "fudg[ing] the numbers."
"When will the lying, the deception, the false promises stop?" the group tweeted. "Only systemic change at a scale and speed unprecedented in human history can get us out of this mess."