An image from the HowToStopFacebook.org campaign, which is calling for a data privacy law "strong enough to end Facebook's current business model."
New 'Stop Facebook' Campaign Demands Ban on Data Harvesting and Corporate Surveillance
"Facebook's surveillance capitalist business model is fundamentally incompatible with basic human rights."
A new campaign is calling for federal action to "shut down Facebook's surveillance machine" including passing legislation to ensure strong data privacy protections.
"The best way to stop Facebook's harms for the whole world is to cut off the fuel supply for its dangerous machine," says the How to Stop Facebook campaign, launched Wednesday by a diverse coalition of over 40 organizations.
"The best way to stop Facebook's harms for the whole world is to cut off the fuel supply for its dangerous machine."
The campaign argues that the fuel driving Facebook's business model is the trove of user data the company amasses to power algorithms that generate ad revenue and corporate profits.
"The problem with companies like Facebook and YouTube is not that they host user-generated content, it's that they use surveillance-driven algorithms to pick and choose what content goes viral and what content no one sees, in order to keep us all on the platform clicking and scrolling to maximize advertising revenue," said Fight for the Future director Evan Greer.
Along with Fight for the Future, other groups behind the campaign include Win Without War, Media Justice, Public Knowledge, and United We Dream.
The campaign points to the recent revelations from Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen, who told senators earlier this month that the company's algorithms are dangerous and that "Facebook became a $1 trillion company by paying for its profits with our safety, including the safety of our children."
According to Sara Collins, policy counsel at Public Knowledge, "The harms described by Ms. Haugen are fueled by unrestrained data collection and data use."
A petition linked to the campaign lays out a number of recommendations:
Congress must pass strong data privacy legislation, and the FTC should move forward with rule making that prohibits companies from collecting, purchasing, or otherwise acquiring user information beyond what is needed to provide the service requested by the user, and from using this information for another purpose or to transfer it to another company without the user's explicit, opt-in consent. There should also be clear guardrails around what companies can do. People shouldn't have to pay more if they assert their privacy rights, using a service shouldn't be conditioned on turning over personal information that is not necessary, and technology companies should not be able to discriminate against people in ways that would be illegal in the physical world or that undermine the intent of existing civil rights laws.
A further recommendation is for lawmakers to use their subpoena power and begin a full investigation into "Facebook's harms."
As Myaisha Hayes, campaign strategies director of Media Justice, sees it, the need to address the sweeping harms is urgent.
"Facebook's surveillance capitalist business model is fundamentally incompatible with basic human rights," she said, "and disproportionately harms Black and brown communities by silencing our voices while artificially amplifying racist and harmful content."
The company's "surveillance machine," she added, "is putting our communities and our democracy in danger. It's time for lawmakers to cut off their fuel supply by passing a strong data privacy law."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
A new campaign is calling for federal action to "shut down Facebook's surveillance machine" including passing legislation to ensure strong data privacy protections.
"The best way to stop Facebook's harms for the whole world is to cut off the fuel supply for its dangerous machine," says the How to Stop Facebook campaign, launched Wednesday by a diverse coalition of over 40 organizations.
"The best way to stop Facebook's harms for the whole world is to cut off the fuel supply for its dangerous machine."
The campaign argues that the fuel driving Facebook's business model is the trove of user data the company amasses to power algorithms that generate ad revenue and corporate profits.
"The problem with companies like Facebook and YouTube is not that they host user-generated content, it's that they use surveillance-driven algorithms to pick and choose what content goes viral and what content no one sees, in order to keep us all on the platform clicking and scrolling to maximize advertising revenue," said Fight for the Future director Evan Greer.
Along with Fight for the Future, other groups behind the campaign include Win Without War, Media Justice, Public Knowledge, and United We Dream.
The campaign points to the recent revelations from Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen, who told senators earlier this month that the company's algorithms are dangerous and that "Facebook became a $1 trillion company by paying for its profits with our safety, including the safety of our children."
According to Sara Collins, policy counsel at Public Knowledge, "The harms described by Ms. Haugen are fueled by unrestrained data collection and data use."
A petition linked to the campaign lays out a number of recommendations:
Congress must pass strong data privacy legislation, and the FTC should move forward with rule making that prohibits companies from collecting, purchasing, or otherwise acquiring user information beyond what is needed to provide the service requested by the user, and from using this information for another purpose or to transfer it to another company without the user's explicit, opt-in consent. There should also be clear guardrails around what companies can do. People shouldn't have to pay more if they assert their privacy rights, using a service shouldn't be conditioned on turning over personal information that is not necessary, and technology companies should not be able to discriminate against people in ways that would be illegal in the physical world or that undermine the intent of existing civil rights laws.
A further recommendation is for lawmakers to use their subpoena power and begin a full investigation into "Facebook's harms."
As Myaisha Hayes, campaign strategies director of Media Justice, sees it, the need to address the sweeping harms is urgent.
"Facebook's surveillance capitalist business model is fundamentally incompatible with basic human rights," she said, "and disproportionately harms Black and brown communities by silencing our voices while artificially amplifying racist and harmful content."
The company's "surveillance machine," she added, "is putting our communities and our democracy in danger. It's time for lawmakers to cut off their fuel supply by passing a strong data privacy law."
A new campaign is calling for federal action to "shut down Facebook's surveillance machine" including passing legislation to ensure strong data privacy protections.
"The best way to stop Facebook's harms for the whole world is to cut off the fuel supply for its dangerous machine," says the How to Stop Facebook campaign, launched Wednesday by a diverse coalition of over 40 organizations.
"The best way to stop Facebook's harms for the whole world is to cut off the fuel supply for its dangerous machine."
The campaign argues that the fuel driving Facebook's business model is the trove of user data the company amasses to power algorithms that generate ad revenue and corporate profits.
"The problem with companies like Facebook and YouTube is not that they host user-generated content, it's that they use surveillance-driven algorithms to pick and choose what content goes viral and what content no one sees, in order to keep us all on the platform clicking and scrolling to maximize advertising revenue," said Fight for the Future director Evan Greer.
Along with Fight for the Future, other groups behind the campaign include Win Without War, Media Justice, Public Knowledge, and United We Dream.
The campaign points to the recent revelations from Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen, who told senators earlier this month that the company's algorithms are dangerous and that "Facebook became a $1 trillion company by paying for its profits with our safety, including the safety of our children."
According to Sara Collins, policy counsel at Public Knowledge, "The harms described by Ms. Haugen are fueled by unrestrained data collection and data use."
A petition linked to the campaign lays out a number of recommendations:
Congress must pass strong data privacy legislation, and the FTC should move forward with rule making that prohibits companies from collecting, purchasing, or otherwise acquiring user information beyond what is needed to provide the service requested by the user, and from using this information for another purpose or to transfer it to another company without the user's explicit, opt-in consent. There should also be clear guardrails around what companies can do. People shouldn't have to pay more if they assert their privacy rights, using a service shouldn't be conditioned on turning over personal information that is not necessary, and technology companies should not be able to discriminate against people in ways that would be illegal in the physical world or that undermine the intent of existing civil rights laws.
A further recommendation is for lawmakers to use their subpoena power and begin a full investigation into "Facebook's harms."
As Myaisha Hayes, campaign strategies director of Media Justice, sees it, the need to address the sweeping harms is urgent.
"Facebook's surveillance capitalist business model is fundamentally incompatible with basic human rights," she said, "and disproportionately harms Black and brown communities by silencing our voices while artificially amplifying racist and harmful content."
The company's "surveillance machine," she added, "is putting our communities and our democracy in danger. It's time for lawmakers to cut off their fuel supply by passing a strong data privacy law."