SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A green sea turtle among the corals at Lady Elliot Island. In the quest to save the Great Barrier Reef, researchers, farmers, and business owners are looking for ways to reduce the effects of climate change as experts warn that a third mass bleaching has taken place. (Photo: Jonas Gratzer/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Australia's Great Barrier Reef 'In Danger,' Says UNESCO
"The recommendation from UNESCO is clear and unequivocal that the Australian government is not doing enough to protect our greatest natural asset."
Jun 22, 2021
The Great Barrier Reef has deteriorated so rapidly it should be listed as a World Heritage Site "in danger," a United Nations committee said Monday, echoing scientists' warnings that climate change is destroying the world's largest coral reef system.
UNESCO, the world body's educational, scientific, and cultural agency, said its recommendation to downgrade the status of the site is due to the ongoing impacts of unusually warm ocean temperatures along the reef that have left large swaths of the coral endangered or already dead.
According to NBC News:
Any downgrade of the reef's World Heritage status could also reduce tourism revenue that the natural wonder generates and shake Australians' national pride, along with confidence in their government's ability to care for the coral reef ecosystem.
The committee's call to place the massive coral ecosystem on its List of World Heritage in Danger comes ahead of a July meeting of the World Heritage Committee in Fuzhou, China where officials will vote on the reef's designation.
Without significant action, rising temperatures and ocean acidification could wipe out all of the world's coral reef habitats by 2100.
The designation is meant to inform the international community and encourage corrective action and would empower UNESCO to monitor the reef's state in reducing emissions and environmental harm.
The decision prompted immediate backlash from Australian officials.
Australia's environment minister, Sussan Ley, said in a statement on Tuesday that Australia would "strongly oppose" the draft recommendation and claimed the decision was flawed and overtly political.
Australian officials have been at odds with UNESCO for years and in 2016 successfully lobbied for details of the damage to the reef to be omitted from a 2016 UNESCO report so that it would not affect tourism.
"For too long, a succession of Australian prime ministers have hidden behind the big lie that you can protect the Great Barrier Reef without rapidly reducing greenhouse gas emissions from burning coal, oil and gas," said Greenpeace Australia Pacific chief executive David Ritter.
Rejection of the designation from Australian officials comes despite years of warnings from scientists about the devastating effects of human-caused climate change to the world's crucial ecosystems, including a World Wildlife Fund (WWF) official who last year described the Great Barrier Reef as 'on a knife edge.'
The Great Barrier Reef has suffered massive bleaching events in recent years and scientists have said that without significant action, rising temperatures and ocean acidification could wipe out all of the world's coral reef habitats by 2100.
A 2020 Environmental Justice Foundation report found that rising temperatures, pollution, and overfishing were leading causes of unprecedented damage to coral reefs and biodiversity around the world.
"The recommendation from UNESCO is clear and unequivocal that the Australian government is not doing enough to protect our greatest natural asset," said Richard Leck, head of oceans for WWF-Australia in a statement.
While half of the corals on the Great Barrier Reef have reportedly already been lost, Australia remains one of the only wealthy nations that has not pledged to reach net-zero emissions by 2050.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Great Barrier Reef has deteriorated so rapidly it should be listed as a World Heritage Site "in danger," a United Nations committee said Monday, echoing scientists' warnings that climate change is destroying the world's largest coral reef system.
UNESCO, the world body's educational, scientific, and cultural agency, said its recommendation to downgrade the status of the site is due to the ongoing impacts of unusually warm ocean temperatures along the reef that have left large swaths of the coral endangered or already dead.
According to NBC News:
Any downgrade of the reef's World Heritage status could also reduce tourism revenue that the natural wonder generates and shake Australians' national pride, along with confidence in their government's ability to care for the coral reef ecosystem.
The committee's call to place the massive coral ecosystem on its List of World Heritage in Danger comes ahead of a July meeting of the World Heritage Committee in Fuzhou, China where officials will vote on the reef's designation.
Without significant action, rising temperatures and ocean acidification could wipe out all of the world's coral reef habitats by 2100.
The designation is meant to inform the international community and encourage corrective action and would empower UNESCO to monitor the reef's state in reducing emissions and environmental harm.
The decision prompted immediate backlash from Australian officials.
Australia's environment minister, Sussan Ley, said in a statement on Tuesday that Australia would "strongly oppose" the draft recommendation and claimed the decision was flawed and overtly political.
Australian officials have been at odds with UNESCO for years and in 2016 successfully lobbied for details of the damage to the reef to be omitted from a 2016 UNESCO report so that it would not affect tourism.
"For too long, a succession of Australian prime ministers have hidden behind the big lie that you can protect the Great Barrier Reef without rapidly reducing greenhouse gas emissions from burning coal, oil and gas," said Greenpeace Australia Pacific chief executive David Ritter.
Rejection of the designation from Australian officials comes despite years of warnings from scientists about the devastating effects of human-caused climate change to the world's crucial ecosystems, including a World Wildlife Fund (WWF) official who last year described the Great Barrier Reef as 'on a knife edge.'
The Great Barrier Reef has suffered massive bleaching events in recent years and scientists have said that without significant action, rising temperatures and ocean acidification could wipe out all of the world's coral reef habitats by 2100.
A 2020 Environmental Justice Foundation report found that rising temperatures, pollution, and overfishing were leading causes of unprecedented damage to coral reefs and biodiversity around the world.
"The recommendation from UNESCO is clear and unequivocal that the Australian government is not doing enough to protect our greatest natural asset," said Richard Leck, head of oceans for WWF-Australia in a statement.
While half of the corals on the Great Barrier Reef have reportedly already been lost, Australia remains one of the only wealthy nations that has not pledged to reach net-zero emissions by 2050.
The Great Barrier Reef has deteriorated so rapidly it should be listed as a World Heritage Site "in danger," a United Nations committee said Monday, echoing scientists' warnings that climate change is destroying the world's largest coral reef system.
UNESCO, the world body's educational, scientific, and cultural agency, said its recommendation to downgrade the status of the site is due to the ongoing impacts of unusually warm ocean temperatures along the reef that have left large swaths of the coral endangered or already dead.
According to NBC News:
Any downgrade of the reef's World Heritage status could also reduce tourism revenue that the natural wonder generates and shake Australians' national pride, along with confidence in their government's ability to care for the coral reef ecosystem.
The committee's call to place the massive coral ecosystem on its List of World Heritage in Danger comes ahead of a July meeting of the World Heritage Committee in Fuzhou, China where officials will vote on the reef's designation.
Without significant action, rising temperatures and ocean acidification could wipe out all of the world's coral reef habitats by 2100.
The designation is meant to inform the international community and encourage corrective action and would empower UNESCO to monitor the reef's state in reducing emissions and environmental harm.
The decision prompted immediate backlash from Australian officials.
Australia's environment minister, Sussan Ley, said in a statement on Tuesday that Australia would "strongly oppose" the draft recommendation and claimed the decision was flawed and overtly political.
Australian officials have been at odds with UNESCO for years and in 2016 successfully lobbied for details of the damage to the reef to be omitted from a 2016 UNESCO report so that it would not affect tourism.
"For too long, a succession of Australian prime ministers have hidden behind the big lie that you can protect the Great Barrier Reef without rapidly reducing greenhouse gas emissions from burning coal, oil and gas," said Greenpeace Australia Pacific chief executive David Ritter.
Rejection of the designation from Australian officials comes despite years of warnings from scientists about the devastating effects of human-caused climate change to the world's crucial ecosystems, including a World Wildlife Fund (WWF) official who last year described the Great Barrier Reef as 'on a knife edge.'
The Great Barrier Reef has suffered massive bleaching events in recent years and scientists have said that without significant action, rising temperatures and ocean acidification could wipe out all of the world's coral reef habitats by 2100.
A 2020 Environmental Justice Foundation report found that rising temperatures, pollution, and overfishing were leading causes of unprecedented damage to coral reefs and biodiversity around the world.
"The recommendation from UNESCO is clear and unequivocal that the Australian government is not doing enough to protect our greatest natural asset," said Richard Leck, head of oceans for WWF-Australia in a statement.
While half of the corals on the Great Barrier Reef have reportedly already been lost, Australia remains one of the only wealthy nations that has not pledged to reach net-zero emissions by 2050.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.