

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Vice President Kamala Harris delivers remarks on the Democratic National Committee's get-out-the-vote strategy at Howard University on July 8, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
"Clueless and depressing" was how one voting rights expert described the Democratic National Committee's Thursday announcement of a new $25 million plan to invest in get-out-the-vote efforts ahead of the 2022 midterm elections--an effort that critics said the Biden administration appeared to be treating as an alternative to passing voting rights legislation like the For the People Act.
The "I Will Vote" plan, unveiled by Vice President Kamala Harris at Howard University, conveyed little understanding of the fact that "we stand at an inflection point about whether we can be a multiracial democracy or not," said Michael Li, senior counsel for the Brennan Center for Justice's Democracy Program, who highlighted the Republican Party's concerted voter suppression efforts across the country.
"There is a faction within the White House that thinks the best way to respond to voter suppression laws is not to fix the laws, but to get big donors to fund a giant GOTV operation."
--Ryan Grim, The Intercept
According to the Brennan Center, 17 states have enacted 28 new laws restricting voting rights so far this year, with dozens more expected to pass in Republican-led legislatures. Newly passed laws include bans on curbside voting, restrictions on absentee voting, termination of Election Day registration in Montana, and purges of voter rolls--voter suppression tactics which won't be countered by encouraging Democratic voters to show up at the polls, Li and other critics said.
Last month, the White House enlisted the help of Silicon Valley executive Reid Harrison, who hosted a virtual fundraiser for the DNC's initiative.
"There is a faction within the White House that thinks the best way to respond to voter suppression laws is not to fix the laws, but to get big donors to fund a giant GOTV operation," said Ryan Grim, Washington bureau chief for The Intercept.
Engaging with voters is "all fine and good," added Grim, "But if you do that instead of passing a voting rights law, what you're saying is that the GOP was right, that it was never about democracy reform or voting rights, it was only about winning."
The $25 million investment by the Democratic National Committee will go toward digital and TV ads explaining how to register to vote, social media partnerships to highlight the accomplishments of President Joe Biden and the Democrats, and technology to identify and contact voters affected by voter suppression laws--none of which will help the party to overcome the GOP's redistricting efforts, which the Brennan Center says are rampant across the South.
"Just consider gerrymandering, which could determine control of the House for a decade," tweeted Li from his personal account. "Hard to 'organize' out of that."
In an analysis he authored in February, Li said seven states--Texas, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, and Alabama--are at high or very high risk for partisan gerrymandering, which the For the People Act would ban as well as strengthening voting protections in communities of color.
"I would have [the Biden administration] de-emphasize the infrastructure bill to prioritize voting rights," said Li. "But since that doesn't seem likely, they could be more engaged on legislation instead of just making anodyne statements. And stop pretending that organizing is a substitute."
Other progressives echoed Li and Grim's concerns on social media, calling on the White House to focus on pushing to abolish the filibuster, passing the For the People Act, and restoring the full protections of the Voting Rights Act, a key part of which was rendered inoperable in the 2013 Supreme Court ruling in Shelby County vs. Holder.
Both Biden and Harris have expressed support for the For the People Act, but the White House's push to pass the legislation has paled in comparison to efforts to generate public support and reach a deal on Biden's infrastructure proposal.
"Why stump for roads and bridges but not democracy?" said Ezra Levin, co-founder of Indivisible. "Both require 50 votes. If the bully pulpit works on infrastructure, why not democracy?"
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
"Clueless and depressing" was how one voting rights expert described the Democratic National Committee's Thursday announcement of a new $25 million plan to invest in get-out-the-vote efforts ahead of the 2022 midterm elections--an effort that critics said the Biden administration appeared to be treating as an alternative to passing voting rights legislation like the For the People Act.
The "I Will Vote" plan, unveiled by Vice President Kamala Harris at Howard University, conveyed little understanding of the fact that "we stand at an inflection point about whether we can be a multiracial democracy or not," said Michael Li, senior counsel for the Brennan Center for Justice's Democracy Program, who highlighted the Republican Party's concerted voter suppression efforts across the country.
"There is a faction within the White House that thinks the best way to respond to voter suppression laws is not to fix the laws, but to get big donors to fund a giant GOTV operation."
--Ryan Grim, The Intercept
According to the Brennan Center, 17 states have enacted 28 new laws restricting voting rights so far this year, with dozens more expected to pass in Republican-led legislatures. Newly passed laws include bans on curbside voting, restrictions on absentee voting, termination of Election Day registration in Montana, and purges of voter rolls--voter suppression tactics which won't be countered by encouraging Democratic voters to show up at the polls, Li and other critics said.
Last month, the White House enlisted the help of Silicon Valley executive Reid Harrison, who hosted a virtual fundraiser for the DNC's initiative.
"There is a faction within the White House that thinks the best way to respond to voter suppression laws is not to fix the laws, but to get big donors to fund a giant GOTV operation," said Ryan Grim, Washington bureau chief for The Intercept.
Engaging with voters is "all fine and good," added Grim, "But if you do that instead of passing a voting rights law, what you're saying is that the GOP was right, that it was never about democracy reform or voting rights, it was only about winning."
The $25 million investment by the Democratic National Committee will go toward digital and TV ads explaining how to register to vote, social media partnerships to highlight the accomplishments of President Joe Biden and the Democrats, and technology to identify and contact voters affected by voter suppression laws--none of which will help the party to overcome the GOP's redistricting efforts, which the Brennan Center says are rampant across the South.
"Just consider gerrymandering, which could determine control of the House for a decade," tweeted Li from his personal account. "Hard to 'organize' out of that."
In an analysis he authored in February, Li said seven states--Texas, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, and Alabama--are at high or very high risk for partisan gerrymandering, which the For the People Act would ban as well as strengthening voting protections in communities of color.
"I would have [the Biden administration] de-emphasize the infrastructure bill to prioritize voting rights," said Li. "But since that doesn't seem likely, they could be more engaged on legislation instead of just making anodyne statements. And stop pretending that organizing is a substitute."
Other progressives echoed Li and Grim's concerns on social media, calling on the White House to focus on pushing to abolish the filibuster, passing the For the People Act, and restoring the full protections of the Voting Rights Act, a key part of which was rendered inoperable in the 2013 Supreme Court ruling in Shelby County vs. Holder.
Both Biden and Harris have expressed support for the For the People Act, but the White House's push to pass the legislation has paled in comparison to efforts to generate public support and reach a deal on Biden's infrastructure proposal.
"Why stump for roads and bridges but not democracy?" said Ezra Levin, co-founder of Indivisible. "Both require 50 votes. If the bully pulpit works on infrastructure, why not democracy?"
"Clueless and depressing" was how one voting rights expert described the Democratic National Committee's Thursday announcement of a new $25 million plan to invest in get-out-the-vote efforts ahead of the 2022 midterm elections--an effort that critics said the Biden administration appeared to be treating as an alternative to passing voting rights legislation like the For the People Act.
The "I Will Vote" plan, unveiled by Vice President Kamala Harris at Howard University, conveyed little understanding of the fact that "we stand at an inflection point about whether we can be a multiracial democracy or not," said Michael Li, senior counsel for the Brennan Center for Justice's Democracy Program, who highlighted the Republican Party's concerted voter suppression efforts across the country.
"There is a faction within the White House that thinks the best way to respond to voter suppression laws is not to fix the laws, but to get big donors to fund a giant GOTV operation."
--Ryan Grim, The Intercept
According to the Brennan Center, 17 states have enacted 28 new laws restricting voting rights so far this year, with dozens more expected to pass in Republican-led legislatures. Newly passed laws include bans on curbside voting, restrictions on absentee voting, termination of Election Day registration in Montana, and purges of voter rolls--voter suppression tactics which won't be countered by encouraging Democratic voters to show up at the polls, Li and other critics said.
Last month, the White House enlisted the help of Silicon Valley executive Reid Harrison, who hosted a virtual fundraiser for the DNC's initiative.
"There is a faction within the White House that thinks the best way to respond to voter suppression laws is not to fix the laws, but to get big donors to fund a giant GOTV operation," said Ryan Grim, Washington bureau chief for The Intercept.
Engaging with voters is "all fine and good," added Grim, "But if you do that instead of passing a voting rights law, what you're saying is that the GOP was right, that it was never about democracy reform or voting rights, it was only about winning."
The $25 million investment by the Democratic National Committee will go toward digital and TV ads explaining how to register to vote, social media partnerships to highlight the accomplishments of President Joe Biden and the Democrats, and technology to identify and contact voters affected by voter suppression laws--none of which will help the party to overcome the GOP's redistricting efforts, which the Brennan Center says are rampant across the South.
"Just consider gerrymandering, which could determine control of the House for a decade," tweeted Li from his personal account. "Hard to 'organize' out of that."
In an analysis he authored in February, Li said seven states--Texas, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, and Alabama--are at high or very high risk for partisan gerrymandering, which the For the People Act would ban as well as strengthening voting protections in communities of color.
"I would have [the Biden administration] de-emphasize the infrastructure bill to prioritize voting rights," said Li. "But since that doesn't seem likely, they could be more engaged on legislation instead of just making anodyne statements. And stop pretending that organizing is a substitute."
Other progressives echoed Li and Grim's concerns on social media, calling on the White House to focus on pushing to abolish the filibuster, passing the For the People Act, and restoring the full protections of the Voting Rights Act, a key part of which was rendered inoperable in the 2013 Supreme Court ruling in Shelby County vs. Holder.
Both Biden and Harris have expressed support for the For the People Act, but the White House's push to pass the legislation has paled in comparison to efforts to generate public support and reach a deal on Biden's infrastructure proposal.
"Why stump for roads and bridges but not democracy?" said Ezra Levin, co-founder of Indivisible. "Both require 50 votes. If the bully pulpit works on infrastructure, why not democracy?"