Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Dear Common Dreams Readers:
Corporations and billionaires have their own media. Shouldn't we? When you “follow the money” that funds our independent journalism, it all leads back to this: people like you. Our supporters are what allows us to produce journalism in the public interest that is beholden only to people, our planet, and the common good. Please support our Mid-Year Campaign so that we always have a newsroom for the people that is funded by the people. Thank you for your support. --Jon Queally, managing editor

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal speaks at a rally

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) speaks at a "Go Bigger on Climate, Care, and Justice" rally on July 20, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Shannon Finney/Getty Images for Green New Deal Network)

'No Flexibility on the Price Tag,' Jayapal Says of $3.5 Trillion Bill

"If we don't deliver, then I think all of the people who came out and voted for Democrats to take control of the House, the Senate, and the White House are going to come out and say, 'that's it.'"

Jake Johnson

The leader of the nearly 100-member Congressional Progressive Caucus made clear Tuesday that she's not willing to accept cuts to Democrats' $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation proposal, a sweeping climate and social spending package that conservative members of the party are currently attempting to scale back.

"There is no flexibility on the price tag, and it's not because I care about what the top line is," Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the chair of the CPC, told the Washington Post. "It's because I care about delivering on these benefits."

Jayapal went on to warn that approving a watered-down version of the popular proposal—which includes Medicare expansion, paid family and medical leave, immigration reform, and major investments in green energy—could have disastrous electoral consequences for Democrats, who are clinging to vanishingly narrow majorities in the House and Senate ahead of the 2022 midterms.

According to a recent USA Today/Suffolk University survey, 52% of U.S. voters overall and 90% of Democrats support the $3.5 trillion package, which lawmakers are racing to complete by next month as deadly extreme weather across the U.S. lays bare the need for ambitious climate action.

"If we don't deliver," Jayapal said, "then I think all of the people who came out and voted for Democrats to take control of the House, the Senate, and the White House are going to come out and say, 'that's it.'"

Progressives in Congress believe they have the leverage to ensure that their major priorities are not stripped from the final reconciliation package to appease conservative Democrats, who are griping about the bill's $3.5 trillion price tag without offering an alternative or specifically detailing which provisions they would like to cut.

For weeks, members of the CPC have promised to vote against a $550 billion bipartisan infrastructure bill backed by conservative Democrats unless a reconciliation package containing progressive priorities is approved at the same time—a position that Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) reiterated Tuesday.

"The commitment on this strategy to move both of these pieces simultaneously still remains," Omar, the CPC whip, told Roll Call.

Democratic committee leaders currently are rushing to finalize the details of the far-reaching reconciliation package before September 27, the date on which House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) agreed to bring the bipartisan infrastructure bill up for a floor vote.

Asked about Sen. Joe Manchin's (D-W.Va.) call last week for a "strategic pause" on the reconciliation package, Pelosi said Tuesday, "Obviously, I don't agree."

"The number is the number: $3.5 [trillion]," Pelosi added. "We're going to pay for as much of it as possible. It'll have far less impact on the national debt than Republicans' 2017 tax scam."

A large majority of that tax giveaway went to the richest 1%, noted Pelosi, and "it added $2 trillion to the national debt."

Intraparty haggling over the final price tag of the reconciliation package comes as powerful corporations from a variety of industries—such as pharmaceuticals to fossil fuels—are mobilizing their vast resources in an effort to defeat the proposal, which is expected to include tax hikes on big businesses and wealthy individuals.

"These guys don't lose," Sanders (I-Vt.), the chair of the Senate Budget Committee and leading architect of the $3.5 trillion measure, told the Post earlier this summer when asked about the corporate lobbying blitz. "They're going to lose this round."

During five Labor Day town halls in his home state of Vermont on Monday, Sanders touted the reconciliation package as a necessity for "working families all over this country and to those of us who believe we have to act boldly on climate change."

"We've got California on fire," said the Vermont senator. "In Vermont, 3,000 miles away from Oregon, we're breathing the air, the smoke from those fires. Unbelievable."

Speaking to 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben at an event in Middlebury, Sanders stressed that the reconciliation package is "immensely popular, especially among working people," and said it's no surprise that corporations are aiming to tank the bill.

"The big-money interests are going to be hit on this bill," Sanders continued. "They're going to be asked to pay more in taxes. We're going to move away from fossil fuel. We're going to take on the pharmaceutical industry, the healthcare industry. Of course they are going to do everything they can to defeat it."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Just a few days left in our crucial Mid-Year Campaign and we might not make it without your help.
Who funds our independent journalism? Readers like you who believe in our mission: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. No corporate advertisers. No billionaire founder. Our non-partisan, nonprofit media model has only one source of revenue: The people who read and value this work and our mission. That's it.
And the model is simple: If everyone just gives whatever amount they can afford and think is reasonable—$3, $9, $29, or more—we can continue. If not enough do, we go dark.

All the small gifts add up to something otherwise impossible. Please join us today. Donate to Common Dreams. This is crunch time. We need you now.

'Witness Intimidation. Clear as Day': Jan. 6 Panel Teases Evidence of Cover-Up Effort

"Add witness tampering to the laundry list of crimes Trump and his allies must be charged with," said professor Robert Reich.

Jessica Corbett ·


'Bombshell After Bombshell' Dropped as Jan. 6 Testimony Homes In On Trump Guilt

"Hutchinson's testimony of the deeply detailed plans of January 6 and the inaction of those in the White House in response to the violence show just how close we came to a coup," said one pro-democracy organizer.

Brett Wilkins ·


Mark Meadows 'Did Seek That Pardon, Yes Ma'am,' Hutchinson Testifies

The former aide confirmed that attorney Rudy Giuliani also sought a presidential pardon related to the January 6 attack.

Jessica Corbett ·


UN Chief Warns of 'Ocean Emergency' as Leaders Confront Biodiversity Loss, Pollution

"We must turn the tide," said Secretary-General António Guterres. "A healthy and productive ocean is vital to our shared future."

Julia Conley ·


'I Don't F—ing Care That They Have Weapons': Trump Wanted Security to Let Armed Supporters March on Capitol

"They're not here to hurt me," Trump said on the day of the January 6 insurrection, testified a former aide to ex-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.

Jake Johnson ·

Common Dreams Logo