Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

The construction of then-U.S. President Donald Trump's wall along the United States-Mexico border imperils endangered species like the Sonoran pronghorn and desert bighorn sheep, which routinely move between the two countries, including through a section of fence viewed on March 27, 2017 in Sonoyta, a town in the northern Mexican state of Sonora. (Photo: Pedro Pardo/AFP via Getty Images)

The construction of then-U.S. President Donald Trump's wall along the United States-Mexico border imperils endangered species like the Sonoran pronghorn and desert bighorn sheep, which routinely move between the two countries, including through a section of fence viewed on March 27, 2017 in Sonoyta, a town in the northern Mexican state of Sonora. (Photo: Pedro Pardo/AFP via Getty Images)

Court Ruling on US Border Militarization Called 'Win for Wildlife'

"This is a win for wildlife and communities along the border, where the government has behaved as if the laws don't apply," said one environmental lawyer.

Kenny Stancil

Social and environmental justice advocates welcomed a federal judge's ruling Monday that two U.S. agencies broke the law by not conducting an analysis of potential ecological harms associated with increased militarization along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Monday's ruling (pdf) found that officials at both the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to prepare an updated and detailed environmental impact statement for the U.S.-Mexico border enforcement program.

The court's decision stems from a 2017 lawsuit filed by U.S. Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.) and the Center for Biological Diversity.

"This is a win for wildlife and communities along the border, where the government has behaved as if the laws don't apply," Brian Segee, endangered species legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity, said in response to the court's decision. "This victory follows years of federal officials neglecting the environment and the health and well-being of borderland communities."

While DHS and CBP officials argued that enforcement along the U.S.-Mexico border had not changed in the two decades since the agencies last submitted an environmental impact statement, the judge wrote that there are numerous "examples of expanding federal action in the form of border enforcement activity."

The Center for Biological Diversity noted Monday in a statement that the 2001 review, which "was supposed to be updated every five years, but never has been... identified potential harm from border wall construction and other enforcement operations to wildlife and endangered species across four states from the Pacific Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico."

"We hope the Biden administration takes a long overdue look at the wanton environmental destruction from border militarization."
—Brian Segee, Center for Biological Diversity

According to the Center, U.S. security operations along the southern border have escalated over the past 20 years, including "off-road vehicle patrols, installation of high-intensity lighting, construction of base camps and checkpoints, wall construction, and other activities."

Under the Trump administration, the group noted, federal agencies also "ramped up wall construction by waiving dozens of laws protecting the environment, public health, and safety."

"Also since 2001, scientific understanding has advanced significantly regarding the potential harm from border walls and other border enforcement activities on wildlife and endangered species, including jaguars, ocelots, Mexican gray wolves, and cactus ferruginous pygmy owls," the organization said.

Furthermore, "beyond jeopardizing wildlife, endangered species, and public lands, ongoing border militarization damages human rights, civil liberties, native lands, local businesses, and international relations," added the Center. "Border militarization and the border wall impede the natural migrations of people and wildlife that are essential to healthy diversity."

Although the court ruled that federal officials did not violate the Endangered Species Act, the judge wrote that there were "undisputed statements of fact which demonstrate that there was a large number of new or revised critical habitat designations for threatened or endangered species within the southern border enforcement corridor since 2001."

Those designations by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the judge added, "constitute triggering events for which Defendants should have contemporaneously considered and evaluated the need for supplemental environmental analysis."

In response, Segee of the Center for Biological Diversity said that "we're disappointed the court stopped short of ordering a new environmental impact statement, but we hope the Biden administration takes a long overdue look at the wanton environmental destruction from border militarization."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Biden Decries 'Outrageous' Treatment of Haitians at Border—But Keeps Deporting Them

"I'm glad to see President Biden speak out about the mistreatment of Haitian asylum-seekers. But his administration's use of Title 42 to deny them the right to make an asylum claim is a much bigger issue."

Jessica Corbett ·


Global Peace Activists Warn of Dangers of US-Led Anti-China Pacts

"No to military alliances and preparation for catastrophic wars," anti-war campaigners from over a dozen nations write in a letter decrying the new AUKUS agreement. "Yes to peace, disarmament, justice, and the climate."

Brett Wilkins ·


PG&E Charged With 11 Felony Counts—Including Manslaughter—Over 2020 Zogg Fire

"PG&E has a history with a repeated pattern of causing wildfires that is not getting better," said Shasta County District Attorney Stephanie Bridgett. "It's only getting worse."

Brett Wilkins ·


'Hold My Pearls': Debbie Dingell Lets Marjorie Taylor Green Have It Over Abortion Rights

The Michigan Democrat engaged in a verbal altercation with the far-right Republican lawmaker from Georgia on the steps of the U.S. Capitol Building.

Jon Queally ·


Dems Who Opposed Pentagon Cuts Received Nearly 4x More Donations From Weapons Makers

The latest passage of the NDAA "is particularly strong evidence that Pentagon contractors' interests easily take precedence over national security and the public interest for too many members of Congress," said one critic.

Kenny Stancil ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.


Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo