Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

If you’ve been waiting for the right time to support our work—that time is now.

Our mission is simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

But without the support of our readers, this model does not work and we simply won’t survive. It’s that simple.
We must meet our Mid-Year Campaign goal but we need you now.

Please, support independent journalism today.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

Young people sit in the street in Cologne, Germany during a Fridays for Future demonstration on September 25, 2020.

Young people sit in the street in Cologne, Germany during a Fridays for Future demonstration on September 25, 2020. (Photo: Ying Tang/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

'This Is Huge': Top Court Rules Germany's Climate Law Inadequate to Protect Future Generations

"This can change so much, not just for us here in Germany but for activists worldwide."

Jake Johnson

In a ruling hailed as a landmark victory for the climate justice movement, Germany's top constitutional court said Thursday that the nation's 2019 climate law violates young people's "fundamental rights to a human future" by failing to set adequate emissions-reduction targets.

The court ruled that in their current form, the elements of Germany's Federal Climate Protection Act "governing national climate targets and the annual emission amounts allowed until 2030 are incompatible with fundamental rights insofar as they lack sufficient specifications for further emission reductions from 2031 onwards."

"Climate protection is not nice to have; climate protection is our basic right and that's official now."
—Luisa Neubauer, Fridays for Future

The law's emissions targets for 2031 and beyond, the court added, "are not sufficient to ensure that the necessary transition to climate neutrality is achieved in time" and thus "violate the freedoms of the complainants, some of whom are still very young."

The new ruling gives the German government until the end of next year to improve the climate law, which requires the country to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030 relative to 1990 levels and ensure almost no carbon emissions by 2050. A signature achievement of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the law has long been criticized by scientists and activists as woefully insufficient.

"This is huge," Luisa Neubauer, a Berlin-based Fridays for Future activist and one the plaintiffs in the case, told The Guardian in response to the ruling. "Climate protection is not nice to have; climate protection is our basic right and that's official now."

"This can change so much, not just for us here in Germany but for activists worldwide," Neubauer added on Twitter.

The case was brought in January 2020 by nine climate activists then between the ages of 15 and 32 and is supported by Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth Germany, and other advocacy organizations.

Sophie Backsen, a 22-year-old plaintiff, said in a statement Thursday that "the court's decision is a huge success for us young people who are already affected by the climate crisis—I am very happy!"

"It has become clear that essential parts of the Federal Climate Protection Act are not compatible with our fundamental rights," said Backsen, whose family lives on the German island of Pellworm. "Effective climate protection must start and be implemented now—not in 10 years. This is the only way to secure my future on my home island. The decision gives me a tailwind to keep fighting. "

Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg, who kicked off the global Fridays for Future movement in 2018 with a solitary school strike, also applauded the German court's ruling.

"Everywhere around the world we see layer upon layer of incomplete targets and insufficient action," Thunberg tweeted. "Little by little it's starting to become exposed."

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

"I'm sure this will be all over the corporate media, right?"
That’s what one longtime Common Dreams reader said yesterday after the newsroom reported on new research showing how corporate price gouging surged to a nearly 70-year high in 2021. While major broadcasters, newspapers, and other outlets continue to carry water for their corporate advertisers when they report on issues like inflation, economic inequality, and the climate emergency, our independence empowers us to provide you stories and perspectives that powerful interests don’t want you to have. But this independence is only possible because of support from readers like you. You make the difference. If our support dries up, so will we. Our crucial Mid-Year Campaign is now underway and we are in emergency mode to make sure we raise the necessary funds so that every day we can bring you the stories that corporate, for-profit outlets ignore and neglect. Please, if you can, support Common Dreams today.


'We WILL Fight Back': Outrage, Resolve as Protests Erupt Against SCOTUS Abortion Ruling

Demonstrators took to the streets Friday to defiantly denounce the Supreme Court's right-wing supermajority after it rescinded a constitutional right for the first time in U.S. history.

Brett Wilkins ·

80+ US Prosecutors Vow Not to Be Part of Criminalizing Abortion Care

"Criminalizing and prosecuting individuals who seek or provide abortion care makes a mockery of justice," says a joint statement signed by 84 elected attorneys. "Prosecutors should not be part of that."

Kenny Stancil ·

Progressives Rebuke Dem Leadership as Clyburn Dismisses Death of Roe as 'Anticlimactic'

"The gap between the Democratic leadership, and younger progressives on the question of 'How Bad Is It?' is just enormous."

Julia Conley ·

In 10 Key US Senate Races, Here's How Top Candidates Responded to Roe Ruling

While Republicans unanimously welcomed the Supreme Court's rollback of half a century of reproductive rights, one Democrat said "it's just wrong that my granddaughter will have fewer freedoms than my grandmother did."

Brett Wilkins ·

Sanders Says End Filibuster to Combat 'Outrageous' Supreme Court Assault on Abortion Rights

"If Republicans can end the filibuster to install right-wing judges to overturn Roe v. Wade, Democrats can and must end the filibuster, codify Roe v. Wade, and make abortion legal and safe," said the Vermont senator.

Jake Johnson ·

Common Dreams Logo