SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Union leaders are joined by community group representatives, elected officials, and social activists for a rally in support of unionization efforts by Amazon workers in Alabama on March 21, 2021 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo: Frederic J. Brown/AFP via Getty Images)
An official at the National Labor Relations Board on Monday formally recommended tossing out the results of a closely watched union election at Amazon's warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama, potentially giving workers there a chance to hold another vote as the e-commerce giant faces accusations of unlawful misconduct.
"We support the hearing officer's recommendation that the NLRB set aside the election results and direct a new election."
--Stuart Appelbaum, RWDSU
The recommendation by NLRB hearing officer Kerstin Meyers has yet to be released to the public, but the Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union (RWDSU)--which led the unionization drive at the Bessemer warehouse--said the official concluded that "Amazon violated labor law" and that a second election should be held. (Update: here is Meyers' recommendation.)
An NLRB regional director will now review the decision and determine whether to adopt Meyers' recommendation--a process that could take weeks. Amazon has already vowed to appeal to ensure that the results of the first election are upheld.
Stuart Appelbaum, president of the RWDSU, said in a statement that "throughout the NLRB hearing, we heard compelling evidence of how Amazon tried to illegally interfere with and intimidate workers as they sought to exercise their right to form a union."
Following Bessemer workers' overwhelming April vote against unionizing, RWDSU lodged nearly two dozen complaints with the NLRB alleging that Amazon illegally threatened employees with loss of pay and benefits, installed and surveilled an unlawful ballot collection box, and singled out and removed pro-union workers from so-called "captive audience" meetings during which management argued against unionization.
"We support the hearing officer's recommendation that the NLRB set aside the election results and direct a new election," Appelbaum said Monday. "The question of whether or not to have a union is supposed to be the workers' decision and not the employer's. Amazon's behavior throughout the election process was despicable. Amazon cheated, they got caught, and they are being held accountable."
The long-shot effort to unionize roughly 6,000 Bessemer workers in the face of Amazon's relentless intimidation campaign drew national attention--including from President Joe Biden--as observers saw the election as a potential bellwether for the U.S. labor movement.
"This is happening in the toughest state, with the toughest company, at the toughest moment," Janice Fine, a professor of labor studies at Rutgers University, said earlier this year. "If the union can prevail given those three facts, it will send a message that Amazon is organizable everywhere."
This post has been updated to correct the spelling of Kerstin Meyers.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
An official at the National Labor Relations Board on Monday formally recommended tossing out the results of a closely watched union election at Amazon's warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama, potentially giving workers there a chance to hold another vote as the e-commerce giant faces accusations of unlawful misconduct.
"We support the hearing officer's recommendation that the NLRB set aside the election results and direct a new election."
--Stuart Appelbaum, RWDSU
The recommendation by NLRB hearing officer Kerstin Meyers has yet to be released to the public, but the Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union (RWDSU)--which led the unionization drive at the Bessemer warehouse--said the official concluded that "Amazon violated labor law" and that a second election should be held. (Update: here is Meyers' recommendation.)
An NLRB regional director will now review the decision and determine whether to adopt Meyers' recommendation--a process that could take weeks. Amazon has already vowed to appeal to ensure that the results of the first election are upheld.
Stuart Appelbaum, president of the RWDSU, said in a statement that "throughout the NLRB hearing, we heard compelling evidence of how Amazon tried to illegally interfere with and intimidate workers as they sought to exercise their right to form a union."
Following Bessemer workers' overwhelming April vote against unionizing, RWDSU lodged nearly two dozen complaints with the NLRB alleging that Amazon illegally threatened employees with loss of pay and benefits, installed and surveilled an unlawful ballot collection box, and singled out and removed pro-union workers from so-called "captive audience" meetings during which management argued against unionization.
"We support the hearing officer's recommendation that the NLRB set aside the election results and direct a new election," Appelbaum said Monday. "The question of whether or not to have a union is supposed to be the workers' decision and not the employer's. Amazon's behavior throughout the election process was despicable. Amazon cheated, they got caught, and they are being held accountable."
The long-shot effort to unionize roughly 6,000 Bessemer workers in the face of Amazon's relentless intimidation campaign drew national attention--including from President Joe Biden--as observers saw the election as a potential bellwether for the U.S. labor movement.
"This is happening in the toughest state, with the toughest company, at the toughest moment," Janice Fine, a professor of labor studies at Rutgers University, said earlier this year. "If the union can prevail given those three facts, it will send a message that Amazon is organizable everywhere."
This post has been updated to correct the spelling of Kerstin Meyers.
An official at the National Labor Relations Board on Monday formally recommended tossing out the results of a closely watched union election at Amazon's warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama, potentially giving workers there a chance to hold another vote as the e-commerce giant faces accusations of unlawful misconduct.
"We support the hearing officer's recommendation that the NLRB set aside the election results and direct a new election."
--Stuart Appelbaum, RWDSU
The recommendation by NLRB hearing officer Kerstin Meyers has yet to be released to the public, but the Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union (RWDSU)--which led the unionization drive at the Bessemer warehouse--said the official concluded that "Amazon violated labor law" and that a second election should be held. (Update: here is Meyers' recommendation.)
An NLRB regional director will now review the decision and determine whether to adopt Meyers' recommendation--a process that could take weeks. Amazon has already vowed to appeal to ensure that the results of the first election are upheld.
Stuart Appelbaum, president of the RWDSU, said in a statement that "throughout the NLRB hearing, we heard compelling evidence of how Amazon tried to illegally interfere with and intimidate workers as they sought to exercise their right to form a union."
Following Bessemer workers' overwhelming April vote against unionizing, RWDSU lodged nearly two dozen complaints with the NLRB alleging that Amazon illegally threatened employees with loss of pay and benefits, installed and surveilled an unlawful ballot collection box, and singled out and removed pro-union workers from so-called "captive audience" meetings during which management argued against unionization.
"We support the hearing officer's recommendation that the NLRB set aside the election results and direct a new election," Appelbaum said Monday. "The question of whether or not to have a union is supposed to be the workers' decision and not the employer's. Amazon's behavior throughout the election process was despicable. Amazon cheated, they got caught, and they are being held accountable."
The long-shot effort to unionize roughly 6,000 Bessemer workers in the face of Amazon's relentless intimidation campaign drew national attention--including from President Joe Biden--as observers saw the election as a potential bellwether for the U.S. labor movement.
"This is happening in the toughest state, with the toughest company, at the toughest moment," Janice Fine, a professor of labor studies at Rutgers University, said earlier this year. "If the union can prevail given those three facts, it will send a message that Amazon is organizable everywhere."
This post has been updated to correct the spelling of Kerstin Meyers.